Let me get this straight, war hero and Medal of Honor recipient Sgt. Dakota Meyer goes to work for major US defense contractor BAE Systems in Texas and not only is he ridiculed by his supervisor for his heroism but the company has the audacity to question his sanity? The only sanity in question here are the government entities who continue awarding contracts to these repeat offenders. Why is it, defense contractors who plead guilty to crimes and who continue to be implicated in shady and underhanded business practices are rewarded with new contracts? Why the hell are these parasites being awarded USG contracts allowing them to suck the U.S. taxpayer dry instead of being debarred? And, what’s up with these contractors using the mental illness card against employees who come forward and blow the whistle on their dirty deeds? Seems to me more than one contractor with FCPA issues and ties to Texas has repeatedly used the “this employee is crazy” defense to cover their tracks and protect their profit margins. Maybe the legal leeches that defend these deviants lack the creativity to come up with new ideas or excuses for their clients’ actions.
When will the DoJ learn that settling with criminals is not a deterrent? I’m willing to bet these companies factor in the costs of getting caught into their bid calculations leaving the taxpayer on the hook for covering these hidden fees every time the DoD, DoS and even the DoJ rewards them with a contract. A special gated community provided by the Federal Bureau of Prisons would be a good start DoJ! ~Ms Sparky
Dakota Meyer vs. Bobby McCreight and BAE Systems, Inc.
Decorated Marine Sues Contractor
Julian E. Barnes – (Wall Street Journel) – November 28, 2011 – In legal papers filed Monday, the Marine claims that BAE Systems, where he worked earlier this year, retaliated against him after he raised objections about BAE’s alleged decision to sell high-tech sniper scopes to the Pakistani military. He says his supervisor at BAE effectively blocked his hiring by another defense contractor by making the claims about drinking and his mental condition.
Sgt. Meyer’s complaint is likely to pose a more difficult challenge for BAE, a British company with extensive U.S. operations, than a typical employment dispute. In the September White House ceremony, Sgt. Meyer was hailed for braving enemy fire as he tried to save the lives of fellow Marines who had been trapped in a Taliban ambush.
BAE said it would defend itself, but comments by BAE officials Monday made clear they don’t want to be seen as denigrating a Medal of Honor recipient. “Although we strongly disagree with his claims, which we will address through the appropriate legal process, we wish him success and good fortune in his endeavors,” said Brian J. Roehrkasse, a BAE spokesman. He declined to discuss any specifics of the suit.
Through a lawyer, Sgt. Meyer declined to comment on his suit. Representatives of the Pentagon and Marine Corps said they weren’t aware of the suit. (Read the rest of the story here…)
























