Home » GOV. CONTRACTORS » Agility/PWC/GCC » Agility Attempts to Vault Fraud Charges
Home 

Agility Attempts to Vault Fraud Charges

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
February 1st, 2010

Agility, a Kuwait-based multi-billion dollar logistics company spawned by the U.S. invasion of Iraq, is facing criminal charges for over-billing the U.S. taxpayer on more than $8.5 billion worth of food supply contracts in the Iraq war zone. If the lawsuit,  scheduled for February 8, is successful, the company could owe the U.S. government as much as $1 billion.

Originally known as Public Warehousing Corporation (PWC), Agility boasts that it once supplied one million meals a day to U.S. soldiers and contractors in the Middle East. The company’s Mercedes trucks hauled delicacies from ice cream to lobster tails to feed soldiers living on military bases scattered throughout Iraq. Today it has new contracts to provide food to the U.S. Agency for International Development in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa and – until about a month ago – was supposed to ramp up food delivery to the troops newly posted in southern Afghanistan.

In a lawsuit filed on November 18, 2005, accuses Agility of cheating him of a share of profits from the lucrative contract because he refused to go along with alleged corruption. A former business partner of PWC/Agility, Sultan is a cousin of the company founder and CEO, Tarek Abdul Aziz Sultan Al-Essa.

After conducting a grand jury investigation, the joined and filed criminal charges against PWC/Agility on November 9, 2009, immediately boosting the original lawsuit’s chances of success.

“We will not tolerate fraudulent practices from those tasked with providing the highest quality support to the men and women who serve in our armed forces,” said Tony West, assistant attorney general for the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, in a press release. “As this case illustrates, the Department of Justice will investigate and pursue allegations of fraud against contractors and subcontractors, whether they are foreign or domestic.”

Joint Venture Leads to Fall Out

PWC was part of the Sultan family’s business empire that is grounded in high-end supermarkets and mega-stores across the Middle East. (See Sidebar.) Starting in the late 1990s, teamed up with ex-U.S. soldiers to bid on lucrative U.S. government projects. PWC’s first major contract, initially advertised in May 2002, was for a U.S. Defense Supply Center called Prime Vendor Subsistence to supply food eaten on U.S. military bases in the Middle East in anticipation of the invasion of Iraq. (Halliburton/KBR cooks and serves the food, but it does not supply it.)

At the time, Tarek Sultan had no experience in food supply, nor did he have a personal track record with the U.S. military – a requirement for bidding on the contract. However, KMSCO – run by his cousin, Kamal Sultan – had multi-million dollar U.S. military contracts dating back to1996 for “life support, food supplements, and ice.” In a January 2007 interview with CorpWatch, Kamal Sultan says he agreed to create a joint venture with Tarek in June 2002 to provide PWC with the qualifications to bid.

The Sultan Family

In 1981 the family of Jamil Sultan al-Essa, a Kuwaiti family whose heritage has been alternately described as southern Iraqi and Saudi, opened Kuwait’s first self-service store near the Shuwaikh Port. It focused on hardware and do-it-yourself products. Almost three decades later, that store had evolved into a chain of 11 Sultan Centers scattered around Kuwait. In 1999 the Sultans expanded the retail chain to Oman, and in 2003 they acquired the Safeway chain in Jordan.

The Sultan Center supermarkets sit in or near some of Kuwait’s fanciest shopping malls, and sell a wide range of consumer goods including Horizon Organic milk flown in from the U.S. (at $22 a half gallon), mangosteens from Thailand, tents for desert camping, and shoes. The brightly lit, modern stores offer one-stop, 24-hour-a-day shopping to wealthy Kuwaitis and expatriates, often trailed by maids pushing over-laden shopping carts.

Like many wealthy Middle Eastern families, the Sultans have multiple businesses, each operated by a sibling or cousin with overlapping ownership and often senior government positions. One, Abdul Aziz Sultan al-Essa, was chairman of Kuwait’s Gulf Bank. Another, Kamal Sultan, ran the local franchise for Apple. Yet another Sultan venture, National Real Estate corporation, bought up 25 percent of the shares of a state-owned company, Public Warehousing Corporation (PWC), when it was privatized in 1997.

PWC was given to Abdul Aziz’s son, Tarek Sultan al-Essa, who is a dual Kuwaiti-U.S. citizen and a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business. When Tarek Sultan took over PWC, the company was already charging the U.S. military $60,000 a month to operate Camp Doha on a 1.6 million-square-meter property near Shuwaik port in Kuwait.

In the late 1990s Tarek Sultan hired Toby Switzer, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps, who had extensive experience in U.S. military logistics. When the invasion of Iraq began, Switzer started to visit the U.S. military bases on a regular basis to offer services to the military. As a former soldier, Switzer was able to gain access easily. Indeed, he was invited to events such as the May 2003 Naval Supply Corps birthday party at Camp Patriot with his former comrades in the military supply business.

After the Iraq invasion, Tarek Sultan and Toby Switzer turned to Eric Stagliano of the Lucas Group in Atlanta, an executive search firm that specializes in helping ex-soldiers land jobs. With Stagliano’s help, PWC soon built up a team of former military officers to trawl for business and write up bids to send to the military contract managers in Kuwait and the States. A former PWC employee told CorpWatch: “It’s much easier for a former soldier with a crew cut and shiny shoes to get a contract than any foreigner, even a wealthy Arab.

A year later in May 2003, PWC won the initial Prime Vendor contract. Soon after that, Kamal Sultan alleges, PWC officials asked him to take part in a scheme to defraud the military. When Kamal refused, Tarek Sultan dropped KMSCO from the contract, thus depriving Kamal Sultan of his expected 30 percent profit share. Over the next four years the two men waged a series of legal battles in Kuwaiti courts, with each side alternately gaining the legal upper hand.

Overcharging Allegations

The court cases exposed a scheme of “prompt payment discounts.” It works like this: Company A (a shell company) buys a pound of chicken for $1 and gives it to Company B (e.g., PWC) along with a bill for $1.10. Then Company B sells it to the military for $1.10 plus the agreed-on overhead and profits. Next, Company B pays Company A $1.10 and pockets the ten cent mark-up from Company A as a prompt payment discount.

In this case, Company B has effectively earned the agreed-upon (and legal) profits from the military plus an extra ten cents that the military would never have paid if it bought it directly from company A. At the very least, this system is a waste of taxpayer money. And if Companies A and B are owned by the same people, it may constitute fraud.

Kamal Sultan says that in June 2003, PWC officials asked him to use KMSCO to buy local produce, and re-sell it to PWC at an inflated price invoiced to the U.S. military. In his lawsuit, Kamal Sultan alleges that when he “refused to participate in this announced scheme,” the Sultan Center supermarket chain agreed to take over responsibility to supply local produce.

PWC/Agility spokesperson Jim Cox told CorpWatch in September 2008 that “prompt payment discounts” were written into the contract and therefore not illegal. In any case, they far exceeded the more typical two percent military discounts.

Asked about the relationship between PWC and the Sultan Center, Cox said that the two companies are distinct businesses, listed separately on the Kuwait stock exchange.

In fact, Tarek Sultan and family head Jamil Sultan al-Essa serve on each other’s boards, while Jamil and four other Sultan family members are the largest stockholders the in Sultan Center, and also control a large stake in PWC. The DoJ criminal indictment states: “the two companies had interlocking directorates with at least three directors in common.” PWC/Agility’s Cox explains that this cross-ownership is common and legal in Kuwait.

In the grand jury documents submitted to the courts in November 2009, however, the investigators cite multiple examples of collusion. An October 15, 2004 email from PWC officials asked the Sultan Center to alter figures so that “the temporary price decline in the catalogue will not be obvious to the DSCP (Defence Supply Center, Philadelphia).” It also quotes emails from Albuquerque-based (a consulting firm working for PWC) to tell Toby Switzer, the CEO of PWC Global Logistics, to “fire somebody, blame it on them, and cover up” the revisions in the Sultan Center’s local market prices “ASAP–THIS IS VERY SERIOUS.”

PWC is also alleged to have profited from “prompt payment discounts” from companies in the U.S. In early 2007 the DoJ began a series of investigations into the company’s pricing practices, alleging that PWC had overcharged the Pentagon by as much as $374 million “by inserting a related company to inflate the amount billed.”

One PWC supplier that the DoJ investigated was American Grocers Inc., which provides foods such as Smucker’s peanut butter to the Sultan Center for resale to PWC in Iraq. In July 2009 American Grocers owner Samir Itani, a Houston-based Lebanese-American businessman, was convicted for tacking on “bogus trucking charges.”

Another company under DoJ scrutiny is , owned by of California. At one point, it was supplying $2.3 million a month worth of raw cold-water lobster tails to the military at $21 a pound while the average wholesale price at that time was between $17.60 and $18.75 a pound.

An October 2007 Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that PWC appeared to have also taken advantage of revolving doors between the military officials who hand out logistics contracts and the vendors that bid on them.

For example, when PWC bought poultry, ham, sausage and bakery products from Sara Lee, the Illinois-based company paid PWC five percent of the purchase price. The agreement, which began in 2003, was negotiated by a Sara Lee executive in charge of military sales, , who was previously a chief warrant officer for the Army.

One of his counterparts on the military side is David Staples, a senior procurement official for the Army who formerly worked at Sara Lee’s Jimmy Dean Sausage unit. Staples went to work for the Army after his predecessor, Emily Prior, quit. Prior now works for , in Illinois, which supplies beef to troops in Iraq. She also represents Perdue Chicken, another company that sells food to the military.

Expands

As the Iraq war dragged on, PWC made billions from its contracts with the military. By late 2005, it had billed the U.S. $4.6 billion under the Prime Vendor contract, according to Kamal Sultan’s 2005 lawsuit. Four years later, according to the criminal charges brought by the DoJ, the amount billed had almost doubled to $8.5 billion.

Awash in cash, courtesy of U.S. taxpayers, Tarek Sultan embarked on a buying spree, snapping up companies around the world. In December 2006 PWC changed its name to Agility.

From managing a few warehouses in 2003, PWC/Agility was suddenly in the same league as global logistics giants FedEx and DHL. Like many multinational corporations, it signed on to the World Economic Forum’s “Partnering Against Corruption Initiative” where it has committed to zero-tolerance policies toward bribery and pledged to implement anti-corruption programs.

Today, Agility operates ports in Dubai, and runs shipping companies out of New Orleans. The company boasted to the Los Angeles Times that it was capable of “hauling giant mining equipment through the jungles of Papua New Guinea, or erecting stage sets in Asia for touring rock groups such as the Doobie Brothers.”

Wining and Dining the U.S. Military

Senior PWC staff regularly wined and dined army officials at five-star hotels including the Hilton Resort in Kuwait, as well as in the States to obtain military contracts, according to accounts provided by several former PWC officials to CorpWatch.

At least one such instance has been confirmed in a court hearing in Illinois in January 2008 when Peleti “Pete” Peleti, a former U.S. Army warrant officer at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, pleaded guilty to accepting bribes from an unrelated company. At the hearing, government investigators confirmed that Peleti told them that of PWC had taken him to the Super Bowl game in Detroit, Michigan, in January 2006.

In June 2005 PWC won part of the $1.5 billion Heavy Lift 6 contract to move all the military equipment from the Kuwait ports to Baghdad, sharing the award with , a Florida-based contractor. PWC’s October 2006 purchase of an Alabama-based company, Taos, made it the main supplier of guns to the Iraqi army and police force. (see “One Million Weapons to Iraq; Many Go Missing.”)

The Heavy Lift contract is an example of how the company won bids despite its lack of qualifications. After wining and dining the military contracting officers at resorts in Kuwait, PWC executives obtained the Heavy Lift 6 draft bid documents four months before the published bid, multiple sources told CorpWatch,. The two men involved – who was in charge of the bidding and of PWC – are both ex-101st Apache helicopter pilots from the same class at West Point.

Since it did not have the minimum number of trucks to qualify for the bid, the company would never have qualified for Heavy Lift in 2004 without advance knowledge. When the “request for proposals” was published, the company showed the military a fleet of borrowed “low-boy,” “reefer” and “flat-bed” trucks to prove that could fullfill the contract (reefers are refrigeration trucks and low-boys have low beds). As soon as it won the contract, PWC paid Mercedes to set aside an entire assembly line in Stuttgart for four months to build 1,800 trucks.

The U.S. “war on terror” continues to be a profitable source of business for the company. In 2008, , an Agility subsidiary in the United Arab Emirates, was contracted to fly turbines and transformers from Germany and Mexico to a power plant in Afghanistan. That contract is now the subject of a $20 million dispute with the company building the plant: Black & Veatch of Kansas. (For more on the power plant, (see “Black & Veatch’s Tarakhil Power Plant: White Elephant in Kabul.”)

In 2009, Agility announced revenues of $6.8 billion, a staff of 37,000 employees with 550 offices in 120 countries around the world, making it one of the world’s eight biggest logistics companies.

Supporters and Critics

The company has powerful supporters in the military. Its brochures quote Gen. David Petraeus, now the head of U.S. Central Command: “Agility has performed a miracle across Iraq.”

Some see less miracle and more profiteering. Rory Mayberry, a Halliburton/KBR food production manager for a dining facility at Camp Anaconda testified before Congress in June 2005: “For example, tomatoes cost about $5 a box locally, but the PWC price was $13 to $15 per box. The local price for a 15-pound box of bacon was $12, compared to PWC‘s price of $80 per box. PWC charged a lot for transportation because they brought the food from Philadelphia,” he said.

“They get options, privileges, that no one else can get, because they used to be part of the (Kuwaiti) government,” says Saad Salem Al-Qattan, a Kuwaiti business man who owns Al-Rakeb Company Petroleum Electricity & Construction Services (RAPICO) which is involved in a land dispute with PWC/Agility. Asked about the U.S. military contracts, he shrugs: “They (PWC/Agility) are greedy, and the (U.S.) military doesn’t know where to go.”

Several lawsuits have been filed against the company. Beth Hanken, an Iowa businesswoman, sued PWC/Agility when she lost contracts to supply pork to the military. The case was dismissed. The only lawsuit that has so far stuck is Kamal Sultan’s 2005 charge against PWC and its top officials – Tarek Sultan, Toby Switzer, and Emad Al-Saleh, PWC‘s deputy director (who now heads an investment management company called North Africa Holding).

After the court unsealed the records in November 2009 when the DoJ joined Kamal Sultan’s lawsuit, PWC/Agility posted a statement on its website: “Kamal Mustafa Sultan, owner of Kamal Mustafa Sultan Company … has a long history of strong animosity towards PWC, its officers and its employees.” PWC/Agility added that Kamal has filed more than 40 court actions against PWC, its executives and its employees in Kuwaiti courts, but that “all of the court actions have been unsuccessful.”

But whether or not Agility wins in court, it is already losing at the cash register. Immediately after the DoJ joined the case, the Pentagon barred PWC/Agility and its subsidiaries – including Taos of Alabama and Matrix from the UAE – from federal contracts by placing it on the “Excluded Parties List System.” DynCorp, a business partner, followed suit in late December by dropping PWC/Agility from a major U.S. military logistics contract in southern Afghanistan.

In November, PWC/Agility said it “is confident that once these allegations are examined in court, they will be found to be without merit.” Since then PWC/Agility has attempted to reach a settlement with the DoJ by offering to pay a $600 million fine, according to reports in the Kuwaiti press. “No agreement has been reached so far and there is no guarantee these negotiations will lead to a solution,” the company stated at the end of December.

A criminal arraignment of PWC/Agility scheduled for early January has been postponed five times so far, the latest delay coming at the eleventh hour on January 29. U.S. Magistrate Christopher Hagy agreed to a new date of February 8, although he expressed exasperation. “There’s a point at which this stops,” Hagy said.

Unless these settlement discussions bear fruit, the arraignment could lead to a trial in which spectators can expect a fascinating view into the extent of corruption engendered by the U.S. occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. (Click HERE for original article)

Other Related Posts From Ms Sparky

  1. US moves to drop charges against Kuwait’s Agility
  2. Kuwait logistics firm Agility pleads not guilty to US fraud charges
  3. MG Dan Mongeon, USA (Ret.), his supeona stands, new charges against Agility possible
  4. Agility U.S. Unit Fraud Charges to Be Dropped
  5. Kuwait Agility to pay $600M in DoD fraud case (updated)

90 Comments


The comments posted on this site are the sole opinion of the comment poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of MsSparky.com™

  1. Comment by spooky:

    When Anham won Startegic warehousing in Iraq from Agility, all Agility personnel handed the Cv’s to Anham (which promptly made a bon fire with them).

    EXPECT NO ONE WITH MORE THAN 6 MONTHS AGILITY SERVICE TO BE HIRED BY ANHAM……HEHEHE
    Arrogant Agility bastards GO HOMe (and take the KBR/CSA fools with you)

    • Comment by Jhowds:

      Yes, but after one year the USG cancelled the contract due to Anham’s poor performance. So poor that the USG handed the PCO Warehouse contract over to the Iraqis instead. Ouch! Now they’re entrusting SPV to them. Hmmm. Would love to see the official debrief and the comparative prices of all bidders. Anyone able to pull that from Anham or the other bidders. I’ll throw in a dinner for anyone that can provide that. Your date will be my building night watchman. ;)

      Considering Anham has zero assets/warehouses and plans to subcontract out all operations, I find it odd how the USG wouldn’t rate them as a much higher risk than an asset-based company. The USG said ‘best value’, but realistically it should have been LPTA.

    • Comment by nyx:

      You sound like you were part of PCO in AGW or UQ~! Are you? Plus Anham did lap up a few employees (expat) and most of the Local Nationals.
      Agility employees were arrogant – rightly so! They did all the hard work from ground up at the port and AGW just to have another co., get ops served on a tray followed by the Iraq MoD to take over within 7 months!

      • Comment by Jhowds:

        Spent about 4 months at Abu Ghraib Prison working with the USG, but not AGW.

        My vote: Anham will lose the PV protest IF the USG follows the letter of the solicitation. They simply don’t meet the requirements of the RFP for space, pallet positions or force protection. Decision to be made in the next 30 days. Hold your breath.

        • Comment by Jhowds:

          Did I say I love the timely FOIA documents pertaining to the PV protests? They allow us all to see the grounds for protest from the other bidders. :)

  2. Comment by simzer:

    No comment ?

  3. Comment by JHowds:

    I’ll believe it when I see it officially released by the USG. The big question now…..will/can Agility settle AND be removed from the EPLS before 10MAY when DDKS is due? Tick tock, tick tock Tarek Sultan.

  4. Comment by simzer:

    But the court filings are official, denoting a real settlement motion taking place between the Justice dept. and Agility. In the past, it was but a mere allegation from Agility’s side..

    Problem now with the crooks here in Kuwait (Agility) not disclosing the true developments in the settlement part of their case …

    • Comment by nyx:

      They will not do that! Lest they want to commit hara kiri on the bourse. The former most preferred Co., has been shunned by its financial partner – NBK. Other banks and financial institutions are not even entertaining phone calls of Agility Employees – the risk is high my friend; is what you feel when you speak to them. Feel sad to know with the current job scene in Kuwait and mid east; all those handed pink slips have no where to go, roll on December when DGS actually crumbles and falls like dust, expect atleast 2% of Expat Population to leave!

  5. Comment by Sad Tears:

    All the above comments can’t stand when it comes to a soldire meal who fights for Freedom!!

    the troops of freedom must eat as we all do, So take this internal Tip as its ver fresh

    17.8.2010 11:00 am EST, PV contract is extended till Dec 2010, so Agility please serve more meals.

    what a waste of time, and there is a change to do more extentions, and might reach to re-reward the PV to agility again. Image that, the power of food and options the USARMY has!@

  6. Comment by Raji:

    TMG –Threat Management Group is rumored to be bought by SOC security or Olive Group .. to get off the EPLS list and re-gain their government contracts.. end of the day the funds still go to the SULTAN family

    would like to know what will happen to the families and employees of TMG if sold to SOC out of Mendin or Olive group? and if the rumors are true? will their assets be bought and company employees be gone ? ? as employee no management has had the guts to send email or news down among the troops as to our destiny… we hear these stories and still not even a reach out from management to stop or explain anything .. will one day we wake up and be gone ?

    • Comment by Ms Sparky:

      I have been hearing similar rumors and have been trying to root them out! If I hear anything I will post it. I hope you will do the same!

    • Comment by QuickSand:

      Raji,

      Appears you must be another Agility/GCC/Taos/TMG employee that has been left out of the loop. Join the long list. Agility management is and has been clueless for years.

    • Comment by john.sensen:

      I received official notice last week that TMG did get officially acquired by SOC on January 13, 2011. It took Agility a while to sell them off, but it did happen.

      Now will SOC attempt to sell TMG’s services to the leading transportation companies in the Middle East? I’d bet so. And talking about transportation, the $1.5B Heavy Lift 7 contract is nearing award. The USG intended to award it by February 1, 2011, but like always they far behind the timeline curve. The USG intended a 120-day transition from HETCO and IAP to the new awardees (HETCO, IAP, KGL, etc.), but even with the one extra month (May) the USG said they could extend the current HL6 contract, 120 days is impossible. Damn! The USG released this RFP in June of last year and it was due in July. Does it truly take 7+ months to award a transportation contract? I don’t think so. Does anyone else have a clue who the most likely HL7 awardees will be? I assume the incumbents have a strong chance. Agility is still suspended so they’re out of the running. I assume KGL is bidding. What about the other small companies in Kuwait: Regency Gate, Al Mada, Jasim, GLOW, etc. Any idea if a small company could pull this off and be selected one of the four awardees?

      Now that KBOSSS has been awarded, only a few large contracts valued in the billions remain up for grabs. Good luck to all!

  7. Comment by Saga:

    Hi any news on TMG, DDKS, HL7?

    • Comment by john.sensen:

      I contacted the USG and inquired about the HL7 ESTIMATED award date a few weeks ago and the KO said he couldn’t reveal this information. Can you believe that? He wouldn’t even provide an ESTIMATED award date! WTF?! Why not? Although the extension of HL6 runs through December 31, 2010, I guess he doesn’t want the incumbents (HETCO, IAP) to scare and start demobilizing assets/personnel that may negatively affect the performance of the contract. That’s my only guess. But here’s rub: IAP and HETCO subcontract virtually all of their assets. Possibly if the asset-based companies think they may be a new prime for HL7, they may withhold assets from the current primes to prepare for their own operations.

    • Comment by john.sensen:

      Read my comment above yours.

  8. Comment by CFDs:

    This all sounds a bit dodgy to me, why cant people in this world be honest this also goes for company’s who are the most dishonest of the lot.

    • Comment by tink:

      that’s why i resigned in 2008. the company lose my respect…i don’t see my self working with CEOs and dealing with all the bullshit! it was not worth it at all!

  9. Comment by john.sensen:

    The USG just posted the J&As for the Heavy Lift 6 extensions to IAP and HETCO running through April 31, 2011. It appears the USG intended to award the Heavy Lift 7 contract on December 19, 2010, but due to the two protests (one denied, one withdrawn) and a short period for discussions with qualified bidders, the new award date appears to be in late January to late February. This is a HUGE $1.5B contract with four awardees expected. IAP and HETCO are the incumbents. I expect several local Kuwaiti vendors to be in the running as well (KGL, Regency Gate (former Agility assets), Al Mada, Al Jassim, Rehal, Mubarrad, GLOW, etc.), but only a few have the past performance and compliant assets required. Sorry Agility, NO SOUP FOR YOU!

    Anyone want to wager who the HL7 awardees will be?

    J&A’s links below.

    IAP: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=e0e5157428f35359f8e1c0fc48b7f269&tab=core&_cview=1

    HETCO: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=dcec3ff2d6b6f58fb3383f04db031f58&tab=core&_cview=1

    • Comment by john.sensen:

      From the intel I’ve collected from the USG and most of the bidders for HL7, award is imminent (the next two weeks). It’s a multi-award contract, so I expect an award to four companies.

      Can anyone contribute intel to the HL7 discussion?

  1. Ping from Organizational Corruption is Rarely Isolated; It’s Systemic. « Ron Cruse

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Subscribe without commenting

© 2008-2012 Ms Sparky - MsSparky.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright