Home » Archive for category 'KBR Contract'

KBR Contract Archive

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInPinterestShare

Brian Bowling – (TribLive News) – May 14, 2013 – A federal jury can determine whether a Defense  contractor is responsible for the electrocution death of a Shaler soldier  without second-guessing the military’s choice of where to house troops in ,  a lawyer for the soldier’s parents argued Tuesday.

The jury doesn’t have to decide whether the Army made  the right choice in housing Sgt. Ryan Maseth, 24, in a building with a  substandard electrical system to determine whether Inc. of Houston had the  discretion to fix the water pump that electrocuted Maseth while he was taking a  shower, said .

If the jury decides the Army tied KBR’s hands, “we  simply lose,” he told a three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of  Appeals, which was hearing oral arguments in the Downtown federal courthouse.

of Cranberry and Douglas Maseth of  Allison Park want the appeals court to reinstate their lawsuit against KBR Inc.  for the Jan. 2, 2008, death of their son at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex in  Iraq.

Read the remainder of this entry »

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInPinterestShare

Army Secretary signed an agreement giving legal indemnity to in 2003. (AFP PHOTO by Luke Frazza)

Ryan J. Reilly – (Huffington Post) – Washington – January 24, 2013 – The Army official who signed a secret agreement that military contractor KBR claims should burden taxpayers with the bill for the company’s negligent poisoning of U.S. soldiers in resigned from the military in 2003 after a tenure marked by questions about his ties to Corp.

Thomas E. White, named secretary of the Army in 2001, signed an indemnity agreement protecting KBR, the military’s largest contractor, from legal liability on March 19, 2003. KBR had asked for the agreement as part of its contract to rebuild Iraq oilfields destroyed in the U.S. invasion. White resigned a month later, on April 23, under fire for his previous role as a senior Enron executive and after clashing with former Defense Secretary over his advocacy for a multi-billion dollar artillery system.

Read the remainder of this entry »

Pages: 1 2

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInPinterestShare

– () – November 26, 2012 – November has been a very bad month for defense contractor KBR.

is the federal government’s primary logistics support contractor in , receiving tens of billions of dollars in business from the Department of Defense over the last decade, much of that under the U.S. Army’s monopolistic Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) III contract.

In early November, an Oregon federal jury returned an $85.2 million verdict against KBR for exposing military personnel to toxic chemicals at an Iraqi water treatment facility in 2003. The jury found that KBR had “acted with reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and conscious indifference to the health, safety, and welfare” of the plaintiffs. A case raising similar claims is pending in KBR’s hometown of Houston, Texas, and will soon go to trial.

Read the remainder of this entry »

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInPinterestShare

The US Army resists ’s attempt to “gobble” up more taxpayer dollars as cries “fowl” and sues the US Army Corp of Engineers () after they refuse to indemnify the “turkey’s” ['s] legal fees from exposure of troops and others to at , . If I were the Army, I would be saying “Stick a fork in ‘em [KBR], they’re DONE!” (OK….that’s all the Thanksgiving cliche’s for now.)

On November 2, 2012, an Oregon federal jury ruled that KBR must pay $85 million to 12 Oregon National Guard members who allegedly suffered emotional distress after the company exposed them to sodium dichromate at Qarmat Ali.

Each guardsman was awarded $6.25 million in punitive damages after the jury determined that KBR “acted with reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and conscious indifference to the health, safety and welfare of others,” as well as $850,000 in non-economic damages. Read the remainder of this entry »

Pages: 1 2

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInPinterestShare

I wonder who comes up with this stuff?

United States Sues Houston-based and Kuwaiti Subcontractor for False Claims on Contracts to House American Troops in

(DoJ) – November 19, 2012 – The government’s complaint arises from the Bed Down Mission, a push to replace the tents used to house soldiers during the early days of the war with trailers, also called living containers.   KBR performed many of the services required under , including the Bed Down Mission, through foreign and domestic subcontractors.   According to the complaint, KBR awarded a subcontract to on Oct. 16, 2003, to supply, transport and install 2,252 living containers at in Iraq for about $80 million.   The government alleges that was required to complete delivery and installation of the trailers at Camp Anaconda by Dec. 15, 2003.   The government further alleges that in July 2004, presented two claims to KBR contending that government-caused delays in providing military escorts for convoys into Iraq entitled the company to an increase in the contract price to cover its increased costs.   According to the complaint, KBR agreed to pay an additional $48.8 million and passed that cost on to the United States.    

The government’s complaint alleges that First Kuwaiti knowingly inflated its crane and truck costs, among other items, and misrepresented the cause of its delays.   The complaint further alleges that KBR charged these costs to the United States knowing they were improper.

Read the remainder of this entry »

© 2008-2013 Ms Sparky - MsSparky.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright