“What they don’t mention, though, is that a United States soldier was killed while doing his duty on a U.S. base in Iraq which was maintained by KBR, a U.S. company, which was getting paid by the United States government under a contract entered into with the United States Department of Defense in the United States,” — Bill Stickman
Defense contractor wants wrongful death case to be tried under Iraqi law rules
Brian Bowling – PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW – February 4, 2011 – A Houston-based defense contractor says in federal court documents filed today in Pittsburgh that it prefers Iraqi law to Texas or Pennsylvania law when it comes to being sued for the death of a Shaler soldier.
Cheryl Harris and Douglas Maseth are suing KBR Inc. for the death of their son, Sgt. Ryan Maseth. Maseth, 24, died Jan. 2, 2008, while showering at a military base in Baghdad. The Green Beret was electrocuted by a water pump that shorted out.
His parents claim shoddy electrical work by KBR caused Maseth’s death. KBR maintains it wasn’t responsible for repairs and did not work on the water pump.
KBR Inc. today asked U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer to use Iraqi law in handling the case.
“Iraq is the location where the Plaintiffs’ injury occurred, it is the location where all events relating to the incident occurred, and it is the location where the alleged conduct at issue occurred,” the company’s motion says. “There is no other jurisdiction that has a greater interest in having its law apply to this litigation.”
Under Iraqi law, if KBR can convince the court that someone else was more responsible for Maseth’s death, the company would be exempt from damages. In cases in which more than one party is responsible for a death or injury, Pennsylvania law holds every party fully liable for damages, the brief says. Texas law allows a jury to determine how liable each party is for damages, the brief says.





KABUL, Afghanistan — Afghanistan is expected to sign a formal agreement with the 
















