Windfalls of war: KBR, the government’s concierge

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

’s umbrella contract to provide everything from showers to rebuilding airfields tops $37 billion. “It’s like a gigantic monopoly,” says one critic.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld talks with troops in Iraq. KBR has been paid $37 billion to build infrastructure like this dining hall. Jim Watson/AP

After a decade of war, KBR’s umbrella contract tops $37 billion

Sharon Weinberger – (The Center for Public Integrity – iWatch News) – August 30, 2011 – The rush to war in the months following the terrorist attacks of 9/11 created an urgency in the , not just for military operations but also for contracting.

When U.S. forces moved into Afghanistan in 2001, there was little, if any, infrastructure to support and house U.S. troops. The military needed someone to do everything from housing troops to rebuilding airfields. The solution was a contract called the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, or LOGCAP, a type of umbrella contract the Army had been using to support is military bases overseas. In late 2001, the Army, after a competition, awarded to KBR. The Houston-based firm [3], once a subsidiary of , began providing everything from showers to dining halls.

Even beyond single-source contracts, the Pentagon has other types of contracts it can use to quickly award work without having to compete specific jobs. They include umbrella-type contracts, like LOGCAP, that allow the government to buy unspecified goods and services over long periods of time. “It’s the government’s way of saying ‘We don’t know what we want, and we don’t know how much it costs,’” said Laura Peterson, a senior policy analyst with Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group. “Instead they say, ‘we’ll put you on retainer and tell you later what we want and when we want it, and you just bill us.’ You become the government’s concierge, and it’s like a gigantic monopoly.”

(Read the rest of the story here…)

Bunnatine Greenhouse settles whistleblower suit after she was injured by boobytrap

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

(The segment is after the Noraway attacks. I couldn’t figure out how to separate them or fast forward. It’s well worth your patience.)

EXCLUSIVE: Fired Army Whistleblower Receives $970K for Exposing No-Bid Contract in Iraq
(Read the rest of the story here…)

Jury says “No rape, no fraud” in Jamie Leigh Jones Rape case against KBR

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

by khou.com & The Associated Press
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 3:32 PM

HOUSTON – A federal jury on Friday ruled that a woman who sued over an alleged sexual assault in Iraq was not raped, and the company did not commit fraud.

Jamie Leigh Jones sued KBR, its Houston-based former parent company and KBR firefighter , who she claimed led an attack on her while she worked for KBR at Camp Hope in Baghdad in 2005.

Jones’ attorney, Ron Estefan, told jurors during closing arguments that KBR had neglected to enforce its policies against sexual harassment by its contract workers in Iraq, which facilitated Jones’ .

Estefan asked the jury to award his client as much as 5 percent of KBR’s net worth in actual or punitive damages, which would have been more than $114 million.

“It’s a lot of money, but it’s a lot of harm that was caused to her,” he told jurors. (click HERE for the rest of the article)

I have to add, I’m so sorry Jamie lost, this is a sad day for other KBR victims! ~

Army veteran’s lawyer argues to reinstate KBR lawsuit

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

By Brian Bowling, PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

A federal appeals court should reinstate an Iraqi war veteran`s lawsuit against a defense contractor because the contractor delayed revealing information that would have allowed doctors to diagnose and treat the veteran’s illness, a lawyer for the Pleasant Hills man argued today.

Fred Jug, one of the lawyers representing , 32, said Inc. of Houston had an obligation to warn Bootay and other soldiers in April 2003 about the danger of being exposed to that was spread around the water treatment facility they guarded while employees restored it to service.

Instead, the company went so far as to immediately transfer one of its own employees who raised the question of warning the soldiers, he said. “That is outrageous,” Jug said during the hearing at the federal courthouse, Downtown.

Kurt Hamrock, a lawyer for KBR, urged the three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry`s Sept. 9 ruling that the company had no duty to warn the soldiers about the danger of being exposed to the chemical.

Bootay sat in a wheelchair at the back of the courtroom during the hearing. Rob Bootay said his brother was too exhausted to talk afterward. The chemical exposure has given the former combat engineer chronic health problems that include constant headaches, chest pain, irregular heartbeat, extreme fatigue and short-term memory loss, according to his lawsuit. (click HERE for original article)

3rd anniversary of the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

3 years ago today, 24 year old  entered the shower in his Special Forces living quarters at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex in Baghdad, Iraq and he died. He was electrocuted do to an improperly installed water pump on the roof of his building.

The Army initially reported that Ryan, a decorated Green Beret foolishly took an electrical appliance into the shower and that was the reason for his death.

The Criminal Investigations Command (CID) closed Ryan’s investigation on June 11, 2008 proclaiming Ryan’s manner of death was “accidental”. His mother, refused to accept this as the cause of death for her son. (Read the rest of the story here…)

KBR’s appeal rejected in Oregon National Guard case (updated)

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

In the latest of the twists and turns in the lawsuit brought by troops against mega defense contractor ,  the U.S. Court of Appeals-Ninth Circuit declined to review Judge Papak’s rulings in the Oregon case.

In an unusual legal maneuver last September, KBR attorneys asked the U.S. District Court in Oregon for permission to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit even before the trial started let alone after a verdict had been rendered.

In a 19-page memorandum, attorneys for KBR argued that the case raises unique issues and they should be resolved prior to discovery and trial.

In October Judge Papak agreed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit should review his decision.

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied KBR’s petition and dismissed the appeal. This case will stay in the trial court.

This is a huge victory for the Oregon National Guardsmen and others who were allegedly poisoned at the hand of KBR at the water treatment plant in , Iraq.

This case has exposed the little known practice of contract indemnity given by the to defense contractors who have been awarded multi-million dollar contracts. KBR’s “classified” () contract in Iraq has such a clause. Basically, even if KBR is found negligent and the Oregon National Guard and others are awarded damages, the DoD and therefore the taxpayer will pick up the tab!

We have been following this story since the held their first hearings on this in 2008. We will continue to follow this story all the way to the end.

HERE’s a link to Mike Doyle’s post at Doyle Raizner

Updated: December 15, 2010:

From Julie Sullivan’s article in the Oregonian:

KBR issued a statement: “This is a procedural ruling with which we are disappointed. Regardless, this ruling does not change the facts of the case. KBR’s position remains that no soldier was injured nor has any soldier demonstrated an injury. The medical evidence confirms these facts.”

Thou shalt not lie! Someone needs to tell the Pentagon!

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

Anatomy of a Pentagon Lie

Kelley B. Vlahos – November 1, 2010 – Antiwar.com

It shouldn’t startle anyone to find that the has blatantly ignored a congressional mandate to start reducing its use of at U.S. bases overseas.

It was only a year ago that Pentagon officials openly doubted that the black hellfire released from tons of burning hazardous waste in the open air could possibly have any long-term health effects on anyone unlucky enough to be breathing it in everyday.

“When we look at respiratory effects on a population-wide basis,” said Dr. , director of DoD’s force readiness and health assurance, in an interview last September, “we’re not seeing a cause for concern.” The DoD’s official view has so far not changed. So, even as more and more service members come home sick – some of them irreparably, terminally – it would seem the Department of Defense has gone into classic default mode: stall until it becomes impossible to stall any longer.

That may buy the DoD ten years at least, and by then it’ll be the Veterans Administration’s problem.

The DoD Shuffle.

“They hold with the lie until they are caught so red handed they just can’t lie about it any longer,” says Deb Crawford, who spent time as a civilian electrician in the Green Zone from 2004 to 2006. She now publishes Ms. Sparky.com, a popular watchdog site, and recently spoke with Antiwar.com. “If anyone in the Pentagon were to claim they didn’t think the burn pits were an inherent health hazard to civilians and troops, I would have to call them a bold face liar.” (Read the rest of the story here…)