Murder plots, corruption & Bodie seeks salvation

He that lieth down with Dogs, shall rise up with Fleas.

~Benjamin Franklin 

"The Godfather" - Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando)

This Week in Government Contracting: 

Here is a rundown on some noteworthy happenings in the world of defense contracting, that occurred this week.  I am beginning to believe that there is no such thing as honesty and integrity when it comes to corporations vying for our taxdollars, or the lawmakers we elect to carry out their intended duties to prevent waste and fraud, for that matter.  Feel free to submit a comment and let me know if I missed anything that was newsworthy this week:

Take the money and run
February 2, 2010
(WHAS11) – Keith Shaw is charged with making unauthorized modifications to military aircraft parts and trying to kill his former business associates who were cooperating with military investigators. 

While the plot described in Shaw’s indictment reads like spy novel, the testimony Tuesday was more like hearing a technical manual read aloud. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senator Webb questions the value of  ‘Retired Generals Club’
February 2, 2010
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.). Saying that there’s no reason military spending should be “sacrosanct,” Webb urged Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen to “take a hard look at programs that don’t produce a clear bottom line.” 

Webb shot out three programs. First, he questioned the wisdom of giving $60 million to Blackwater to train sailors in self-defense on board ships — or, as Webb put it, “how to do their job.” He attacked sending military officers to defense think tanks to serve as fellows, specifically calling out the well-connected Center for a New American Security, which has sent a lot of its own analysts to the Obama State and Defense Departments. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senate Leader from Kentucky has ties to corrupt defense contractor
February 3, 2010
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has been quick to denounce a bid by Democrats to stop foreign corporations from pouring money into U.S. elections, claiming current law already bars such spending. As we’ve reported before, it’s not nearly as simple as that — but McConnell should know: The GOP Senate leader has raked in campaign cash from a subsidiary of a major foreign defense contractor that’s currently being investigated by the Justice Department for bribery (See BAE Settles Corruption Charges). (Click HERE for full article) 

Alabama Senator demands a side of pork – to the tune of $35 billion
February 5, 2010
To be sure, Shelby was just one of many lobbying targets for EADS and Northrop Grumman — both of whom are major players in the world of money in politics and influence peddling. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), for one, received a series of suspicious donations from the companies after he threw his support behind granting them the $35 billion Pentagon contract. Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), meanwhile, serves on EADS’s board. (Click HERE for full article) 

KBR ordered to pay $19 million in damages related to LOGCAP III sub-contract
February 4, 2010
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal court has ordered subsidiaries of global engineering firm KBR Inc. (NYSE: KBR) to pay nearly $19 million in damages to The Event Source over a 5-year-old contractual row, according to an 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  The dispute arose from a 2005 subcontract that KBR’s subsidiaries handed the Orlando, Fla.-based global event management firm, under the LOGCAP III contract. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Politics of LOGCAP
February 4, 2010
From 1995 to 2000 Cheney was chief executive and chairman of Halliburton, the major provider of products and services to the military. Most of Halliburton’s government contracts were won by its construction subsidiary, KBR. Under Cheney the company benefited from $3.8 billion in government contracts or insured loans. Cheney’s wealth also escalated from $700,000 to $65 million in five years. (Click HERE for full article) 

Hamilton College – Conference on Military Contracting
February 04, 2010
Additionally, Joelson argued that there are significant non-monetary costs to America when giving these contracts. He pointed to two cases in particular: one, the electrocution death of an American soldier in a shower wired by KBR employees, and the other, an incident in which Blackwater employees killed 17 Iraqi civilians. Both incidents demonstrated problems in the contracting system that the federal government is currently unable to remedy. (Click HERE for full article) 

BAE Settles Corruption Charges
February 5, 2010    
BAE Systems, Europe’s largest military contractor, has agreed to plead guilty to two criminal charges and pay nearly $450 million in penalties in the United States and Britain to end long-running investigations into questionable payments made to win contracts overseas. Under its settlement with the Justice Department, BAE will pay a $400 million fine and plead guilty to one count of conspiring to make false statements about having an internal program to comply with anti-bribery laws. The Justice Department’s complaint said the charge related to more than $200 million of business that BAE had won through 2003 in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Saudi Arabia and other countries. (Click HERE for full article) 

Also announced on February 5th – BAE Systems is shutting down their Grainger body armor plant in Tennessee.  Grainger County’s unemployment rate was reported to be over 13%, prior to this announcement. (Click HERE for article) 

And Finally I don’t know what to think about this one but  Led Zep’s Stairway To Heaven has been stuck in my head since I read this: 

Bill Bodie joins the Army – The Salvation Army
February 3, 2010
Bill Bodie was named the chairman-elect, Salvation Army’s D.C. Advisory Board. Bodie is president of KBR North American Government and Defense in Arlington. He has held leadership roles in the public and private sectors, and has also been published in the Wall Street Journal, the Detroit News and other publications. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Salvation Army has several 12 step programs maybe they will come up with a KBR recovery program for employees and a special one for Bodie’s incessant babbling and BS!

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Defense contractors to DoD – “The taxman is calling; it’s for you”

Contractors ask DoD to reimburse offshore payroll taxes

By ELISE CASTELLI |  Jan 27, 2010
In 2008, Congress passed a law to force contractors to pay payroll taxes for employees who are U.S. citizens working for their offshore subsidiaries. The IRS is collecting more taxes as a result, but much of that new tax revenue is leaving government in the form of higher contract costs for the Defense Department.

Defense contractors have billed the department for more than $140 million in reimbursements for payroll tax expenses they’ve paid since the law was passed, a new Government Accountability Office report says.

And that’s just on five contracts — worth a combined $6 billion — that were reviewed by GAO.

Executives from some of the biggest Defense contractors — including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and KBR — told GAO that, before the law was passed, they hired U.S. citizens at their offshore subsidiaries as a way to lower their costs and remain competitive. The companies say they only use the offshore subsidiaries to hire employees to perform work overseas.

Overall, GAO said the law is accomplishing its intended effect: forcing offshore companies to share the tax burden for social security, Medicare and federal income tax payments. GAO recommended Congress expand the legislation to force contractors offshore to contribute to state unemployment insurance programs so workers can collect when they lose their jobs.

In 2009, one state, Texas, denied unemployment claims of 140 individuals employed by several of the contractors because they were employed by offshore subsidiaries that did not contribute to the state’s unemployment insurance programs. GAO chose Texas because several major contractors have corporate offices there. (Click HERE for original article)

David Isenberg wrote an excellent article on this in the Huffington Post, click HERE to read that article.
———————————————————————————————-

Okay I have to admit, I wish I could find a way get someone else to foot the bill and pay my taxes. I guess I have to give these folks credit for their creative thinking.

These companies mission statements must read something like:

Maximize the Project, More Cost, More Plus  (I think screw the taxpayer, is in there somewhere too)

I have to wonder if the reason the DoD appears to turn their head the other way and not support legislation like the Franken Amendment is because these contractors have them by the short hairs and the proposed law will just up the price of the contract.

Eventually the DoD or Congress will demand that contract costs be cut arbitrarily and these contractors will comply by outsourcing the jobs to foreign nationals and the US taxpayers will be left holding the bag and the bill AGAIN.

Forseti

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Uncle Sam wants you…..to pay your damn taxes or “No contracts for you!”

It would be nice if these multi-billion dollar defense contractors had to follow the same laws the rest of us do!!

Obama cracking down on contractor tax cheats

January 20, 2010 at 9:09 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is ordering a new crackdown on federal contractors who don’t pay their taxes.

He was signing an executive order Wednesday telling federal agency chiefs to take steps to bar those companies from receiving new government contracts. Obama was also directing the IRS to review contractor filings to ensure the companies are not lying about the taxes they’ve paid.

“It is simply wrong for companies to take taxpayer dollars and not be taxpayers themselves,” Obama said in his prepared remarks. “We need to insist on the same sense of responsibility in Washington that so many of you strive to uphold in your own lives, in your own families and in your own businesses.”

A White House fact sheet said the move is part of the president’s effort to restructure government contracting to root out waste and abuse.

That effort has included measures to end no-bid contracts and to crack down on what the administration deems improper payments. Administration officials estimate the measures saved as much as $100 billion last year.

Obama said studies by the Government Accountability Office have estimated that the U.S. is owed more than $5 billion in unpaid taxes by thousands of companies that are being awarded government contracts.

The White House said Obama is also urging Congress to give the administration additional tools to ensure tax dollars don’t benefit companies that are in arrears to Uncle Sam. Among the powers being sought: allowing the IRS to share tax data with agency contracting chiefs to help officials catch tax scofflaws. (Click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR and the Pentagon breathe sigh of relief at Dorgan’s announcement

Senator Dorgan (D-ND)

As the Chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee since 1999, Senator Dorgan and been a thorn in KBR’s side ever since he started investigating and holding hearings into KBR’s fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan. This Senator has held a total of 21 hearings targeting Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Iraq since this series of hearings began 2003.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the exposure of our soldiers and civilians to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the deaths of SSG Ryan Maseth, SSG Christ Everett and others due to electrocution caused by shoddy electrical work by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who brought to light the contaminated water and expired food that was served to our troops and civilians by KBR.

It was Senator Dorgan and Senate Democratic Policy Committee who publicly exposed the Pentagon for their utter incompetence in managing contractor contracts.

Senator Dorgan has been an honest and fair voice for the citizens of North Dakota and all Americans who believe lying, cheating and stealing are wrong.

Senator Dorgan will never be replaced on the Senate Democratic Committee, but hopefully Senator Reid will find someone who can adequately continue his work.

(I can just see  KBR’s Bill Bodie and Bill Utt doing the  KBR Happy Dance at 4100 Clinton Drive in Houston.)

Dorgan says he will not seek re-election in fall

By KEN THOMAS Associated Press Writer © 2010 The Associated Press
Jan. 5, 2010, 11:57PM

WASHINGTON — North Dakota Democrat Byron Dorgan said Tuesday he will not seek re-election to the Senate in November, a surprise announcement that dealt another blow to Democrats already struggling to protect their Senate majority.

Adding to the party’s concerns was news that Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., was expected to announce Wednesday that he also won’t run for re-election in the fall. The officials who disclosed Dodd’s plans would speak only on condition of anonymity ahead of the announcement.

In addition, Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, considered a rising star in the Democratic Party, won’t run for a second term in November, according to two Democrats with knowledge of Ritter’s decision. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the governor’s political plans publicly. Ritter was expected to make an announcement Wednesday.

The decisions by the three Democrats come at the start of an election year that’s shaping up to be challenging for lawmakers of all political stripes, and particularly for Democrats. Anti-incumbent sentiment is rippling through the electorate, a majority of the country says it’s on the wrong track, and the party in power typically gets blamed for the nation’s troubles.

Dorgan, a moderate who was first elected to the Senate in 1992 after serving a dozen years in the House, said he reached the decision after discussing his future with family over the holidays. Dorgan, 67, said he “began to wrestle with the question of whether making a commitment to serve in the Senate seven more years was the right thing to do.”

“Although I still have a passion for public service and enjoy my work in the Senate, I have other interests and I have other things I would like to pursue outside of public life,” he said in a statement.

Dorgan’s decision stunned members of his party, who control the Senate but are facing spirited challenges from Republicans in several states. Democrats were confident heading into the new year that Dorgan would run for re-election even as rumors intensified that Republican Gov. John Hoeven would challenge him in November.

Early polling showed Dorgan trailing Hoeven in a hypothetical contest, and Democrats expected a competitive race if the matchup materialized.

Hoeven has not announced a candidacy but national Republicans expect he will. Hoeven told The Associated Press on Tuesday that he was “looking at (a Senate race) very seriously.”

“I expect we’ll announce our intentions here within a couple of weeks,” Hoeven said.

Democrats insist they will field a strong candidate to run in Dorgan’s place, and recruitment already was under way Tuesday. Democratic Rep. Earl Pomeroy, who was first elected to the House in 1992, could be interested in seeking the Senate seat, along with Heidi Heitkamp, a former state attorney general and tax commissioner who was defeated by Hoeven in the 2000 gubernatorial race.

In a statement, Pomeroy praised Dorgan’s long service to North Dakota and the nation. “His extraordinary influence in the United States Senate, particularly as a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, will be sorely missed in North Dakota,” Pomeroy said.

President Barack Obama also praised Dorgan, citing his work on energy issues and for supporting farmers and the state’s Indians, and for “standing with North Dakota’s families through difficult economic times.”

“Michelle and I extend our gratitude for his service to our nation and our very best wishes for the future for him and his family,” Obama said in a statement.

Dorgan’s announcement could complicate efforts by Democrats to maintain their advantage in the Senate, where they hold an effective 60-40 majority, including two independents who align themselves with Democrats. That’s just enough to break Republican filibusters if all 60 stick together.

Many Democratic incumbents could face challenges in 2010 amid high unemployment rates, concerns about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and anger at incumbents.

At least three Senate Democrats, including Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, are in serious trouble. The decisions by Dorgan and Dodd mean Democrats now will have to defend open seats in four states. The others are Delaware and Illinois, where Sens. Ted Kaufman, who has Vice President Joe Biden’s old seat, and Roland Burris, who has Obama’s old seat, aren’t running for full terms.

Republicans, for their part, are defending six open seats, in Ohio, Florida, Missouri, New Hampshire, Kentucky and Kansas.

Electoral politics aside, Dorgan’s decision also could have ramifications for another of Obama’s top priorities — climate and energy legislation. With no re-election race and nothing to lose, Dorgan could be even more of a wild card on the issue than he already has been. There’s no telling how the moderate Democrat will vote if the Senate takes up the legislation this year.

Representing a large oil and coal-producing state, Dorgan opposes the bill backed by the White House and Democratic leaders that would put a limit on heat-trapping pollution and would allow companies to swap valuable emissions permits. Dorgan instead has pushed an energy bill that would boost renewable energy production and oil drilling and wait to tackle global warming pollution.

Dorgan said his decision “does not relate to any dissatisfaction that I have about serving in the Senate. Yes, I wish there was less rancor and more bipartisanship in the U.S. Senate these days. But still, it is a great privilege to serve and I have the utmost respect for all of the men and women with whom I serve.”

Dorgan is chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee and leads his party’s policy committee as a member of the Senate Democratic leadership team. He has been advocate for farmers and ranchers in his home state and secured funding for renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and biofuels. (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Pregnant Soldiers in War Zone Won’t be Punished

Top U.S. General in Iraq, Countermanding Subordinate, Rescinds Order to Punish Pregnant Soldiers
By SARAH NETTER and LUIS MARTINEZ
Dec. 25, 2009

The top U.S. commander in Iraq rescinded a controversial order by a subordinate general intended to punish soldiers who became pregnant while serving in a war zone.

Army general in Iraq issues an order making pregnancy a punishable offense.

Gen. Raymond Odierno has drafted a broad new policy for the U.S. forces in Iraq that will take effect Jan. 1, but which does not include a provision issued last month by Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo that disciplined both soldiers who became pregnant and their military sex partners.

Earlier this week Cucolo said the policy was intended to emphasize the problems created when pregnant soldiers go home and leave behind a weaker unit.

Cucolo’s order set off a firestorm of criticism this week, including condemnation by four Democratic senators who wrote Odierno a letter calling for the order to be overturned.

“We can think of no greater deterrent to women contemplating a military career than the image of a pregnant woman being severely punished simply for conceiving a child,” the senators wrote to Cucolo. “This defies comprehension. As such, we urge you to immediately rescind this policy.”

The letter was signed by Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.

That was the latest salvo to hit Cucolo over the controversial policy. Earlier the National Organization for Women called the policy “ridiculous.”

“How dare any government say we’re going to impose any kind of punishment on women for getting pregnant,” NOW President Terry O’Neill said. “This is not the 1800s.”

O’Neill said NOW would turn to Defense Secretary Robert Gates and even President Obama for help.

Even before the senators took aim at Cucolo’s policy, the general had backed away from his threat to court martial women under his command who got pregnant.

“I regret that the term court martial is bandied about or mentioned,” Cucolo said from Iraq in a conference call earlier this week. “I do not ever see myself putting a soldier in jail for this.”

Pregnant soldiers are immediately redeployed out of combat zones to bases where they can get comprehensive medical care.

“The true purpose behind this is to cause them to pause and think about, ‘Okay wait a minute. It was written in the order and I’m going to leave my team. I’m going to leave an outfit shorthanded,’” Cucolo said.

Cucolo said that he was not surprised by the reaction and intense interest in his general order, but that those outside the military may not be able to fully understand his motivation.

Cucolo said that in the eight weeks his policy has been in force, four women soldiers were redeployed because they had become pregnant in violation of Cucolo’s order. The four women and two male soldiers received letters of reprimand that will not remain in their permanent military files.

A third male soldier, he said, was also punished for getting a female soldier pregnant. He was a noncommissioned officer who was committing adultery. He was also charged with fraternization and given a permanent letter of reprimand. In that case, the man was a sergeant and the female a junior soldier.

One of the pregnant women declined to identify the person who got her pregnant, Cucolo said.

In addition to the four women who got pregnant while on duty in Iraq, Cucolo said four other female soldiers were sent home because they found out they were pregnant, but had become pregnant before being sent to Iraq.

“Will some soldiers hear this, read this and say ‘Well that’s nothing?’ Sure, they might,” Cuculo said. “But I’ve got 22,000 incredible soldiers who are incredible Americans and I’m counting on them to do the right thing.” Of the soldiers in his command, 1,682 are women.

Court Martial Threat for Pregnant Soldiers Draws Fire

Cucolo said the Army does not provide emergency contraception or abortive services and does not intend to start.

There’s “only discussion about appropriate behavior and consideration of the impact of getting pregnant, of getting someone pregnant,” he said. “That’s the only discussion that’s taken place. Nothing about pills.”

“Anyone who leaves this fight early because they made a personal choice that changed their medical status — or contributes to doing that to another — is not in keeping with a key element of our ethos, ‘I will always place the mission first,’ or three of our seven core values: loyalty, duty and selfless service,” he continued. “And I believe there should be negative consequences for making that personal choice. ”

The pregnancy policy was just one provision in a larger general order that also prohibits soldiers from sexual contact with Iraqis or third-party nationals who are not members of coalition forces.

U.S. military leaders in Iraq conducted a full review of all existing orders as part of the ongoing transition in Iraq, and a new general order has been drafted. The order would consolidate several general orders from the U.S. commanders across Iraq.

Previously, the commanders have had the authority to draft their own restrictions. (Click HERE for the original story)

ABC News’ Aadel Rashid and Zachary Wolf contributed to this story. The Associated Press contributed to this story.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Yes, KBR, Congress is Talking About You-Huffington Post

Another insightful story from The Huffington Post! Well done!! To read any of the 100’s of post I have publish on KBR just pick a category on the left!

David Isenberg – Huffington Post
Author, Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq
Posted: December 26, 2009 03:29 PM

Although it was not mentioned by name there are some provisions in the FY 2010 Defense Appropriations bill which are very clearly aimed at KBR, the former Halliburton company. These are not the sort of provisions that will be making KBR officials happy.

Consider Sec. Sec. 8116, “Limitation on Availability of Funds for Execution of Contracts Under LOGCAP.” It says:

No later than 90 days after enactment of this Act none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be obligated or expended for the execution of a contract under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) unless the Secretary of the Army determines that the contract explicitly requires the contractor–

(1) to inspect and immediately correct deficiencies that present an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury so as to ensure compliance with generally accepted electrical standards as determined by the Secretary of Defense in work under the contract;

For those who have forgotten, it was KBR which has done the majority of the electrical work at U.S. facilities in Iraq. That work resulted in faulty wiring in far too many facilities, resulting in the low-level electrocutions of 16 U.S soldiers and 2 contractors and hundreds more incurred shock-related injuries in Iraq over a span of four years.. The most recent was 25-year-old Adam Hermanson, a US Air Force veteran-turned private security contractor who died in a shower at the compound of his employer, Triple Canopy, in Baghdad’s Green Zone on September 1, 2009. That a contractor’s apparently shoddy work ended up killing a contractor can only be viewed as ironic.

In October an Army task force re-inspecting thousands of potentially unsafe U.S. facilities in Iraq for faulty electrical wiring said KBR, which previously ordered to conduct inspections of its own work, placed 5,600 facilities on a “deferred” list — meaning they were low priority or there were no plans to inspect them.

Officials with the Defense Department’s Task Force SAFE said many of the buildings on KBR’s deferred list were still being used by soldiers.

Those wanting details on KBR’s offenses over the years should head over to Ms. Sparky , an excellent blog on the perils of KBR.

And then there was part 3 of Sec. 8116, which says:

(3) establish and enforce strict standards for preventing, and immediately addressing and cooperating with the prosecution of, any instances of sexual assault in all of its operations and the operations of its subcontractors.

For those who follow KBR this is a not very veiled reference to KBR’s rape problem. Prompted by the allegation that former KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones was drugged, stripped, beaten and gang-raped by her co-workers on her fourth day in Iraq in 2005 , this provision bans defense contractors from forcing employees to use arbitration to resolve claims of discrimination and sexual assault.

The provision is a result of an amendment introduced by Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) to the appropriations bill.

Employers and other potential lawsuit targets generally prefer binding arbitration because it keeps disputes out of the court system, where juries can inflict damaging verdicts. The no-arbitration provision would ban defense contracts worth more than $1 million with companies that seek to enforce or establish binding requirements in employee contracts in certain circumstances.

On May 16, 2007, Jones filed a civil lawsuit against KBR and former parent corporation Halliburton. KBR requested a private arbitration, and claims this is required by her employment contract. On September 15, 2009 the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled Jamie Leigh Jones’ federal lawsuit against KBR and several affiliates can be tried in open court.

The provision covers any requirements that force workers to use arbitration to resolve claims of sexual assault, sexual harassment, assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment and negligent hiring.

Of course, as is usually the case, Congress left in the usual all purpose national security escape clause for a contractor.

(b) Waiver.–The Secretary of the Army may waive the applicability of the limitation in subsection (a) to any contract if the Secretary certifies in writing to Congress that–
(1) the waiver is necessary for the provision of essential services or critical operating facilities for operational missions; or
(2) the work under such contract does not present an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury.

Click HERE for original article.

Again the Huffington Post contributor writes about what the mainstream media disregards. That’s why more and more people go to the HP for their news.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Obama tightens reins on contractors

Obama By: Mike Allen
December 21, 2009 10:23 AM EST

Ahead of remarks Monday by President Barack Obama about making government more efficient and effective, the White House Office of Management and Budget released details of the administration’s drive to tighten the government’s contracting practices.

“This is a situation that would never exist in a business,” Jeff Zients, federal chief performance officer and OMB deputy director for management, told reporters on a conference call. “A business that had these kind of practices would have been out of business a long time ago. I believe we’re off to a really fast start here. There’s a lot of work to be done. And we’re going to clean up the situation and make sure there’s no waste, and we save as much money as possible.”

Asked how much of the effort was a response to Bush administration policies, and how much was a response to endemic waste and mismanagement, Zients replied: “Across the last six years of the prior administration, contracting doubled. At the same time, the work force remained relatively flat. And I believe that in that doubling process, there was such a rush to outsource that there inevitably has been a marked increase in the reliance on high-risk contracting vehicles like the cost reimbursement. There’s been an underuse of competition. There are … too many contracts that are sole source. So we have a lot of work to do to save money here and … bring best practices to contracting in the government.”

This spring, the administration plans to roll out an “online dashboard” that will allow the public to see the savings plans for agencies and how they’re doing against their targets.

A White House fact sheet reports that Obama “has charged federal departments and agencies with saving $40 billion annually by Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 through terminating unnecessary contracts, strengthening acquisition management, ending the overreliance on contractors, and reducing the use of high-risk contracts across government. … In the first year of this effort, agencies have identified more than $19 billion of savings in Fiscal Year 2010 — on track to meet the $40 billion target. …

“These acquisition improvements — strengthening accountability, eliminating waste, improving performance, and targeting fraud and mismanagement — are significant components of a government that places the taxpayers’ best interests at the forefront of its actions.”

See the fact sheet here.

In a 13-page report titled “Acquisition and Contracting Improvement Plans and Pilots Saving Money and Improving Government,” OMB reports: “Agencies are on track to cut contracting costs by 3.5 percent in Fiscal Year 2010. … Agencies are taking aggressive steps to improve accountability and management oversight. Agencies are working to reduce their reliance on high-risk contracting by 10 percent. Agencies are piloting new tools to determine the best mix of skills and workforce size for their organizations. …

“Contractors’ past performance is being scrutinized more closely. For too long, contractor performance data was inconsistent and, often, inaccessible, and there was no easy way to track performance across agencies. Now, agencies are required to submit an electronic review to centralized federal database, allowing contracting officers to assess a firm’s track record before signing a new agreement. These assessments should lower the chances that the government repeatedly does business with underperforming contractors, which should, in turn, decrease inefficiency and waste of taxpayer resources. Compliance and quality assessments of agencies’ contractor performance evaluations will begin in February 2010.”

(Click HERE for original article)

If you would like to share your experiences while working for some of these contractors here is the link to contact the White House.  Keep it short, to the point and use spell check :)   Who knows maybe your information will be the missing piece to a puzzle that investigators need before they can take action.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Iraq accuses Iran of seizing oil well near border

By REBECCA SANTANA, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD (AP) – Iranian forces crossed into Iraq and seized an oil well just over the two countries’ disputed border, Iraq’s government said Friday, prompting a protest from Baghdad and providing a dramatic display of the sometimes tenuous relations between the wary allies.

The incident could trouble Iraq’s drive to attract the international investment needed to develop its beleaguered oil sector, analysts said, and it raised questions about the two countries’ ties, which had improved greatly after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

According to Iraq’s deputy foreign minister, Mohammed Haj Mahmoud, Iranian troops crossed into Iraqi territory on Thursday and seized oil well No. 4 in the al-Fakkah oil field, located in Maysan province about 200 miles (about 320 kilometers) southeast of Baghdad. The oil field is one of Iraq’s largest.

“This is not the first time that the Iranians have tried to prevent Iraqis from investing in oil fields in border areas,” Mahmoud told the AP. He said he did not know if the Iranians were still in control of the well.

Iraq’s national security council held an emergency meeting Friday to discuss the issue, and government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh later said the seizure showed anew the need for clearly defined borders between Iraq and Iran. He said the two countries have begun diplomatic talks.

However, al-Dabbagh appeared careful to avoid describing the incident as a military incursion, saying the oil well takeover was carried out by a group of armed Iranians.

“Iraq considers this penetration as a border breach and a violation of Iraq’s sovereignty,” he said in a statement. “We call upon the Iranian government to solve all the border disputes with Iraq through diplomatic means and to avoid the use of military force.”

Relations between the two countries have improved dramatically since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam, who in the ’80s attacked Iran and started an almost decade-long war. Since Saddam’s ouster, however, both countries have had Shiite-led governments, a rarity in the mostly Sunni Middle East.

But their border remains in dispute.

The al-Fakkah field is considered a shared field between Iran and Iraq, meaning both nations are able to pump oil from it, but the Iraqis consider oil well No. 4 theirs.

Iranian soldiers carrying rifles seized the well Thursday night in a 25-car convoy and ordered the Iraqi workers to leave the area, according to a worker at the site who did not want to be identified for fear of retribution. The soldiers then mounted an Iranian flag inside the well, he said.

There were no reports of violence during the incident, and Iranian forces left the well on Friday, leaving the flag behind, the worker said. His account could not be immediately confirmed.

Analysts said it was too early to say whether the incident would mushroom into greater tension but said it could raise concerns with oil companies looking to invest in Iraq. Oil prices rose slightly after news of the incident.

“It looks like some kind of warning shot, and it could definitely escalate into a big worry for oil companies,” said Samuel Ciszuk of the London-based IHS Global Insight.

In Washington, a U.S. official said that although Iranians have crossed the border before, they had not previously ventured this far.

Iraqi security forces were in the area, but there are no reports of fighting, he said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record. The Iranians are believed to have left the area, he said.

An official at the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad who did not want to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to media said reports of Iran seizing the well were “mere rumors.”

A message left for Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman seeking comment was not returned. Iran’s semiofficial Mehr news agency quoted officials at the National Iranian Oil Company as denying the incursion.

Such incidents have happened before. Last year, the Iraqi Oil Ministry accused Iran of stealing oil from the al-Fakkah field and of illegally seizing and capping off wells in a second field Iraq says lies entirely within its territory.

Iraq has an estimated 115 billion barrels of proven oil reserves — the world’s third largest.

But years of neglect, war and insurgency have left the oil fields severely underperforming. Iraq has been trying to attract international investment, including a round of international bidding last week.

The incursion comes as Iraq is preparing for national elections on March 7, and in a research note, analysts at the Washington-based Eurasia Group said the incident could affect Iraq’s domestic politics.

Although Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, has tried to present himself as a nationalist candidate with wide support, “…there remains the lingering perception that he is close to Tehran. If Iran appears to be acting against the interests of Iraq, some of al-Maliki’s more nationalist and Sunni supporters, who harbor hostility toward Iran, could desert him,” the note read.

The al-Fakkah field, which has about 1.55 billion barrels of oil in reserves, was offered along with another two adjacent fields as a single group in Iraq’s first postwar oil and gas bidding round in June. But the group received only one bid by a consortium grouping China’s CNOOC Ltd. and Sinochem International Co. Ltd, which was rejected by the Oil Ministry. (click HERE for the original article)

Iraqi official: Iranians seized Iraqi oil well

By SAMEER N. YACOUB – 8 hours ago

BAGHDAD (AP) — Iraq’s deputy foreign minister says Iranian troops have seized an oil well in southern Iraq along their disputed border.

Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammed Haj Aziz said Friday that Iranian troops seized oil well No. 4 Thursday night.

He said he did not know whether Iranians were still in control of the oil well. He said the Foreign Ministry and the Oil Ministry are coordinating over what steps to take and were considering summoning the Iranian ambassador to discuss the issue on Saturday.

Such incidents have happened before along the Iran-Iraq border, which was never clearly delineated after the brutal war between the two countries in the 1980s. (click HERE fore the original AP article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
Posted in Politics. Tags: . 3 Comments »

Franken amendment moves forward, the “dirty thirty” back pedal

bill to law

Rape case to influence rules for contractors

By JENNIFER A. DLOUHY
Houston Chronicle
Dec. 16, 2009, 7:39PM

WASHINGTON— Prompted by the alleged rape of former KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones, Congress is poised to pass a measure banning defense contractors from forcing employees to use arbitration to resolve claims of discrimination and sexual assault.

House and Senate negotiators agreed to include the no-arbitration provision in a $636 billion defense spending bill that passed the House 395-34 on Wednesday. The measure now heads to the Senate, which is expected to pass it before Christmas.

Employers and other potential lawsuit targets generally prefer binding arbitration because it keeps disputes out of the court system, where juries can inflict damaging verdicts.

The no-arbitration provision would ban defense contracts worth more than $1 million with companies that seek to enforce or establish binding requirements in employee contracts in certain circumstances.

The provision covers any requirements that force workers to use arbitration to resolve claims of sexual assault, sexual harassment, assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment and negligent hiring.

Heated debate
Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., who pushed the initiative, said it “allows victims of assault and discrimination their rightful day in court.”

The agreement and House move Wednesday caps weeks of sometimes heated debate that began in October when the Senate voted 68-30 to adopt Franken’s proposal. The 30 Republicans who opposed it — including Sen. John Cornyn of Texas (Phone# 202-224-2934) — were instantly the target of barbs from liberal commentators and bloggers accusing them of being rapist sympathizers.

While liberal commentators were fuming over opposition to the binding arbitration ban, Obama administration officials and Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii (phone# 202-224-3934), chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, raised concerns that it could leave defense contractors vulnerable.

Some exceptions
In response, House and Senate negotiators narrowed the final language to allow arbitration in cases where the defense secretary or a deputy “personally determines (it) is necessary to avoid harm to national security interests of the United States.” House and Senate members also agreed to limit the scope of companies that would have to comply with the mandate, restricting it to those with federal contracts of $1 million or more.

Cornyn on Wednesday called the changes “a positive development.”

Franken said the arbitration proposal was a direct response to Jones’ allegations that she was raped by co-workers while in Iraq in 2005. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in September that Jones’ lawsuit against Houston-based engineering firm KBR and its former parent company, Halliburton, can go to trial, despite language in her 18-page employment contract requiring that such claims be resolved through arbitration.

However a Houston-based federal judge in 2008 dismissed a similar claim by another woman who claimed she was raped while working for KBR, citing the binding arbitration language in her employment contract.

Jones has told her story in testimony to Congress and via a Web site for the Jamie Leigh Foundation. The Conroe native has said fellow military contractors drugged and raped her and then held her in a shipping container. (Click HERE for original article)

————————————-

I don’t know about you but the line from Santa Claus Is Coming To Town, just keep running through my head ”He’s makin’ a list and checkin’ it twice.”   I think we all know what list KBR is on.

For all the current and former employees who have fought, endured and persevered Merry Christmas to all and to all a good fight!

–Forseti

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

DoD contractors can no longer rape, plunder and pillage

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

In a memorandum dated December 14, 2009, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Shay D. Assad has directed a Class Deviation be effective immediately. (click HERE for memo)

This Class Deviation, Additional Contractor Requirements and Responsibilities Related to Alleged Crimes By or Against Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan provides a new clause that basically says:

  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed by contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed against contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must train their employees on how and where to report a crime.
  • All DoD Contractors must train their employees on where to seek victim and witness protection and victim assistance. (click HERE for UCMJ Chapter 47 Title 10)

All future contracts are to contain this clause and all current contracts are to be modified to the extent practical.

Let me tell you Ms Sparky’s version of what that means.

KBR and other DoD contractors can no longer legally protect their Thailand brothel owning managers.

KBR and other DoD contractors can no longer legally protect any manager or managers’ buddies who have committed a crime against an employee such as assault or TIPs violations. Now, hopefully all an employee will have to do is contact the MP’s.

It appears the Uniform Code of Military Justice covers threats, intimidation, coercion, harassment and discrimination (click HERE) If that’s true…KBR is DONE! They couldn’t manage a McDonald’s Playland without those sharply hone management skills!

I would be a liar to say I wasn’t thrilled to see these changes in DoD Procurement policy. I would like to see this expanded to ALL DoD contractors. Some employees are really having problems with some contractors such as CSA in Kuwait.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

CIA out-sourced kidnappings and hits to Blackwater?

Blackwater Guards Tied to Secret C.I.A. Raids

By JAMES RISEN and MARK MAZZETTI
New York Times
Published: December 10, 2009

BlackwaterWASHINGTON — Private security guards from Blackwater Worldwide participated in some of the C.I.A.’s most sensitive activities — clandestine raids with agency officers against people suspected of being insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan and the transporting of detainees, according to former company employees and intelligence officials.

The raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders called “snatch and grab” operations, the former employees and current and former intelligence officers said.

Several former Blackwater guards said that their involvement in the operations became so routine that the lines supposedly dividing the Central Intelligence Agency, the military and Blackwater became blurred. Instead of simply providing security for C.I.A. officers, they say, Blackwater personnel at times became partners in missions to capture or kill militants in Iraq and Afghanistan, a practice that raises questions about the use of guns for hire on the battlefield.

Separately, former Blackwater employees said they helped provide security on some C.I.A. flights transporting detainees in the years after the 2001 terror attacks in the United States.

The secret missions illuminate a far deeper relationship between the spy agency and the private security company than government officials had acknowledged. Blackwater’s partnership with the C.I.A. has been enormously profitable for the North Carolina-based company, and became even closer after several top agency officials joined Blackwater.

“It became a very brotherly relationship,” said one former top C.I.A. officer. “There was a feeling that Blackwater eventually became an extension of the agency.”

George Little, a C.I.A. spokesman, would not comment on Blackwater’s ties to the agency. But he said the C.I.A. employs contractors to “enhance the skills of our own work force, just as American law permits.”

“Contractors give you flexibility in shaping and managing your talent mix — especially in the short term — but the accountability’s still yours,” he said.

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Blackwater, said Thursday that it was never under contract to participate in clandestine raids with the C.I.A. or with Special Operations personnel in Iraq, Afghanistan or anywhere else.

Blackwater’s role in the secret operations raises concerns about the extent to which private security companies, hired for defensive guard duty, have joined in offensive military and intelligence operations.

Representative Rush D. Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who is chairman of the House Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, said in an interview that “the use of contractors in intelligence and paramilitary operations is a scandal waiting to be examined.” While he declined to comment on specific operations, Mr. Holt said that the use of contractors in such operations “got way out of hand.” He added, “It’s been very troubling to a lot of people.”

Blackwater, now known as Xe Services, has come under intense criticism for what Iraqis have described as reckless conduct by its security guards, and the company lost its lucrative State Department contract to provide diplomatic security for the United States Embassy in Baghdad earlier this year after a 2007 shooting that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead.

Blackwater’s ties to the C.I.A. have emerged in recent months, beginning with disclosures in The New York Times that the agency had hired the company as part of a program to assassinate leaders of Al Qaeda and to assist in the C.I.A.’s Predator drone program in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Leon E. Panetta, the C.I.A. director, recently initiated an internal review examining all Blackwater contracts with the agency to ensure that the company was performing no missions that were “operational in nature,” according to one government official.

Five former Blackwater employees and four current and former American intelligence officials interviewed for this article would speak only on condition of anonymity because Blackwater’s activities for the agency were secret and former employees feared repercussions from the company. The Blackwater employees said they participated in the raids or had direct knowledge of them.

Along with the former officials, they provided few details about the targets of the raids in Iraq and Afghanistan, although they said that many of the Iraq raids were directed against members of Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. To corroborate the claims of the company’s involvement, a former Blackwater security guard provided photographs to The Times that he said he took during the raids. They showed detainees and armed men whom he and a former company official identified as Blackwater employees. The former intelligence officials said that Blackwater’s work with the C.I.A. in Iraq and Afghanistan had grown out of its early contracts with the spy agency to provide security for the C.I.A. stations in both countries.

In the spring of 2002, Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, offered to help the spy agency guard its makeshift Afghan station in the Ariana Hotel in Kabul. Not long after Mr. Prince signed the security contract with Alvin B. Krongard, then the C.I.A.’s third-ranking official, dozens of Blackwater personnel — many of them former members of units of the Navy Seals or Army Delta Force — were sent to provide perimeter security for the C.I.A. station.

But the company’s role soon changed as Blackwater operatives began accompanying C.I.A. case officers on missions, according to former employees and intelligence officials.

A similar progression happened in Iraq, where Blackwater was first hired for “static security” of the Baghdad station. In addition, Blackwater was charged with providing personal security for C.I.A. officers wherever they traveled in the two countries. That meant that Blackwater personnel accompanied the officers even on offensive operations sometimes begun in conjunction with Delta Force or Navy Seals teams.

A former senior C.I.A. official said that Blackwater’s role expanded in 2005 as the Iraqi insurgency intensified. Fearful of the death or capture of one of its officers, the agency banned officers from leaving the Green Zone in Baghdad without security escorts, the official said.

That gave Blackwater greater influence over C.I.A. clandestine operations, since company personnel helped decide the safest way to conduct the missions.

The former American intelligence officials said that Blackwater guards were supposed to only provide perimeter security during raids, leaving it up to C.I.A. officers and Special Operations military personnel to capture or kill suspected insurgents or other targets.

“They were supposed to be the outer layer of the onion, out on the perimeter,” said one former Blackwater official of the security guards. Instead, “they were the drivers and the gunslingers,” said one former intelligence official.

But in the chaos of the operations, the roles of Blackwater, C.I.A., and military personnel sometimes merged. Former C.I.A. officials said that Blackwater guards often appeared eager to get directly involved in the operations. Experts said that the C.I.A.’s use of contractors in clandestine operations falls into a legal gray area because of the vagueness of language laying out what tasks only government employees may perform.

P.W. Singer, an expert in contracting at the Brookings Institution, said that the types of jobs that have been outsourced in recent years make a mockery of regulations about “inherently governmental” functions.

“We keep finding functions that have been outsourced that common sense, let alone U.S. government policy, would argue should not have been handed over to a private company,” he said. “And yet we do it again, and again, and again.”

According to one former Blackwater manager, the company’s involvement with the C.I.A. raids was “widely known” by Blackwater executives. “It was virtually continuous, and hundreds of guys were involved, rotating in and out,” over a period of several years, the former Blackwater manager said.

One former Blackwater guard recalled a meeting in Baghdad in 2004 in which Erik Prince addressed a group of Blackwater guards working with the C.I.A. At the meeting in an air hangar used by Blackwater, the guard said, Mr. Prince encouraged the Blackwater personnel “to do whatever it takes” to help the C.I.A. with the intensifying insurgency, the former guard recalled.

But it is not clear whether top C.I.A. officials in Washington knew or approved of the involvement by Blackwater officials in raids or whether only lower-level officials in Baghdad were aware of what happened on the ground.

The new details of Blackwater’s involvement in Iraq come at a time when the House Intelligence Committee is investigating the company’s role in the C.I.A.’s assassination program, and a federal grand jury in North Carolina is investigating a wide range of allegations of illegal activity by Blackwater and its personnel, including gun running to Iraq.

Several former Blackwater personnel said that Blackwater guards involved in the C.I.A. raids used weapons, including sawed-off M-4 automatic weapons with silencers, that were not approved for use by private contractors. In separate interviews, former Blackwater security personnel also said they were handpicked by senior Blackwater officials on several occasions to participate in secret flights transporting detainees around war zones.

They said that during the flights, teams of about 10 Blackwater personnel provided security over the detainees.

“A group of individuals were selected who could manage detainees without the use of lethal force,” said one former Blackwater guard who participated in one of the flights.

Intelligence officials deny that the agency has ever used Blackwater to fly high-value detainees in and out of secret C.I.A. prisons that were shut down earlier this year. Mr. Corallo, the Blackwater spokesman, said that company personnel were never involved in C.I.A. “rendition flights,” which transferred terrorism suspects to other countries for interrogation. (click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Lt. Col. James “Jim” Gentry dies at age 52

Lieutenant Colonel James Gentry, Indiana National Guard

Lieutenant Colonel James Gentry, Indiana National Guard

(See Funeral Notice update below)

Sadly, I have learned Lt. Col James “Jim” Gentry has lost his battle with cancer and has died in Indiana at the young age of 52. Gentry was diagnosed with cancer in 2006. A cancer he felt was caused by his exposure to the deadly carcinogen known as sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali water plant in Southern Iraq in 2003.

A retired Indiana National Guard lieutenant colonel, Gentry was the commander of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry, which, at about 600 soldiers strong, was in Iraq from February 2003 to February 2004.

This Indian National Guard unit was responsible for protecting US civilians working for KBR at the Qarmat Ali water plant in Southern Iraq. Returning this water plant to full operation was essential to restoring Iraqi oil production and KBR had the contract to do that.

Unfortunately, upon retreat, Saddam loyalists sabotaged the plant by cutting open bags of sodium dichromate, a yellow-orange powered rust inhibitor, and spread it everywhere. Not being informed by KBR management what this powder was, soldiers and civilians alike took few precautions to protect themselves.  People started experiencing symptoms of chronic nose bleeds, headaches, skins lesions. Even after countless complaints KBR did not test the substance and inform anyone as to the hazards. Click HERE for five short (18 min total) deposition testimony videos of KBR management putting their spin on why soldiers and civilians weren’t informed of the inherent health risks of this “yellow-orange” powder.

Gentry, even after being retired and diagnosed with cancer, led his soldiers with strength and dignity. He became an outspoken advocate demanding investigations and VA coverage for illnesses believed to have been caused by the toxic exposure.

Jo Frederiksen is a construction manager who worked with Gentry during his second tour in Iraq. She said,

“He was the consummate leader and professional who always put others first before himself.”

“Jim’s courage and selflessness continued even after he was diagnosed with a devastating disease and given a terminal prognosis.”

Because of Lt. Col. Gentry hundreds if not thousands of US National Guard soldiers from the states of Indiana, Oregon, West Virginia, British troops and US and Iraqi civilians are now aware of their potential exposure. Congressional Hearings have been held, Department of Defense Inspector General Investigations have been initiated. Lawsuits have been filed. Click HERE for everything I have on the sodium dichromate exposures at Qarmat Ali.

Senator Bayh (D-IN) said,

“I promised Lt. Col. Gentry I would use my position to get them the care they deserve and to make sure we protect our soldiers from preventable risks like this in the future.”

Frederiksen said,

“Jim came forward to speak out on behalf of the troops he commanded. … I hope that his country and its people will give Lt. Col. Gentry and his troops the honor and respect they deserve for their sacrifices, while serving our country with valor.”

My most sincere condolences to Lt. Col. Gentry’s family and friends, both in the private sector and military.

As for KBR, I would think in this case, they could be charged with treason. They knowingly exposed out soldiers to a chemical that is killing them.

Updated Nov 30, 2009 - The original article in the Times Mail stated that Lt. Col Gentry was not a part of the suit against KBR. He in fact did join the other litigants earlier this year after he saw more of the documentation and testimony about what KBR’s managers knew and when they knew it.

Ms Sparky

UPDATED Nov 30, 2009 Funeral Notice:

Lt. Col. James Gentry

52; Iraq War veteran

Funeral service for Lt. Col. James Gentry, 52, of Williams, will be at noon Tuesday, Dec. 1, at the Kraft Spring St. Chapel with burial with Full Military Honors in Pleasant Ridge Cemetery in Starlight.

He was retried from the Indiana Army National Guard after serving as commander of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry and two tours of duty in Iraq. He was a former resident of Indianapolis and was a native of Mitchell.

Survivors include his wife LouAnn Grube Gentry; children Sarah Clark (Will), of New Albany, Jason Newman, of Indianapolis, Emily Gentry, Bloomington, Jennafer Newman, of Santa Anna, Calif., Ellen Gentry, of Georgetown; parents George and Brenda Sue Gentry, of Mitchell; brother Sanford Gentry (Valerie) of Williams; and sister Carolyn Hodges (Franks), of Mitchell.

He was preceded in death by his brother Randy Gentry.

Visitation will be from 3 to 8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 30, at Kraft Funeral Service, New Albany.

Expressions of Sympathy can be made to Uplands Hospice, 1500 West Main St. P.O. Box No. 9, Mitchell, Ind., 47496.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Kahn has the guts to say what we’re all thinking!

free-passA Free Pass
By ROBERT KAHN
Courthouse News Service
November 13, 2009

While a religious pervert’s mass murder of GIs at Fort Hood dominated the news on Veterans Day, Courthouse News’ top story that day began like this:

“A Florida defense contractor put soldiers at risk and defrauded the government by producing hundreds of ‘bunker buster’ bomb fuzes it knew could explode unpredictably, ‘often shortly after the fuze was armed,’ federal prosecutors say.  Kaman Precision Products knew it was using bad parts, and charged taxpayers $2 million for it, according to the False Claims Act complaint.”

Here is how our story ended: “The military discovered the substitution and has spent $3 million in an ‘attempt to rework the defective fuzes to create usable ones,’ prosecutors say. The government wants a refund.”

Military prosecutors said they will seek the death penalty for Nidal Hasan, the religious pervert who killed 13 soldiers.

Good. I hope they kill him.

But why is no one facing jail time for selling dangerous bomb fuses to the U.S. Army?

The government spent $5 million on bomb fuses that could have blown dozens of aircraft out of the sky, and killed dozens of GIs, and the government wants a refund?

Is the government out of its mind?

Or is it – and by it I mean we – just so thoroughly corrupt and cowardly that war profiteers get a free pass?

There was not a word about Kaman Precision Products in The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, or even the Orlando Sentinel, where the company is based. I checked.

Why is that?

Every one of those newspapers had enough reporters to beat us to death with coverage of a family of morons who claimed their little boy had flown away in a balloon. But not a word on a war profiteer. Excuse me: an alleged war profiteer.

People who remember history – which seems to be me and a couple of other guys – may recall that Harry S Truman became famous when he led a Senate investigation of war profiteering during World War II.

This was during a war against enemies who were as powerful as we were.

Truman turned up corruption all over the country. It was small change compared to what goes unpunished today – a few thousand dollars here, a few lousy parts there.

But people were prosecuted. People went to jail.

In the past two weeks, three dozen class actions in three dozen states have accused Halliburton and KBR of exposing more than 100,000 GIs to poison in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention all the GIs Halliburton and KBR electrocuted from their cheap and incompetent wiring in Iraq. Or the women that Halliburton and its subcontractors drugged and gang raped in Iraq.

Why is no one in Halliburton facing the prospect of going to jail?

Why is Blackwater founder Erik Prince, the biggest bastard on Planet Earth, not being prosecuted? His mercenaries committed dozens of pointless murders in Iraq, occasionally when drunk or high, after which the company spirited them out of Iraq to avoid prosecution, according to at least a dozen civil lawsuits filed in U.S. courts.

After Blackwater’s mass murder of 17 Iraqis in 2007, Prince tried to bribe Iraqi officials with $1 million to let his gang of bastards stay in Iraq, The New York Times reported – on Veteran’s Day.

Why isn’t Prince facing jail time?

Why do private attorneys have to bring civil actions against these war profiteers? Why is the government not trying to put them in jail? What the hell are government prosecutors doing?

Well, here’s the top of another story Courthouse News printed on Veteran’s Day:

“Northwestern journalism students whose investigative work reignited a nationwide debate on the death penalty are being forced to defend themselves. Cook County prosecutors subpoenaed journalism professor David Protess, seeking his students’ grades, his syllabus and their private e-mails.”

That’s right; prosecutors are going after journalism students. Government prosecutors fear – fear? – that students in Professor Protess’ class might try to get good grades by claiming that people in prison are innocent. So the prosecutors subpoenaed the professor’s lesson plans and his grade book.

Maybe Professor Protess should change his students’ assignments. He should have them get drunk and kill strangers, and rip off the government, and make stuff that explodes when it’s not supposed to, and could kill GIs by the dozen.

Prosecutors would give the class a free pass. (click HERE for the original article)

I really love some of the stuff that The Courthouse News puts out. WELL DONE!!!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

KBR still owes at least $61M for improper billing

Hand ShakeKBR improperly billed for security guards, senator says

Bloomberg News
Nov. 11, 2009, 2:54PM

KBR, the largest contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan, improperly billed the Pentagon and was paid about $103 million for armed security guard services, a U.S. senator says.

In a Nov. 6 letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who chairs a contracting oversight panel, wrote that the Pentagon has recovered $42 million of the payments.

McCaskill said she was concerned the Defense Department “is not moving quickly enough to recover the remaining $61 million” and asked Gates for a status report by Dec. 1.
KBR officials have not seen the McCaskill letter but “the assertion KBR has engaged in ‘improper’ billings is false,” said company spokeswoman Heather Browne in an e-mail. “KBR has previously addressed billing issues and worked with the government to answer questions raised,” she said.

The billings were part of the Houston-based company’s $34 billion contract to provide housing, food, laundry, mail delivery and fuel. The Defense Contract Audit Agency first identified the billings in August 2007. McCaskill said the failure to recover all the money by now “raises questions about the sufficiency” of Pentagon efforts “to recover disapproved costs on other contracts.”

The Pentagon audit agency believes the entire amount should be repaid, because the contract specifically prohibits contractors billing the Pentagon for armed security guards, said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Darryn James, a Defense Contract Audit Agency spokesman.

“KBR billed the costs as part of the payments to subcontractors,” James said in an e-mail.

Army Sustainment Command spokesman Linda Theis said the private security costs “were embedded in subcontract costs and were not evident in the normal review of interim vouchers,” and the Army is continuing its efforts to recover the remaining $61 million.

KBR’s Browne said the company is contesting the $42 million in court and will fight paying back any additional funds. (click HERE for original article)

I have to add something in response to this statement: Army Sustainment Command spokesman Linda Theis said the private security costs “were embedded in subcontract costs and were not evident in the normal review of interim vouchers,”

Does anyone else think that KBR MIGHT have been just a snidge bit deceitful?? Or is it just me being too hard on poor little ole KBR!!!

As for the Army Sustainment Command, it would appear managing  KBR’s LOGCAP contract might be a little more than you can handle at this time. Why not subcontract that out to someone who doesn’t have a vested interest?

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

How KBR poisoned our troops-Toxic Tour of Duty: Part 2

The poisoning of our US troops and civilians at Qarmat Ali is a clear example of KBR’s total disregard for the safety of their employees and their client.- Ms Sparky

by Melissa Swan
Posted on November 2, 2009

Related links to this article

(WHAS11)–Russ Kimberling has nearly 2,000 images from Iraq on his computer.  They chronicle his duties there as a captain in the Indiana National Guard.

Kimberling now pours over the pictures wondering why he and other soldiers weren’t warned about a yellowish substance in thesand at Qarmat Ali, a water injection plant near Basrah.

Kimberling recently told me, “If it came up they would say don’t worry about it.  It’s a mild irritant.  It’s not a big deal.  You may get a bloody nose.  It’s not a problem.”

He says he got that “don’t worry” message from workers with KBR, an American contractor headquartered in Houston, Texas and at the time owned by Halliburton.

KBR was restoring Iraqi oil fields.   The guard members were protecting the private contractors.

Clinton Hammack is a retired National Guard soldier from Tell city who says he wasn’t too concerned about what he calls “dirty sand.”  He says “You know I didn’t worry about it.  I did what I was there to do – take care of the contractor.”

The yellow substance in the sand was later confirmed to be sodium dichromate.  The Environmental Protection Agency calls it a human carcinogen.

It was used as an anti-corrosive at the Qarmat Ali plant before the Americans arrived.  It may have been spread by Iraqis to sabotage the site at the beginning of the American invasion.

Currently 51 Southern Indiana National Guard members have filed a federal lawsuit against KBR claiming the company knew about the chemical and endangered the soldiers’ health.

Kimberling says one day in Iraq he realized the yellow substance might be more than a mild irritant.

He says, “I remember that day when we jumped out, jumped out of the vehicle.  I’m kicking the ground around.  I’m kicking the ground and everyone’s in chemical gear all protected but not me or any of the soldiers.”

He says the people in the protective gear were managers from KBR.  He remembers thinking at the time, “They know something we don’t and it can’t be good.

Mike Doyle the attorney for the National Guard Members who have filed suit says, “That’s what’s kind of frustrating about it.  You have these fellows they have every reason to expect if KBR knew — and they did — there was this poison they’ll tell them about it.”  (Link to original article)

Statements from KBR’s Director of Communications

Heather Browne, KBR’s Director of Communications on when the Company was told about Sodium dicromate at Qarmat Ali Water Injection Plant:

It is important to remember that to date the plaintiffs still show no signs of illness consistent with the long-term sodium dichromate exposure they allege. Medical reports by both the U.S. and British Military support this finding as well as findings from the plaintiff’s own doctors.

KBR engineers learned around June 1, 2003, that sodium dichromate was previously used at Qarmat Ali by the Iraqi state-owned Southern Oil Company.  The Southern Oil Company had used sodium dichromate as an anti-corrosive agent in the chemical injection process, but it was no longer being used and the water plant was not operational.  The June 21, 2003 memo attached to your email reflects KBR’s first awareness that the sodium dichromate used in the past may have contaminated some of the soil surrounding the plant.

As KBR’s efforts at the Qarmat Ali facility continued, it notified USACE about the potential contamination of the soil by sodium dichromate in late July 2003.  KBR subsequently worked with the military to conduct air and soil testing to confirm the presence and extent of the contamination.  Once contamination was confirmed, KBR received authorization from the military to commence remediation efforts, which it immediately began.

In addition, KBR initiated a medical surveillance program for its workers.  The U.S. military and the British military initiated a similar medical surveillance program for military personnel who had been at the plant.  The results were negative for signs and symptoms of exposure to sodium dichromate or hexavalent chromium.  Regardless, out of abundance of caution, the U.S. Army and KBR decided to discontinue all work at the plant pending additional air and soil testing.  The plant subsequent was closed and remained closed until mid-October 2003.

Statements from Attorney for Indiana National Guard members

Mike Doyle, Attorney for Indiana National Guard members in Federal Lawsuit:

“Having spent time recently with Jim Gentry and knowing what the VA has recently confirmed for the US Senate about the health affects of soldiers exposed to hexavalent chromium at KBR’s Qarmat Ali project, KBR’s claim of no ill health effects is contrary to the known facts.  KBR has been continually changing its story about what it knew and did about the dangerous chemicals present, and these most recent admissions only came when the previously concealed Kimbro memo was revealed during his testimony this month.  There is still no explanation, nor can there ever be, for KBR’s concealing of what it knew for months from Jim Gentry and our soldiers serving in Iraq.”  (Link to original article)

Click HERE for Part 1

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

How KBR poisoned our troops-Toxic Tour of Duty: Part 1

The poisoning of our US troops and civilians at Qarmat Ali is a clear example of KBR’s total disregard for the safety of their employees and their client.- Ms Sparky

by Melissa Swan
Posted on November 2, 2009

Related links to this article

(WHAS11)–Tell City, Indiana is the small Perry County seat.  It’s where a giant We Support the Troops banner hangs on the county courthouse and many a man here has served in the military.

It’s where I visited recently with Clinton Hammack who told me, ” I enjoyed being in the military or I wouldn’t have stayed and retired.”

Hammack reenlisted while he was in Iraq and while there he had a huge portrait of him and his wife painted from a photo he carried to war with him.

Lucas Whistle leaves just down the road from Hammack and agrees that military service was good for him.   He told me, “The military gave me a lot of opportunities that I would never get in just a regular life.”

Whistle has permanent reminders of his military days.  Tattooed on his chest are the initials U.S. and the sword of the infantry.     His son, three month old Tikelan is named for Lucas’s best army buddy.

Russ Kimberling, a newly remarried father of two was their captain in the 1-152 infantry battlion.   They were sent to Iraq in 2003 and assigned to Task Force RIO — Restore Iraqi Oil.

According to Hammack the National Guard Soldiers were basically like bodyguards for the American contractors paid to get the oil flowing again.   Hammack puts it like this, “Make sure I’m looking out over the horizon and they ain’t nobody on the roof start to shoot.”

The contractor, KBR, then owned by Halliburton is headquartered in Houston, Texas.  Everyday the soldiers rode out in non-descript white pickups and SUVs with the KBR contractors.

They traveled to the oil sites that were likely sabotaged by Iraqi forces just before the American invasion.  One of the work sites was a water injection facility in Qarmat Ali near the southern Iraqi town of Basrah.   The water from the injection plant was used to force oil out of the ground.

Now, Hammack, Whistle and Kimberling along with 48 other National Guard troops from Southern Indiana have filed a federal lawsuit again KBR.

They believe it wasn’t what was on the horizon that put them in the most danger it was what was on the ground at Qarmat Ali.

“Orange, I would say and it was all over the ground…saturated the ground, ” Kimberling says.  “There were ripped opened bags strewn all over the site …away from the building.

The soldiers would work in it all day, eat in it, the wind could be blowing on the food then they take it back to the sleeping quarters because it was all over their uniforms, boots so they really never got away from it.

Hammack says . ” It was kind of an orange, yellow color.”  And you can see it in a military document sent to the National Guard members in August of last year.

Now, six years later the soldiers know its name.    Sodium dichromate.  It’s toxic component is chromium hexivalent the same chemical at the center of the movie, Erin Brockovich.

The lawsuit claims KBR knew about the toxic chemical at Qarmet Ali and failed to warn the soldiers.   Mike Doyle the attorney for the Indiana guardsmen who have filed suit says the soldiers were getting nose bleeds, rashes and having difficulty breathing.

Kimberling says, “I didn’t have any issues until I hit that site.  When I hit the site I started having sinus problems, headaches, bloody noses and then I got a perforation in the left nostril of my nose.

When the ENT, he was looking in my nostril hit the light and you could see it inside my nose.”

Lucas Whistle also has mysterious rashes on his nose and congestion.

He told me, ” I get nose bleeds and usually when I get them ..they’re pretty bad..bad enough to where the towels and clothes I’m wearing we have to throw them away.  When I lay in there at bed at night and I get to coughing and I can’t breath.”

Clinton Hammack says, ” I do worry about it and I worry about what’s going to happen later on.”

But they believe they know what might be in store.    Dave Moore was from Dubois County and the 42 year old father of a little girl.   He died in 2008 from an inflammatory lung disease.

According to his attorney Mike Doyle,  Lt. Colonel Jim Gentry was a robust commander when he was in Iraq in 2003.   Now  at 52 years old he’s dying from lung cancer.

Last year while taping a deposition for the federal lawsuit, Gentry said, “We should have been told.”   Jim Gentry is currently undergoing radiation treatments in an Indianapolis hospital.

The National Guard soldiers who have filed suit against KBR say they have recently obtained a document that proves the company knew about the toxic chemical before the soldiers were told.

As for KBR, the corporation strongly denied the claims made by the National Guard members.   In part two of this report, see what KBR says about the orange substance at Qarmat Ali. (Link to original article)

Click HERE for Part 2

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Cornyn & Inouye BFF’s?

Politics make strange bed fellows but Cornyn and Inouye - Bipartisan Friends Forever?

cornyn-inouye-luv

Apparently Government Contracting is the last bastion for snake oil salesmen to ply their trade.  It appears that 30 Senators want to maintain this status quo, even if it means blocking victims of violent crime from seeking justice.  The mere fact that legislation had to be drafted to protect employees from companies, that do business with the US Government,  both in the US and overseas, is in itself reprehensible but the fact that elected officials voted against the amendment is even more disturbing.

Meanwhile the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight held a hearing, October 21, 2009 on “International Violence Against Women: Stories and Solutions.” How can we expect to lead this effort on a global scale when we cannot, or will not, protect our own citizens effectively?  It appears that our moral compass needs to be replaced or at the very least recalibrated.

While some  columnists seem to deem this as a partisan attack against 30 Senators, it is clearly a non-partisan guilt fest.  The list of elected officials and government organizations that have failed to act or follow through is long.  Here are a few:
Department of Defense
Department of State
Department of Justice
Former Senator now Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Here is a letter written by Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) providing his version of why he voted No on the Franken Amendment:

Distortion of the facts
Re: Oct. 19 letter “Where Cornyn stands.”
The letter omitted some important facts.
I opposed this amendment prompted by the Jamie Leigh Jones case for many of the same reasons the Obama administration did.
First, the rape allegations in the Halliburton case were not subject to arbitration (according to Jones v. Halliburton, U.S. district court), so citing them as the reason for passing the amendment in the defense appropriations bill is misleading.
Second, the amendment is a blatant attempt to benefit trial lawyers. It effectively bans defense contractors and subcontractors from entering arbitration agreements. Arbitration greatly reduces litigation costs for employers and employees while ensuring victims are fairly compensated by streamlining the litigation process and limiting lawyers’ fees.
I sympathize greatly with victims of rape and have voted repeatedly to increase sentences for the perpetrators of such heinous crimes.
Liberals have claimed senators who voted no are pro-rape. That is ludicrous. Attempts to manipulate the tragic events in the Halliburton case to line the pockets of the trial lawyers are disgusting.
U.S. Sen. John Cornyn
R-Texas  (Link to original)

Well, Senator Cornyn if this amendment is not a viable solution, what do you suggest?  First before you answer keep in mind that I will be weighing your response based on these facts:

  1. Your home state is Texas, which you were elected to represent and that includes Jamie Leigh Jones.
  2. It was fellow Texan and Congressman Ted Poe that initiated the rescue of Jamie Leigh Jones from Iraq, while both you and Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson remained silent and made no effort to assist in her rescue.  By the way rescuing a constituent from life threatening peril is not a spectator sport.
  3. Approximately 53% of the the registered voters in Texas are women.  The stats on how many you have alienated with this vote are not available yet.

Senator Cornyn, your letter also omitted some important facts about the Franken Amendment.  It explicitly bars contractors that force their employees into binding arbitration for cases of sexual violence, acts of violence and where the employees basic civil and human rights have been violated, it does not ban arbitration as a means for employers or  their employees to seek resolution to a dispute should both parties agree to arbitrate the issue.

In the spirit of Bipartisanship let’s take a look at Senator Dan Inouye.  In recent years, Inouye has become known for his ability to bring federal money to his home state, and he even declared himself “the No. 1 earmarks guy in the U.S. Congress” in August.

Inouye either will get the amendment taken out altogether, or water it down significantly. If they water it down, they will take out the Title VII claims. This means that in discrimination cases, they will still force you into a secret forced arbitration on KBR’s (or other contractors’) own terms — with your chances of prevailing practically zero. The House seems to be very supportive of the original Franken amendment and all in line, but their hands are tied since it originated in the Senate. And since Inouye runs the show on this bill, he can easily take it out to get Republicans and the defense contractors off his back, which looks increasingly likely. (Ms Sparky’s  Original Post)

Senator Inouye will be up for re-election during the 2010 mid-terms and this would be an excellent time to let him know how the public feels about giving corporations preference over the citizens of the US.

Updated - Is this a  conflict of interest?

Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii)
In October 1992, Republican Senate nominee Rick Reed began running a campaign commercial that included a surreptitiously taped interview with Lenore Kwock, Inouye’s hairdresser. Kwock said Inouye had sexually forced himself on her in 1975 and continued a pattern of sexual harassment, even as Kwock continued to cut his hair over the years. Inouye, seeking a sixth term, denied the charges. And Kwock said that by running the commercial, Reed had caused her more pain than Inouye had. Reed was forced to pull the ad, and while many voters took out their anger on the Republican, Inouye was held to 57 percent of the vote – the lowest total of his career. A week later, a female Democratic state legislator announced that she had heard from nine other women who claimed Inouye had sexually harassed them over the past decade. But the women didn’t go public with their claims, the local press didn’t pursue the story, and the Senate Ethics Committee decided to drop the investigation because the accusers wouldn’t participate in an inquiry.

Here is the contact information for both Senators.  Feel free to give them a call and inform them that they are public servants and dependant on the votes of their constituents who will not tolerate corporate puppets:

Senator John Cornyn: 202-224-2934

Senator Dan Inouye: 202-224-3934

 

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Hawaii Senator Inouye to water down Franken Amendment

Franken’s Anti-Rape Amendment May Be Stripped By Senior Dem, Sources Say

The Huffington Post – Sam Stein
October 22, 2009

hawaii-senatorAn amendment that would prevent the government from working with contractors who denied victims of assault the right to bring their case to court is in danger of being watered down or stripped entirely from a larger defense appropriations bill.

Multiple sources have told the Huffington Post that Sen. Dan Inouye, a longtime Democrat from Hawaii, is considering removing or altering the provision, which was offered by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and passed by the Senate several weeks ago.

Inouye’s office, sources say, has been lobbied by defense contractors adamant that the language of the Franken amendment would leave them overly exposed to lawsuits and at constant risk of having contracts dry up. The Senate is considering taking out a provision known as the Title VII claim, which (if removed) would allow victims of assault or rape to bring suit against the individual perpetrator but not the contractor who employed him or her.

“The defense contractors have been storming his office,” said a source with knowledge of the situation. “Inouye either will get the amendment taken out altogether, or water it down significantly. If they water it down, they will take out the Title VII claims. This means that in discrimination cases, they will still force you into a secret forced arbitration on KBR’s (or other contractors’) own terms — with your chances of prevailing practically zero. The House seems to be very supportive of the original Franken amendment and all in line, but their hands are tied since it originated in the Senate. And since Inouye runs the show on this bill, he can easily take it out to get Republicans and the defense contractors off his back, which looks increasingly likely.”

A Democratic aide on the Hill, also with knowledge of the situation, confirmed the account, as did a source who works on defense contracting matters outside of Congress. “The contractors are putting on a full-court press on this amendment… they are all doing it,” said the latter source.

A spokesman for the Senate Committee on Appropriations said that “the committee does not comment on ongoing conference negotiations.” But another source with knowledge of the situation stressed that it was premature to say that any decision has been made. Indeed, even the Hill source said that the situation is fluid and could change before the bill is sent out of committee — likely in the next few days.

The decision on what to do with Franken’s amendment is being made in conference committee with the House of Representatives, which severely limits the number of lawmakers who can weigh in on the matter.

The second-longest-serving member of the United States Senate, Inouye is a veteran of WWII. The chairman of the Committee on Appropriations, he has received $294,900 in donations from the defense and aerospace industries over the course of his career, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Franken’s amendment passed the Senate on October 21, 2009 by a voting margin of 68 to 30. The 30 Republicans who opposed the provision were widely pilloried in the press. But they were actually joined in some of their concerns by the Obama administration’s Department of Defense, which worried that “enforcement would be problematic, especially in cases where privity of contract does not exist between parties within the supply chain that supports a contract.”

The White House, for its part, told HuffPost it supports the intent of the amendment and it is “working with the conferees to make sure that it is enforceable,” said spokesman Tommy Vietor. (click HERE for the original article)

I strongly urge everyone to contact not only your Senators office but the office of Senator Inouye’s in DC and Hawaii. If you can’t get through on the phone, send a fax. Let it be known he is not only speaking for Hawaiians here. He is speaking for EVERYONE!! I would hate to see him joined the list of 30 republican’s who initially voted NO on the Franken Amendment.

Senator Inouye’s contact information

Washington D.C.
722 Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-1102
Phone: 202-224-3934
Fax: 202-224-6747

Honolulu
300 Ala Moana Boulevard
Room 7-212
Honolulu, Hawaii 96850-4975
Phone: 808-541-2542
Fax: 808-541-2549

Hilo
101 Aupuni Street, #205
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Phone: 808-935-0844
Fax: 808-961-5163

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

DoD Opposes Franken’s Anti-Rape Amendment

It would appear the Pentagon wants US civilian contractors to risk their lives to support our US soldiers. But in return the Pentagon doesn’t want to support our US civilians. This was made clear when the Pentagon opposed the Al Franken Anti-Rape Amendment!

“The DoD opposes the proposed amendment,” reads a message sent from the White House to the Senate on October 6, the day the amendment passed by a 68-30 vote.

“The Department of Defense, the prime contractor, and higher tier subcontractors may not be in a position to know about such things. Enforcement would be problematic, especially in cases where privity of contract does not exist between parties within the supply chain that supports a contract,” reads the DoD note. “It may be more effective to seek a statutory prohibition of all such arrangements in any business transaction entered into within the jurisdiction of the United States, if these arrangements are deemed to pose an unacceptable method of recourse.”

A White House spokesman said that the DoD opposition is overstated in the message sent to Congress. “We support the intent of the amendment, and we’re working with the conferees to make sure that it is enforceable,” said spokesman Tommy Vietor when asked about the DoD statement.

Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) both provided statement to the Sun News in Macon.

“This would be a major, fundamental change in U.S. labor law and I believe it would be very detrimental to employees to eliminate arbitration as an option,” Isakson said. According the The Huffington Post, this statement inaccurately portrays Franken’s amendment: Employees would still be able to elect to use arbitration; they simply wouldn’t be forced into it.

Chambliss added, also inaccurately according to HP: “If that happens, these employees’ only recourse will be to litigate suits in court, which is a very lengthy, expensive and time-consuming process.” (click HERE to read this entire article at The Huffington Post)

There is not doubt in my mind the Pentagon opposes this Amendment. I’m sure they fear having their dirty laundry aired in a public court! They would love to see it all kept behind closed doors.

You can watch the following Franken Amedment videos below

Al Franken on the Franken Amendment click HERE

Jon Stewart on the Franken Amendment (Rape Nuts) click HERE

Al Franken and KBR Arbitration Attorney de Bernardo click HERE

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR’s ads on the DC Metro

dc-metro-kbr-ad

I would love to get a better photo of this KBR ad on the DC Metro…. OK all my DC readers…hint hint!

Before I start slamming KBR in typical “Ms Sparky” style, I just want to clarify I know there are a lot of qualified hard working good people working for KBR in Iraq and Afghanistan TRYING to support our troops the best they can. The problem is they are being led by unqualified, short sighted idiots. With that in mind let the slamming begin.

I find it interesting that KBR is advertising in Washington DC. Are they finding the customer is a little miffed with them?? Are KBR and the DoD on the outs…..one can only hope!

Here’s what I can read on this sign…..that’s why I need a better photo.

Wherever your mission takes you….

Step 2,??? Fresh Linens

Step 2,082 (?) Clean Clothes

Step 2,??? Hot Meal

Step ?,??? Clean Water

(Then there are two I can’t read at all)

We are with you every step of the way.

KBR

Let’s start with clean water. Are you talking about the water contaminated with micro-organisms or the water contaminated by chemicals like Camp Kalsu.

Are you talking about the poorly constructed and maintain housing and AB units?

Are you talking about the electrified showers? Or the water heaters that blow up?

Are you talking about the burn pit exposures? Or the chemical exposures like Qarmat Ali?

Are you talking about the over charging? Are you talking about the serious abusing of your own employees?

There just might be some soldiers out there who are thinking it’s not such a good idea to have KBR with them “every step of the way”.

KBR….the end does not justify the means. You can’t just do what you want and then chalk it up to “it’s a war zone”! Our soldiers deserve better than that!

I hope you are not charging the US taxpayers for this ad campaign!!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: