What happened to KBR’s Bill Walter and Michael Hatch?

Last weekend I got my first hint there was something amiss at KBR Headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. (we all know there is something amiss with KBR…..I mean something specific!)  I was told that allegedly Mr. William “Bill” Walter and Mr. Michael Hatch were no longer employed by KBR. I have been told they were “fired” and also I have been told they “resigned”.

On top of that there are the “not so insignificant” number hits I am getting from internet search engines like this one below:

Fort Belvoir, Virginia arrived from google.com on “» DFAC” by searching for Bill Walter & KBR & Fired. 14:55:46 — (this one was from 03/05/2010)

William (Bill) Walter – Some internet references refer to Mr. Walter as Senior Vice President for Government Compliance. Others refer to Mr. Walter as Director of Government Compliance for KBR’s Government Operations unit. Either way, according the Halliburton/KBR’s site Mr. Walter has overall responsibility for all U.S. government compliance functions, including Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audits and government interface, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) compliance, cost accounting standards, pricing compliance, training and compliance policy. Mr. Walter has more than 15 years as a leading defense industry compliance consultant.

You may remember Mr. Walter from his recent appearances on KBR’s behalf before the esteemed members of the Commission on Wartime Contracting. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Judge dismisses Indiana soldiers’ Iraq suit

By Jon Murray – Posted: February 25, 2010
IndyStar.com

LTC James C. Gentry in Baghdad died of cancer in November 2009 after exposure to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali

A federal judge today dismissed a lawsuit accusing a large defense contractor of concealing the risks faced by nearly 140 Indiana National Guard soldiers potentially exposed to a cancer-causing agent in Iraq.

The ruling did not address any of the claims in the lawsuit, which could still be pursued elsewhere by the attorneys for the 47 Indiana Guard soldiers serving as plaintiffs. Chief Judge Richard L. Young ruled that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana lacks “personal jurisdiction” over Texas-based KBR and several related companies.
Advertisement

The dismissal was based in part on a finding that the actions at issue in the suit took place outside Indiana even if the health effects are only being felt now. And the KBR companies’ limited contacts in Indiana — they have no offices here but have held contracts in Indiana — amount to an insufficient business footprint.

Mike Doyle, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, said the legal team plans to file a new version of the lawsuit in another jurisdiction as soon as possible, but he did not specify where. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Senator Wyden fights for Oregon vets exposed at Qarmat Ali in Iraq

Veterans exposed to hexavalent chromium deserve lifelong health care and Purple Hearts, Sen. Ron Wyden says
By Julie Sullivan, The Oregonian
February 18, 2010, 8:45PM

U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden watches as Larry Roberta, an Oregon veteran who suffers breathing and stomach problems from exposure to hexavalent chromium, coughs during a news conference in Portland. "There was no way to get away from it,'' Roberta said. "Our job was to watch KBR's back and make sure they were OK." (the Oregonian)

Veterans exposed to cancer-causing hexavalent chromium in Iraq — including nearly 300 Oregon soldiers — should be treated as if they’d hit a roadside bomb and receive lifelong medical care and Purple Hearts, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden said Thursday.

Ten Oregon Army National Guard veterans who were exposed to the chemical while protecting war contractor KBR’s employees stood with the Oregon Democrat a news conference to acknowledge their “invisible wounds” and to hold the contractor accountable. When one veteran began to cough violently and struggled for breath at the podium, Wyden’s alarm turned to outrage.

“Precautions should have been taken and they were not, that is inexcusable,” Wyden said. “That soldiers have become critically ill and suffer respiratory diseases and skin rashes that, again, is inexcusable.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR asks judge to throw out Oregon soldiers suit

Photo from Oregon National Guard Website

February 08, 2010

Lawyers for the war contractor Kellogg, Brown & Root on Monday asked a federal judge to dismiss an Oregon Army National Guard soldiers’ lawsuit against it, saying the court in Oregon lacks jurisdiction.

The challenge before U.S. District Judge Paul Papak in Portland is being watched closely in Indiana and West Virginia where National Guard soldiers have also sued KBR, Inc. The Houston-based holding company and its four subsidiaries won contracts to restore oil production after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. National Guard troops were ordered to guard KBR employees as they raced to get the oil flowing. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Iraq chemical exposure lawsuit against KBR goes global

British veteran joins W.Va. National Guard lawsuit

By Andrew Clevenger – February 4, 2010
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A retired sergeant of the Royal Air Force has joined members of the West Virginia National Guard in a lawsuit alleging that they were exposed to a toxic chemical by a government contractor in Iraq in 2003, becoming the first British veteran to sue over the exposure.

In an amended complaint filed Thursday in federal court in West Virginia’s Northern District, Andrew M. Tosh, 44, of Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, maintains that officials with KBR Inc. knew about dangerous levels of sodium dichromate, a potent carcinogen, at the Qarmat Ali water-treatment plant months before they informed American and British troops guarding the facility. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Death & Denial – The KBR legacy lives on

Soldiers Fight in the Courts Over Liability in War Zones

By DIONNE SEARCEY – JANUARY 7, 2010

LTC James C. Gentry Indiana National Guard Commander died November 26, 2009 of exposure to sodium dichromate from Qarmat Ali

A recent lawsuit brought by a group of Indiana National Guardsman spotlights a controversial legal doctrine that prevents soldiers on active duty from seeking compensation for injuries sustained in war zones.

The guardsman allege that a mission to help clean up a water treatment plant in southern Iraq left them with what they say are potentially fatal illnesses.

In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Indiana, the Guardsmen allege that oil company KBR Inc. “disregarded and downplayed” the fact that the site at Qarmat Ali was coated with the hazardous chemical sodium dichromate. They were exposed, they say, to the chemical that is used as an industrial anti-corrosive agent to protect pipes.

