Will our next war be with Mexico?

Americans Killed In Drive-By Shooting At Consulate In Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, Obama ‘Outraged’
Is this violence any different than what is going on in the Middle East?

Ciudad Juarez, Mexico — Gunmen killed a U.S. consulate employee and her husband as they drove in this violent border city with their baby in the back seat, minutes after the husband of another consular employee was shot to death and his two children wounded, officials said Sunday. Security forces suspected a drug gang hit, but offered no motive.

President Barack Obama expressed outrage over the killings, and Mexican President Felipe Calderon said he was indignant and promised a swift investigation.

The gunmen are suspected of belonging to a gang of hit men tied to the Juarez drug cartel, according to a statement from the joint mission of soldiers and federal police overseeing security in Ciudad Juarez. The statement said the theory was based on “information exchanged with U.S. federal agencies” helping in the investigation.

But police gave no information on a possible motive. U.S. State Department spokesman Fred Lash said the three slain people had attended the same social event before the attacks Saturday.

Several U.S. citizens have been killed in Mexico’s drug war, most of them people with family ties to Mexico. It is very rare for American government employees to be targeted, although assailants hurled grenades at the U.S. consulate in the northern city of Monterrey in 2008.

Civilians have increasingly gotten caught in the middle of drug gang violence that has made Ciudad Juarez one of the deadliest cities in the world, with more than 2,500 people killed last year alone. At least 11 people were killed in Ciudad Juarez over the weekend.

The three died during a particularly bloody weekend in Mexico, with nearly 50 people killed in apparent gang violence. Nine people were killed in a gang shootout early Sunday in the Pacific resort city of Acapulco, one of Mexico’s spring break attractions.

The State Department authorized U.S. government employees at Ciudad Juarez and five other U.S. consulates in northern Mexico to send their family members out of the area because of concerns about rising drug violence. The cities are Tijuana, Nogales, Nuevo Laredo, Monterrey and Matamoros.

Lash said the decision was based not only on Saturday’s killings but also on a wider pattern of violence and threats in northern Mexico in recent weeks. The State Department noted the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City has advised American citizens to delay unnecessary travel to parts of the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua. (click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

What happened to KBR’s Bill Walter and Michael Hatch?

Last weekend I got my first hint there was something amiss at KBR Headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. (we all know there is something amiss with KBR…..I mean something specific!)  I was told that allegedly Mr. William “Bill” Walter and Mr. Michael Hatch were no longer employed by KBR. I have been told they were “fired” and also I have been told they “resigned”.

On top of that there are the “not so insignificant” number hits I am getting from internet search engines like this one below:

Fort Belvoir, Virginia arrived from google.com on “» DFAC” by searching for Bill Walter & KBR & Fired. 14:55:46 — (this one was from 03/05/2010)

William (Bill) Walter – Some internet references refer to Mr. Walter as Senior Vice President for Government Compliance. Others refer to Mr. Walter as Director of Government Compliance for KBR’s Government Operations unit. Either way, according the Halliburton/KBR’s site Mr. Walter has overall responsibility for all U.S. government compliance functions, including Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audits and government interface, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) compliance, cost accounting standards, pricing compliance, training and compliance policy. Mr. Walter has more than 15 years as a leading defense industry compliance consultant.

You may remember Mr. Walter from his recent appearances on KBR’s behalf before the esteemed members of the Commission on Wartime Contracting. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Senator warns against $1B deal with Blackwater

By ANNE FLAHERTY (AP)

WASHINGTON — A senior Senate Democrat said Thursday the Pentagon should consider barring Blackwater, now called Xe Services, from a new $1 billion deal to train Afghan police because of “serious questions” about the contractor’s conduct.

The comments by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin suggests thinning patience in Congress for the Pentagon’s heavy reliance on contractors on the battlefield.

U.S. efforts to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan using independent contractors has been a boon for companies like Blackwater and saved money and time for the Defense Department, whose forces are busy in combat.

But the outsourcing has made it more difficult for military commanders to control what happens on the battlefield.

In one recent incident in Afghanistan, two contractors tied to Blackwater allegedly killed two Afghan civilians and injured a third. U.S. officials say the May 2009 shooting damaged relations with the local population (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

David Isenberg: Would Blackwater Lie?

David IsenbergHuffington Post
Author, Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq (Praeger Security International)
Posted: March 4, 2010 01:19 PM

The title is not an attempt at facetiousness. It is a genuinely serious question. The reason I ask is that Politico’s Laura Rozen has just published a story about Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) today releasing letters he wrote to Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Attorney General Eric Holder on Feb. 25 regarding the committee’s investigation of a Blackwater “shell” company in Afghanistan, Paravant, which conducted training for the Afghan National Army.

In his letter to Holder, Levin asked him to “initiate an inquiry into whether individuals from Blackwater and Raytheon made false or misleading statements in their submission of the ‘Paravant’ contract proposal to the U.S. government.”

Levin noted that the committee’s investigation found that Blackwater-Paravant had made false statements to get the Afghan National Army training contract, including in creating a shell company, Paravant, fully owned by Blackwater but not encumbered by its public relations “baggage” to bid for the contract.

“Among concerns raised by the investigation were representations made by Blackwater in its proposal for the subcontract that Paravant had ‘over 2000 personnel deployed overseas supporting U.S. Government contracts’ and ‘many years experience in identifying and selecting top candidates for training, security, and consulting positions,’” a SASC press release accompanying the letters said. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Not so fast KBR – Lawmakers demand answers from Pentagon

Lawmakers challenge Army decisions on KBR

By Andrea Shalal-Esa – 7:31pm EST
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Lawmakers in the Senate and House of Representatives on Wednesday questioned the Army’s continued use of KBR Inc for logistics work in Iraq in the face of confirmed reports of poor past performance.

Representative Edolphus Towns, who heads the House Oversight Committee, wrote to Defense Secretary Robert Gates to question the Army’s decision to award KBR a new contract valued at up to $2.8 billion despite a wide array of problems.

Towns, citing problems with KBR’s maintenance of electrical systems at bases where U.S. troops were fatally electrocuted and “numerous allegations of waste, fraud, and abuse,” asked Gates to provide the committee with a wide array of documents about the KBR contract by March 17.

“It seems inconceivable to me that the Defense Department would award this new contract to KBR in Iraq,” Towns said, citing the company’s “poor past performance.”

“When multiple deaths of service men and women are not enough to preclude the award of a new contract, it makes me wonder what it takes for a contractor to be fired.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Army decision to deny millions in bonuses to KBR is “Right call, but only fist step”

American Chronicle – Congressional Desk
February 26, 2010

Former Task Force SAFE Electrical Subject Matter Expert James Childs testifies before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee about the shoddy electrical work performed by KBR. Cheryl Harris, SSG Ryan Maseth's mother, sheds a tear as she listens to why her son was electrocuted and died in his shower in Baghdad on January 2, 2008.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who chaired Senate hearings on electrocutions of soldiers in Iraq resulting from shoddy contracting work by KBR, said Thursday the Army´s decision to deny million of dollars in bonuses to the firm for its 2008 work in Iraq “is the right call, but it is only a first step.”

Dorgan chaired two Senate Democratic Policy Committee (DPC) hearings in 2008 and 2009 on KBR´s shoddy electrical work in Iraq. The hearings revealed widespread problems with KBR´s electrical work there including countless electrical shocks including one that killed Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth, and perhaps others, and injured dozens more on their own bases as they showered and engaged in other routine activities.

Following the hearings, Dorgan and Senator Robert Casey (D-PA) wrote the Army asking that it review KBR´s work and the electrocution death of Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth. They also asked the Army to re-evaluate the millions of dollars in bonuses it has routinely awarded KBR for supposedly excellent work, even when the Army´s own evidence made clear it was highly questionable.

The Army´s investigation of Maseth´s January 2008 death found that KBR´s work exposed soldiers to “unacceptable risk.” A theatre-wide safety review that resulted from the Dorgan-Casey request — Task Force SAFE — also found widespread problems with KBR´s electrical work that exposed soldiers to life threatening risks. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR adds another retired General to its ranks @ $650.00 an hour

Army tries to halt retired general’s work as KBR expert

By MARY FLOOD HOUSTON CHRONICLE – Feb. 25, 2010
The U.S. Army is trying to stop retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who once led U.S. forces in Iraq, from continuing to be an expert for KBR in a lawsuit against it over civilian truck driver deaths and injuries.

Sanchez is being paid $650 an hour and has reviewed documents and written a report that support’s KBR’s contention it should not be held legally responsible for the deaths of six civilian truck drivers and the injuries of others in a 2004 ambush in Iraq.

The suing drivers and family members contend that KBR should have stopped the convoys when it was warned that attacks would increase on April 9, 2004, the first anniversary of the day allies in the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq reached Baghdad.

KBR argues that the military approved sending the convoys out and several laws protect KBR from responsibility in a wartime situation. The Army contracts with KBR to provide transportation, food services and other logistical support. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

The KBR killing fields subsidized by US tax dollars

Why did Sgt. Thomas die?

By Matthew Hansen – Staff Writer
Omaha World Herald – February 21, 2010

Sgt. Klayton Thomas looked every bit the poster boy Marine as he strode into a military hospital last September to get his back checked.

He taught karate and earned his abs in the gym. He had survived a 2007 deployment to Iraq, even thrived during his prolonged stay in the middle of the then-treacherous Sunni Triangle. He rarely drank. He didn’t smoke. Life seemed perfect on this mid-September Thursday, if only his back would stop aching. The 25-year-old Columbus, Neb., native thought he had wrenched it playing soccer. Three months and 10 days later, he died in hospice care.

This much is known: Thomas succumbed to an unstoppable lung cancer that crushed his vertebrae, blitzed his bones and invaded his brain, dumbfounding doctors who had spent their entire careers treating the disease.

His death leaves a medical mystery, one similar to those posed by hundreds of other American military personnel battling exotic cancers or struggling with rare respiratory problems.
Advertising

This mystery begins in the unlikeliest of places: Iraqi “burn pits” — large, primitive landfills where contractors set trash aflame, causing ever-present black smoke to drift over dozens of U.S. military bases.

Health experts, a high-powered defense lawyer, Congress and even the president have taken notice, asking questions like Klayton Thomas’ parents and doctors asked in the weeks after he fell ill.

Why would an otherwise healthy young nonsmoker contract a cancer that generally haunts older smokers? Why did this cancer spread like wildfire when experts say its normal path can take years?

Simply put: Why did Sgt. Klayton Thomas die?

“We were scared to death when he went to Iraq, scared of a mortar attack, an IED,” said his mother, Connie Thomas of Columbus. “But nothing like this. Not in our wildest dreams.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Iraq tells former Blackwater employees, “You have seven days!”

Iraq orders former Blackwater security guards out

Published: 2/10/10, 4:46 PM EDT
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA

FILE- In this Feb. 7, 2007 file photo, a helicopter operated by Blackwater USA, a private security contractor, flies over central Baghdad, Iraq. Iraq has ordered about 250 former and current employees of Blackwater Worldwide to leave the country within seven days or face having their visas pulled. The order comes in the wake of a U.S. judge dismissing criminal charges against five Blackwater guards who were accused in the September 2007 shooting deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad. (AP Photo/Marko Drobnjakovic, File) (Marko Drobnjakovic - AP)

BAGHDAD (AP) – Iraq has ordered hundreds of private security guards linked to Blackwater Worldwide to leave the country within seven days or face possible arrest on visa violations, the interior minister said Wednesday.

The order comes in the wake of a U.S. judge’s dismissal of criminal charges against five Blackwater guards who were accused in the September 2007 shooting deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad.

It applies to about 250 security contractors who worked for Blackwater in Iraq at the time of the incident, Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani told The Associated Press.

Some of the guards now work for other security firms in Iraq, while others work for a Blackwater subsidiary, al-Bolani said. He said all “concerned parties” were notified of the order three days ago and now have four days left before they must leave. He did not name the companies.

Blackwater security contractors were protecting U.S. diplomats when the guards opened fire in Nisoor Square, a busy Baghdad intersection, on Sept. 16, 2007. Seventeen people were killed, including women and children, in a shooting that inflamed anti-American sentiment in Iraq. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Murder plots, corruption & Bodie seeks salvation

He that lieth down with Dogs, shall rise up with Fleas.

~Benjamin Franklin

"The Godfather" - Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando)

This Week in Government Contracting:

Here is a rundown on some noteworthy happenings in the world of defense contracting, that occurred this week.  I am beginning to believe that there is no such thing as honesty and integrity when it comes to corporations vying for our taxdollars, or the lawmakers we elect to carry out their intended duties to prevent waste and fraud, for that matter.  Feel free to submit a comment and let me know if I missed anything that was newsworthy this week:

Take the money and run
February 2, 2010
(WHAS11) – Keith Shaw is charged with making unauthorized modifications to military aircraft parts and trying to kill his former business associates who were cooperating with military investigators.

While the plot described in Shaw’s indictment reads like spy novel, the testimony Tuesday was more like hearing a technical manual read aloud. (Click HERE for full article)

Senator Webb questions the value of  ‘Retired Generals Club’ (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Defense contractors to DoD – “The taxman is calling; it’s for you”

Contractors ask DoD to reimburse offshore payroll taxes

By ELISE CASTELLI |  Jan 27, 2010
In 2008, Congress passed a law to force contractors to pay payroll taxes for employees who are U.S. citizens working for their offshore subsidiaries. The IRS is collecting more taxes as a result, but much of that new tax revenue is leaving government in the form of higher contract costs for the Defense Department.

Defense contractors have billed the department for more than $140 million in reimbursements for payroll tax expenses they’ve paid since the law was passed, a new Government Accountability Office report says.

And that’s just on five contracts — worth a combined $6 billion — that were reviewed by GAO.

Executives from some of the biggest Defense contractors — including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and KBR — told GAO that, before the law was passed, they hired U.S. citizens at their offshore subsidiaries as a way to lower their costs and remain competitive. The companies say they only use the offshore subsidiaries to hire employees to perform work overseas. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Uncle Sam wants you…..to pay your damn taxes or “No contracts for you!”

It would be nice if these multi-billion dollar defense contractors had to follow the same laws the rest of us do!!

Obama cracking down on contractor tax cheats

January 20, 2010 at 9:09 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is ordering a new crackdown on federal contractors who don’t pay their taxes.

He was signing an executive order Wednesday telling federal agency chiefs to take steps to bar those companies from receiving new government contracts. Obama was also directing the IRS to review contractor filings to ensure the companies are not lying about the taxes they’ve paid.

“It is simply wrong for companies to take taxpayer dollars and not be taxpayers themselves,” Obama said in his prepared remarks. “We need to insist on the same sense of responsibility in Washington that so many of you strive to uphold in your own lives, in your own families and in your own businesses.”

A White House fact sheet said the move is part of the president’s effort to restructure government contracting to root out waste and abuse.

That effort has included measures to end no-bid contracts and to crack down on what the administration deems improper payments. Administration officials estimate the measures saved as much as $100 billion last year. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR and the Pentagon breathe sigh of relief at Dorgan’s announcement

Senator Dorgan (D-ND)

As the Chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee since 1999, Senator Dorgan and been a thorn in KBR’s side ever since he started investigating and holding hearings into KBR’s fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan. This Senator has held a total of 21 hearings targeting Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Iraq since this series of hearings began 2003.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the exposure of our soldiers and civilians to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the deaths of SSG Ryan Maseth, SSG Christ Everett and others due to electrocution caused by shoddy electrical work by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the contaminated water and expired food that was served to our troops and civilians by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who publicly exposed the Pentagon for their utter incompetence in managing contractor contracts.

Senator Dorgan has been an honest and fair voice for the citizens of North Dakota and all Americans who believe lying, cheating and stealing are wrong.

Senator Dorgan will never be replaced on the Senate Democratic Committee, but hopefully Senator Reid will find someone who can adequately continue his work.

(I can just see  KBR’s Bill Bodie and Bill Utt doing the  KBR Happy Dance at 4100 Clinton Drive in Houston.) (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Pregnant Soldiers in War Zone Won’t be Punished

Top U.S. General in Iraq, Countermanding Subordinate, Rescinds Order to Punish Pregnant Soldiers
By SARAH NETTER and LUIS MARTINEZ
Dec. 25, 2009

The top U.S. commander in Iraq rescinded a controversial order by a subordinate general intended to punish soldiers who became pregnant while serving in a war zone.

Army general in Iraq issues an order making pregnancy a punishable offense.

Gen. Raymond Odierno has drafted a broad new policy for the U.S. forces in Iraq that will take effect Jan. 1, but which does not include a provision issued last month by Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo that disciplined both soldiers who became pregnant and their military sex partners.

Earlier this week Cucolo said the policy was intended to emphasize the problems created when pregnant soldiers go home and leave behind a weaker unit.

Cucolo’s order set off a firestorm of criticism this week, including condemnation by four Democratic senators who wrote Odierno a letter calling for the order to be overturned.

“We can think of no greater deterrent to women contemplating a military career than the image of a pregnant woman being severely punished simply for conceiving a child,” the senators wrote to Cucolo. “This defies comprehension. As such, we urge you to immediately rescind this policy.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Yes, KBR, Congress is Talking About You-Huffington Post

Another insightful story from The Huffington Post! Well done!! To read any of the 100’s of post I have publish on KBR just pick a category on the left!

David Isenberg – Huffington Post
Author, Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq
Posted: December 26, 2009 03:29 PM

Although it was not mentioned by name there are some provisions in the FY 2010 Defense Appropriations bill which are very clearly aimed at KBR, the former Halliburton company. These are not the sort of provisions that will be making KBR officials happy.

Consider Sec. Sec. 8116, “Limitation on Availability of Funds for Execution of Contracts Under LOGCAP.” It says:

No later than 90 days after enactment of this Act none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be obligated or expended for the execution of a contract under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) unless the Secretary of the Army determines that the contract explicitly requires the contractor–

(1) to inspect and immediately correct deficiencies that present an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury so as to ensure compliance with generally accepted electrical standards as determined by the Secretary of Defense in work under the contract; (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Obama tightens reins on contractors

Obama By: Mike Allen
December 21, 2009 10:23 AM EST

Ahead of remarks Monday by President Barack Obama about making government more efficient and effective, the White House Office of Management and Budget released details of the administration’s drive to tighten the government’s contracting practices.

“This is a situation that would never exist in a business,” Jeff Zients, federal chief performance officer and OMB deputy director for management, told reporters on a conference call. “A business that had these kind of practices would have been out of business a long time ago. I believe we’re off to a really fast start here. There’s a lot of work to be done. And we’re going to clean up the situation and make sure there’s no waste, and we save as much money as possible.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Iraq accuses Iran of seizing oil well near border

By REBECCA SANTANA, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD (AP) – Iranian forces crossed into Iraq and seized an oil well just over the two countries’ disputed border, Iraq’s government said Friday, prompting a protest from Baghdad and providing a dramatic display of the sometimes tenuous relations between the wary allies.

The incident could trouble Iraq’s drive to attract the international investment needed to develop its beleaguered oil sector, analysts said, and it raised questions about the two countries’ ties, which had improved greatly after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

According to Iraq’s deputy foreign minister, Mohammed Haj Mahmoud, Iranian troops crossed into Iraqi territory on Thursday and seized oil well No. 4 in the al-Fakkah oil field, located in Maysan province about 200 miles (about 320 kilometers) southeast of Baghdad. The oil field is one of Iraq’s largest. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
Posted in Politics. Tags: . 3 Comments »

Franken amendment moves forward, the “dirty thirty” back pedal

bill to law

Rape case to influence rules for contractors

By JENNIFER A. DLOUHY
Houston Chronicle
Dec. 16, 2009, 7:39PM

WASHINGTON— Prompted by the alleged rape of former KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones, Congress is poised to pass a measure banning defense contractors from forcing employees to use arbitration to resolve claims of discrimination and sexual assault.

House and Senate negotiators agreed to include the no-arbitration provision in a $636 billion defense spending bill that passed the House 395-34 on Wednesday. The measure now heads to the Senate, which is expected to pass it before Christmas.

Employers and other potential lawsuit targets generally prefer binding arbitration because it keeps disputes out of the court system, where juries can inflict damaging verdicts. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

DoD contractors can no longer rape, plunder and pillage

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

In a memorandum dated December 14, 2009, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Shay D. Assad has directed a Class Deviation be effective immediately. (click HERE for memo)

This Class Deviation, Additional Contractor Requirements and Responsibilities Related to Alleged Crimes By or Against Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan provides a new clause that basically says:

  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed by contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed against contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must train their employees on how and where to report a crime.
  • All DoD Contractors must train their employees on where to seek victim and witness protection and victim assistance. (click HERE for UCMJ Chapter 47 Title 10)

All future contracts are to contain this clause and all current contracts are to be modified to the extent practical. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

CIA out-sourced kidnappings and hits to Blackwater?

Blackwater Guards Tied to Secret C.I.A. Raids

By JAMES RISEN and MARK MAZZETTI
New York Times
Published: December 10, 2009

BlackwaterWASHINGTON — Private security guards from Blackwater Worldwide participated in some of the C.I.A.’s most sensitive activities — clandestine raids with agency officers against people suspected of being insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan and the transporting of detainees, according to former company employees and intelligence officials.

The raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders called “snatch and grab” operations, the former employees and current and former intelligence officers said.

Several former Blackwater guards said that their involvement in the operations became so routine that the lines supposedly dividing the Central Intelligence Agency, the military and Blackwater became blurred. Instead of simply providing security for C.I.A. officers, they say, Blackwater personnel at times became partners in missions to capture or kill militants in Iraq and Afghanistan, a practice that raises questions about the use of guns for hire on the battlefield.

Separately, former Blackwater employees said they helped provide security on some C.I.A. flights transporting detainees in the years after the 2001 terror attacks in the United States.

The secret missions illuminate a far deeper relationship between the spy agency and the private security company than government officials had acknowledged. Blackwater’s partnership with the C.I.A. has been enormously profitable for the North Carolina-based company, and became even closer after several top agency officials joined Blackwater.

“It became a very brotherly relationship,” said one former top C.I.A. officer. “There was a feeling that Blackwater eventually became an extension of the agency.”

George Little, a C.I.A. spokesman, would not comment on Blackwater’s ties to the agency. But he said the C.I.A. employs contractors to “enhance the skills of our own work force, just as American law permits.”

“Contractors give you flexibility in shaping and managing your talent mix — especially in the short term — but the accountability’s still yours,” he said.

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Blackwater, said Thursday that it was never under contract to participate in clandestine raids with the C.I.A. or with Special Operations personnel in Iraq, Afghanistan or anywhere else.

Blackwater’s role in the secret operations raises concerns about the extent to which private security companies, hired for defensive guard duty, have joined in offensive military and intelligence operations.

Representative Rush D. Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who is chairman of the House Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, said in an interview that “the use of contractors in intelligence and paramilitary operations is a scandal waiting to be examined.” While he declined to comment on specific operations, Mr. Holt said that the use of contractors in such operations “got way out of hand.” He added, “It’s been very troubling to a lot of people.”

Blackwater, now known as Xe Services, has come under intense criticism for what Iraqis have described as reckless conduct by its security guards, and the company lost its lucrative State Department contract to provide diplomatic security for the United States Embassy in Baghdad earlier this year after a 2007 shooting that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead.

Blackwater’s ties to the C.I.A. have emerged in recent months, beginning with disclosures in The New York Times that the agency had hired the company as part of a program to assassinate leaders of Al Qaeda and to assist in the C.I.A.’s Predator drone program in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Leon E. Panetta, the C.I.A. director, recently initiated an internal review examining all Blackwater contracts with the agency to ensure that the company was performing no missions that were “operational in nature,” according to one government official.

Five former Blackwater employees and four current and former American intelligence officials interviewed for this article would speak only on condition of anonymity because Blackwater’s activities for the agency were secret and former employees feared repercussions from the company. The Blackwater employees said they participated in the raids or had direct knowledge of them.

Along with the former officials, they provided few details about the targets of the raids in Iraq and Afghanistan, although they said that many of the Iraq raids were directed against members of Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. To corroborate the claims of the company’s involvement, a former Blackwater security guard provided photographs to The Times that he said he took during the raids. They showed detainees and armed men whom he and a former company official identified as Blackwater employees. The former intelligence officials said that Blackwater’s work with the C.I.A. in Iraq and Afghanistan had grown out of its early contracts with the spy agency to provide security for the C.I.A. stations in both countries.

In the spring of 2002, Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, offered to help the spy agency guard its makeshift Afghan station in the Ariana Hotel in Kabul. Not long after Mr. Prince signed the security contract with Alvin B. Krongard, then the C.I.A.’s third-ranking official, dozens of Blackwater personnel — many of them former members of units of the Navy Seals or Army Delta Force — were sent to provide perimeter security for the C.I.A. station.

But the company’s role soon changed as Blackwater operatives began accompanying C.I.A. case officers on missions, according to former employees and intelligence officials.

A similar progression happened in Iraq, where Blackwater was first hired for “static security” of the Baghdad station. In addition, Blackwater was charged with providing personal security for C.I.A. officers wherever they traveled in the two countries. That meant that Blackwater personnel accompanied the officers even on offensive operations sometimes begun in conjunction with Delta Force or Navy Seals teams.

A former senior C.I.A. official said that Blackwater’s role expanded in 2005 as the Iraqi insurgency intensified. Fearful of the death or capture of one of its officers, the agency banned officers from leaving the Green Zone in Baghdad without security escorts, the official said.

That gave Blackwater greater influence over C.I.A. clandestine operations, since company personnel helped decide the safest way to conduct the missions.

The former American intelligence officials said that Blackwater guards were supposed to only provide perimeter security during raids, leaving it up to C.I.A. officers and Special Operations military personnel to capture or kill suspected insurgents or other targets.

“They were supposed to be the outer layer of the onion, out on the perimeter,” said one former Blackwater official of the security guards. Instead, “they were the drivers and the gunslingers,” said one former intelligence official.

But in the chaos of the operations, the roles of Blackwater, C.I.A., and military personnel sometimes merged. Former C.I.A. officials said that Blackwater guards often appeared eager to get directly involved in the operations. Experts said that the C.I.A.’s use of contractors in clandestine operations falls into a legal gray area because of the vagueness of language laying out what tasks only government employees may perform.

P.W. Singer, an expert in contracting at the Brookings Institution, said that the types of jobs that have been outsourced in recent years make a mockery of regulations about “inherently governmental” functions.

“We keep finding functions that have been outsourced that common sense, let alone U.S. government policy, would argue should not have been handed over to a private company,” he said. “And yet we do it again, and again, and again.”

According to one former Blackwater manager, the company’s involvement with the C.I.A. raids was “widely known” by Blackwater executives. “It was virtually continuous, and hundreds of guys were involved, rotating in and out,” over a period of several years, the former Blackwater manager said.

One former Blackwater guard recalled a meeting in Baghdad in 2004 in which Erik Prince addressed a group of Blackwater guards working with the C.I.A. At the meeting in an air hangar used by Blackwater, the guard said, Mr. Prince encouraged the Blackwater personnel “to do whatever it takes” to help the C.I.A. with the intensifying insurgency, the former guard recalled.

But it is not clear whether top C.I.A. officials in Washington knew or approved of the involvement by Blackwater officials in raids or whether only lower-level officials in Baghdad were aware of what happened on the ground.

The new details of Blackwater’s involvement in Iraq come at a time when the House Intelligence Committee is investigating the company’s role in the C.I.A.’s assassination program, and a federal grand jury in North Carolina is investigating a wide range of allegations of illegal activity by Blackwater and its personnel, including gun running to Iraq.

Several former Blackwater personnel said that Blackwater guards involved in the C.I.A. raids used weapons, including sawed-off M-4 automatic weapons with silencers, that were not approved for use by private contractors. In separate interviews, former Blackwater security personnel also said they were handpicked by senior Blackwater officials on several occasions to participate in secret flights transporting detainees around war zones.

They said that during the flights, teams of about 10 Blackwater personnel provided security over the detainees.

“A group of individuals were selected who could manage detainees without the use of lethal force,” said one former Blackwater guard who participated in one of the flights.

Intelligence officials deny that the agency has ever used Blackwater to fly high-value detainees in and out of secret C.I.A. prisons that were shut down earlier this year. Mr. Corallo, the Blackwater spokesman, said that company personnel were never involved in C.I.A. “rendition flights,” which transferred terrorism suspects to other countries for interrogation. (click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: