<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama tightens reins on contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mssparky.com/2009/12/obama-tightens-reins-on-contractors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/obama-tightens-reins-on-contractors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sail</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/obama-tightens-reins-on-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-9338</link>
		<dc:creator>sail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=7887#comment-9338</guid>
		<description>Not sure who the players will be - but since Agility is currently suspended (and was suspended at the request of DLA who also owns this contract)- they can not award the option year to Agility - so it makes sense that it is on the street. 

Also heard that they were going to put DRMS back under LOGCAP rather than issue a separate contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure who the players will be &#8211; but since Agility is currently suspended (and was suspended at the request of DLA who also owns this contract)- they can not award the option year to Agility &#8211; so it makes sense that it is on the street. </p>
<p>Also heard that they were going to put DRMS back under LOGCAP rather than issue a separate contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sail</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/obama-tightens-reins-on-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-9337</link>
		<dc:creator>sail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=7887#comment-9337</guid>
		<description>Least we are blind enough to think that all of the corruption is confined to work in the Middle East - consider the following from the Project on Government Oversight - aparently we can&#039;t get away from it no matter where we turn.

Military contractor Lockheed Martin tops POGO&#039;s list of &quot;worst 100 contractors,&quot; with $34.2 billion in government business and a record of fifty instances of civil, criminal and administrative misconduct. ExxonMobil, General Electric, Boeing, Honeywell and others are close behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Least we are blind enough to think that all of the corruption is confined to work in the Middle East &#8211; consider the following from the Project on Government Oversight &#8211; aparently we can&#8217;t get away from it no matter where we turn.</p>
<p>Military contractor Lockheed Martin tops POGO&#8217;s list of &#8220;worst 100 contractors,&#8221; with $34.2 billion in government business and a record of fifty instances of civil, criminal and administrative misconduct. ExxonMobil, General Electric, Boeing, Honeywell and others are close behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jhowds</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/obama-tightens-reins-on-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-9332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jhowds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=7887#comment-9332</guid>
		<description>Just saw the USG posted a FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION pre-solicitation notice for the DDKS contract.  Looks like the USG withdrew the sole source to KGL and will now be competing the requirement.  Not sure who the other competitors are, but competition is usually a good thing.  As long as the taxpayer doesn&#039;t get screwed and the servicemen are taken care of properly, it&#039;s for the best.  I wonder if Agility had a hand in this, but I suspect that all of the press in the past 6+ months forced this to occur.

Anyone know who the legitimate competitors are for the DDKS recompete?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw the USG posted a FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION pre-solicitation notice for the DDKS contract.  Looks like the USG withdrew the sole source to KGL and will now be competing the requirement.  Not sure who the other competitors are, but competition is usually a good thing.  As long as the taxpayer doesn&#8217;t get screwed and the servicemen are taken care of properly, it&#8217;s for the best.  I wonder if Agility had a hand in this, but I suspect that all of the press in the past 6+ months forced this to occur.</p>
<p>Anyone know who the legitimate competitors are for the DDKS recompete?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