As a result, the soldiers suffered “unprotected, unknowing, direct exposure to one of the most potent carcinogens and mutagenic substances known to man,” alleges the suit, which seeks monetary compensation for health problems the soldiers say they have suffered. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR knowingly exposes soldiers and employees to toxic poison (NBC video)

Lt. Col. James “Jim” Gentry dies at age 52

Lieutenant Colonel James Gentry, Indiana National Guard

Lieutenant Colonel James Gentry, Indiana National Guard

(See Funeral Notice update below)

Sadly, I have learned Lt. Col James “Jim” Gentry has lost his battle with cancer and has died in Indiana at the young age of 52. Gentry was diagnosed with cancer in 2006. A cancer he felt was caused by his exposure to the deadly carcinogen known as sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali water plant in Southern Iraq in 2003.

A retired Indiana National Guard lieutenant colonel, Gentry was the commander of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry, which, at about 600 soldiers strong, was in Iraq from February 2003 to February 2004.

This Indian National Guard unit was responsible for protecting US civilians working for KBR at the Qarmat Ali water plant in Southern Iraq. Returning this water plant to full operation was essential to restoring Iraqi oil production and KBR had the contract to do that.

Unfortunately, upon retreat, Saddam loyalists sabotaged the plant by cutting open bags of sodium dichromate, a yellow-orange powered rust inhibitor, and spread it everywhere. Not being informed by KBR management what this powder was, soldiers and civilians alike took few precautions to protect themselves.  People started experiencing symptoms of chronic nose bleeds, headaches, skins lesions. Even after countless complaints KBR did not test the substance and inform anyone as to the hazards. Click HERE for five short (18 min total) deposition testimony videos of KBR management putting their spin on why soldiers and civilians weren’t informed of the inherent health risks of this “yellow-orange” powder.

Gentry, even after being retired and diagnosed with cancer, led his soldiers with strength and dignity. He became an outspoken advocate demanding investigations and VA coverage for illnesses believed to have been caused by the toxic exposure.

Jo Frederiksen is a construction manager who worked with Gentry during his second tour in Iraq. She said,

“He was the consummate leader and professional who always put others first before himself.”

“Jim’s courage and selflessness continued even after he was diagnosed with a devastating disease and given a terminal prognosis.”

Because of Lt. Col. Gentry hundreds if not thousands of US National Guard soldiers from the states of Indiana, Oregon, West Virginia, British troops and US and Iraqi civilians are now aware of their potential exposure. Congressional Hearings have been held, Department of Defense Inspector General Investigations have been initiated. Lawsuits have been filed. Click HERE for everything I have on the sodium dichromate exposures at Qarmat Ali.

Senator Bayh (D-IN) said,

“I promised Lt. Col. Gentry I would use my position to get them the care they deserve and to make sure we protect our soldiers from preventable risks like this in the future.”

Frederiksen said,

“Jim came forward to speak out on behalf of the troops he commanded. … I hope that his country and its people will give Lt. Col. Gentry and his troops the honor and respect they deserve for their sacrifices, while serving our country with valor.”

My most sincere condolences to Lt. Col. Gentry’s family and friends, both in the private sector and military.

As for KBR, I would think in this case, they could be charged with treason. They knowingly exposed out soldiers to a chemical that is killing them.

Updated Nov 30, 2009 - The original article in the Times Mail stated that Lt. Col Gentry was not a part of the suit against KBR. He in fact did join the other litigants earlier this year after he saw more of the documentation and testimony about what KBR’s managers knew and when they knew it.

Ms Sparky

UPDATED Nov 30, 2009 Funeral Notice:

Lt. Col. James Gentry

52; Iraq War veteran

Funeral service for Lt. Col. James Gentry, 52, of Williams, will be at noon Tuesday, Dec. 1, at the Kraft Spring St. Chapel with burial with Full Military Honors in Pleasant Ridge Cemetery in Starlight.

He was retried from the Indiana Army National Guard after serving as commander of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry and two tours of duty in Iraq. He was a former resident of Indianapolis and was a native of Mitchell.

Survivors include his wife LouAnn Grube Gentry; children Sarah Clark (Will), of New Albany, Jason Newman, of Indianapolis, Emily Gentry, Bloomington, Jennafer Newman, of Santa Anna, Calif., Ellen Gentry, of Georgetown; parents George and Brenda Sue Gentry, of Mitchell; brother Sanford Gentry (Valerie) of Williams; and sister Carolyn Hodges (Franks), of Mitchell.

He was preceded in death by his brother Randy Gentry.

Visitation will be from 3 to 8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 30, at Kraft Funeral Service, New Albany.

Expressions of Sympathy can be made to Uplands Hospice, 1500 West Main St. P.O. Box No. 9, Mitchell, Ind., 47496.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Bill Bodie in the KBR litter box…..again!

william-c-bodieIn typical Bill Bodie style…..he issued ANOTHER whiny editorial to a newspaper in the jurisdiction and might I add jury pool of the West Virginia National Guard. The same National Guardsman who have filed suit against KBR for knowingly exposing them to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali in Iraq in 2003. Bodie pulled this same shit in Pittsburgh when he sent an editorial about how KBR was not responsible for the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth. (click HERE) He has to send editorials because the main stream media doesn’t take KBR statement seriously. Bodie wasn’t even working for KBR when this happened. He didn’t start working for KBR until March of 2005. So anything he has to say is hearsay at best. Just another pathetic attempt by Bodie to cover up KBR shit in the KBR litter box. He is turning in to quite the KBR “bobble head” doll. Maybe KBR could market Bill Bodie and Heather Browne as a set!! I guess I am going to have to add a new post category called “Bodie’s Bull Shit” or “More Mindless Drivel” I haven’t decided.

William C. Bodie: KBR handled Iraq site (Qarmat Ali) safely

October 16, 2009

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — As the old saying goes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. Recent media coverage on lawsuits filed against KBR alleging military personnel were sickened because of long-term exposure to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali, an Iraqi water treatment plant, has been so erroneous that it is time to set the record straight.

It is important to understand that the chemical in question — sodium dichromate, which is used as an anti-corrosive agent in industrial enterprises, was left behind at the Qarmat Ali plant by Iraqi staff upon vacating the site in the wake of Saddam Hussein’s overthrow in 2003. No remedial action was taken to clean up the site prior to KBR’s arrival in support of U.S. forces. KBR was not hired to do an environmental assessment of the facility and was told the site was free of environment hazards prior to starting work.

One erroneous assertion is that KBR discovered the presence of sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali and took no precautionary action. In fact, immediately after we became aware of potential contamination from sodium dichromate in the plant, KBR began working with the military to conduct air and soil testing at the site and posted signs in English and Arabic to advise of the presence of the chemical. In October 2003, The U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine issued a report noting that KBR effectively minimized exposure at the site.

Moreover, the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine conducted extensive testing on military personnel who were stationed at the site to determine any exposure levels. The testing showed that no troops were harmed and that they were unlikely to develop future injury from any limited exposure they received while in Iraq.
The results were further reviewed and confirmed by the Defense Health Board of the Department of Defense. The British military reached similar conclusions regarding their own troops. KBR’s testing also found no measurable exposure and no indication of injury. The troops were on the site an average of 18 days, and the scientific literature indicates that this amount of exposure is insufficient to cause long-term health effects. There is no evidence linking any injury to chemical exposure at the water treatment facility.

KBR remains committed to a fact-based dialogue on this issue. We will also continue our historic practice of working fully and cooperatively with the government on this matter.

Since 2003, KBR has supported the U.S. military in Iraq, providing life-support services such as meals and laundry and mail service to our troops. KBR remains proud of the work it performs and we intend to continue our vigorous defense on this issue, on behalf of the more than 50,000 dedicated employees who work tirelessly for KBR in Iraq and Afghanistan at great sacrifice to themselves and their families.

Bodie is president of KBR’s North American Government and Defense Unit.(Link to original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

No Conractor Left Behind Part IV: Congress’s Powerless Probe

No Contractor Left Behind is a series by DC Bureau.org chronicling how a toxic time bomb followed three Army National Guard units home from Iraq. It reveals how a notorious military contractor (KBR) exposed American soldiers to a cancer-causing carcinogen on the battlefield and how the Pentagon tried to downplay the consequences. And it describes how Congress has relegated its investigation to a toothless forum that lacks the political clout and oversight powers to ensure effective accountability.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part I: KBR, the Pentagon and the Soldiers Who Paid – October 5, 2009
The first of a multi-part account of how KBR management knowingly exposed not only their own employees but hundreds of US Army National Guard troops, British Soldiers and local Iraqi citizens to to the toxic carcinogen known as sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali in southern Iraq.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part II: KBR’s Negligence - October 7, 2009

In 2003, as part of project RIO, U.S. soldiers would accompany contractors into Iraq from Kuwait as they assessed southern oil sites, including Qarmat Ali. Their orders forbade them from leaving KBR personnel alone at any time. Even when they were working, soldiers had to remain an arm’s length away—which not only exposed them to whatever chemical elements the contractors uncovered during their work, it allowed KBR managers ample time to notify them of any potential health risks.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part III: “Just Suck It Up and Move On” – October 9, 2009

Military Exposure Guidelines permissible exposure limit for chromium: 5,700 parts per million.

Chromium soil concentrations found by KBR samples at Qarmat Ali on August 7, 2003: 16,459 parts per million.

Like KBR, the military failed to look after its own at Qarmat Ali.

“Unfortunately,” Sgt. Russell Powell said in Congressional testimony, “many of the soldiers who served at Qarmat Ali are paying the consequences for the Army’s failure to warn and protect the troops.”

At the treatment plant, as soldiers expressed concerns about sodium dichromate, the military brass remained taciturn and downplayed the danger posed by the chemical. Once the toxic conditions at Qarmat Ali were revealed, the Army relied on a questionable and surreptitiously administered medical test to fend off claims of a hazard, and used the results to deny health care for exposed veterans.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part IV: Congress’s Powerless Probe – October 13, 2009

“When you have contractors that have demonstrated that they have fleeced the government agency or the taxpayer, I don’t think there should be a slap on the wrist or a pat on the back. They should be debarred. …This is the most significant waste and fraud in the history of our country. It’s not even close.”  Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND)

Thank God for Senator Dorgan and the Senate Democratic Policy Committee. If they had not investigated this and brought it to the attention of the DoD and media, how many soldiers would be dying and not know why?

Ms Sparky


  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

No Contractor Left Behind Part III: “Just Suck It Up and Move On”

No Contractor Left Behind is a series by DC Bureau.org chronicling how a toxic time bomb followed three Army National Guard units home from Iraq. It reveals how a notorious military contractor (KBR) exposed American soldiers to a cancer-causing carcinogen on the battlefield and how the Pentagon tried to downplay the consequences. And it describes how Congress has relegated its investigation to a toothless forum that lacks the political clout and oversight powers to ensure effective accountability.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part I: KBR, the Pentagon and the Soldiers Who Paid – October 5, 2009
The first of a multi-part account of how KBR management knowingly exposed not only their own employees but hundreds of US Army National Guard troops, British Soldiers and local Iraqi citizens to to the toxic carcinogen known as sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali in southern Iraq.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part II: KBR’s Negligence - October 7, 2009

In 2003, as part of project RIO, U.S. soldiers would accompany contractors into Iraq from Kuwait as they assessed southern oil sites, including Qarmat Ali. Their orders forbade them from leaving KBR personnel alone at any time. Even when they were working, soldiers had to remain an arm’s length away—which not only exposed them to whatever chemical elements the contractors uncovered during their work, it allowed KBR managers ample time to notify them of any potential health risks.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part III: “Just Suck It Up and Move On” – October 9, 2009

Military Exposure Guidelines permissible exposure limit for chromium: 5,700 parts per million.

Chromium soil concentrations found by KBR samples at Qarmat Ali on August 7, 2003: 16,459 parts per million.

Like KBR, the military failed to look after its own at Qarmat Ali.

“Unfortunately,” Sgt. Russell Powell said in Congressional testimony, “many of the soldiers who served at Qarmat Ali are paying the consequences for the Army’s failure to warn and protect the troops.”

At the treatment plant, as soldiers expressed concerns about sodium dichromate, the military brass remained taciturn and downplayed the danger posed by the chemical. Once the toxic conditions at Qarmat Ali were revealed, the Army relied on a questionable and surreptitiously administered medical test to fend off claims of a hazard, and used the results to deny health care for exposed veterans.


  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR managers at their worst

In Feb 2003, KBR was awarded a $7 billion no-bid contract in Iraq called Restore Iraqi Oil (RIO). In short…the contract was for putting out oil well fires and getting the oil fields back to production. Because water was used to pressurize the wells, part of the contract included restoring water to the oil fields. Water that was normally pumped through the Qarmat Ali water plant near Basra in Southern Iraq. This plant had been chemically sabotaged by Saddam loyalists and was in need of repairs before water could flow. It was at this water plant that 100’s of US National Guard soldiers, British soldiers, US civilians and Iraqi civilians were exposed to toxic levels of sodium dichromate. Sodium dichromate is a well known carcinogen and it’s dangers were brought to the public’s attention in the movie Erin Brockovich.

Many US Army National Guard soldiers have already died and others suffer from a myriad of conditions from what is believed to be exposure to toxic levels of sodium dichromate. US Soldiers testified before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee in August that the orange dust was everywhere. They ate it in their food, drank it in their water and slept in it. In some places it was reported to be “feet” thick. The remaining unopened bags (which were labeled in Arabic) were used as sandbags for bunkers and protection.

When KBR’s own Safety Coordinator  Ed Blacke, who also testified at a Senate DPC hearing in June 2008, requested information on the red/orange substance, he was told by his own HSE Manager “it is a non-issue”. Even though soldiers and civilians were experiencing symptoms consistent with sodium dichromate exposure. Soon after he was terminated for pressing the issue.

In the last year there have been numerous law suits filed against KBR by US Army National Guard soldiers from several states for knowingly exposing them to sodium dichromate. KBR employees can not sue KBR for not providing them when a safe work environment.  They are held to secret binding arbitration.  Below are clips from sworn depositions of five key witnesses in the chemical exposures. Please pay close attention the testimony of the KBR Operations and Safety Managers.  Unbelievable arrogance and what I believe to be negligence.

Below is a portion of the sworn deposition of Johnny Morney KBR Health Safety & Environmental Manager at Qarmat Ali in 2003. (3:01) Click HERE to watch it on YouTube. This is just unbelievable ignorance!

Below is a portion of the sworn deposition of Doug Fletcher KBR General Program (Operations) Manager in Iraq (2:26) Click HERE to watch it on YouTube. Mr. Fletcher is just not sure if he had a “meeting” about the hazards of sodium dichromate with his employees or not.

Below is a portion of the sworn deposition of Charles “Chuck” Adams KBR Health Safety & Environmental (HSE) Manager for Iraq in 2003 (4:11) Click HERE to watch it on YouTube. How many HSE managers would be allowed to get away with this in the States?

Below is a portion of the sworn deposition of Dr. Sudhir Desai KBR Industrial Hygienist (3:52) Click HERE to watch it on YouTube

Below is a portion of the sworn deposition of Dr. Robert Conte, KBR Medical Director (4:34) Click HERE to watch it on YouTube

I can’t even think of anything else to say except “what the hell!” And we wonder why KBR is having problems on LOGCAP. Why they are electrocuting people. Making contaminated water. Exposing people to dangerous toxins. Either they are just plain stupid or just don’t care or both! Regardless, murder charges need to be filed for those who have died and assault or attempted murder for those who are still suffering from this negligence. AT THE VERY LEAST…TREASON!

Am I being to hard on these losers? And don’t even try to use the “it’s a war zone” excuse. That’s BS!

Just before I hit the “publish” button this came out from the Associate Press. click HERE

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

No Contractor Left Behind Part II: KBR’s Negligence

No Contractor Left Behind is a series by DC Bureau.org chronicling how a toxic time bomb followed three Army National Guard units home from Iraq. It reveals how a notorious military contractor (KBR) exposed American soldiers to a cancer-causing carcinogen on the battlefield and how the Pentagon tried to downplay the consequences. And it describes how Congress has relegated its investigation to a toothless forum that lacks the political clout and oversight powers to ensure effective accountability.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part I: KBR, the Pentagon and the Soldiers Who Paid – October 5, 2009
The first of a multi-part account of how KBR management knowingly exposed not only their own employees but hundreds of US Army National Guard troops, British Soldiers and local Iraqi citizens to to the toxic carcinogen known as sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali in southern Iraq.

Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part II: KBR’s Negligence - October 7, 2009
In this report on Qarmat Ali you will watch video taped deposition testimony from KBR management. Watch how the KBR Safety Manager blames the KBR employees for not reporting the existence of a chemical that they had no idea was even on site. This is a classic example of KBR management at it’s finest. If I didn’t know better I would swear he was my safety manager in Iraq!

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Contractors in Iraq are hidden casualties of war

Another awesome article by T. Christian Miller and Propublica – This could have been anyone of us.

By ProPublica
Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 — 7:57 am
By T. Christian Miller

In April 2004, Reggie Lane was driving a fuel truck in Iraq for a defense contractor when insurgents attacked his convoy with rocket-propelled grenades, causing him numerous injuries. For most of the five years since, Lane, now 60, has spent his days in silence, cared for at the Country Gardens Adult Foster Care in Central Point, Ore. (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times)

In April 2004, Reggie Lane was driving a fuel truck in Iraq for a defense contractor when insurgents attacked his convoy with rocket-propelled grenades, causing him numerous injuries. For most of the five years since, Lane, now 60, has spent his days in silence, cared for at the Country Gardens Adult Foster Care in Central Point, Ore. (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times)

A nurse rocked him awake as pale dawn light crept into the room. “C’mon now, c’mon,” the nurse murmured. “Time to get up.”

Reggie Lane was once a hulking man of 260 pounds. Friends called him “Big Dad.” Now, he weighed less than 200 pounds and his brain was severely damaged. He groaned angry, wordless cries.

The nurse moved fast. Two bursts of deodorant spray under each useless arm. Then he dressed Lane and used a mechanical arm to hoist him into a wheelchair.

He wheeled Big Dad down a hallway and parked the chair in a beige dining room, in front of a picture window. Outside stretched a green valley of pear trees filled with white blossoms.

Lane’s head fell forward, his chin buried in his chest. His legs crossed and uncrossed involuntarily. His left index finger was rigid and pointed, as if frozen in permanent accusation.

In 2004, Lane was driving a fuel truck in Iraq for a defense contractor when insurgents attacked his convoy with rocket-propelled grenades. For most of the five years since, Lane, now 60, has spent his days in silence — a reminder of the hidden costs of relying on civilian contract workers to support the U.S. war effort.

His wife, Linda, said visiting her husband was difficult. They were childhood friends and fiercely loyal to each other. On this spring morning, she caressed his hand and told him she loved him.

“He was a good man. He paid his bills. He took care of his family,” she said, her breathing labored from a pulmonary disease. “He’s a human being who fought for his country. He doesn’t deserve to be thrown away.”

In Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military has depended on contract workers more than in any previous conflict — to cook meals for troops, wash laundry, deliver supplies and protect diplomats, among other tasks. Tens of thousands of civilians have worked in the two battle zones, often facing the same dangers as U.S. troops and suffering the same kinds of injuries.

Contract workers from the U.S. have been mostly men, primarily middle-aged, many of them military veterans drawn by money, patriotism or both, according to interviews and public records. They are police officers, truck drivers, firefighters, mechanics and craftsmen, mostly from rural corners of America, especially the South.

Nearly 1,600 civilian workers — both Americans and foreign nationals — have died in the two war zones. Thousands more have been injured. (More than 5,200 U.S. service members have been killed and 35,000 wounded.)

Many of the civilians have come home as military veterans in all but name, sometimes with lifelong disabilities but without the support network available to returning troops.

There are no veterans’ halls for civilian workers, no Gold Star Wives, no military hospitals. Politicians pay little attention to their problems, and the military has not publicized their contributions.

“These guys are like the Vietnam vets of this generation,” said Lee Frederiksen, a psychologist who worked for Mission Critical Psychological Services, a Chicago-based firm that provides counseling for war zone workers. “The normal support that you would get if you were injured in the line of duty as a police officer or if you were injured in the military . . . just doesn’t exist.”

Herbert J. Lanese, former chief executive of DynCorp International, one of the largest employers of civilian workers in Iraq and Afghanistan, said: “These are people who have given their lives in the service of our country. They are the unappreciated patriots of our country at this point in time.”

Lane was born in Ventura and moved to Grants Pass, Ore., when he turned 12. He met Linda there, and the two grew up together.

After high school, Reggie enlisted in the Army and went to Vietnam. He and Linda found each other after he returned. By then, each had been married and divorced, and each had a child.

As a pair, they were inseparable. Reggie was steady, strong. Linda was energetic and outgoing. They eventually found work as a truck-driving team, steering tractor-trailers across the country.

His CB radio handle was “Grizzly.” Hers was “Wild Cat.” He loved country music and Tom Clancy novels, G. Gordon Liddy’s talk show and Honda motorcycles. She loved the open road, the speed of the truck.

“We went to see the big wide world driving a truck. What an adventure,” Linda recalled.

But work was haphazard, and the pay was modest. Together, they made about $32,000 a year. They had a hard time keeping up with bills and twice filed for bankruptcy.

In the late 1990s, they sold their home in Oregon and moved to Montana, where land was cheaper.

In the fall of 2003, Linda heard that defense contractor KBR Inc. was hiring truck drivers to deliver fuel, food and supplies for the military in Iraq. The salary was $88,000 a year, more than they had ever earned.

“We wouldn’t be on easy street,” Linda said. “But we wouldn’t be stressed.”

By November, Reggie was on his way to Iraq. He arrived during a turbulent period, with the insurgency raging. Convoys regularly came under attack. The trucks were not armored.

“He didn’t go over there to fight a war. He went over there because [KBR] said, ‘You’ll have armed guards,’ ” Linda said. “They promised big money. ‘You’ll be protected, no problem.’ ”

On April 9, 2004, Reggie Lane and a friend, Jason Hurd, rolled out of a base south of Baghdad to deliver fuel to Balad, north of the city. The convoy was outside Baghdad when gunfire rang out. Hurd saw Reggie’s truck careen to the side of the road.

Hurd pulled over. A rocket-propelled grenade had shattered the windshield. Reggie was lying face-up on the shoulder of the road. His right arm was gone below the elbow. His face was covered in shrapnel wounds. He was drenched in blood.

The rest of the convoy moved ahead, apparently oblivious. Hurd fumbled with Reggie’s arm, trying to apply a tourniquet. Then a group of military vehicles pulled over to help.

Soldiers helped stabilize Lane, who shuddered awake and asked for water. An Army helicopter evacuated him to a U.S. base, where he was put on an emergency flight to Germany.

Linda got the news from a military doctor. A few days later, Reggie called. He told her not to worry.

“I still got one arm left to hug you with,” he said.

It was the last conversation she would have with her husband.

Two days later, another military doctor in Germany called Linda, asking permission to perform an emergency tracheotomy on Reggie. A blood clot had dislodged, blocking the flow of blood to his brain.

“My head is spinning. I’m trying to digest what they’re telling me,” Linda said. “I’m deciding this long-distance by phone, and it’s someone I love.”

Ten days after the attack, Reggie Lane was on a flight back to the U.S., headed to a Houston hospital. KBR paid to have Linda meet her husband in Texas.

She was unprepared for the sight. A raw, red stump was all that remained of his right arm. There was a hole in his throat. She could see his intestines, which were left exposed to aid in cleaning out shrapnel. His body was swollen and purple. He was unresponsive, his pupils mere pinpoints.

Over the next nine months, Linda lived out of a hotel in downtown Houston. She became her husband’s advocate, navigating a complex medical world with little guidance.

“It was a lot of one foot in front of the other. I was pretty devastated,” she said.

Slowly, Lane’s condition improved. Toward the end of his hospital stay, he could respond to questions. He would say: “Love Linda.” He was trying to stand up with help.

“By the time he left, he was interacting, communicating,” said Dr. Sunil Kothari, a neurosurgeon who coordinated Reggie’s care at the Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Memorial Hermann in Houston, one of the country’s top rehabilitation hospitals for brain injury. “Near the end, he was beginning to answer questions, starting to vocalize.”

In January 2005, doctors cleared Reggie for release. He was going home.

Grants Pass had a handful of nursing homes. They provided physical and speech therapy, but Linda was dissatisfied with the care. She confronted workers at one home, leading to Reggie’s discharge. He returned to a hospital.

Linda was dealing with her own health problems. Her weight ballooned. She was admitted to the hospital repeatedly with breathing difficulties.

As Linda searched for a home for her husband, she got into a dispute with American International Group Inc., the insurance carrier for KBR. Linda wanted her husband close to home. She said AIG insisted that he go to a facility in Portland, where care was less expensive than in the hospital.

Linda hired a lawyer, and AIG relented, allowing Reggie to be placed in an adult foster care home near Grants Pass.

The lawyer, Roger Hawkins of Los Angeles, said it was the least Reggie deserved.

“You look in his eyes and you see that somewhere, he realizes what is going on,” Hawkins said. “He’s sitting there with his arm missing and knowing that he’s never going to get better.”

AIG and KBR declined to comment on the case.

Reggie’s mental state had gradually declined since he’d left Houston. Before, he spoke. Now he descended into long silences broken only by grunts.

Told of Lane’s condition, Kothari, who treated him in Houston, expressed concern.

“Decline is not typical,” Kothari said. “If someone goes to a nursing facility, if they happen not to get stimuli, it means the brain could not heal as well as it would otherwise.”

Jim Gregg, operator of the foster care home where Lane was placed, said the facility was not equipped for advanced physical or speech therapy. In their home on a 4-acre farm, Gregg and his wife provided basic medical care and monitoring to half a dozen elderly patients.

“It’s a boring life. He just sits here,” Gregg said. “It’s not a stimulating environment.”

Gregg closed his facility earlier this year, and Lane was moved to another foster home. The total cost of Lane’s care for the rest of his life could be as much as $8.9 million, according to an AIG estimate. The bill will be paid by the federal government, which reimburses insurers for combat-related claims from war zone workers.

Linda Lane died July 10. She had been hospitalized after suffering respiratory distress, family members said.

Reggie let out a wail when relatives told him the news. “I had never heard anything like that before,” said Bev Glasgow, who runs Lane’s current foster home.

Glasgow arranged for a van to take Reggie to a memorial service for his wife. It was held in a state park alongside the Rogue River. Under the shade of scrub oak and aspen, he watched as Linda’s family and friends sang “Amazing Grace” and looked at old photos of the couple.

Diane Firestone, Reggie’s sister, visited him shortly after Linda’s death. She said the family accepted that Reggie’s condition was unlikely to change. But, she said, they did not believe his sacrifices had been adequately recognized, by his company or the country.

She knelt beside her brother and asked him about the attack on his convoy.

“Hey, Reg,” she said. “Do you know it’s been five years? It doesn’t seem that long to me. Does it seem that long to you?”

Reggie blinked twice, hard — his signal for yes. (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

No Contractor Left Behind Part I: KBR, the Pentagon and the Soldiers Who Paid

No Contractor Left Behind is a series by DC Bureau.org chronicling how a toxic time bomb followed three Army National Guard units home from Iraq. It reveals how a notorious military contractor (KBR) exposed American soldiers to a cancer-causing carcinogen on the battlefield and how the Pentagon tried to downplay the consequences. And it describes how Congress has relegated its investigation to a toothless forum that lacks the political clout and oversight powers to ensure effective accountability.


Click HERE to read No Contractor Left Behind Part I: KBR, the Pentagon and the Soldiers Who Paid

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Investigation critical to protecting welfare of soldier

Times-Mail Editorial Board
October 3, 2009

Needed movement has been made in the push to examine the U.S. Army’s response to exposure of troops in Iraq to deadly chemicals.

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind, reports the Department of Defense inspector general has announced that an investigation has been initiated. The investigation is critical and every responsible Hoosier should demand nothing less than thoroughness and resolve as the probe takes place. Nothing less than that is owed to the hundreds of U.S. soldiers, including 142 members of the Indiana National Guard, exposed to the deadly chemical sodium dichromate.

A complete investigation is necessary for a number of reasons — reasons that have immediate impact, as well as far-reaching ramifications.

At the forefront is the health — and associated care — of those soldiers who were exposed and have experienced illness, or will become sick, because of it. It’s important to have a plan in place to assure that soldiers who might not experience related health difficulties until years down the road still get the care they need — and the respect they’ve earned — without having to fight for either.

The situation involving the sodium dichromate exposure is very relevant to the people of Lawrence County. Retired Indiana National Guard Lt. Col. James Gentry, 52, formerly of Mitchell and now of Williams, is fighting cancer. He led the National Guard unit in Iraq and told the Times-Mail in December he’s convinced his wartime experience involving exposure to the chemical caused his illness.

Bayh is adamant, as everybody should be, that the right steps be taken to deal with the huge misfortune that took place. To describe what happened, in 2003, Hoosier troops were guarding the Qarmat Ali Water Treatment Plant in Iraq as it was being rebuilt by the Houston-based construction firm KBR. Despite on-site assurances that the dust spread throughout the facility was a “mild irritant,” it was later revealed to be sodium dichromate, which contains hexavalent chromium, one of the world’s most carcinogenic substances.

Capitol Hill hearings on the issue have subsequently revealed a number of failures by contractor KBR to warn troops of the exposure and to properly clean up the contamination. Hearings also exposed multiple failures by the Army either to hold KBR accountable or to inform and test soldiers once the Army did learn of the contamination.

Bayh is absolutely right in his assertion that it is “essential that the Defense Department take a hard look at this incident to learn the lessons of Qarmat Ali and make sure that service members are never again needlessly exposed to hazardous chemicals while deployed.”

It’s critical that the Department of Veterans Affairs properly treat veterans for a “service-connected” sickness that could take years after the initial exposure to develop.

Bayh also is pushing for a registry for U.S. military personnel exposed to hazardous chemicals while serving in the line of duty.

“If you serve in combat conditions, you are entitled to the best care possible,” Bayh said. “We must diligently track which soldiers may have been placed at risk and ensure they have access to the best care our country has to offer.”

Nothing less than that will be acceptable.

The Times-Mail

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Feds look for soldiers likely exposed to toxic chemical in Iraq

Feds look for soldiers likely exposed to toxic chemical in Iraq

By Andrew Clevenger-Staff writer
October 3, 2009

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — More than 1,100 soldiers, including members of the West Virginia National Guard were likely exposed to a highly toxic chemical in southern Iraq in 2003, according to information provided to U.S. Sen. Robert C. Byrd by the U.S. Defense Department.

Hundreds of those soldiers still may not know they were exposed to the chemical, according to the U.S. Army.

Last month, then-Secretary of the Army Pete Geren wrote to Byrd after the West Virginia Democrat expressed concern about soldiers who may have been exposed to sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali water plant outside Basra.

During Project RIO, members of the West Virginia National Guard’s 1092nd Engineering Battalion, as well as guard units from Indiana and Oregon, helped guard the plant while employees from KBR, Inc., repaired the facility, which provided water pumped to the oil fields to create the pressure needed to extract oil from the ground.

Sodium chromate, a known carcinogen, was used to keep the pipes from rusting.

Of the 1,164 soldiers likely exposed, the Department of Defense has confirmed contact with 863, Geren reported. Almost 260 have enrolled in a registry that helps track soldiers with possible exposure, and 154 have undergone medical exams.

“During the last few months we have continued our efforts to identify and contact soldiers who may have been at the site, and have worked with several agencies of the federal government to identify potential health issues and provide the service connection needed to ensure eligibility for care,” Geren wrote.

Geren’s information does not break down the total number of soldiers by state.

On Aug. 3, at a Democratic Policy Committee hearing on the possible exposure at Qarmat Ali, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., put the number of West Virginia guardsmen who had possible exposure at 150.

Earlier this week, the Department of Defense’s Inspector General announced that it would investigate the military’s response to possible exposure and lasting health implications from Qarmat Ali, a move applauded by both Byrd and Rockefeller.

At the August hearing, Russell Powell, a onetime member of the 82nd Airborne Division who served as the West Virginia National Guard unit’s medic in 2003, described how he and other soldiers began having nosebleeds, nausea, difficulty breathing and burning throats and lungs after deploying to the Qarmat Ali facility.

“I questioned one of the KBR workers about the powder and the related medical problems. He told me that his supervisors at KBR told him not to worry about the powder or health problems because we must be allergic to dust,” said Powell, who lives in Moundsville. “I laughed at the explanation, it seemed pretty bogus. After 15 years of working as a medic, I knew there was no way that all of us could be allergic to dust at the same time.”

Powell said he had no idea about the possible cause of his lingering health problems until he got a letter from the West Virginia National Guard earlier this year.

“During the time I was serving in Iraq, I was never informed that our West Virginia platoon, or unit, had been exposed to sodium dichromate while serving at Qarmat Ali. The Army never told us before the mission that there might be a risk of chemical exposure. As a medic, had I known the true nature of the risk, I would have made sure that everyone had personal protection equipment,” he said.

“After leaving Iraq in April 2004, I went to the VA [Veterans Administration] Clinic in Clarksburg, West Virginia, to talk to doctors about my skin rashes, lesions, stomach problems, and nosebleeds. The doctors were unable to determine what caused my problems. Five years passed before I received a letter from the WV National Guard saying that we were exposed [to] sodium dichromate while serving at Qarmat Ali.”

In June, Powell and six other members of the West Virginia National Guard unit filed a lawsuit in the state’s Northern District, alleging that KBR, a former Haliburton subsidiary that was awarded billions of dollars’ worth of no-bid contracts to rebuild Iraq, negligently exposed them to the chemical.

KBR has denied any wrongdoing in relation to Qarmat Ali.

The Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, of which Rockefeller is a member, has scheduled a hearing on chemical exposure for Oct. 8. (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Toxic Chemicals, Noxious Fumes – We Delivered

The New Gulf War Syndrome

Soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan are in danger from toxic chemicals, yet most don’t know what they’ve been exposed to or where to get help.

By Nora Eisenberg, The Guardian – Posted on November 11, 2008

What does a war injury look like? In the case of Iraq, we tend to picture veterans bravely getting on with their lives with the help of steel legs or computerized limbs. Trauma injuries are certainly the most visible of health problems — the ones that grab our attention. A campaign ad for congressman Tom Udall featured an Iraq war veteran who had survived a shot to his head. Speaking through the computer that now substitutes for his voice, Sergeant Erik Schei extols the top-notch care that saved his life.

As politicians argue about healthcare for veterans, it is generally people like Sgt Schei that they have in mind, men and women torn apart by a bullet or bomb. And of course, these Iraq war veterans must receive the best care available for such complex and catastrophic injuries.

Unfortunately, the dangers of modern war extend far beyond weapons. As Iraqis know only too well, areas of Iraq today are among the most polluted on the planet — so toxic that merely to live, eat and sleep (never mind to fight) in these zones is to risk death. Thousands of soldiers coming home from the war may have been exposed to chemicals that are known to cause cancers and neurological problems. What’s most tragic is that the veterans themselves do not always realize that they are in danger from chemical poisoning. Right now, there is no clear way for Iraq war veterans to find out what they’ve been exposed to and where to get help.

In October, the Military Times reported on the open-air pits on U.S. bases in Iraq, where troops incinerate tons of waste. Because of such pits, tens of thousands of soldiers may be breathing air contaminated with burning Freon, jet fuel and other carcinogens. According to reports, soldiers are coughing up blood or the black goop that has been nicknamed “plume crud”. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR failed to protect troops in Iraq

Senate Democrats charge that KBR failed to protect troops in Iraq from “deadly poison”

by Julie Sullivan, The Oregonian
Monday August 03, 2009, 6:54 PM

Senate Democrats say the Army and the nation’s largest war contractor failed to protect troops from a “deadly poison” in Iraq and are demanding further investigation.

The statement came after a former Oregon Army National Guardsman and three other combat veterans testified Monday that since being exposed to hexavalent chromium in 2003, they have been chronically ill and that some of their fellow soldiers have died.

“Before my service to Iraq, I was physically fit. I used to run several miles without much effort,” said 42-year-old Rocky Bixby of Hillsboro, who struggled to speak between raspy coughs. “Now I have trouble walking from my house to my car. I simply run out of breath.”

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota, called the Army’s investigation so far into the exposure “tragically inadequate,” and likened it to the government’s mishandling of Agent Orange after Vietnam. “The Defense Department failed to protect our troops,” Dorgan said. “And I believe they are downplaying this in part because it is an embarrassment to them.”

The Army has defended its actions and last year the Defense Health Board, an independent review body, agreed with the Army. Defense contractor Kellogg Brown & Root has maintained in statements that its actions have not harmed troops.

The Houston firm provides almost all basic services for the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. But they have been the frequent target in 20 oversight hearings conducted by Dorgan.

Last week the Defense Department’s inspector general found the company that KBR’s shoddy electrical work failed to protect a Green Beret electrocuted in the shower. Last spring the inspector general found KBR provided wastewater for bathing at one U.S. base in Iraq, causing skin infections and diarrhea. U.S. taxpayers have paid KBR millions in bonuses to restore Iraqi oil production.

Workers — civilians as well as U.S. troops — were exposed to hexavalent chromium as KBR raced to repair a water treatment plant near Basra to get the oil flowing again in 2003.

But the troops’ exposure to the cancer-causing chemical didn’t come to light until a June 2008 oversight hearing. Ed Blacke, a fomer KBR safety official testified that he was sent home from Iraq in 2003 after raising concerns about the reddish-orange powder piled at the plant.

Blacke told Dorgan’s committee that in addition to KBR employees, hundreds of U.S. troops were surrounded by the toxic powder as they slept, ate and patrolled at the Qarmat Ali plant between April and August 2003.

Among them: members of the 1st Battalion-162nd Infantry, the first Oregon Guard members into Iraq, as well as their Indiana and West Virginia counterparts.

The troops learned of the toxin when the state military departments and the Pentagon sent notification letters out earlier this year. At the Monday hearing, the four veterans say they recalled the reddish dust that spilled from100 pound bags that they used for protection from snipers — and for furniture.

They recalled wind storms that made the soldiers look like “orange powdered donuts.” They recalled the constant metallic taste that one veteran described like “a mouthful of pennies.”

But they were never told to use masks and other protective gear they had carried into combat. Their constant nose bleeds, skin sores and headaches were written off by KBR officials and Army medics as allergies to desert dust.

“Within two months, you could shine a light into my nasal cavity through a hole that had eaten through to the outside of my nose,” testified Russell Kimberling, a former Indiana National Guard commander who was medically evacuated to Germany after two months. Kimberling returned to guarding the plant in June 2003 until in August, when KBR employees showed up in full personal protection suits.

“They did not see fit to inform us that for safety purposes, we should’ve been doing the same,” he said. The Indiana Guard commander escort KBR is currently in hospice care with terminal lung cancer.Still, Kimberling testified that KBR officials downplayed what they found, describing the chemical, used as a corrosion fighter, as a “mild irritant” and that one would “literally have to bathe” in it for harm to occur. Experts told Dorgan’s committee last year that exposure to a grain of sand’s worth of hexavalent chromium over a cubic meter would greatly increase the risk of cancer.

In September 2003 the plant was shuttered, and eventually cleaned up. In October the Army administered 137 blood tests. The men never received any written results.

At Monday’s Senate’s Democratic Policy Committee hearing, an epidemiologist and the Environmental Protection Agency’s foremost expert on hexavalent chromium testified that the toxin would have largely been out of the troops’ bodies by the timing of tests. Herman Gibb, who spent his career at the EPA, likened it to “giving a breathalyzer to a person three days after they were pulled over for erratic driving.”

Gibb said further study, based on the military’s medical records, was needed, as well as ongoing medical evaluation and care. Congress is looking at a national registry for exposure.

Meanwhile, the Oregon Legislature has tried to provide some care. This summer the Legislature, led by Rep. Chip Shields of Portland, approved funds for soldiers who develop cancer as a result.

Some soldiers are also going to court. Bixby is one of five current or former Oregon Army National Guard suing KBR, as are dozens of soldiers in other states.

Bixby, who still works as a public safety officer at Oregon Heath & Science University, told the senators that after receiving his notification from the Guard earlier this year, the non-smoker finally had a chest X-ray.

“The doctors discovered I have a node on my lung.”  (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Senate DPC Hearings on Sodium Dichromate Exosure at Qarmat Ali

The Senate Democratic Policy Committee Chaired by Senator Dorgan held their second hearing on the chemical exposure of our troops and civilians at Qarmat Ali water plant is Southern Iraq today. The hearing was entitled:

The Exposure at Qarmat Ali: Did the Army Fail to Protect U.S. Soldiers Serving in Iraq?

Witnesses were:

Russell Kimberling
Former Indiana Army National Guard Company Commander

Rocky Bixby
Former Oregon Army National Guard Staff Sergeant

Russell Powell
Former West Virginia Army National Guard Staff Sergeant

Glen Bootay
Former Army (3rd Infantry Division) Combat Engineer

Herman Gibb, Ph.D
Former Environmental Protection Agency Associate Director for Health

To view the entire hearing video, read witness statements, read witness biographies and see other supporting documents click HERE

The first Senate DPC hearing on the Qarmat Ali chemical exposures was held on June 20, 2008 and entitled:

The Exposure at Qarmat Ali: Contractor Misconduct and the Safety of U.S. Troops in Iraq

To view the entire hearing video, read witness statements and witness biographies click HERE

To read specifically Edward Blacke’s testimony, the former KBR safety coordinator at Qarmat Ali, as reference in the hearing today click HERE

There is no doubt in my mind that KBR knowingly exposed their own employees and our troops to this well known toxic chemical. But that is just my personal opinion!! What is yours?

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: