KBR’s contracts are classified? What is the DoD hiding?

Army Secretary says KBR contract still classified

Published: Tuesday, September 01, 2010, 6:41  PM
, The Oregonian , The Oregonian

The Army’s combat mission in Iraq has ended, but details of the no-bid contract it signed with Kellogg, Brown and Root before the war started remain classified.

On Tuesday, Sec. of the Army John McHugh  said he would not release the contract’s specifics that holds taxpayers — and not — responsible for any harm to a soldier or civilian as it worked restoring Iraqi oil flows in 2003.

But in a two-page response to U. S. ’s demand for details, McHugh reveals how unusual the Army’s arrangement with the former Halliburton subsidiary was.

“Apart from the Restore Iraqi Oil contract with , no other Army contracts awarded since 2001….contain indemnification provisions,” McHugh wrote. “The Army has made no payments as a result of indemnification provisions with contractors supporting contingency operations in Iraq. Afghanistan or anywhere else.”

In July, Blumenauer demanded the Army produce the contract after ’s claims of immunity emerged in a U.S. District Court case in Portland. Chris Heinrich, a attorney, said in a sworn deposition that after signed its Restore Iraqi Oil contract and as the March 2003 invasion was taking place, he went to the Pentagon himself to demand immunity for .

He told Army officials that refused to do the restoration without “broad coverage.” required that taxpayers — not the war contractor — pay for any property damage, injury or death at any site. That applies even if the harm resulted from negligence. eventually billed the government $2.5 billion for the work.

But it could cost taxpayers millions more. Dozens of National Guard soldiers from four states have sued since 2008 claiming the contractor knowingly or negligently exposed them to a cancer-causing chemical at the water treatment plant. Among them: 26 Oregon Army National Guard soldiers who arrived at the Iraq plant in late May 2003. They claim breathing, stomach and skin issues result from their exposure to .

Blumenauer expressed disbelief that the specifics would remain classified — even after combat operations ceased.

“Who is it precisely we’re keeping information from?” he asked. “It appears the only reason to invoke this classification at this point is to keep information from the American public.”

Blumenauer said he is drafting a bill requiring such an arrangement be reported to Congress in the future. “There ought to be someone looking over their shoulders.”

Meanwhile, the National Guard soldiers’ case is moving forward in Portland. Monday, U.S. District Magistrate denied a motion to dismiss.

Spokeswoman Heather Browne said KRB disagrees with the judge and may appeal. She restated ’s stand that the Army was responsible for safety at the plant. (click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • Share/Bookmark

The LTC Rocky Baragona Act (Part II)

, age 42, was killed on 19 May 2003 when his vehicle collided with a tractor trailer driven by a foreign national working for Transportation Company. Baragona died at the scene. (photo courtesy of Baragona Family)

This is Part II of The Rocky Baragona Act continued from The LTC Rocky Baragona Act (Part 1)

Foreign Contracting and Human Trafficking

Working to uncover the truth behind Rocky’s death, we learned that truck drivers often complained of being trafficked; forced to deliver goods, against their will, to US troops in Iraq. Some had been kidnapped, others arrested for smuggling on the black market. A former employee spoke of insurance fraud and falsification of documents in order to win Army contracts; however, fear has kept him silent.  Through our own investigating we learned that had been banned in India for recruiting scams. These scams included bringing in untrained drivers to drive trucks on a promise that the driving would be in country, only to find out that they would be driving into Iraqi war zones.  With no passport, no money, and the threat of breach of contract, these drivers were forced to drive into Iraq with little to no experience. The US Army looked the other way when a contractor like used questionable hiring practices.  There was simply no oversight. I was appalled by the apathy of our military to do nothing about it.

Allowing foreign contractors to perform contracts in violation of the Fars and International Law to support a war fought for democracy was everything my brother was against.  It was clear however, forced labor in defense contracting is an acceptable way of doing business and we were not going to get any support.

Getting In The Ring

Undeterred with the “behind the scenes” of foreign contracting, Rocky’s Justice moved us back to the Hill to use diplomatic measures through Senator DeWine, the Kuwait Ambassador and the Prime Minister…The answer- is untouchable.

Them were some fighting words!!

So we jumped in the ring and hit them in the jaw with a wrongful death suit in the U.S. Northern Georgia Courts. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • Share/Bookmark

Oregon National Guard wins round 2 against KBR

Oregon Guard suit against KBR goes forward on hexavalent chromium exposure
Published: Monday, August 30, 2010, 7:30 PM
, The Oregonian , The Oregonian

A federal judge ruled Monday that a lawsuit by Oregon Army National Guard veterans against war contractor Kellogg, Brown & Root can proceed.

The decision makes the federal court in Portland the apex of a legal battle that stretches from Oregon to West Virginia, and from Indiana to Texas, over who is responsible for exposing American soldiers to a known cancer-causing chemical early in the Iraq war.

Already, the Oregon case has opened a window into the government’s unprecedented use of private companies in Iraq and the lucrative contracts that have remained secret until now.

Beginning in May 2003, hundreds of U.S. and British troops guarded workers as they worked to restore Iraqi oil flows. At a decrepit Qarmat Ali water treatment plant, piles of a toxic orange-yellow powder stained the soil, water and walls.

The powder was a rust-fighter, sodium dichormate, which contains . Exposure to 40 micrograms of per cubic meter — about the size of a grain of salt in about a cubic yard — has shown a high increase in lung, stomach, brain, renal, bladder and bone cancers.

In 2009, 26 Oregon Guard veterans sued , claiming its managers downplayed or dismissed the presence of the chemical.

U.S. District Magistrate Paul Papak denied ’s second motion to dismiss the suit. His fact-finding refutes three of ’s long-time assertions. He found:

  • brought additional sodium dichromate to in June 2003, stored and worked with it. has consistently claimed the chemical was left by Iraqis after Saddam Hussein’s overthrow.
  • knew of the sodium dichromate before most of the soldiers ever arrived, warning a subcontractor — but not the U.S. military or soldiers — that areas of the water plant were contaminated. The Oregon Guard weren’t notified of the chemical until August 2003, two months after they had guarded employees at the plant.
  • was contractually obligated to provide an environmental assessment at and report hazards. says the army was responsible for the assessment.

David Sugerman, the Portland consumer attorney representing the veterans, said, “We are very pleased.”

spokewoman Heather Browne said in an email, “We are disappointed with the ruling and we are in the process of reviewing the decision.”

Troops from four states and Britain claim they suffer health problems as a result of the exposure. At least two soldiers who were exposed to the chemical have died of cancer.

Earlier this summer, attorneys moved to dismiss the Oregon case for lack of jurisdiction. They argued that the contractor was “merely executing the will of the United State.” They also claimed that was acting as a combatant during wartime, and should receive the same legal protection the military.

But in a 29-page opinion, Judge Papak found that ’s work restoring Iraqi oil was a foreign policy goal rather than a combatant activity.

“The defendents operations were more akin to restoring the battlefield to productive use after the battle has ended than to aiding warriors to swing the sword,” Papak wrote, citing another case law in denying ’s claim.

Details of the 2003 Restore Iraqi Oil contract have already raised congressional concern. Earl Blumenhauer, D-Ore., has written the Secretary of the Army demanding details of the agreement because American taxpayers — and not — could pay if the war contractor is found to have harmed Oregon veterans. (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • Share/Bookmark

Blackwater/Xe smuggled weapons into Iraq in dog food containers and still gets USG contracts

Reaches Deal on U.S. Export Violations

By JAMES RISEN
Published: August 20, 2010

WASHINGTON — The private security company formerly called Worldwide, long plagued by accusations of impropriety, has reached an agreement with the for the company to pay $42 million in fines for hundreds of violations of United States export control regulations.

The violations included illegal weapons exports to Afghanistan, making unauthorized proposals to train troops in south Sudan and providing sniper training for Taiwanese police officers, according to company and government officials familiar with the deal.

The settlement, which has not yet been publicly announced, follows lengthy talks between , now called Xe Services, and the that dealt with the violations as an administrative matter, allowing the firm to avoid criminal charges. A company spokeswoman confirmed Friday that a settlement had been reached. The spokesman, Philip J. Crowley, said he could not immediately comment. (Read the rest of the story here…)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • Share/Bookmark

DoD says KBR failed to perform at a level deserving an award fee

Ryan Maseth, a 24-year-old Green Beret, was electrocuted and died in a shower at his base in Iraq on January 2, 2008.

Loses $24.1 Million Fee Over Green Beret’s Death

By David Voreacos and Tony Capaccio -B loomberg – Aug 19, 2010

KBR Inc., the largest contractor in Iraq, must defend a wrongful-death lawsuit by the parents of a Green Beret who was electrocuted while showering in a building that the company maintained, a federal appeals court ruled.

, based in Houston, asked the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss a case over the accidental death on Jan. 2, 2008, of Staff Sergeant Ryan Maseth. The Pentagon inspector general reported last year that was partly to blame because the shower’s electrical pump wasn’t properly installed.

’s appeal, after a judge declined to dismiss in March 2009, raises “interesting and important questions” about whether it invokes political issues that shouldn’t go before a judge, and whether is immune from suit under a “combatant activities” exception, the court said.

“We do not reach these questions now, however, because they are not properly before us,” a panel of the Philadelphia- based court said Aug. 17. “We must dismiss this premature appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”

The panel sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Nora Fisher in Pittsburgh for more pretrial gathering of evidence. The appeal was premature because Fisher did not “conclusively determine” whether could cite the political-question doctrine or combatant activities exception, the panel ruled.

A spokeswoman, Heather Browne, said the company disagrees with the ruling. It was not responsible for Maseth’s death and will defend the case, she said.

Important Questions

“The court recognized that this case raises important questions of law, but ruled the appeal was premature,” Browne said in an e-mail. “The court found only that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the merits of ’s arguments at this time.”

Maseth, of Shaler, Pennsylvania, a member of the 5th Special Forces Group, was in his second tour of duty in Iraq. He died of cardiac arrest caused by electric shock, according to the complaint by his mother, , and his father, Douglas Maseth.

They allege that the electrical problems at the building where Maseth died were well-known, that negligently failed to repair them, and that the negligence caused his death.

Maseth died in a shower at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex in Iraq in part because the pump wasn’t properly grounded when installed less than two years earlier, according to the inspector general’s report. The report examined the electrocution of 18 U.S. soldiers and contractors in Iraq.

‘Catastrophic Result’

The inspector general criticized the Army’s oversight of Maseth’s compound, saying his death “was the catastrophic result of the failure of multiple systems exposing U.S. personnel to unnecessary risk.”

, Army commanders, and Army contracting command that provided oversight were “responsible for the use and physical condition” of the facility, it said.

Starting in February 2006, “ did not ground equipment during installation or report improperly grounded equipment identified during routine maintenance” at the facility, according to the report.

installed the pump on the roof that contributed to the electrocution of Maseth, said the report.

“The pump that failed leading to the electrocution was not grounded during installation,” it said. “Safe and proper installation required grounding.”

In February, the Army’s Rock Island Contracting Center informed it was being docked all potential fees of $24.1 million for January through April 2008.

‘Failures to Perform’

An Army contracting official, James Loehrl, told in a letter the action followed “failures to perform at a level deserving” of a fee.

The deficiencies included “’s failure to document the poor conditions of the electrical systems” at the complex, its “failure to provide notice of unsafe life, health and safety conditions and ’s failure to employ qualified personnel to provide electrical services.”

In a March 9 rebuttal, Vice President Douglas Horn disputed Loehrl’s claims as “contrary to fact and conflict with findings previously made by multiple government entities.”

Horn disputed what he called the implication that bore responsibility for the deaths of Maseth and others.

“There is no evidence this is true,” Horn said. “The Army knew that buildings” in the complex and elsewhere “had deficient electrical systems” and “the Army chose to house individuals in these buildings” or “not to authorize rewiring or other upgrade work.”

The company is “exploring options and remedies” for recovering the $24.1 million from the Army, Horn wrote in a response to the letter denying the fees.

The case is Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc., 08-cv-563, U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh). (click HERE for the original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • Share/Bookmark