Home » CONTRACTOR DEATHS » War’s Risks Shift to Contractors
Home 

War’s Risks Shift to Contractors

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

Page« 1 2 3 ~View All~»

Contractors from the United States and other countries were wounded in an attack last year in Logar Province, Afghanistan. (NYTimes)

By ROD NORDLAND (NYTimes)
Published: February 11, 2012

KABUL, Afghanistan — Even dying is being outsourced here.

This is a war where traditional military jobs, from mess hall cooks to base guards and convoy drivers, have increasingly been shifted to the private sector. Many American generals and diplomats have private contractors for their personal bodyguards. And along with the risks have come the consequences: More civilian contractors working for American companies than American soldiers died in Afghanistan last year for the first time during the war.

American employers here are under no obligation to publicly report the deaths of their employees and frequently do not. While the military announces the names of all its war dead, private companies routinely notify only family members. Most of the contractors die unheralded and uncounted — and in some cases, leave their survivors uncompensated.

“By continuing to outsource high-risk jobs that were previously performed by soldiers, the military, in effect, is privatizing the ultimate sacrifice,” said , a law professor at George Washington University who has studied the civilian casualties issue.

Last year, at least 430 employees of American contractors were reported killed in Afghanistan: 386 working for the Defense Department, 43 for the United States Agency for International Development and one for the State Department, according to data provided by the American Embassy in Kabul and publicly available in part from the United States Department of Labor.

By comparison, 418 American soldiers died in Afghanistan last year, according to Defense Department statistics compiled by icasualties.org, an independent organization that monitors war deaths.

That trend has been growing for the past several years in Afghanistan, and it parallels a similar trend in , where contractor deaths exceeded military deaths as long ago as 2009. In Iraq, however, that took place as the number of American troops was being drastically reduced until their withdrawal at the end of last year. And last year, more soldiers than private contractors died in Iraq (54 compared with 41, according to Labor Department figures).

Experts who have studied the phenomenon say that because many contractors do not comply with even the current, scanty reporting requirements, the true number of private contractor deaths may be far higher. “No one believes we’re underreporting military deaths,” Mr. Schooner said. “Everyone believes we’re underreporting contractor deaths.”

Qais Mansoori, 20, may have been among the uncounted. An Afghan interpreter employed by , a leading provider of interpreters in Afghanistan, Mr. Mansoori was killed along with five other interpreters when Taliban insurgents overran the military base where the interpreters were staying in the Mirwais district of Kandahar Province in July 2010.

That attack, typically, was scantily reported, since no soldiers died — although the death toll was 17, including an unidentified American civilian, according to Afghan officials and Mr. Mansoori’s friends and family.

Page« 1 2 3 ~View All~»

Other Related Posts From Ms Sparky

  1. Defense Department Inspector General says KBR and the military failed to respond quickly to health risks posed to Oregon soldiers
  2. Civilian deaths up while defense contractors downsize in Middle East
  3. More contractors than troops killed during past year in Iraq and Afghanistan
  4. Poor wiring endangers troops in Afghanistan, contractors say
  5. Electrical Risks at Bases in Iraq Worse Than Previously Said

Pages: 1 2 3

5 Comments


The comments posted on this site are the sole opinion of the comment poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of MsSparky.com™

  1. Comment by Intrepid:

    Risk versus pay? I am as greedy as the next greedy SOB but I can not see working as a contractor in Afghanistan for some of the pay that is currently on the offering. Anything less than 250,000 USD is not enough of a carrot for the risk of not seeing my family again and we are not in debt enough to consider it. Some are earning more in Kuwait than some in Afghanistan.

    • Comment by Richard:

      Well some people actually like working over here…AFG….your opinion is basically pointless…I could say the same thing about your 250k why not 500k?? is there really a limit that says it is a good idea? 120k is not bad change for the risk…3 paid vacations health insurance bills paid and an adventerous life!

      bottom line is…if you wouyldnt do it for 250k…the fine we will hire 2 at 125k and you can smoke your morals and reasoning at home…we have no shame taking that money…guess what? were assessing our own risk analysis….so 250k is your line…mine is some where between paying off my 3 houses and money for the Titty bar…..GOD BLESS TRUE CAPITALISM!!!!

  2. Comment by Douglas Donaldson:

    OK Ms Sparky I Have to ask you where you got the photo. I saw a photographer on the flight line when we came off the birds .But thought these would never be published? Since I am in the photo Would like to know . Please contact me
    Thank you.

  3. Comment by ITT WATCH:

    Thanks to ITT not paying Defense Base Act Insurance premiums for the Global Maintenance and Supply contract and the resulting Qui Tam that has been lodged against ITT and the investigation by the Department of Labor into ITT practice of ITT having no Defense Base Act Insurance coverage, we now have those statistics available. Due to ITT’s False Claim to the Army’s Rock Island’s Contracting Officer that they were abiding by the DBA clause requirement and were not, the result is that all solicitations have idiot DBA clauses that even an idiot contracting officer like those administering the GMASS contract just cannot get around the requirement now days.

    Rock Island may have covered up for ITTs profiting from not having DBA insurance, but the Americans and TCNs who have suffered all have claims against the U S Government for the criminal neglect of contracting officers not enforcing the DBA clauses and the pain and suffering due to not being treated and being compensated while injured.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Subscribe without commenting

© 2008-2012 Ms Sparky - MsSparky.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright