Will Dyncorp and Fluor protest the CTP task order award for LOGCAP IV

Am I the only one that thinks there SHOULD be a whole lot of this name calling going on?

There is a whole lot of speculation going on about whether Dyncorp and Fluor will protest the award of the CTP task order. The CTP task order is the first LOGCAP IV task order to be award in Iraq and was awarded to KBR This CTP task order will cover Corps Logistics Support Services (CLSS), Theater Transportation Mission (TTM), Postal Services, Ice Plant Operations, and some Air Terminal Operations to support the U.S. armed forces throughout Iraq.

This task award was very surprising to most, especially after KBR received a zero award fee for poor performance just the day before they were awarded this task order. Rumor has it even the majority of KBR was surprised, but I’m certain there were some KBR exec’s in Virginia that were aware of what was happening.

There is also an enormous amount of anger amongst members of Congress and they are demanding accountability from the Army on this decision.

All you Fluor and Dyncorp insiders, what’s the word on a protest. Fill us in.

Also, all you contract experts. What is the possibility the Army could be forced to reverse their decision on this task order award?

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR Press Release on LOGCAP IV Task Order 2

KBR Awarded Major Task Order Under Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) IV Contract

Houston, Texas – March 2, 2010 – KBR (NYSE: KBR) today announced it has been awarded a task order by the U.S. Army Contracting Command under its current Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) IV contract. KBR will execute the LOGCAP IV Corps Logistics Support Services (CLSS), Theater Transportation mission (TTM), and Postal Services Task Order in Iraq. The Period of Performance is one base year plus four option years. The award represents KBR’s first major Task Order under the LOGCAP IV contract.

Under the task order KBR will provide the following: (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Army awards lucrative Iraq support contract to KBR

By KIMBERLY HEFLING and RICHARD LARDNER (AP)

WASHINGTON — Defense giant KBR Inc. was awarded a contract potentially worth $2.8 billion for support work in Iraq as U.S. forces continue to leave the country, military authorities said Tuesday.

KBR was notified of the award Friday, a day after the company told shareholders it lost about $25 million in award fees because of flawed electrical work in Iraq.

The Houston-based company was charged with maintaining the barracks where Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth of Pittsburgh, a 24-year-old Green Beret, was electrocuted in 2008 while showering. The company has denied wrongdoing, and investigators said in August there was “insufficient evidence to prove or disprove” that anyone was criminally culpable in Maseth’s death.

The uproar over his death triggered a review of 17 other electrocution deaths in Iraq and widespread inspections and repairs of electrical work in Iraq, much of it performed by KBR.

Dan Carlson, a spokesman for the Army Sustainment Command in Rock Island, Ill., said the new contract is for one year, with an option for four more. KBR will handle logistics support, transportation mission, and postal operations. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Finally the media reports on KBR’s recent LOGCAP IV windfall

FINALLY!! Something from the main stream media. KBR was notified of this LOGCAP IV award on the Feb26 0r 27th according to the date on the award letter.  Ms Sparky published the on the 27th. I know there was an earthquake on the same day and a tsunami in the Pacific threatening Hawaii and other coastlines. OK, I get that. But why didn’t the Army and KBR made an official announcement on Monday….or Tuesday? Am I too impatient? Below is the first main stream media article put out by the Associated Press!! Kudo’s to them.

Army Awards Lucrative Contract to KBR

Contractor under fire for faulty electrical work in Iraq awarded contract worth up to $2.8B
By KIMBERLY HEFLING and RICHARD LARDNER
WASHINGTON March 2, 2010 (AP)
The Associated Press

Military authorities say defense giant KBR Inc. has been awarded a contract potentially worth $2.8 billion for work in Iraq as U.S. forces continue to leave the country.

KBR was notified of the award Friday, a day after the company told shareholders it lost about $25 million in award fees because of flawed electrical work in Iraq. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR awarded $2.3B LOGCAP IV task order in Iraq after poor performance evaluation (updated 02/28/2010)

This post has been updated since it was originally published. See below.

The long awaited announcement of the first LOGCAP IV task order to be awarded in Iraq has been made.

KBR has been awarded Task Order 2 under KBR’s LOGCAP IV contract W52P1J-07-D-0009 for the Iraq CTP effort in the amount of $2.345B.

Work is to begin under this Task Order on March 1, 2010.

Interesting…just four days ago KBR received a ZERO award fee for unsatisfactory work and is now awarded a $2.3B contract. Is anyone else gong “What the hell?” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Fluor awarded LOGCAP IV Task Order for Haiti (updated 2/13/2010)

(Updated employment information below) I’ve been getting a lot of questions about the LOGCAP IV Task Order 6 that was awarded to Fluor for the Haiti work. LOGCAP IV is not just in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) can be implemented anywhere the Army needs civilian assistance.

I have updated my LOGCAP IV for Dummies post to include this most recent task order.

To date, there have been no LOGCAP IV task order award announcements made for Iraq. The next award should be the Corp Logistics – Transportation-Postal (CTP) task order. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

The Army made us burn it!

KBR Tells Court It Was Following Military Orders When Employees Burned Toxic Waste in Open Pits
The military’s largest contractor is trying to avoid liability for health risks associated with burn pits to soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the truth is emerging.

by Nora Eisenberg/Alternet
February 12, 2010  |

Balad Burn Pits

In October a class action suit combining 22 lawsuits from 43 states was filed in US District Court in Maryland against KBR, Halliburton, and other military contractors for damages to health from open air burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan.  According to plaintiffs’ lawyers the military contracting giant had been paid millions of dollars to safely dispose of waste on bases but negligently burned refuse in open pits, spewing toxins, including known carcinogens, into the air. Last week, KBR sought to dismiss the charges. Their tack was not to deny that they burned lithium batteries, petroleum, asbestos, trucks, cars, paint, plastic, Styrofoam, medical waste including human limbs, and more, as the soldiers have charged, but to challenge their liability for any ensuing problems.  According to KBR’s press fact sheet on the suit, the Army, not KBR, decides if a burn pit or an incinerator will be used, where it will be built in relation to living and working facilities, and what it can burn. KBR insists it was and is still  just “performing under the direction and control of military commanders in the field.” In short, they were only following orders and the soldiers are going after the wrong guy. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR’s Bill Bodie babbles in Yankton

This is me responding to your bogus propaganda Bodie.....if of course I were an angry cat!

KBR President, Bill Bodie is out there trying to sell his “KBR snake oil” again. He actually took the time to responded to a letter from a reader about the Franken Amendment in a small town newspaper in Yankton, South Dakota. KBR must be absolutely desperate. Here’s my latest addition to my “Bodie Babble” category.

Response To Letter

Published: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:20 AM CST
William C. Bodie, Houston
President, KBR North American Government and Defense

Many of the statements in the letter entitled “Cases of Rape” (Press & Dakotan, Jan. 15) are based on erroneous reports regarding the Jamie Leigh Jones case, and misinformation on Sen. Franken’s amendment. KBR would like to set the record straight. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Defense contractors must now air dirty deeds in public

Defense contractors such as KBR can no longer hide behind the closed doors of secret binding arbitration for serious issues such as discrimination, harassment, rape and assault. No longer with KBR and others be able to violate Title VII Laws and then just sweep them under the rug behind closed doors. Those abusive criminal managers who have been in place for years are finally going to cost them some money and Heather Browne, KBR’s Communications Director is going to be working overtime. Well done, Jamie Leigh Jones and thank you Al Franken for taking these issue seriously. Hopefully this is just the first in a series of laws to protect defense contractor employees.

For those who respond to every dispute or disagreement here on MsSparky.com with “You signed a contract”. You can’t sign away law! (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Hypothetically speaking; Would KBR be liable if….

I’ll bet there is not one current or former KBR employee who does not know of at least one KBR LOGCAP manager who has committed some sort of crime or contract violation. Many have never been punished. Crimes can vary from basic General Order 1 (GO1) violations such as drinking alcohol on base, having sexual relationships with subordinates, subcontract workers or the client, or TIPs violations such as soliciting prostitution on base, in Dubai, Thailand or the Philippines etc. Then there are the crimes of fraud, theft, bribery, assault, sexual assault, harassment and discrimination. These managers were not charged or prosecuted for contract violations and crimes primarily because they were never reported to the client. I doubt seriously it was even reported to Houston. A few lower level managers and non managers have been convicted of crimes. That must have clearly been accidental on the part of the DoD.

Not only were these managers not prosecuted. They were not fired. They were either transferred around until they quit or were asked to resign. “What’s the problem with that?” you ask. Their resume is a lie. Their new hiring company has no idea what happened at KBR and now these managers take those undesirable behavior patterns and management styles to their new company. And then they surround themselves with their cohorts in crime. No charges were filed, so security clearances are granted without a problem. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Employees frustrated with LOGCAP IV transition in Afghanistan

Logistics Civilian Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) Logo

I’ve received several emails looking for clarification on different LOGCAP IV transition issues in Afghanistan.

One of the biggest complaints I’m hearing is about employees incurring airfare costs upon demob with Fluor and Dyncorp.

KBR employees have enjoyed the freedom of not paying for airfare on demob no matter when they demob’d. I’ve heard of KBR employees flying into Baghdad International Airport (BIAP), immediately deciding Iraq was not for them and heading home on that very same plane. All the while not incurring any of the costs to mobilize them. I have never heard of a KBR employee being charged for airfare on demob even if they were fired. It could have happened, I’ve just never heard of it.

From what I understand, KBR’s LOGCAP III contract states something along the lines of….if a new hire demobs prior to 180 days of being in country (mobilization), KBR will incur the costs to replace that employee. It’s apparent to me the Army was not enforcing this portion of KBR’s contract. I believe KBR was practicing their “let’s just do it ’til we get caught” management style. I find it highly unlikely KBR would pay out their own pocket to send the average everyday KBR employee home. Managers might be a different story. KBR was making money on every mobilization having NO INCENTIVE to establish any kind of employee retention program allowing the worst of the worst managers to float to the top. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

U.S. food delivery contracts in Middle East worth billions

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 11, 2010

Christmas lunch is served at Camp Phoenix near Kabul. Much of the food delivered to the region comes from the United States. (Musadeq Sadeq/associated Press)

One of the least publicized elements of the cost of the fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq is the need to truck into Iraq and landlocked Afghanistan almost all the perishable and non-perishable food items consumed by U.S. forces and civilian personnel.

The Defense Logistics Agency is preparing to contract out delivery of more than $10 billion worth of food to U.S. troops and other government personnel serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait and Jordan. The solicitation is broken into two contracts — one for Afghanistan for five years and another for Iraq, Kuwait and Jordan for four years.

The list of items is extensive. The prime vendor, according to the bid solicitation, “must be capable of supplying all chilled products, semi-perishable food stuffs, frozen fish, meat and poultry, other frozen foods (fruits, vegetables, prepared foods, etc.), dairy and ice cream products, fresh and frozen bakery products, beverage base & juices (for dispensers), beverages & juices (nondispenser), fresh fruits and vegetables, non-food items.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Ms Sparky – wrapping up 2009

Before I give you all the “Mosts for 2009″ I want to share some 2009 “MsSparky.com” stats with you . I realize these stats would be considered a failure for blogs such as the Huffington Post, but MsSparky.com has come a long way since  I started keeping stats in June 2008 and I am very proud of that. It is “MsSparky.com” readers, commentors and guest writers (THANK YOU Forseti) who have contributed to these stats which ultimately results in getting the word out about KBR and contractor fraud in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait!

My goal for 2010 is to have numbers at least 5 times greater than 2009!

Month/Year Unique Visitors Total # of Visits Total # of Pages Viewed Hits
June 2008 171 520 3,538 7,133
January 2009 4,728 9,155 29,391 144,978
December 2009 23,014 48,392 558,638 1,691,847
Total for 2009 112,963 245,021 1,295,953 4,722,183

Technorati.com is a blog tracking and rating site. I tried to find the official number of blogs they tracked in 2009 and didn’t find it. But in 2008 it was over 113 million just English speaking blogs. I am expecting 2009 to be in the 100’s of millions of English speaking blogs. My Technorati Authority (rating) is 135. That puts MsSparky.com in the top 20,000 blogs that Technorati tracks. Yes….the Huffington Post is #1. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Obama tightens reins on contractors

Obama By: Mike Allen
December 21, 2009 10:23 AM EST

Ahead of remarks Monday by President Barack Obama about making government more efficient and effective, the White House Office of Management and Budget released details of the administration’s drive to tighten the government’s contracting practices.

“This is a situation that would never exist in a business,” Jeff Zients, federal chief performance officer and OMB deputy director for management, told reporters on a conference call. “A business that had these kind of practices would have been out of business a long time ago. I believe we’re off to a really fast start here. There’s a lot of work to be done. And we’re going to clean up the situation and make sure there’s no waste, and we save as much money as possible.” (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

DoD contractors can no longer rape, plunder and pillage

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

Shay D. Assad, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy

In a memorandum dated December 14, 2009, Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Shay D. Assad has directed a Class Deviation be effective immediately. (click HERE for memo)

This Class Deviation, Additional Contractor Requirements and Responsibilities Related to Alleged Crimes By or Against Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan provides a new clause that basically says:

  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed by contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must report ALL crimes committed against contractor employees.
  • All DoD contractors must train their employees on how and where to report a crime.
  • All DoD Contractors must train their employees on where to seek victim and witness protection and victim assistance. (click HERE for UCMJ Chapter 47 Title 10)

All future contracts are to contain this clause and all current contracts are to be modified to the extent practical. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

LOGCAP IV for Dummies (Updated 02-27-2010)

LOGCAP IV for dummies(Last updated Feb 27, 2010) By now everyone  knows the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program IV (LOGCAP IV) has been split up and three primary contractors have been approved to submit bid proposals for the individual task orders.  The three companies are Fluor, Dyncorp and KBR. I know…old news. But I keep getting asked who has been awarded which task orders. Especially the task orders Dyncorp has been awarded, after the PWC/Agility FUBAR came to light. I figured I could just “google it” get an easy answer and that would be it. Boy was I wrong. The more I read the more confused I got.

I decided to share what I’ve learned. (If you are a LOGCAP contract expert and find I’m in error, please contact me so I can correct it.) Not only are there three companies who have been approved to submit proposals, each company has their own LOGCAP IV contract number. Evidently task order numbers are assigned the next consecutive number under the winning companies contract after they have been awarded. That’s where I got confused, duplicate task order numbers and multiple contract numbers. Unlike LOGCAP III, one company, one contract number. There is also a fourth LOGCAP contractor, SERCO who has been awarded a LOGCAP IV contract for analysis, planning and logistics support.  From what I’m told this is primarily administrative.

Dyncorp – Contract # W52P1J-07-D-0007 Dyncorp International is teamed with CH2M Hill for LOGCAP IV. Agility Defense and Government Services (formerly PWC Logistics) was initially a part of this team but was indicted on fraud charges and suspended from Government contracting pending investigations.  (click HERE for more info)

  • Task Order 1 – Program Management Office Staffing – $1.7M
  • Task Order 2 – Services in support of Kuwait Area of Operations – $77M for a transition period and one year at full performance. Up to four option years may also be awarded at the discretion of the government.
  • Task Order 3 – Support of Udairi Airfield Kuwait – $20.8M for a transition period and one year at full performance. Up to four option years may also be awarded at the discretion of the government.
  • Task Order 4 – Logistics support for the Afghanistan-South Area of Responsibility – $643.5M for the one-year base plus four one year options with a total evaluated value of $5.874 billion.

Fluor – Contract # W52P1J-07-D-0008 Fluor is teamed with ITT for LOGCAP IV.

  • Task Order 1 – Program Management Office Staffing – $331K
  • Task Order 2 – Services in support for Afghanistan Area of Operations (AOR) Expansion – $68.9M for the period of performance one-year with four unpriced option years.
  • Task Order 3 – Services in support of Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE) Kuwait- $4.5M for a transition period and one full year at at full performance. Up to four option years may also be awarded at the discretion of the government.
  • Task Order 4 – Services in support of the Afghanistan South Expansion – $247M for the period of performance one-year with four unpriced option years.
  • Task Order 5 – Logistics support for the Afghanistan North Area of Responsibility (AOR) – $634.2M for the one-year base plus four one year options with a total evaluated value of $7 billion.
  • Task Order 6 – Logistics support of the U.S. military’s humanitarian relief operations in Haiti.  The initial value of the task order is $50,000, with a performance period of 30 days. However, both the value and the performance period of the task order can be expanded as the need for services provided under LOGCAP expands.

KBR – Contract # W52P1J-07-D-0009

  • Task Order 1 – Program Management Office Staffing – $852K
  • Task Order 2 – CTP – Corps Logistics Support Services (CLSS), Theater Transportation Mission (TTM), Postal Services, Ice Plant Operations, and some Air Terminal Operations to support the U.S. armed forces throughout Iraq – $2.345B.

SERCO – Contract # W52P1J07D0010 – Services in support of analysis, planning support and logistics – $45 M for the one base year with four option years with a total evaluated value of $225M.

Forseti recently published a post about KBR and LOGCAP IV task orders HERE. According to internet sources yet to be confirmed, there are a total of 11 task orders for LOGCAP IV. Seven of which have been awarded so far, not to include Task Order 1 for each contract, that’s administrative. That means there are still four task orders to be awarded, most likely for Iraq.

I believe there is only one LOGCAP IV task order up for grabs right now and that’s the Corp Logistics Support, Transportation and Postal(CTP) task order in Iraq. It’s similar to the current Theater Transportation Mission (TTM) task order currently in place. With Dyncorp teamed with Agility and with Agility currently suspended from any future contracts, I’d say Dyncorp is out. KBR could get it, but but I doubt it. I think the DoD wants to shy away from anymore bad KBR press. I think Fluor will get it, call it woman’s intuition.

Keep in mind KBR is still deeply entrenched in Afghanistan working under LOGCAP III. As Fluor and Dyncorp transition the camps and Forward Operating Bases KBR should be phased out. I don’t know if they will ever be completely out of Afghanistan. They aren’t going to go willingly.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Dyncorp should pay the employees they have before hiring more

Will work for moneyMaybe it’s just my crazy way of thinking, but if you have hired someone to work for you….say Dyncorp for example…..don’t you have an obligation to pay them on time and as agree to? And if you don’t, there shouldn’t there be repercussions? I have been getting numerous complaints that Dyncorp seems to be having a problem paying their American employees on time and as agreed to. Some haven’t been paid for as many as two pay periods.  There is no need to go into what I would be doing about that. All I can say is….. I DON’T WORK FOR FREE and I don’t expect anyone else to as well.

Afghanistan contractor numbers expected to increase
Stars and Stripes
European edition, Thursday, December 3, 2009

Even as U.S. troops surge to new highs in Afghanistan they are outnumbered by military contractors, according to a Defense Department census due to be distributed to Congress — illustrating how hard it is for the U.S. to wean itself from the large numbers of war-zone contractors that have proved controversial in Iraq, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The number of contractors in Afghanistan rose to almost 74,000 by June 30, outnumbering the roughly 58,000 U.S. soldiers on the ground at that point, the paper noted.

As the military force in Afghanistan grows further, to a planned 68,000 by the end of the year, the Defense Department expects the ranks of contractors to increase more.

The military requires contractors for essential functions ranging from supplying food and laundry services to guarding convoys and even military bases — functions once performed by military personnel but have been outsourced so a slimmed-down military can focus more on battle-related tasks.

The heavy reliance on contractors in Afghanistan signals that a situation that defense planners once considered temporary has become a standard fixture of U.S. military operations, according to the Journal.

“For a sustained fight like our current commitments, the U.S. military can’t go to war without contractors on the battlefield,” Steven Arnold, a former Army general and retired executive at logistics specialists Ecolog USA and KBR Inc., told the Journal. KBR was formerly owned by Halliburton Co. “For that matter, neither can NATO.” (click HERE for original article)

My question is “Are they going to fill those positions with American taxpayers, or foreign nationals?”

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR can’t run with the big dogs – Army tells them to stay on the porch

Army snubs KBR under latest combat support services contract

By ELISE CASTELLI | Last Updated: December 2, 2009

Dog on porch

The top dog in contracted support services for the military since 2001 has been KBR. As the sole vendor on the LOGCAP III contract, KBR won $37 billion worth of work to provide troops deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait with everything from dining hall and laundry services to recreation and mail delivery.

No more.

In the year since the Army awarded a new, follow-on combat-support services contract — called LOGCAP IV — to three vendors, including KBR, the company has not won any work.

All seven task orders awarded so far — for a variety of support service in Kuwait and Afghanistan — went to the other two vendors on the LOGCAP IV contract: DynCorp and Fluor. Fluor won $500 million worth of work; DynCorp won $750 million. Under the contract, all three vendors must compete for all task orders.

Under LOGCAP IV, which was awarded in June 2007, each of the three companies has the potential of performing $5 billion worth of work per year.

Lee Thompson, executive director of LOGCAP, declined to say why KBR has not won any work under the new contract. Those decisions are “source-selection sensitive,” he said.

But Thompson pointed out that the Army added two additional vendors to the LOGCAP IV contract to generate innovative solutions at the best prices. According to Army solicitations, the key criteria for LOGCAP IV task order awards, in order of importance, were technical skills, past performance and price.

Also, the Army became aware of limitations in having a sole-source arrangement under LOGCAP III. With three vendors, there is another vendor to provide people and services if one or two of the competitors are fully committed elsewhere, Thompson said.

“That’s the whole thing with competition,” Thompson said. “You get that flexibility.”

Auditors repeatedly criticized LOGCAP III’s inflexibility and said the sole-source nature of the contract led to overpricing and shoddy services in some cases.

In a statement, KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne shrugged off the company’s LOGCAP IV losses and LOGCAP III criticism. “KBR will work to maximize our service offerings to the military and therefore maximize our chances of success of obtaining work under LOGCAP IV,” Browne said in a written statement. “No company is better positioned to provide support on LOGCAP IV than KBR.”

In snubbing KBR in the first seven task orders on the contract, the Army apparently sees it differently.

KBR protested three of those decisions before the Government Accountability Office, but was unsuccessful.

In two cases, GAO said KBR lost the competitions because it failed to follow Army instructions. (Link to original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Bagram: the US nerve centre in Afghanistan

By Bonny Schoonakker (AFP)
December 1, 2009

A US Air Force C-17 aircraft takes off from Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul

A US Air Force C-17 aircraft takes off from Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul

BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan — Each and every meal prepared for US soldiers at the sprawling Bagram military base in Afghanistan costs about 28 dollars a head — more than most Afghans earn in a month.

The enormous financial outlay of the eight-year war is brought into sharp focus at Bagram Airfield, where warplanes roar into the skies to the battlefields but where off-duty soldiers can buy burgers, massages and motorbikes.

And it is at Bagram that many of US President Barack Obama’s 30,000 extra troops will get a first taste of Afghanistan.

With its maze of Soviet-era architecture and plywood huts, Bagram is the biggest US garrison in Afghanistan and boasts a dazzling array of fast-food joints and a Harley Davidson dealership for those away from the frontlines.

Already home to more than 25,000 people, the man responsible for its day-to-day running, Lieutenant Colonel Troy Joslin, says the base was on track to grow another 15-20 percent in the next year even without the extra troops.

Colleagues describe Joslin as “mayor of Bagram”, in charge of a base he says has grown 30 percent over the past year in a bustle of expansion that has seen disused land de-mined to make way for new buildings.

“I don’t see us going away in the immediate future,” Joslin told AFP in the two-storey Soviet-built block that serves as nerve centre of the 2,100-hectare (5,190-acre) compound outside the Afghan capital Kabul.

The passenger terminal is being upgraded to accommodate 1,000 personnel a day, up from its current seating capacity of 250, says the US Air Force.

“This is especially important during surges in passenger movements during an increase in force levels and unit deployments,” said Captain David Faggard, a US Air Force spokesman at Bagram.

On a busy day, the terminal strains to cope with around 1,650 inbound and outbound passengers, he said.

Many of the new troops are likely to take-off or land on Bagram’s three-kilometre (two-mile) runway en route to battle the Taliban militia.

Sending in the extra troops will cost the US military 30 billion dollars this year, Obama said — or one million dollars for each deployed soldier.

There are at least 5,000 civilians on base working for companies contracted by the military, such as Kellog, Brown & Root (KBR) and Presidential Aviation, whose pilots still lounge around with “Blackwater Aviation” marked on their jackets — a name laden with controversy since its operations in Iraq.

Multi-course meals are cooked up by KBR costing what a US military spokesman said is 28 dollars per head per meal, more than most Afghans earn a month.

Some nights the fare includes steaks and crab legs, with most of the food flown in more than 10,000 kilometres (6,000 miles) from the United States.

BagramKBR employees also collect the trash, clean the toilets, provide a laundry service and supply fuel to aircraft — doing just about anything that needs to be done without the use of a weapon or military equipment.

Under the supervision of KBR managers, Afghans do most of the menial work. There are also Bangladeshis, Filipinos, Indians, Kyrgyz, Nepalese, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, Tajiks and Uzbeks, working as labourers and service staff.

Bagram’s main thoroughfare is Disney Drive, named after a US serviceman who died in a welding accident in 2002.

With all the construction work and military operations, the road is prone to traffic jams, clogged with mine-proof vehicles and cement trucks.

“Traffic is the biggest headache,” says Joslin. “There are approximately 2,000 vehicles on the base, double that if you count construction vehicles and Gators (a vehicle resembling a golf cart).”

Alcohol may be banned, in keeping with US military policy, but there is no shortage of recreation.

Special guests are flown in — the actor Gary Sinise and his band played a concert recently — while Kyrgyz women offer soldiers eight-dollar haircuts and full-body massages at 20 dollars an hour at a popular beauty salon.

The PX facility — a sort of shopping mall built out of shipping containers and plywood — has a supermarket, Burger King, Pizza Hut and Green Beans coffeeshop open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Other shops sell sports clothing, jewellery, “Afghan apparel” and souvenirs and cell phones. The Harley Davidson dealership says it sells around four motorcycles a month to US servicemen.

To counter the shortage of space, Joslin says, most of the mines have been cleared to make way for barracks, particularly on the eastern side of the base, where a new detention facility and cement factory are located.

The old prison will be reassigned and the former Soviet-built control tower has been converted into offices for the US Air Force.

The US military has built a chapel on site and is also restoring three Bagram mosques, including one named after Ahmed Shah Massoud, the Northern Alliance leader assassinated two days before September 11 attacks. (click HERE for original article)

For those who may not be aware, Bagram Airforce Base (BAF) is in the processing of transitioning from KBR to Fluor. From what I’m being told from KBR and Fluor employees, there is quite a bit of confusion and a lack of housing at this stage of the transition.

If Bagram is the US nerve center for Afghanistan, then this chaotic transfer from KBR LOGCAP III To Fluor LOGCAP IV must be “un-nerving”. Sorry….I couldn’t resist! Any input from Bagram readers would be great!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR, Dyncorp, Fluor and the LOGCAP IV transisition?

KBR PentagonWhat a mess this whole LOGCAP contract has been. LOGCAP III has been plagued with fraud and corruption, electrocution deaths, toxin exposures, over charging, indictments, rapes, convictions, Congressional hearings, law changes, contractor deaths and countless law suits against KBR……the list is endless!!

I think most of us were relieved when LOGCAP IV in Kuwait and Afghanistan was awarded to Fluor and Dyncorp. Personally I was anxious to get this whole KBR disaster put in the past but that doesn’t seem to be happening.

I’m asking those of you in the field with Dyncorp, Fluor and KBR in Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq to let us know what is going on.

What do you think is the hold up with the transition? You guys are the ones who really know what’s going on….share it with us.

If you make a comment about a specific company please be sure to post the company name, country and camp if you can.

There are a lot of people out there looking for answers.

As of the publishing of this post….I don’t think any major LOCAP IV Task Orders have been awarded in Iraq. If I’m wrong let me know.

I’m looking forward to hearing what you have to say.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: