Ryan we haven’t forgotten you

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

was electrocuted in his shower in Baghdad and died January 2, 2008

The war in Iraq is all but over and our troops have pulled out.  It’s been four years today since 24 year old  SSG Ryan Maseth was electrocuted and died while showering in his living quarters at Radwaniyah Palace Complex in Baghdad. Ryan’s courageous mother, continues to fight, not only for the rights of her son, but for the safety of soldiers everywhere.

Cheryl filed suit against for the death of her son. Although this suit drags on in the US courts at an agonizingly slow pace.  has pulled out all the stops in attempts to have this case dismissed in US courts, but much to ’s dismay, it hasn’t.

I will write every year I’m able to remind people of Ryan’s death, the product of corporate greed and corruption, and heroes like Cheryl Harris. We need more heroes like Cheryl!

You can read more on Cheryl’s case against KBR at Cheryl Harris vs KBR.

Below are links to past posts I’ve written and published on the anniversary of Ryan’s death.

SSG Ryan Maseth – You must be very proud! (2009)
Does anyone know what day this is? (2010)
3rd anniversary of the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth (2011)

Cheryl, I pray the next post I publish about Ryan is how you succeeded in holding KBR accountable for his senseless death!

Ms Sparky

3rd anniversary of the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

3 years ago today, 24 year old  entered the shower in his Special Forces living quarters at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex in Baghdad, Iraq and he died. He was electrocuted do to an improperly installed water pump on the roof of his building.

The Army initially reported that Ryan, a decorated Green Beret foolishly took an electrical appliance into the shower and that was the reason for his death.

The Criminal Investigations Command (CID) closed Ryan’s investigation on June 11, 2008 proclaiming Ryan’s manner of death was “accidental”. His mother, refused to accept this as the cause of death for her son. (Read the rest of the story here…)

Defense Cover-Up Management Agency (DCMA) – Part 2

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

US Air Force MSgt

This is Part 2 in a series of original articles to be published on MsSparky.com by former QAR discussing his personal experiences with the oversight of ’s LOGCAP III contract. Defense Cover-Up Management Agency (DCMA) – Part 1 can be read HERE.

The next Statement of Procedure (SOP) I was to turn my attention to was the Water. The concern about the water in the Green Zone was elevated after laundry operations went down for 17 days because the laundry machines became contaminated with diesel fuel. In addition, I had several complaints from military personnel that their showers “smelled like diesel fuel”. I heard that same complaint nearly every week. I told our DCMA commanders about these concerns and they laughed it off. No action was taken to locate the cause of the fuel smell by either Col Miles or his replacement, U.S. Army Col McQuain.

The State Department and US Embassy personnel became very upset about the laundry being shut down (no dry cleaning services) and I was told to find out the cause. Now I have have clients of the LOGCAP contract informing me their shower smells like diesel fuel and the laundry goes down for 17 days because of fuel contamination. I felt the next logical step was to perform an inspection of the Water Operations to assess their compliance with the Statement of Procedure. I informed of the impending Water Operations inspection and gave them a week to prepare. To that date, ’s Water Operations in the Green Zone had never been inspected by DCMA. I questioned on a daily basis what the previous DCMA Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) were doing? The Statement of Procedure for Water Operations stated the requirements for super chlorinating, daily inspections and logbooks. I was to find that none of these requirements were being adequately performed, if at all. (Read the rest of the story here…)

KBR loses $25M in award fee bonuses for poor performance in Iraq (updated)

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

They didn’t just lose $25M….they got ZERO! This is a classic example of how one person can make a difference. I do believe underestimated ’ tenacity. I applaud you Cheryl!

Contractor linked to Iraq death loses $25M in fees

By KIMBERLY HEFLING
Associated Press Writer
Feb 24, 10:42 PM EST

Cheryl Harris with her son Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth. Ryan, 24, was electrocuted in his shower in Iraq on Jan. 2, 2008. Cheryl has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against KBR. That suit is currently sitting in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals awaiting a decision.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Military contractor KBR has lost about $25 million in bonuses from the government because of “failed” worked done in Iraq during the time a Green Beret was electrocuted in a barracks shower it was responsible for maintaining.

The U.S. said in a statement released to The Associated Press Wednesday night that the Houston-based company failed to meet a level deserving of an payment for work it did during the first four months of 2008. Award fees are written into contracts as an incentive for the contractors to do quality work.

The Army statement did not specifically mention the January 2008 death of 24-year-old Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth of Pittsburgh in the statement but said a task force that has extensively reviewed electrical work in Iraq was consulted in making the decision as was the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, which investigated Maseth’s death, but did not press charges against KBR.

Dan Carlson, a spokesman for the Army Sustainment Command, said in an e-mail that “multiple factors” led to the decision. (Read the rest of the story here…)

DCMA Accepts KBR’s Corrective Action Plan-1 year later

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

Almost one year and who knows how many revisions later finally submits a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) the DCMA can accept. On September 11, 2008 the DCMA issued a Level III Corrective Action Request (CAR) # HQ-08-LOGCAP-001 LIII to for their Deficient Quality Systems with regards to electrical maintenance and installations. (Click HERE to read that original post)

From the CAR:

a. This enclosure documents two overarching findings of nonconformance:

i. Grounding and Bonding: KBR’s quality system failed to properly identify and systematically correct facility grounding and bonding deficiencies…..

ii. Quality System: KBR’s Inspection/Quality Control System failed to identify and systemically correct numerous Program-wide deficiencies……

Click HERE to read Corrective Action Request (CAR) # HQ-08-LOGCAP-001 LII. Rumor has it this CAR actually started out as a Level IV. It was that serious. But in usually LOGCAP fashion, the DoD succumbed to pressures and lowered the level.

I do not have the final Corrective Action Plan as of yet. As soon as I get it I will post it. If you have it please email it to me.

This CAR was issued after the facts were revealed surrounding the true manner in which died. He was electrocuted in his shower due to shoddy electrical work. Specifically improper grounding of the water pump in his building at Radwaniah Palace Complex.

Although the CAP for this CAR has been accepted, this does not mean business as usual for KBR.  They have to consistently adhere to the conditions of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP).  This Level III  CAR and the CAP are a permanent DoD documents.

So…if you have that CAP please send it. If you have information about KBR violating this CAP, please let me know so I can pass it on. I’m sure I will be blogging more about this.

Ms Sparky


The DCMA will not let KBR fail

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

When the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) issued a Level III Corrective Action Request (CAR) to on September 11, 2008 a rumor surfaced that this CAR had actually left Iraq as a Level IV and was then lowered to a Level III by DCMA in Washington DC. But there was no way for me to prove that.

The issuance of a Level IV CAR would have meant sure termination of KBR’s contract. As it should have been.

After the last hearing the Senate Democratic Policy Committee published KBR’s most recent Level III  CAR on their website. I was alerted by a very observant reader to take a look at the footer in the attachments.  Of the 48 attachments to this CAR, 40 of them have this in the footer:

HQ-08-LOGCAP-001 LIV

Note the “LIV”. That means Level 4. This confirms to me that this CAR in fact did leave Iraq as a Level 4 and was downgraded by the DCMA in Washington. So now I must ask why? Why would the DCMA in Washington NOT take the recommendations of those with first hand knowledge of the issue? Those who investigated and wrote the CAR in Iraq?

  1. Would it draw attention to the complete and utter failure of the DCMA to oversee KBR’s contract?
  2. Did the DoD think that KBR could not be replaced?
  3. Was there some back room DoD deal that KBR could stay at all cost?

They are correct on the first point. The DCMA oversight of KBR has been a complete and utter failure from the beginning. But, they are completely wrong on the second point. KBR could have easily been replaced by a competent contractor. It was not necessary to replace every single KBR employee. Bring in new management, because that is the biggest problem.  Replace every manager from the top down to the PM or Site Manger level and then go from there. You could sweeten the deal and entice managers with bonuses to ensure a smooth transition. For those who won’t cooperate, escort them out of the country in handcuffs! It might be a little confusing at first. But you would be money ahead in the long run. You would at least be making forward progress. Right now you are just throwing good money after bad. And on the third point, I’m thinking YES!

The DCMA in Washington  should have paid a little more attention to detail when they downgraded the CAR and no one would have been the wiser. But, now we are and now we want to know why you are protecting KBR.

Updated May 24, 2009 8:24am PST: Click HERE to view CAR # HQ-08-LOGCAP-001 LIII Deficient Quality System – Level III Corrective Action Request, the CAR in question.

Ms Sparky

Electric shocks came often at U.S. bases in Iraq, report finds (CNN)

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

Bookmark and Share

By Scott Bronstein and Abbie Boudreau
CNN Special Investigation Unit
January 29, 2008

(CNN)  — Improper wiring by military contractor at U.S. bases in Iraq led to electrical shocks about once every three days for nearly two years, according to Defense Department documents obtained by CNN.
Ryan Maseth, a 24-year-old Green Beret, died in a shower at his base in Iraq on January 2, 2008.

Houston-based KBR, the military contractor responsible for maintaining and providing services at most of U.S. bases across Iraq, had “systemic failures” in its electrical work that threatened the life, health and safety of people inside the bases, according to the documents, from a violation report obtained by CNN.

There were 231 electrical shocks of personnel in Iraq from September 2006 through July 2008 in facilities maintained by KBR, the documents state.

KBR has been at the center of controversy surrounding the electrocution of soldiers on bases in Iraq. Much of the controversy has surrounded the electrocution of Sgt. Ryan Maseth, a highly decorated 24-year old Green Beret from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Maseth was electrocuted in a shower on a U.S. base in Baghdad, Iraq, on January 2, 2008.

At least 18 troops have been electrocuted in Iraq since 2003, and many of the have been attributed to shoddy electrical work done on U.S. bases — work managed by U.S. contractors — according to Pentagon sources. Each of the has occurred in different locations and under various circumstances.

The violation report shows that electrical shocks and problems with wiring and grounding continued for much of last year, long after Maseth was electrocuted.

Heather Browne, a KBR spokesperson, said the company could not comment on the specific language in the document obtained by CNN because KBR had not seen it.

But the company has previously said that “KBR found no link between work it’s been asked to perform and the reported electrocutions” and that “KBR remains committed to the safety and security of all employees and those the company serves. We have fully cooperated with the government when issues have been raised about work in Iraq and we will continue to do so.”

On the death of Maseth, the company has said, “KBR’s investigation has produced no evidence that KBR was responsible for Sgt. Maseth’s death. We have cooperated fully with all government agencies investigating this matter and will do so in the future.”

Last week, CNN obtained other documents that show the Army investigator assigned to look into Maseth’s electrocution blamed KBR for the death, stating that she believed the cause was “negligent homicide” and that there is “credible information that KBR’s negligence led to Maseth’s death.”

The revelations about the frequency of shocks on bases are found in the complete and detailed report that led to KBR’s citation for being in serious violation of its contract several months ago.

At that time, the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Management Agency gave KBR what is known as a “Level III Corrective Action Request.” That is issued only when a contractor is found in “serious non-compliance” and is just one step below the possibility of suspending or terminating a contract, Pentagon officials said.

While that violation citation was previously known, the report’s precise language and details of KBR’s alleged “failures” were not known until now.

The 45-page report alleges KBR had improper electrical wiring, grounding and overall electrical problems across Iraq.

“The government found systemic KBR failures to properly ground and bond facilities — failures that contributed to theater personnel receiving shocks in KBR maintained facilities on average once every three days” between September 2006 and July 31, 2008, the detailed report says.

That information, the report says, came from KBR’s own statistical records.

“The conditions of these facilities created Life, Health, Safety (LHS) conditions for the occupants. The lack of grounding and bonding, among other electrical deficiencies” were “identified and confirmed by three separate independent inspection teams” from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Army Combat Safety Center and a multinational force working with fire and electricity, the report states.

“Most facilities inspected had electrical deficiencies because KBR failed to consistently follow contract standards every time it constructed or emplaced a facility, inspected a facility, responded to a service order request, or performed maintenance and/or repairs on facilities, generators and utilities,” the report says.

Also, the report says, “the Government is unaware of any efforts undertaken by KBR to independently identify, assess, and implement corrective actions to its electrical support services or quality control inspection program as a result of the extensive number of electrical shock incidents … ”

Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pennsylvania, said his office has received numerous anecdotal reports of U.S. military personnel continuing to receive electric shocks.

“While KBR continues to assure the American people that it has completed its own investigations and has found no evidence of corporate wrongdoing, the emerging facts prove otherwise,” Casey said. “According to an internal investigation led by the Pentagon’s contract auditors, we now know that KBR failed to comply with basic contractual requirements even while being rewarded with billions of dollars by U.S. taxpayers.”

Casey called on the Pentagon “to treat this issue for the danger it represents.” The Defense Department, he said, “has taken some encouraging actions [but] it needs to do much more.”

“And it is high time that KBR begin to suffer real consequences for what I consider to be blatant contractual noncompliance,” Casey said. (Click HERE to go to CNN article)

Ms Sparky
Bookmark and Share