Judge allows trial of suits over KBR convoy deaths

By Tom Fowler – Houston Chronicle
Feb. 8, 2010

Lawsuits claiming Houston-based KBR should have stopped a 2004 truck convoy in Iraq before six civilian drivers were killed and others injured in an ambush can go to trial, a federal judge ruled today.

U.S. District Judge Gray Miller had previously dismissed the case, agreeing with KBR’s argument that it didn’t have the authority to keep the fuel convoys off the road and that a trial would be an improper challenge to military decision-making. KBR contracts with the military to provide logistical support.

But after an appeals court overturned his decision, Miller allowed the parties to gather more evidence, which turned up e-mails of KBR managers saying they thought they could stop the conveys and had done so in the past.

Miller said the added information was central to his decision that allowing the trial would not second-guess the military in violation of the political question doctrine — the legal principle that some issues are the province of the elected branches of government and not the federal courts.

“If anything, the record makes it clear that although the political question doctrine lurks just around the corner, it can be extricated from the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants,” Davis wrote.

KBR said it will appeal the ruling.

The case centers on an April 2004 attack on a KBR convoy of supply trucks in Iraq, which killed six civilian truck drivers and wounded 14.

The drivers caught in the ambush were delivering fuel under KBR’s multibillion-dollar contract to transport supplies, build bases, serve meals and provide other support services for American troops in the Middle East.

Plaintiffs in the Houston suits — two injured workers and the family of one who was killed in the attack — allege that the company knew of the likelihood of the attacks in advance and had the authority to cancel the convoys.

Plaintiffs contend that e-mails and testimony allowed after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals sent the case back to Miller suggest KBR supervisors did not believe they were constrained by military orders.

“You, your team or any individual (as you have previously indicated to everyone in theater), have the right to say no to anything that is unsafe or where security is not available,” one KBR senior vice president said in an e-mail shortly before the deadly attacks.

In a statement KBR said it was disappointed with the ruling.

“KBR remains mindful of the tragic circumstances of this case,” the company said. “However, our position remains that the federal courts are not the appropriate forum for these issues to be resolved. KBR’s actions regarding the convoys were based on instruction by the Army and with reliance that the convoys would be protected by the Army. Further, it is not appropriate for federal courts to essentially second guess the military which is in the position daily of making decisions in the dangerous, unpredictable environment of a war zone.”

William Bodie, President of KBR’s North American Government and Defense business, said in a letter to the editor published by the Chronicle in November that the e-mails used in court “do not tell the whole story.”

“In context, the internal communication between KBR and the military evidence the concern KBR had for its employees,” Bodie said. “Further, the U.S. military alone decided to deploy the military supply convoys at issue here; they decided when, where and how the convoys were to be conducted.”

Tommy Fibich, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the judge’s ruling directly refutes those claims.

“It’s clear the judge is saying these plaintiffs need to get their day in court and we look forward to it,” Fibich said. “The company can no longer hide behind these immunities they claim they have for this work.”

The case is set to go to trial on May 24. (Click HERE for article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Murder plots, corruption & Bodie seeks salvation

He that lieth down with Dogs, shall rise up with Fleas.

~Benjamin Franklin 

"The Godfather" - Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando)

This Week in Government Contracting: 

Here is a rundown on some noteworthy happenings in the world of defense contracting, that occurred this week.  I am beginning to believe that there is no such thing as honesty and integrity when it comes to corporations vying for our taxdollars, or the lawmakers we elect to carry out their intended duties to prevent waste and fraud, for that matter.  Feel free to submit a comment and let me know if I missed anything that was newsworthy this week:

Take the money and run
February 2, 2010
(WHAS11) – Keith Shaw is charged with making unauthorized modifications to military aircraft parts and trying to kill his former business associates who were cooperating with military investigators. 

While the plot described in Shaw’s indictment reads like spy novel, the testimony Tuesday was more like hearing a technical manual read aloud. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senator Webb questions the value of  ‘Retired Generals Club’
February 2, 2010
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.). Saying that there’s no reason military spending should be “sacrosanct,” Webb urged Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen to “take a hard look at programs that don’t produce a clear bottom line.” 

Webb shot out three programs. First, he questioned the wisdom of giving $60 million to Blackwater to train sailors in self-defense on board ships — or, as Webb put it, “how to do their job.” He attacked sending military officers to defense think tanks to serve as fellows, specifically calling out the well-connected Center for a New American Security, which has sent a lot of its own analysts to the Obama State and Defense Departments. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senate Leader from Kentucky has ties to corrupt defense contractor
February 3, 2010
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has been quick to denounce a bid by Democrats to stop foreign corporations from pouring money into U.S. elections, claiming current law already bars such spending. As we’ve reported before, it’s not nearly as simple as that — but McConnell should know: The GOP Senate leader has raked in campaign cash from a subsidiary of a major foreign defense contractor that’s currently being investigated by the Justice Department for bribery (See BAE Settles Corruption Charges). (Click HERE for full article) 

Alabama Senator demands a side of pork – to the tune of $35 billion
February 5, 2010
To be sure, Shelby was just one of many lobbying targets for EADS and Northrop Grumman — both of whom are major players in the world of money in politics and influence peddling. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), for one, received a series of suspicious donations from the companies after he threw his support behind granting them the $35 billion Pentagon contract. Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), meanwhile, serves on EADS’s board. (Click HERE for full article) 

KBR ordered to pay $19 million in damages related to LOGCAP III sub-contract
February 4, 2010
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal court has ordered subsidiaries of global engineering firm KBR Inc. (NYSE: KBR) to pay nearly $19 million in damages to The Event Source over a 5-year-old contractual row, according to an 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  The dispute arose from a 2005 subcontract that KBR’s subsidiaries handed the Orlando, Fla.-based global event management firm, under the LOGCAP III contract. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Politics of LOGCAP
February 4, 2010
From 1995 to 2000 Cheney was chief executive and chairman of Halliburton, the major provider of products and services to the military. Most of Halliburton’s government contracts were won by its construction subsidiary, KBR. Under Cheney the company benefited from $3.8 billion in government contracts or insured loans. Cheney’s wealth also escalated from $700,000 to $65 million in five years. (Click HERE for full article) 

Hamilton College – Conference on Military Contracting
February 04, 2010
Additionally, Joelson argued that there are significant non-monetary costs to America when giving these contracts. He pointed to two cases in particular: one, the electrocution death of an American soldier in a shower wired by KBR employees, and the other, an incident in which Blackwater employees killed 17 Iraqi civilians. Both incidents demonstrated problems in the contracting system that the federal government is currently unable to remedy. (Click HERE for full article) 

BAE Settles Corruption Charges
February 5, 2010    
BAE Systems, Europe’s largest military contractor, has agreed to plead guilty to two criminal charges and pay nearly $450 million in penalties in the United States and Britain to end long-running investigations into questionable payments made to win contracts overseas. Under its settlement with the Justice Department, BAE will pay a $400 million fine and plead guilty to one count of conspiring to make false statements about having an internal program to comply with anti-bribery laws. The Justice Department’s complaint said the charge related to more than $200 million of business that BAE had won through 2003 in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Saudi Arabia and other countries. (Click HERE for full article) 

Also announced on February 5th – BAE Systems is shutting down their Grainger body armor plant in Tennessee.  Grainger County’s unemployment rate was reported to be over 13%, prior to this announcement. (Click HERE for article) 

And Finally I don’t know what to think about this one but  Led Zep’s Stairway To Heaven has been stuck in my head since I read this: 

Bill Bodie joins the Army – The Salvation Army
February 3, 2010
Bill Bodie was named the chairman-elect, Salvation Army’s D.C. Advisory Board. Bodie is president of KBR North American Government and Defense in Arlington. He has held leadership roles in the public and private sectors, and has also been published in the Wall Street Journal, the Detroit News and other publications. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Salvation Army has several 12 step programs maybe they will come up with a KBR recovery program for employees and a special one for Bodie’s incessant babbling and BS!

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Victimizing the victim, Halliburton has a knack for that

Halliburton Asks High Court to Block Trial

Halliburton asks Supreme Court to block trial over claim of rape in Iraq

The Associated Press
WASHINGTON

Halliburton Co. is asking the Supreme Court to block a Texas woman’s lawsuit alleging she was raped by military contractor co-workers in Iraq.

The company wants the justices to reverse a lower court ruling that Jamie Leigh Jones’ case can go to trial. Jones sued Halliburton and its former subsidiary KBR, saying she was raped while working for KBR at Camp Hope, Baghdad, in 2005.

The trial is set to begin in February 2011.

Halliburton says the contract signed by Jones and other workers requires claims to be settled through arbitration, not trial.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled in Jones’ favor in September.

The Associated Press usually doesn’t identify people alleging sexual assault, but Jones’ face and name have been broadcast in media reports and on her own Web site.

The case is KBR Technical Services v. Jones, 09-864. (Click HERE for original article)

AlterNet also has a great article click HERE to read it.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR’s Bill Bodie babbles in Yankton

This is me responding to your bogus propaganda Bodie.....if of course I were an angry cat!

KBR President, Bill Bodie is out there trying to sell his “KBR snake oil” again. He actually took the time to responded to a letter from a reader about the Franken Amendment in a small town newspaper in Yankton, South Dakota. KBR must be absolutely desperate. Here’s my latest addition to my “Bodie Babble” category.

Response To Letter

Published: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:20 AM CST
William C. Bodie, Houston
President, KBR North American Government and Defense

Many of the statements in the letter entitled “Cases of Rape” (Press & Dakotan, Jan. 15) are based on erroneous reports regarding the Jamie Leigh Jones case, and misinformation on Sen. Franken’s amendment. KBR would like to set the record straight.

First, it’s important to note that Ms. Jones’ allegation of rape remains unsubstantiated. A criminal investigation was conducted and found her claims to be unconfirmed.  Further, the Justice Department pursued a grand jury investigation in Florida in 2008.  After hearing the evidence, the grand jury issued no indictments.

The allegation that Ms. Jones was imprisoned in a shipping container is also false. Following her reported alleged assault, for her own safety, she was provided with a secure living trailer, similar to that in which other KBR employees live, along with food, water, clothing and was attended to by a female KBR employee. There, she phoned her family and assured them of her safety. There were no armed guards outside her trailer. The employee also stayed with Ms. Jones until the State Department, to whom KBR immediately reported the alleged assault, arrived. KBR then worked with the State Department to arrange for medical treatment and for Ms. Jones to leave Iraq, and provided a female counselor to escort her home.

The writer of the letter bases her information about the Franken amendment on misinformation and criticizes those who opposed its passage.

Because Franken’s amendment promotes frivolous lawsuits and provides less monetary benefit, in many instances, to victims of workplace violence, the Department of Defense, Chambers of Commerce and businesses across the country are also against the legislation.

Under KBR’s dispute resolution program, 95 percent of all employee complaints are resolved promptly to the employees’ satisfaction and at no cost to the employee, and saves taxpayers money in litigation costs. The few remaining claims not resolved by this process are heard before an independent arbitrator.

There’s no greater priority at KBR than the safety and security of its employees, and the company is committed to continuing fact-based dialogue on these issues. (Click HERE for the original article)

One thing Bill Bodie failed to mention is…..if the arbitrator rules in favor of the employee and KBR thinks the dollar amount is too high….they appeal the ruling! As in the case of the $3.5M award to KBR rape victim Tracy Barker.

There is no doubt KBR wanted to keep everything behind closed doors and out of courts. Courts are a matter of public record. We can’t have that now can we! Stop your damn sniveling it’s law now! Get those “snake in the grass” attorney’s of yours to work and find some loop hole to get out of it! That’s what KBR does best!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Ms Sparky’s “Top 10″ villainous blogging inspirations for 2009

!HAPPY NEW YEAR!

What would the end of the year be without a “Top 10″ list? I have seen “Top 10″ best, “Top 10″ worst and just about every other “Top 10″ list you can think of. So I decided I would create my very own. It was difficult to decide on just what I should “Top 10″.  Should I “Top 10″ DoD contractor scandals, indictments, lawsuits and hearings? That would be more like a “Top 100″.  Then it came to me. Why not honor, or at least recognize, those who have unintentionally inspired me and provided me with the fertile soil (aka bull sh*t) that has allowed the seeds of disbelief, disgust and disdain to flourish in my posts at MsSparky.com.

Here is my “Top 10″ list of those who kept me fired up, pissed off and the keyboard smokin’ in 2009:

10. Bruce Stanski – who resigned from KBR and before the ink was dry on his resignation letter, slithered on over to Fluor. More and more of Stanski’s KBR comrades have  joined “Team Fluor” now known as KBR East. Hello Fluor!! Let’s not forget that Bruce Almighty was at the helm of KBR when the majority of fraud, waste, abuse and other crimes were being committed. If you lie down with dogs, expect to get fleas!

9. DynCorp -  who appears to be on the brink of losing their piece of LOGCAP IV due in part to their recruiting of managers from the cesspool of former KBR managers and supervisors. (Are you paying attention Fluor?) Dyncorp has also provided us with an abundance of disgruntled disheartened employees who are more than willing to spill the beans!

8. ArmorGroup – This is an OMG!! ArmorGroup introduced the world to drinking booze from the butt cracks of co-workers at a US Embassy in Afghanistan while collecting paychecks sponsored by the US Taxpayer. This was so nasty, every time I blogged about them I had go take a shower!

7. Stanley Baker Hill (SBH) – Most notably, for providing identity thieves the opportunity to make a little US taxpayer money too by disclosing the names and SS# of 269 SBH employees.

6. CSA – for letting the world know that LOGCAP contractors do not  have the market cornered on corruption and incompetence. The countless employees who come forward to report wrong doing keep these CSA posts alive and well.

5. Agility\Taos Industries – Recently indicted and suspended from DoD contracting. But more importantly bringing several former high level KBR managers one step closer to the indictments we have all been waiting for.

4. Department of Defense\Department of State for continuing to sponsor and support KBR, DynCorp, CSA and others who have proven themselves time and time again to be inept, incompetent and unwilling to meet their contractual requirements. Does anyone have a final Corrective Action Request (CAR) count for 2009?

3. Department of Justice for not pursuing, investigating or holding enough companies and individuals accountable for alleged criminal actions in the realm of government contracting. Most notably, KBR for the negligent homicide of SSG Ryan Maseth.

2. KBR’s Bill Bodie – for single-handedly taking KBR to a new level of arrogance and idiocy with his pathetic editorials pontificating the innocence of KBR. I republish them as “Bodie Babble”. It must be difficult to be nothing more than Bill Utt’s bobble head doll!

Now for my #1 get me all fired up winner for 2009 (drum roll please)

1. KBR’s Heather Browne – for her “unwavering commitment” in defending KBR against the ever mounting and resounding claims of rape, discrimination, harassment, assault and imprisonment of KBR employees. For the exposure of US soldiers and civilians to countless toxins and hazards and the electrocution deaths of US soldiers. And she does it all with a smile. Heather, I am certain KBR is compensating you well for these deceptions. I do hope you are saving some. Because when this is all over, you will need it to buy your soul back! Maybe HISD will have you back or maybe you could team up with Baghdad Bob and go on a comedy tour!

I’m sure after I publish this I will think of someone else who should be on the list. But I can promise you #1 & #2 won’t change! So, tell me who you think should be on the list!

My thanks to all of you for an amazing 2009!

Happy New Years. I have a feeling 2010 will be a good one!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Pentagon promises study on burn pits

By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes
Stars and Stripes – Mideast edition
Saturday, December 26, 2009

WASHINGTON — Military health officials who have steadfastly denied that burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan cause serious health problems will launch a massive study next year to see if they’re wrong.

Officially, the Pentagon still says the toxic smoke from the pits is not to blame for the fatal cancers and respiratory illnesses suffered by some troops upon returning from the war zones. But Dr. Craig Postlewaite, director of the Defense Department’s Force Health Protection programs, said that researchers “are keeping the door open” on the issue.

“When we look at the health outcome data of those exposed [to the burn pits] we’re not seeing a great increase in respiratory illnesses,” he said in an interview with Stars and Stripes this week. “But we’ve become aware in the last several months that there have been a handful of conditions diagnosed by military physicians where they’ve indicated there could be an inhalational exposure cause.”

That doesn’t mean burn pits are to blame, he said — dust and sand, cigarette smoke or other unknown airborne particulates could be at fault. However, he said, it does indicate that more research is needed on the issue.

The move comes amid criticism that Pentagon officials have overlooked dozens of serious illnesses related to combat zone burn pits — used at numerous bases to dispose of everyday trash, broken furniture and even excess combat equipment.

So far, 22 class-action lawsuits related to alleged burn pit illnesses have been filed in federal courts, covering both contractors and soldiers exposed to the pits. Members of Congress have pushed military officials to respond to anecdotal reports of leukemia, lung tumors and other unusual cancers in troops stationed near some of the largest burn pits.

Most of the department’s current data on the pits’ acrid smoke comes from a 2007 study of the air quality around Balad Air Base in Iraq. Critics have blasted the methodology and thoroughness of the study, and Postlewaite admitted that the research provides only a snapshot of airborne particulate matter at that one location.

“Our previous assessment did not consider combined exposures, whether the dust and smoke together might cause problems,” he said. “It did not consider genetic susceptibility. If there are people being harmed by the smoke, it’s probably a relatively small number of people. But what we care about most is the health of our people.”

Joe Chenelly, spokesman for the Disabled Veterans of America, applauded the decision to further research the inhalation illnesses but “we’d like to see these sick troops getting more help right away and their families getting help right away.”

The group has compiled a list of more than 500 servicemembers suffering from what they believe are burn pit-related illnesses.

“We’d like to see every one of these burn pits shut down today,” he said. “The study costs will likely be more than what it would cost to get proper incinerators at these bases.”

Postlewaite said officials are still organizing sites and collection details for the study, but he expects a formal report on the data by the end of 2010. Both the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center and the Department’s Deployment Health Research Center are involved in the effort.

The Department of Veterans Affairs has also promised to investigate the long-term health effects of exposure to the smoke, although the department does not currently recognize burn pit exposure as a presumed combat-connected illness.

In August, President Barack Obama promised the issue would not become another “Agent Orange,” the name for herbicides used heavily during the Vietnam War and later linked to serious health problems in civilians and U.S. troops. Veterans groups have fought with military agencies for years over health benefits related to that chemical exposure. (Click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Dyncorp should pay the employees they have before hiring more

Will work for moneyMaybe it’s just my crazy way of thinking, but if you have hired someone to work for you….say Dyncorp for example…..don’t you have an obligation to pay them on time and as agree to? And if you don’t, there shouldn’t there be repercussions? I have been getting numerous complaints that Dyncorp seems to be having a problem paying their American employees on time and as agreed to. Some haven’t been paid for as many as two pay periods.  There is no need to go into what I would be doing about that. All I can say is….. I DON’T WORK FOR FREE and I don’t expect anyone else to as well.

Afghanistan contractor numbers expected to increase
Stars and Stripes
European edition, Thursday, December 3, 2009

Even as U.S. troops surge to new highs in Afghanistan they are outnumbered by military contractors, according to a Defense Department census due to be distributed to Congress — illustrating how hard it is for the U.S. to wean itself from the large numbers of war-zone contractors that have proved controversial in Iraq, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The number of contractors in Afghanistan rose to almost 74,000 by June 30, outnumbering the roughly 58,000 U.S. soldiers on the ground at that point, the paper noted.

As the military force in Afghanistan grows further, to a planned 68,000 by the end of the year, the Defense Department expects the ranks of contractors to increase more.

The military requires contractors for essential functions ranging from supplying food and laundry services to guarding convoys and even military bases — functions once performed by military personnel but have been outsourced so a slimmed-down military can focus more on battle-related tasks.

The heavy reliance on contractors in Afghanistan signals that a situation that defense planners once considered temporary has become a standard fixture of U.S. military operations, according to the Journal.

“For a sustained fight like our current commitments, the U.S. military can’t go to war without contractors on the battlefield,” Steven Arnold, a former Army general and retired executive at logistics specialists Ecolog USA and KBR Inc., told the Journal. KBR was formerly owned by Halliburton Co. “For that matter, neither can NATO.” (click HERE for original article)

My question is “Are they going to fill those positions with American taxpayers, or foreign nationals?”

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

It was the Army’s fault

This posted updated on Nov 29, 2009. I added Tommy Fibich’s response to Bill Bodies laughable letter to the editor! Tommy Fibish of Fibich, Hampton and Leebron represent the families and victims of The Good Friday Massacre.

KBR’s Bill Bodie is still on his letter writing campaign! Here is the latest edition to my “Bodie Babble” collection!

KBR defends its actions

The article entitled “KBR aware convoy in harm’s way” (Page A1, Thursday) does not address some of the paramount issues in the convoy cases. KBR would like to set the record straight.

The events of the April 2004 convoy attack were tragic. We remain mindful of those who lost their loved ones as they were members of the KBR family. However, the assertion that KBR deliberately placed these men in harm’s way or failed to warn of the dangers of working in Iraq is simply false. KBR takes great care in warning and in training employees about the dangers they will face working in a war zone before they depart for Iraq.

It is important to understand the framework in which KBR and other government contractors perform their work in Iraq and Afghanistan. The executive branch and Congress decided many years ago to use civilian contractors to support the military during wartime in order to save costs in peacetime and because they could not recruit enough soldiers to meet all of their logistical needs without resorting to a draft. The Defense Base Act (DBA) was established by Congress as the process to provide coverage to civilians who are injured while supporting the military during war time. Given this exclusive remedy under the DBA, in order for these lawsuits to proceed, the plaintiffs must prove that KBR specifically intended to have the insurgents injure or kill KBR’s employees on the April 2004 convoys. The evidence does not support this allegation.

The e-mails that were the basis of the article do not tell the whole story. In context, the internal communication between KBR and the military evidence the concern KBR had for its employees. Further, the U.S. military alone decided to deploy the military supply convoys at issue here; they decided when, where and how the convoys were to be conducted. These military decisions were made based on the intelligence about insurgent threats that the military compiled through its unique capabilities and resources. Under the Political Question Doctrine and other established principles of law, it is not appropriate for courts — as litigation in these cases would require — to second-guess such wartime decisions and actions by the military that are reserved by the U.S. Constitution to the elected branches of government.

The men and women who work for KBR in Iraq do so at great sacrifice to themselves and their families. It is on their behalf that we will continue to defend the company and its actions. In turn we would hope that the media and others remain mindful that a presentation by the plaintiffs’ lawyers does not accurately reflect all of the facts.

William C. Bodie, president, KBR North American Government and Defense (click HERE to read original article)

Below is the response to Tommy Fibish of Fibich, Hampton and Leebron to this latest attack by KBR’s Bill Bodie on our intelligence and personal integrity!

Appalled by views of KBR

The widows and children of the seven men who were killed or left comatose in the April 9, 2004, KBR convoy attacks in Iraq are appalled by the views expressed by the company’s president of government affairs (“KBR defends its actions,” Page B10, Friday). They wish their loved ones could respond to KBR’s reprehensible statement. They also request that KBR stop referring to the contractors as “family” because KBR’s actions are unlike any family they have ever known.

Contrary to KBR’s new claims, the events that led to the convoy attacks of April 9, 2004, were warned about for weeks by KBR security officials. After at least 11 KBR convoys were hit by enemy attacks the day before, KBR’s security director — recognizing the futility of trying to protect their personnel from certain danger — then wrote of “pressure,” “big politics,” and “contract issues,” but, most importantly, that he thought “we will get people killed or injured tomorrow.” KBR then released our clients’ convoys into an area where they knew other KBR convoys already were being attacked.

KBR’s public response now belies the fact that much of the incriminating evidence of the convoy attacks has been sealed at KBR’s request and its investigation into this incident kept secret. The company’s true regard for these families seems evident by the fact that KBR has neither apologized for their acts nor accepted responsibility for the deaths and wounds inflicted upon their personnel. (click HERE for original article)

Tommy Fibich, Houston

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Unwavering commitment to profit

dumpster-2Please Dispose Of Injured and Abused Employees Properly

We honored our veterans and soldiers this week for their service to our country.  The following article was published on Veterans Day with the focus on civilian contractors and the contributions they have made and the struggles they face.

Honoring Veterans of the Disposable Army

by T. Christian Miller, ProPublica – November 11, 2009

Today we honor the veterans who have served in the country’s armed forces. Nobody seriously questions whether they deserve such recognition. The men and women who defended this country and fought its wars made immeasurable sacrifices.

I have spent much of the last year writing about another group of people who suffered losses on behalf of U.S. interests abroad: the civilian contractors injured or killed while doing their jobs in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They are not, of course, soldiers. They could quit their jobs and go home any time they wanted. Many were paid far higher wages than their military counterparts. They knew they were signing up to take a specific job in a dangerous part of the world.

And yet, neither are the contractors working in Afghanistan and Iraq ordinary laborers. Civilians compose half the manpower  in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have seen and experienced the full horror of war. More than a thousand have been killed. Thousands more have suffered debilitating physical and mental injuries. And yet, the Pentagon does not even know how many have died, nor how many are actually working (PDF).

I have come to see the civilian contractors as a new kind of class in the demography of war. They are quasi-veterans: civilians who have experienced war much as soldiers do. There are tens of thousands of them. And while it’s hard to argue that they deserve ticker tape parades and Medals of Honor, it’s also hard to believe that they should be sent home with little more than a pay stub and a patchy health care system that doesn’t even address basic medical needs.

I received a letter from a former KBR contractor which crystallized the strange position of those who work in a war zone. D.A. Corson, who worked at a variety of companies in Iraq until 2008, wrote the following, which I thought worth sharing:

Civilian contactors in combat zones will likely continue to be a staple of military engagements. They cook, clean, make ice, purify water, install housing, do laundry, install and maintain generators for lighting, air conditioning, truck the beans, bullets and bandages, install latrines, wastewater treatment facilities, and as many of the other logistical functions as the military can give them to do so the troops can do their job, i.e., go out and, God willing, win the peace.

They too left their families, homes, and friends. They too labor 84-hour weeks, endure shellings, mortars, and RPG attacks, IEDS, and heat strokes. They too live on three meals a day of four different flavors of noodles or MREs when the convoys cannot get through and rations are running low. Some of them see to it that the bodies of your fallen sons, daughters, husbands, and wives are seen off from combat airfields with proper honors when no military personnel are available to do the honors themselves. They watch helplessly on Armed Forces media as our homes thousands of miles away are blown and washed away in hurricanes, floods and other disasters and wonder if their families are safe. Many die, are injured, captured and held as POWs; some have been beheaded. They too suffer high divorce rates and come home with their own cases of Combat Stress. Many serve for over a year and then came back 2 and 3 times for another year. Many are still there going on 5 and 6 years now. When they come home they have no Veteran’s benefits, indeed, no benefits at all in many instances, save perhaps a very pricey COBRA.

Yes, all go for the money. They too are doing what they think necessary for their families to get a little piece of the American Dream, but they are not all a bunch of money-grubbing, carpetbagging, war profiteers. We are your neighbors, friends, relatives, and fellow Americans. So many are there because they have to be. One young lady had just had a baby. Her husband had cancer, and she had to leave her newborn infant and other children, as well as her terribly ill husband to pay the bills and keep a roof over their head. But more than that, each wanted to serve our troops. They wanted to do their part. So many are Viet Nam veterans. They do their jobs; they serve our troops, proudly. They do it for them. They do it for freedom; they do it for our country. The American contractors all still take off their hats and get tears in their eyes when hearing the national anthem. When they go home their benefits end. Many are having to fight to get their medical insurance benefits for the injuries received and many families are fighting to get their life insurance benefits for their fallen loved ones.

They knew going in that returning to bands playing, flags waving, and such were not part of their bargain. That’s not why they went. However, in your churches and other ceremonies, when you ask your veterans to stand, after you have given them their well-deserved honors, you might want to give a thought to then asking any civilian contractors who served the troops in combat zones to stand up beside the vets too. I’ll bet they’d be proud to do so, again. Maybe there won’t be many in your particular gathering, but they are there: one for every soldier according to the Congressional Budget Reports and one dying for each 3 soldiers killed.

And by the way, you’re welcome. Maligned, appreciated, even counted or not, I am sure most would do it all again. It was an honor.

D. A. Corson
Camp Anaconda, Balad, Iraq –June 2004 through October 2006 B.I.A., Basrah, Iraq –July 2006 through May 2007 Ali Al-Saleem Air Base, Kuwait — September-October 2007

God Bless America !  (Link to original)

————————————————

There are countless former employees who went to the Middle East to provide support for our troops and did not expect a hero’s welcome when they returned home, and rightfully so.  They did however, expect to have the ability to go on with their lives. While most have, many who were injured or maimed are now facing financial ruin at the hands of the very companies who have received billions of US tax dollars in the form of government contracts or bailouts. To add insult to injury, many employees have been terminated by KBR and deemed “not eligible for rehire.”  Many have no idea this label has been attached to their file.   Because of the incestuous relationships between DoD LOGCAP contractors, I am of the understanding this makes them ineligible for rehire with other LOGCAP contractors as well.

Is it an unreasonable expectation to assume the US Government contractor who employs you is obligated to follow the same US laws you do.  The absolute corruption of these companies astounds me.  It turns my stomach to think the DoD, DoJ and apparently the executive branch of our government are condoning and rewarding these thieves, crooks and liars!

Another thing that really ticks me off  is when these corporate spokespeople spew their canned responses about their company’s unwavering commitment to their employees and their customer.  BS, the only unwavering commitment is to lining their pockets with more tax dollars!

In closing…..to all our soldiers and civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, thank you for your service, sacrifice and patriotism…..I salute you.  To those who are wallowing in their corporate greed fests; I have a salute for you too but this is a G Rated site…..for the most part!

–Forseti

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Kahn has the guts to say what we’re all thinking!

free-passA Free Pass
By ROBERT KAHN
Courthouse News Service
November 13, 2009

While a religious pervert’s mass murder of GIs at Fort Hood dominated the news on Veterans Day, Courthouse News’ top story that day began like this:

“A Florida defense contractor put soldiers at risk and defrauded the government by producing hundreds of ‘bunker buster’ bomb fuzes it knew could explode unpredictably, ‘often shortly after the fuze was armed,’ federal prosecutors say.  Kaman Precision Products knew it was using bad parts, and charged taxpayers $2 million for it, according to the False Claims Act complaint.”

Here is how our story ended: “The military discovered the substitution and has spent $3 million in an ‘attempt to rework the defective fuzes to create usable ones,’ prosecutors say. The government wants a refund.”

Military prosecutors said they will seek the death penalty for Nidal Hasan, the religious pervert who killed 13 soldiers.

Good. I hope they kill him.

But why is no one facing jail time for selling dangerous bomb fuses to the U.S. Army?

The government spent $5 million on bomb fuses that could have blown dozens of aircraft out of the sky, and killed dozens of GIs, and the government wants a refund?

Is the government out of its mind?

Or is it – and by it I mean we – just so thoroughly corrupt and cowardly that war profiteers get a free pass?

There was not a word about Kaman Precision Products in The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, or even the Orlando Sentinel, where the company is based. I checked.

Why is that?

Every one of those newspapers had enough reporters to beat us to death with coverage of a family of morons who claimed their little boy had flown away in a balloon. But not a word on a war profiteer. Excuse me: an alleged war profiteer.

People who remember history – which seems to be me and a couple of other guys – may recall that Harry S Truman became famous when he led a Senate investigation of war profiteering during World War II.

This was during a war against enemies who were as powerful as we were.

Truman turned up corruption all over the country. It was small change compared to what goes unpunished today – a few thousand dollars here, a few lousy parts there.

But people were prosecuted. People went to jail.

In the past two weeks, three dozen class actions in three dozen states have accused Halliburton and KBR of exposing more than 100,000 GIs to poison in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention all the GIs Halliburton and KBR electrocuted from their cheap and incompetent wiring in Iraq. Or the women that Halliburton and its subcontractors drugged and gang raped in Iraq.

Why is no one in Halliburton facing the prospect of going to jail?

Why is Blackwater founder Erik Prince, the biggest bastard on Planet Earth, not being prosecuted? His mercenaries committed dozens of pointless murders in Iraq, occasionally when drunk or high, after which the company spirited them out of Iraq to avoid prosecution, according to at least a dozen civil lawsuits filed in U.S. courts.

After Blackwater’s mass murder of 17 Iraqis in 2007, Prince tried to bribe Iraqi officials with $1 million to let his gang of bastards stay in Iraq, The New York Times reported – on Veteran’s Day.

Why isn’t Prince facing jail time?

Why do private attorneys have to bring civil actions against these war profiteers? Why is the government not trying to put them in jail? What the hell are government prosecutors doing?

Well, here’s the top of another story Courthouse News printed on Veteran’s Day:

“Northwestern journalism students whose investigative work reignited a nationwide debate on the death penalty are being forced to defend themselves. Cook County prosecutors subpoenaed journalism professor David Protess, seeking his students’ grades, his syllabus and their private e-mails.”

That’s right; prosecutors are going after journalism students. Government prosecutors fear – fear? – that students in Professor Protess’ class might try to get good grades by claiming that people in prison are innocent. So the prosecutors subpoenaed the professor’s lesson plans and his grade book.

Maybe Professor Protess should change his students’ assignments. He should have them get drunk and kill strangers, and rip off the government, and make stuff that explodes when it’s not supposed to, and could kill GIs by the dozen.

Prosecutors would give the class a free pass. (click HERE for the original article)

I really love some of the stuff that The Courthouse News puts out. WELL DONE!!!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Bodie’s “Man-trum” – DCAA you’re not the boss of me!

KBR disputes agency’s claims

The Nov. 4 editorial “Iraq contractor boosts staff as troops withdraw” is inaccurate and KBR would like to set the record straight.

First, it is incorrect to say that KBR will face penalties of nearly $200 million if the company does not trim its workforce. The LOGCAP III contract does not contain a provision for assessing any such fines and no such statement has been made to KBR by DCAA or any other regulatory agency. Instead, the recent audit on which the Associated Press article is written, states that should KBR reduce its workforce by 2,857 people by Jan. 1, cost-savings would be approximately $193 million. This is simply an estimate computed by DCAA.

DCAA states KBR has no plan for withdrawal from Iraq. To the contrary, KBR has explained its plan to auditors, which includes a process to close camps as military personnel are withdrawn and to identify appropriate reductions to the contract price. While the military has closed over 185 camps this year, only seven of those camps had a permanent KBR presence under the LOGCAP contract. Further, to date, KBR has reduced its workforce by 2,622 workers, a 14% reduction. KBR continues to actively pursue opportunities to effectively reduce costs associated with supporting the military.

The broader issue, however, is the illogical theory that a contractor supporting the military should have a concrete plan about how to withdraw its troops prior to the military formalizing its plan. KBR works to support the U.S. military and that work will continue relative to planning for a troop drawdown. Further, it is not appropriate for KBR to make decisions on troop withdrawal planning that could cause serious, negative results in a war zone.

KBR remains disappointed in the DCAA’s heavy-handed intrusion in the logistics process. The continued unfounded and punitive assertions regarding KBR’s work by DCAA and other agencies is a great disservice to our men and women in Iraq. KBR remains committed to engaging in a transparent, fact-based dialogue and in turn, we expect and deserve the same commitment from those in the media. (Link to original article)

William C. Bodie

KBR North American Government & Defense

Houston, Texas

————————————————————————————-

Please note the new Category for ALL Bill Bodie’s “editorials” and “guest columns” called

Bodie Babble

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Posted in Bodie Babble. Tags: , . No Comments »

Troubling portrait emerges of Fort Hood suspect


“>

By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – His name appears on radical Internet postings. A fellow officer says he fought his deployment to Iraq and argued with soldiers who supported U.S. wars. He required counseling as a medical student because of problems with patients.

There are many unknowns about Nidal Malik Hasan, the man authorities say is responsible for the worst mass killing on a U.S. military base. Most of all, his motive.

For six years before reporting for duty at Fort Hood, Texas, in July, the 39-year-old Army major worked at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center pursuing his career in psychiatry, as an intern, a resident and, last year, a fellow in disaster and preventive psychiatry. He received his medical degree from the military’s Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., in 2001.

While an intern at Walter Reed, Hasan had some “difficulties” that required counseling and extra supervision, said Dr. Thomas Grieger, who was the training director at the time.

Grieger said privacy laws prevented him from going into details but noted that the problems had to do with Hasan’s interactions with patients. He recalled Hasan as a “mostly very quiet” person who never spoke ill of the military or his country.

“He swore an oath of loyalty to the military,” Grieger said. “I didn’t hear anything contrary to those oaths.”

But, more recently, federal agents grew suspicious.

At least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades.

They had not determined for certain whether Hasan is the author of the posting, and a formal investigation had not been opened before the shooting, said law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the case.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Hasan’s aunt, Noel Hasan of Falls Church, Va., said he had been harassed about being a Muslim in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and he wanted out of the Army.

“Some people can take it and some people cannot,” she said. “He had listened to all of that and he wanted out of the military.”

She said he had sought a discharge from the military for several years, and even offered to repay the cost of his medical training.

A military official told The Associated Press that Hasan was in the preparation stage of deployment, which can take months. The official said Hasan had indicated he didn’t want to go to Iraq but was willing to serve in Afghanistan. The official did not have authorization to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

A second military official said Hasan’s family has Palestinian roots. There have been reports that he was harassed for his Muslim religion, but the official says there is no indication Hasan filed a complaint within the military about that.

Terrorism task force agents plan to interview several of Hasan’s relatives Friday, according to a law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss the case.

Noel Hasan said her nephew “did not make many friends” and would say “they military was his life.”

A cousin, Nader Hasan, told The New York Times that after counseling soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with post-traumatic stress disorder, Hasan knew war firsthand.

“He was mortified by the idea of having to deploy,” Nader Hasan said. “He had people telling him on a daily basis the horrors they saw over there.”

Federal law-enforcement agents ordered an evacuation of the apartment complex where Hasan lived in Killeen, Texas, Thursday night and conducted a search of his home, said Hilary Shine, director of public information for the city. She didn’t say what was found during the search.

Officials said earlier that federal search warrants were being drawn up to authorize the seizure of his computer.

Retired Army Col. Terry Lee, who said he worked with Hasan, told Fox News that Hasan had hoped President Barack Obama would pull troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq. Lee said Hasan got into frequent arguments with others in the military who supported the wars, and had tried hard to prevent his pending deployment.

Hasan attended prayers regularly when he lived outside Washington, often in his Army uniform, said Faizul Khan, a former imam at a mosque Hasan attended in Silver Spring, Md. He said Hasan was a lifelong Muslim.

“I got the impression that he was a committed soldier,” Khan said. He spoke often with Hasan about Hasan’s desire for a wife.

On a form filled out by those seeking spouses through a program at the mosque, Hasan listed his birthplace as Arlington, Va., but his nationality as Palestinian, Khan said.

“I don’t know why he listed Palestinian,” Khan said, “He was not born in Palestine.”

Nothing stood out about Hasan as radical or extremist, Khan said.

“We hardly ever got to discussing politics,” Khan said. “Mostly we were discussing religious matters, nothing too controversial, nothing like an extremist.”

Hasan earned his rank of major in April 2008, according to a July 2008 Army Times article.

He served eight years as an enlisted soldier. He also served in the ROTC as an undergraduate at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg. He received a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry there in 1997.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Who is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan?

Military officials say the suspected shooter at Fort Hood was a psychiatrist

07:45 PM CST on Thursday, November 5, 2009

Maj. Malik Nadal Hasan

Major Nidal Malik Hasan - Alleged Shooter - Reportedly Wounded

Major Nidal Malik Hasan - Alleged Shooter - New Reports Say He is Wounded Not Killed

WASHINGTON — Military officials say the suspected shooter at Fort Hood was a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center for six years before being transferred to the Texas base in July.

The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because military records are confidential.

The Virginia-born soldier was single with no children. He was 39 years old.

Federal law enforcement officials say the suspected Fort Hood, Texas, shooter had come to their attention at least six months ago because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats.

The officials say the postings appeared to have been made by Hasan, who was killed (CORRECTION: Hasan was not killed and has been hospitalized) during the shooting incident that left least 11 others dead and 31 wounded. The officials say they are still trying to confirm that he was the author. They say an official investigation was not opened.

One of the Web postings that authorities reviewed is a blog that equates suicide bombers with a soldier throwing himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades.

Hasan is a graduate of Virginia Tech University, where he was a member of the ROTC and earned a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry in 1997. He received his medical degree from the military’s Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., in 2001. At Walter Reed, he did his internship, residency and a fellowship.

Sen. Jay Bailey Hutchison said Hasan was to be deployed to Iraq, and there were indications he did not want to go.  (Link to original article)

I just ran across this page page at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress

HASAN

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

13 Dead, 38 wounded in Shooting at Fort Hood


“>

UPDATED 5:00 AM PST, 7 Nov 2009

Thursday’s Fort Hood shooting rampage that left 13 dead and 38 injured, of which 30 needed to be hospitalized.

13 slain in soldier’s Fort Hood ambush, Army says

06:34 AM CST on Friday, November 6, 2009
By CHRISTY HOPPE
 
FORT HOOD, Texas – The bloody scene might have been drawn from the scarred memories of Iraq war veterans assigned to this Army outpost in the hills of Central Texas: 13 dead and 30 wounded, gunned down in a sudden ambush.

But Thursday’s bloody assault at Fort Hood was committed by one of the Army’s own. As night fell across the nation’s largest military outpost on Thursday, investigators sought to explain why Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a 39-year-old Army psychiatrist, reportedly turned a pair of pistols on his comrades.

Late Thursday, Lt. Gen. Robert Cone and Col. Ben Danner gave an account of the chaos and carnage that began about 1:30 p.m. inside two buildings that house psychiatric, medical and dental units:

Officials say Hasan used two handguns, including a semi-automatic, to fire at fellow soldiers. Neither of the guns was military-issue.

As Hasan fired, an unidentified female civilian officer managed to shoot him at least once before being shot herself.

The gunman was finally felled by four bullets and airlifted by medical helicopter to an undisclosed hospital where he underwent surgery. Early reports said the gunman was dead, but Cone later said Hasan was in stable condition under guard at a hospital and “his death is not imminent.” He was on a ventilator and unconscious, officials.

Life-saving actions

The general said that many of the military personnel used life-saving skills learned as part of their training. He described a scene where people were “ripping their uniforms and taking care of each other.”

Still unexplained Thursday night was the motive for the attack.

Asked whether it could be considered a terrorist attack, Cone replied, “I couldn’t rule that out” but said the evidence does not point to that.

At one point, officials detained and interviewed three suspects, But they now think that there was a single shooter.

Apartment searched

Late Thursday night, Killeen police had cordoned off Hasan’s apartment at the Casa del Norte Apartments and had evacuated the neighborhood. They were concerned that Hasan might have booby-trapped his home and were cautiously moving in with a bomb squad.

Family members said Hasan, a native-born Virginian and 1997 biochemistry graduate of Virginia Tech University, had been distraught over an impending overseas deployment.

Hasan had been posted to Fort Hood in July, after serving for six years at Water Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. He was unmarried, authorities said.

Nader Hasan, a cousin of the major, told Fox News that Hasan had suffered harassment from comrades over his Middle Eastern heritage.

“He is a good American,” Hasan told the news channel. “We are shocked.”

While wounded were being transported to hospitals around the area, authorities ordered the massive post closed. About 40,000 military personnel are based at the post, one of the country’s largest military installations.

“It’s a terrible tragedy. It’s stunning,” Cone told reporters gathered outside the vast facility northeast of Austin. “Soldiers and family members and many of the great civilians who work here are absolutely devastated.”

‘Stay put!’

At the Military Personnel Center, where arriving soldiers are processed and records updated, civilian employee Poi Shaffer was updating records for a soldier when she heard sirens on Battalion Avenue – about a mile away from the scene of the shooting.

“I heard sirens, ambulances, fire trucks, all kinds of stuff,” said Shaffer. “At first I thought it was a wreck, but I kept hearing more sirens. It kept going on.”

When she finished processing the soldier’s records, she checked her phone and saw that her husband, who works on the base for the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, had been trying to call her. He phoned again and said urgently: “Where are you? Stay put!”

Her husband was close enough to the scene of the attack to hear the gunfire, said Shaffer.

Wife, baby on base

Spc. Joshua Branum, just back from his second long tour in Iraq, was at the Killeen courthouse taking care of a minor traffic issue when he heard of shootings and death at Fort Hood.

Three months back and now it was his wife and 1-year-daughter in harm’s way. “I went into combat mode – autopilot,” he said.

He immediately called his wife and told her to lock the doors and windows. “Keep yourself and the baby down at all costs,” he said to her. “And then I started on my way.”

For almost two hours, Branum paced outside the main gate at Fort Hood in his desert fatigues as he and more than a dozen active military personnel waited for the post to lift a lockdown so they could see their loved ones. Phone lines were jammed, and some were having trouble getting through.

He said he wanted to patrol the perimeter in his truck, to feel he could help in some way.

“In a situation like this, any soldier feels that I should have been there. Maybe there wouldn’t have been so many dead, maybe there wouldn’t have been so many wounded,” Branum said.

He said he was angered to hear that it was a soldier who fired at colleagues.

Having defused bombs and cleared roadways during his first two-year tour in Iraq, Branum said he knows all about post traumatic stress disorder and has suffered from it the past two years.

“If they blame this on PTSD, I’ll lose my faith,” Branum said. “PTSD does not cause you to organize and carry out a shooting.”

The lockdown was finally lifted about 9 p.m.

‘Texas family’ tragedy

In Austin, Gov. Rick Perry issued a statement that read in part: “The Texas family suffered a significant loss today with the tragedy at Fort Hood. Along with all Texans, Anita and I are keeping those affected by today’s incidents in our thoughts and prayers.”

Perry ordered that all Texas flags be lowered to half-staff until Sunday.

The FBI and Texas Rangers joined with military investigators in the search to determine how and why the attack occurred.

Around the country, some bases stepped up security precautions, but no others were locked down.

“The bottom line for us is that we are increasing security at our gates because the threat hasn’t yet been defined, and we’re reminding our Marines to be vigilant in their areas of responsibility,” said Capt. Rob Dolan, public affairs officer for the Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma, Ariz.

After nightfall at Fort Hood, the religious gathered to pray, the patriotic gave blood, and doctors and nurses worked to save the lives of the wounded.

Sirens continued to sound, but traffic once again rumbled along Battalion Avenue and speakers blared, “The emergency no longer exists.”

President Obama called the shootings “tragic” and “a horrific outburst of violence.”

Texas Gov. Rick Perry ordered that all flags in the state be lowered to half-staff until Sunday as a tribute to the victims.

“We are deeply saddened by today’s events but resolve to continue supporting our troops and protecting our citizens,” he said.

In the aftermath of the incident, Scott & White Memorial Hospital in Temple, Texas, posted an online appeal for blood as it began receiving victims.

“Due to the recent events on Fort Hood, we are in URGENT need of ALL blood types,” it said.

Fort Hood is the Army’s largest U.S. post, with about 40,000 troops stationed there. It is home to the Army’s 1st Cavalry Division and elements of the 4th Infantry Division, as well as the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and the 13th Corps Support Command. It is near Killeen, Texas. The Headquarters Unit and three brigades of the 1st Cavalry are deployed in Iraq.

The fort is home to the Warrior Combat Stress Reset Program, which helps soldiers returning from war with combat stress and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

In June, Fort Hood’s commander, Lt. Gen. Rick Lynch, told CNN that he was trying to ease the kind of stresses soldiers face.

He has pushed for soldiers working a day schedule to return home for dinner by 6 p.m. and required his personal authorization for anyone working weekends. At the time, two soldiers stationed there had committed suicide in 2009 — a rate well below those of other posts.

Nearby Killeen was the scene of one of the most deadly shootings in American history 18 years ago when George Hennard crashed his truck into a Luby’s cafeteria and then began shooting, killing 23 people and wounding 20.

Hennard’s spree lasted 14 minutes. He eventually took his own life.

 (Link to original article)

———————————————————————————-

I will update this as more information becomes available. Please keep these soldiers, their families and friends in your thoughts and prayers during this difficult time.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

How KBR poisoned our troops-Toxic Tour of Duty: Part 2

The poisoning of our US troops and civilians at Qarmat Ali is a clear example of KBR’s total disregard for the safety of their employees and their client.- Ms Sparky

by Melissa Swan
Posted on November 2, 2009

Related links to this article

(WHAS11)–Russ Kimberling has nearly 2,000 images from Iraq on his computer.  They chronicle his duties there as a captain in the Indiana National Guard.

Kimberling now pours over the pictures wondering why he and other soldiers weren’t warned about a yellowish substance in thesand at Qarmat Ali, a water injection plant near Basrah.

Kimberling recently told me, “If it came up they would say don’t worry about it.  It’s a mild irritant.  It’s not a big deal.  You may get a bloody nose.  It’s not a problem.”

He says he got that “don’t worry” message from workers with KBR, an American contractor headquartered in Houston, Texas and at the time owned by Halliburton.

KBR was restoring Iraqi oil fields.   The guard members were protecting the private contractors.

Clinton Hammack is a retired National Guard soldier from Tell city who says he wasn’t too concerned about what he calls “dirty sand.”  He says “You know I didn’t worry about it.  I did what I was there to do – take care of the contractor.”

The yellow substance in the sand was later confirmed to be sodium dichromate.  The Environmental Protection Agency calls it a human carcinogen.

It was used as an anti-corrosive at the Qarmat Ali plant before the Americans arrived.  It may have been spread by Iraqis to sabotage the site at the beginning of the American invasion.

Currently 51 Southern Indiana National Guard members have filed a federal lawsuit against KBR claiming the company knew about the chemical and endangered the soldiers’ health.

Kimberling says one day in Iraq he realized the yellow substance might be more than a mild irritant.

He says, “I remember that day when we jumped out, jumped out of the vehicle.  I’m kicking the ground around.  I’m kicking the ground and everyone’s in chemical gear all protected but not me or any of the soldiers.”

He says the people in the protective gear were managers from KBR.  He remembers thinking at the time, “They know something we don’t and it can’t be good.

Mike Doyle the attorney for the National Guard Members who have filed suit says, “That’s what’s kind of frustrating about it.  You have these fellows they have every reason to expect if KBR knew — and they did — there was this poison they’ll tell them about it.”  (Link to original article)

Statements from KBR’s Director of Communications

Heather Browne, KBR’s Director of Communications on when the Company was told about Sodium dicromate at Qarmat Ali Water Injection Plant:

It is important to remember that to date the plaintiffs still show no signs of illness consistent with the long-term sodium dichromate exposure they allege. Medical reports by both the U.S. and British Military support this finding as well as findings from the plaintiff’s own doctors.

KBR engineers learned around June 1, 2003, that sodium dichromate was previously used at Qarmat Ali by the Iraqi state-owned Southern Oil Company.  The Southern Oil Company had used sodium dichromate as an anti-corrosive agent in the chemical injection process, but it was no longer being used and the water plant was not operational.  The June 21, 2003 memo attached to your email reflects KBR’s first awareness that the sodium dichromate used in the past may have contaminated some of the soil surrounding the plant.

As KBR’s efforts at the Qarmat Ali facility continued, it notified USACE about the potential contamination of the soil by sodium dichromate in late July 2003.  KBR subsequently worked with the military to conduct air and soil testing to confirm the presence and extent of the contamination.  Once contamination was confirmed, KBR received authorization from the military to commence remediation efforts, which it immediately began.

In addition, KBR initiated a medical surveillance program for its workers.  The U.S. military and the British military initiated a similar medical surveillance program for military personnel who had been at the plant.  The results were negative for signs and symptoms of exposure to sodium dichromate or hexavalent chromium.  Regardless, out of abundance of caution, the U.S. Army and KBR decided to discontinue all work at the plant pending additional air and soil testing.  The plant subsequent was closed and remained closed until mid-October 2003.

Statements from Attorney for Indiana National Guard members

Mike Doyle, Attorney for Indiana National Guard members in Federal Lawsuit:

“Having spent time recently with Jim Gentry and knowing what the VA has recently confirmed for the US Senate about the health affects of soldiers exposed to hexavalent chromium at KBR’s Qarmat Ali project, KBR’s claim of no ill health effects is contrary to the known facts.  KBR has been continually changing its story about what it knew and did about the dangerous chemicals present, and these most recent admissions only came when the previously concealed Kimbro memo was revealed during his testimony this month.  There is still no explanation, nor can there ever be, for KBR’s concealing of what it knew for months from Jim Gentry and our soldiers serving in Iraq.”  (Link to original article)

Click HERE for Part 1

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

How KBR poisoned our troops-Toxic Tour of Duty: Part 1

The poisoning of our US troops and civilians at Qarmat Ali is a clear example of KBR’s total disregard for the safety of their employees and their client.- Ms Sparky

by Melissa Swan
Posted on November 2, 2009

Related links to this article

(WHAS11)–Tell City, Indiana is the small Perry County seat.  It’s where a giant We Support the Troops banner hangs on the county courthouse and many a man here has served in the military.

It’s where I visited recently with Clinton Hammack who told me, ” I enjoyed being in the military or I wouldn’t have stayed and retired.”

Hammack reenlisted while he was in Iraq and while there he had a huge portrait of him and his wife painted from a photo he carried to war with him.

Lucas Whistle leaves just down the road from Hammack and agrees that military service was good for him.   He told me, “The military gave me a lot of opportunities that I would never get in just a regular life.”

Whistle has permanent reminders of his military days.  Tattooed on his chest are the initials U.S. and the sword of the infantry.     His son, three month old Tikelan is named for Lucas’s best army buddy.

Russ Kimberling, a newly remarried father of two was their captain in the 1-152 infantry battlion.   They were sent to Iraq in 2003 and assigned to Task Force RIO — Restore Iraqi Oil.

According to Hammack the National Guard Soldiers were basically like bodyguards for the American contractors paid to get the oil flowing again.   Hammack puts it like this, “Make sure I’m looking out over the horizon and they ain’t nobody on the roof start to shoot.”

The contractor, KBR, then owned by Halliburton is headquartered in Houston, Texas.  Everyday the soldiers rode out in non-descript white pickups and SUVs with the KBR contractors.

They traveled to the oil sites that were likely sabotaged by Iraqi forces just before the American invasion.  One of the work sites was a water injection facility in Qarmat Ali near the southern Iraqi town of Basrah.   The water from the injection plant was used to force oil out of the ground.

Now, Hammack, Whistle and Kimberling along with 48 other National Guard troops from Southern Indiana have filed a federal lawsuit again KBR.

They believe it wasn’t what was on the horizon that put them in the most danger it was what was on the ground at Qarmat Ali.

“Orange, I would say and it was all over the ground…saturated the ground, ” Kimberling says.  “There were ripped opened bags strewn all over the site …away from the building.

The soldiers would work in it all day, eat in it, the wind could be blowing on the food then they take it back to the sleeping quarters because it was all over their uniforms, boots so they really never got away from it.

Hammack says . ” It was kind of an orange, yellow color.”  And you can see it in a military document sent to the National Guard members in August of last year.

Now, six years later the soldiers know its name.    Sodium dichromate.  It’s toxic component is chromium hexivalent the same chemical at the center of the movie, Erin Brockovich.

The lawsuit claims KBR knew about the toxic chemical at Qarmet Ali and failed to warn the soldiers.   Mike Doyle the attorney for the Indiana guardsmen who have filed suit says the soldiers were getting nose bleeds, rashes and having difficulty breathing.

Kimberling says, “I didn’t have any issues until I hit that site.  When I hit the site I started having sinus problems, headaches, bloody noses and then I got a perforation in the left nostril of my nose.

When the ENT, he was looking in my nostril hit the light and you could see it inside my nose.”

Lucas Whistle also has mysterious rashes on his nose and congestion.

He told me, ” I get nose bleeds and usually when I get them ..they’re pretty bad..bad enough to where the towels and clothes I’m wearing we have to throw them away.  When I lay in there at bed at night and I get to coughing and I can’t breath.”

Clinton Hammack says, ” I do worry about it and I worry about what’s going to happen later on.”

But they believe they know what might be in store.    Dave Moore was from Dubois County and the 42 year old father of a little girl.   He died in 2008 from an inflammatory lung disease.

According to his attorney Mike Doyle,  Lt. Colonel Jim Gentry was a robust commander when he was in Iraq in 2003.   Now  at 52 years old he’s dying from lung cancer.

Last year while taping a deposition for the federal lawsuit, Gentry said, “We should have been told.”   Jim Gentry is currently undergoing radiation treatments in an Indianapolis hospital.

The National Guard soldiers who have filed suit against KBR say they have recently obtained a document that proves the company knew about the toxic chemical before the soldiers were told.

As for KBR, the corporation strongly denied the claims made by the National Guard members.   In part two of this report, see what KBR says about the orange substance at Qarmat Ali. (Link to original article)

Click HERE for Part 2

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Ignore that man behind the curtain – KBR’s Bill Bodie is full of BS

BiohazardWARNING: Personal protective equipment is highly recommend to read the following article. (see photo for suggestion) It is so full of bullshit you are bound to get some on you!! If you have a low bullshit tolerance, I suggest you just back away. What you are about the read is the chosen (by KBR attorney’s) opinion of a KBR corporate puppet! Everything you are about to read should be considered fictional and in no way represents the will of the majority of past and present KBR employees and victims. Please proceed with CAUTION!

By WILLIAM C. BODIE
Times Guest Columnist (The Daily Times serving Delaware County, PA)

As the old saying goes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Recent media coverage on an amendment proposed by newly elected U.S. Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., has not only misstated the facts on the arbitration issue, but the Jamie Leigh Jones case as well. KBR would like to set the record straight.

As written, Sen. Franken’s ill-conceived amendment promotes frivolous lawsuits, increases litigation costs, and provides less monetary benefit, in many instances, to victims.

For these very reasons, the Department of Defense, Chambers of Commerce and businesses, large and small, across the country are against the legislation.

Sen. Franken’s amendment does not help employees. It hurts American business and erodes the ability of businesses to support our soldiers.

Many companies have dispute resolution programs designed to address employee complaints timely and efficiently, without the delays and expense often associated with litigation. KBR is no exception.

Under KBR’s dispute resolution program, 95 percent of all employee complaints are resolved promptly to the employees’ satisfaction and at no cost to the employee. This is not only good for employees, it is good for business because it helps control costs, ultimately saving customers money, in this case, U.S. taxpayers.

The few remaining claims not resolved by this process are heard before an independent arbitrator, chosen by both parties, who considers all the evidence and rules accordingly.

There have been erroneous and inaccurate reports regarding the Jamie Leigh Jones case on which it appears the writer of the Oct. 19 Delaware County Daily Times editorial relied.

The assertion that Ms. Jones has been denied her day in court is false. A criminal investigation was conducted and found Jones’ claims unsubstantiated.

A State Department investigation in Iraq, in which numerous individuals, including Ms. Jones, were questioned, found there was no evidence Ms. Jones had been sexually assaulted.

Further, the Justice Department pursued a grand jury investigation in Florida in February 2008.

After hearing all of the evidence, which included testimony from Ms. Jones as well as the firefighter she alleges sexually assaulted her, the grand jury decided to issue no indictments.

The allegation that Jones was imprisoned in a shipping container is also false. Following her reported alleged assault, for her own safety, Jones was provided with a secure living container, or trailer, similar to that in which other KBR employees live (and the very kind in which Jones herself had requested to live).

There, Jones phoned her family and was attended to by a female KBR employee who got her food and clothes and, upon Ms. Jones request, spoke with Jones’ family to assure them of her safety.

The employee also stayed with her for several hours until the State Department, to whom KBR reported the alleged assault immediately, arrived. Despite claims to the contrary, there were no armed guards outside her room.

KBR safety personnel (who are never allowed to carry weapons) were in the area for Jones’ safety since her alleged assailant had not been identified at that time.

KBR then worked with the State Department to arrange for Jones to leave Iraq and provided a female counselor to escort Ms. Jones home to the United States.

To date, two formal investigations have been completed and neither resulted in any liability against Ms. Jones’ alleged perpetrators. Despite these findings, Ms. Jones continues to pursue legal action against KBR.

There is no greater priority at KBR than the safety and security of its employees.

Throughout the continued media blitz regarding Ms. Jones’ case, assertions against KBR suggesting the contrary and a blatant disregard of the facts have perpetuated a biased, one-sided dialogue.

The company intends to continue its vigorous defense and we believe we have the facts on our side. KBR remains committed to engaging in a transparent, fact-based dialogue and in turn, we expect and believe that, we as well as the public, deserve the same commitment from those in the media and in public office.

William C. Bodie is president of KBR North American Government and Defense.  (Link to Original)

Bodie….what is wrong with you? I’m no psychologist, but I think you’re just not right in the head!! Pathological maybe?? Whatever it is….I’m sure there is a treatment or at least a pill available.  You really should consider seeking help.

You don’t actually believe these sad pathetic attempts to sway public opinion by publishing columns or opinions is actually working???  Did you actually write them???  Highly unlikely!!

You are a sad sad pathetic little man!  I do hope KBR is paying you BIG bucks…..because you are going to need ever dollar to try buy your way out of hell!! Some people who have actually worked for KBR think KBR is hell.

You are an embarrassment to the United States of America!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR prefers to defer electrical inspections in Iraq

Task force re-inspecting U.S. facilities in Iraq for faulty wiring

By Lisa Novak, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Sunday, November 1, 2009

Courtesy of the Department of Defense Spc. Marcus O. Nolasco was electrocuted while showering at this facility on Forward Operating Base Summerall, Beiji, Iraq, on May 18, 2004. The Defense Department has created a task force to inspect all facilities in Iraq after more than a dozen U.S. troops have been electrocuted. Included in the list are thousands of facilities whose electrical work was completed by defense contractor KBR.

Courtesy of the Department of Defense Spc. Marcus O. Nolasco was electrocuted while showering at this facility on Forward Operating Base Summerall, Beiji, Iraq, on May 18, 2004. The Defense Department has created a task force to inspect all facilities in Iraq after more than a dozen U.S. troops have been electrocuted. Included in the list are thousands of facilities whose electrical work was completed by defense contractor KBR.

An Army task force re-inspecting thousands of potentially unsafe U.S. facilities in Iraq for faulty electrical wiring says a contractor previously ordered to conduct inspections of its own work placed 5,600 facilities on a “deferred” list — meaning they were low priority or there were no plans to inspect them.

Officials with the Defense Department’s 135-member Task Force SAFE said many of the buildings on KBR’s deferred list were still being used by soldiers. As a result, the task force moved these facilities to the top of its inspection list, according to a Sept. 8 internal memo.

Sixteen U.S. troops and two contractors were electrocuted — and hundreds more incurred shock-related injuries — in Iraq over a span of four years, prompting the Defense Department to create the task force last year to physically inspect every military facility in the country, the majority of which were provided by KBR. Additionally, the Defense Contract Management Agency directed KBR to inspect all 75,000 of its facilities, a process that began last February.

But Multi-National Forces–Iraq let KBR either postpone or abandon site inspections because of confusion surrounding the status of the thousands of facilities, a military official said.

The Army said the deferred list is intended for facilities not likely to be used, that have been abandoned, are about to be turned over to the Iraqi government or are located in sensitive areas.

Brig. Gen. Kurt Stein, the senior logistics officer in Iraq and who serves as the director for Task Force SAFE, said there initially was confusion over these deferred facilities.

“What I wanted to know upfront is ‘Have you been in this facility to ensure that there’s no life, health, safety issues in them?’?” Stein said. “That’s why it got put up to the top because people were concerned that ‘Hey, we better double-check or we better verify.’?”

But “once KBR identified that they were not going to validate these facilities, they were made the [task force’s] top priority,” Glen MacDonald, program manager for Task Force SAFE, wrote in an e-mail to Stars and Stripes.

When first reached about the issue three weeks ago, KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne denied any knowledge of a “deferred” list.

Two weeks later — after being provided a copy of the list by Stars and Stripes — Browne acknowledged only 120 facilities as deferred, stating those facilities required special access to complete inspections. She said the list, titled “Deferred Un-inspected,” includes deferred and nondeferred facilities and that KBR is inspecting all of its facilities. She would not, however, say when that decision was made.

Requests to talk with other KBR officials were denied.

There are 3,350 KBR deferred facilities that had not been inspected for electrical safety as of Oct. 31, according to Navy Capt. Russ Hughes, a Task Force SAFE spokesman. While KBR is in the process of inspecting 150 of those facilities, the Defense Contract Management Agency is considering the status of the remaining deferred facilities. If the DCMA decides those facilities will be abandoned, they won’t be inspected, he said.

The task force, which was created in August 2008, is working from “sunup to sundown” to inspect all facilities in Iraq, Stein said. Since last year, the team has inspected around 107,000 facilities — the majority of them wired by KBR — and found 22,000 major deficiencies. Around 19,000 of them have been fixed, he said.

While electrical hazards still exist, Stein said much has improved.

“When I first got here a year ago, I was afraid to touch any socket, I was afraid to turn my lights on, I was afraid to take a shower. I made sure I didn’t touch any walls or anything,” Stein said.

Initially, the task force focused on housing and shower units, Stein said.

“Now we’re into motor pools, fixed facilities. … If the bonding and grounding is not right, we’re fixing all that.”

Bonding creates a safe pathway for electricity to flow between components, while grounding ensures that pathway leads to the ground to absorb any current.

The task force is expected to complete inspections on all facilities in Iraq by the end of January. (click HERE for original article)

I’d like to know if Adam Hermanson’s building where he was electrocuted in his shower and died on September 1, 2oo9 was on that deferred list.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

US military contractor burns recyclables, violating contract

KBR was contracted to recycle cafeteria waste at Forward Operating Base Warhorse. Such spotty accountability is coming under new scrutiny; an Oct. 30 report reveals that transactions worth $10.7 billion are being audited.

By Tom A. Peter | The Christian Science Monitor | October 30, 2009

Forward Operating Base Warhorse, Diyala Province, Iraq

In this desert fortress of housing trailers and concrete barriers, military contractor KBR has launched a recycling campaign – a kind of oasis in the military, an institution not exactly renowned for environmental activism.

As soldiers exit the dining facility, run by KBR and its subcontractor Najlaa International Catering Services Iraq, they see signs along the emerald walkway urging those who “like to recycle” to follow the path and “Think Green.” At the end of the path, soldiers sort aluminum cans and plastic silverware into separate bins.

But there’s one problem: The recyclable goods are thrown into a pit with the rest of the trash and burned. While this is likely to disappoint soldiers who “like to recycle,” it also is a breach of the government’s contract with KBR to run the dining facility on FOB Warhorse, according to the US government’s Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA).

The chimerical recycling program is apparently a microcosmic example of the spotty accountability under which contractors have operated – at substantial expense to US taxpayers. A report issued Oct. 30 by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) said that audits of $6.4 billion worth of contracts revealed “internal weaknesses,” including inadequate oversight of invoices and excessive change orders. The report also noted evidence of duplicate payments and payments sent to fictitious addresses and unapproved contractors.

Eyewitness account: ‘recycling’ burned in trash pit

When first asked about the recycling program at FOB Warhorse, Xopher Bryant, program manager of Najlaa International Catering Services Iraq, responded in an e-mail, “The innovative recycling efforts we conduct at FOB Warhorse are a direct result of our company’s wish to make a positive impact in all areas of our business dealings and are offered as a cost benefit to our client and customers.”

When asked to show the actual recycling operations to a reporter at FOB Warhorse, Mr. Bryant, who was not on site, cited media policies that did not allow for such interaction between company officials and the press, but encouraged this reporter to investigate for himself. With two escorts from the military’s public relations outfit – Spc. Christopher Bruce and Sgt. Jeremy Pitcher – the Monitor sought out the KBR manager in the FOB Warhorse’s cafeteria, which serves 2,000 to 3,000 people. But the manager, who refused to be named, repeatedly refused to help the Monitor verify the existence of KBR’s recycling program.

A soldier checking badges at the cafeteria’s entrance said, however, that she was fairly certain that the recycling material was thrown in with the trash – a practice the Monitor witnessed firsthand.

When one of the trash cans used for “recyclables” in the cafeteria filled up, workers emptied it into a dumpster placed in a long row with identical dumpsters. That dumpster was then emptied into a dump truck that proceeded to collect the contents of numerous other dumpsters, confirmed by the military PR officials to be used for trash only, around the base. Then the truck’s cargo – trash and “recycling” alike – was emptied into a huge burn pit and set ablaze. Apart from the cafeteria trash cans, nowhere on the base was there any evidence of infrastructure – dumpsters, trucks, or sorting facilities – for separating recycling and trash.

After the Monitor’s eyewitness confirmation that the recycling program was not operational, Bryant and his colleagues did not respond to nearly a dozen e-mails asking for a comment.

Heather Browne, KBR’s director of corporate communications in Houston, Texas, did respond, however. She said in a statement that KBR “is committed to environmental responsibility” and, based on its “ongoing review, at sites where KBR provides services related to waste disposal, KBR complies with all applicable military directives and contractual requirements.”

Mission taking precedence over transparency

With contractors providing almost all basic services for US forces, their numbers have already reached unprecedented levels: Contractors now outnumber uniformed US military personnel in Afghanistan, according to a recent Congressional Research Service report.

“The fundamental problem is that the government has no capacity to do things itself,” says Pratap Chatterjee, author of “Halliburton’s Army.” “As a result, they’re willing to overlook little things like recycling and even big things like fraud so long as their mission is met.”

Although the US has used military contractors as far back as the Revolutionary War, they didn’t begin to proliferate until the early 1990s. Former President George H. W. Bush began relying more heavily on contractors to reduce the government’s footprint. In the Balkans conflict, the first billion-dollar contract was awarded to KBR.

As the role of contractors increased, the Clinton administration passed a ruling in December 2000 to weed out firms with felony charges in their pasts and “blacklist” contractors that had past environmental, labor, or federal-trade violations lodged against them. Former President George W. Bush, who took office a month later, repealed the law in 2001.

Obama administration may take harder line

Today, if a contractor fails to fulfill its obligations, a DCMA spokesperson says that the normal protocol is that the firm will be issued a “corrective action request” to tell the government how it will address the cause of the compliance issue. He refused to discuss KBR’s recycling case, and declined to be named, in accordance with the agency’s policy.

Allegations of misconduct in Iraq targeting companies including KBR, its former parent company, Halliburton, and Blackwater – renamed Xe Services – have periodically drawn the wrath of US lawmakers. But government-contractor experts say that the focus on providing for troops in the field often may trump such concerns.

“All of these negative things that are happening are not seemingly making an impact at a significant level where policymakers are paying attention. Instead, it’s quite the opposite; policymakers are still seeing them as cost-effective,” says Dawn Rothe, a criminology professor at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Va., citing an August 2008 Congressional Budget Office report as evidence.

Before the government reconsiders its use of contractors, Dr. Rothe says she thinks there will have to be “more revelations of some serious harm, legal discrepancies, and criminal behavior.”

But while allegations and investigations of corruption have so far done little to crimp contractors’ style in Iraq and Afghanistan, there are signs that the Obama administration is looking to effect systemic change. SIGIR, which reports to the secretaries of State and Defense, is auditing a further 22,000 transactions involving $10.7 billion – a substantial chunk of the $50 billion the US has spent to date on reconstruction efforts in Iraq.

“We’re at a point now with tightening budgets and the economic crisis … that we’re also not going to put up with waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending,” says Scott Amey, general consul at the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight in Washington, who adds that there’s a push to increase the government’s ability to defer, detect, and prosecute fraud.”At that point we’re going to place an emphasis on contractor accountability as well as getting the most value out of the dollars that we’re awarding these contractors.” (Link to original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Bill Bodie in the KBR litter box…..again!

william-c-bodieIn typical Bill Bodie style…..he issued ANOTHER whiny editorial to a newspaper in the jurisdiction and might I add jury pool of the West Virginia National Guard. The same National Guardsman who have filed suit against KBR for knowingly exposing them to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali in Iraq in 2003. Bodie pulled this same shit in Pittsburgh when he sent an editorial about how KBR was not responsible for the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth. (click HERE) He has to send editorials because the main stream media doesn’t take KBR statement seriously. Bodie wasn’t even working for KBR when this happened. He didn’t start working for KBR until March of 2005. So anything he has to say is hearsay at best. Just another pathetic attempt by Bodie to cover up KBR shit in the KBR litter box. He is turning in to quite the KBR “bobble head” doll. Maybe KBR could market Bill Bodie and Heather Browne as a set!! I guess I am going to have to add a new post category called “Bodie’s Bull Shit” or “More Mindless Drivel” I haven’t decided.

William C. Bodie: KBR handled Iraq site (Qarmat Ali) safely

October 16, 2009

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — As the old saying goes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. Recent media coverage on lawsuits filed against KBR alleging military personnel were sickened because of long-term exposure to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali, an Iraqi water treatment plant, has been so erroneous that it is time to set the record straight.

It is important to understand that the chemical in question — sodium dichromate, which is used as an anti-corrosive agent in industrial enterprises, was left behind at the Qarmat Ali plant by Iraqi staff upon vacating the site in the wake of Saddam Hussein’s overthrow in 2003. No remedial action was taken to clean up the site prior to KBR’s arrival in support of U.S. forces. KBR was not hired to do an environmental assessment of the facility and was told the site was free of environment hazards prior to starting work.

One erroneous assertion is that KBR discovered the presence of sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali and took no precautionary action. In fact, immediately after we became aware of potential contamination from sodium dichromate in the plant, KBR began working with the military to conduct air and soil testing at the site and posted signs in English and Arabic to advise of the presence of the chemical. In October 2003, The U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine issued a report noting that KBR effectively minimized exposure at the site.

Moreover, the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine conducted extensive testing on military personnel who were stationed at the site to determine any exposure levels. The testing showed that no troops were harmed and that they were unlikely to develop future injury from any limited exposure they received while in Iraq.
The results were further reviewed and confirmed by the Defense Health Board of the Department of Defense. The British military reached similar conclusions regarding their own troops. KBR’s testing also found no measurable exposure and no indication of injury. The troops were on the site an average of 18 days, and the scientific literature indicates that this amount of exposure is insufficient to cause long-term health effects. There is no evidence linking any injury to chemical exposure at the water treatment facility.

KBR remains committed to a fact-based dialogue on this issue. We will also continue our historic practice of working fully and cooperatively with the government on this matter.

Since 2003, KBR has supported the U.S. military in Iraq, providing life-support services such as meals and laundry and mail service to our troops. KBR remains proud of the work it performs and we intend to continue our vigorous defense on this issue, on behalf of the more than 50,000 dedicated employees who work tirelessly for KBR in Iraq and Afghanistan at great sacrifice to themselves and their families.

Bodie is president of KBR’s North American Government and Defense Unit.(Link to original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: