<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dyncorp should pay the employees they have before hiring more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Sparky</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-9176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-9176</guid>
		<description>Dyncorp is Afghanistan is being run by a KBR reject Scott Mount and others. Do you realized how bad you have to screw up in order for KBR to fire a manager or give them a &quot;not eligible&quot; for rehire status. And evidently that makes them qualified to work for Dyncorp because they have some doozies! 

Speaking of DOOZIES.....Bill Walter KBR&#039;s Director if Government Compliance is no longer working for KBR as of last week. Also...Senior Counsel Michael Hatch seems to be looking for employment as well (hello Dyncorp) anyway.....someone email me and fill me in. Don&#039;t post it publicly. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dyncorp is Afghanistan is being run by a KBR reject Scott Mount and others. Do you realized how bad you have to screw up in order for KBR to fire a manager or give them a &#8220;not eligible&#8221; for rehire status. And evidently that makes them qualified to work for Dyncorp because they have some doozies! </p>
<p>Speaking of DOOZIES&#8230;..Bill Walter KBR&#8217;s Director if Government Compliance is no longer working for KBR as of last week. Also&#8230;Senior Counsel Michael Hatch seems to be looking for employment as well (hello Dyncorp) anyway&#8230;..someone email me and fill me in. Don&#8217;t post it publicly. </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Sparky</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-9175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-9175</guid>
		<description>This is unbelievable. I have yet to get one complaint about pay issues with Fluor on LOGCAP IV. I have never heard of a KBR employee going so long without being paid. If there was a error is was fixed ASAP. Although I loathe KBR Corporate I will give them KUDOS on making sure people got paid. I am going to contact the Mainstream Media and see of anyone is interested in a story on this...again. This is messed up and has to be costing the US taxpayer money for those people who are demobing because they don&#039;t work for free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unbelievable. I have yet to get one complaint about pay issues with Fluor on LOGCAP IV. I have never heard of a KBR employee going so long without being paid. If there was a error is was fixed ASAP. Although I loathe KBR Corporate I will give them KUDOS on making sure people got paid. I am going to contact the Mainstream Media and see of anyone is interested in a story on this&#8230;again. This is messed up and has to be costing the US taxpayer money for those people who are demobing because they don&#8217;t work for free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ksniper</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-9165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ksniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-9165</guid>
		<description>There heads are stuck in the sand when something bad happens God forbid the finger pointing will begin.  Alas not KBR this time unless it spun.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There heads are stuck in the sand when something bad happens God forbid the finger pointing will begin.  Alas not KBR this time unless it spun.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dyncorp employee</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-9164</link>
		<dc:creator>dyncorp employee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-9164</guid>
		<description>The pay problems are still continuing on into March 2010. Now I&#039;m hearing guys talk that their CIGNA insurance hasn&#039;t been started yet. I&#039;ve not checked mine as it&#039;s been at home. TCN&#039;s are the ones being hit the hardest. It&#039;s insane as to whats happening. The DCMA&#039;s and a couple of DCAA&#039;s are very aware of the problem. I&#039;m told that these issues are being worked, but, you just don&#039;t know unless you&#039;re in the know. So far my pay hasn&#039;t been affected, but several co-employees I know still have not been paid. The Govt needs to get on the ball...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pay problems are still continuing on into March 2010. Now I&#8217;m hearing guys talk that their CIGNA insurance hasn&#8217;t been started yet. I&#8217;ve not checked mine as it&#8217;s been at home. TCN&#8217;s are the ones being hit the hardest. It&#8217;s insane as to whats happening. The DCMA&#8217;s and a couple of DCAA&#8217;s are very aware of the problem. I&#8217;m told that these issues are being worked, but, you just don&#8217;t know unless you&#8217;re in the know. So far my pay hasn&#8217;t been affected, but several co-employees I know still have not been paid. The Govt needs to get on the ball&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afghan</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-8284</link>
		<dc:creator>Afghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-8284</guid>
		<description>Yes I work with a couple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I work with a couple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darko</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-8273</link>
		<dc:creator>Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-8273</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Gungho... But I disagree with You... I&#039;m a Macedonian and I have worked in the States... I&#039;m sorry to say that I&#039;ve seen more racism there than I&#039;ve imagined(not on my skin, I&#039;m caucasian)... Second, My country currently deploys, as I&#039;ve heard, approx. 4% of total NATO soldiers in Afghanistan... That&#039;s a lot for a country of 2 mil.people like mine is...
And for why they hire us... Well, we&#039;re known as skilled and highly committed workers..so..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Gungho&#8230; But I disagree with You&#8230; I&#8217;m a Macedonian and I have worked in the States&#8230; I&#8217;m sorry to say that I&#8217;ve seen more racism there than I&#8217;ve imagined(not on my skin, I&#8217;m caucasian)&#8230; Second, My country currently deploys, as I&#8217;ve heard, approx. 4% of total NATO soldiers in Afghanistan&#8230; That&#8217;s a lot for a country of 2 mil.people like mine is&#8230;<br />
And for why they hire us&#8230; Well, we&#8217;re known as skilled and highly committed workers..so..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonic</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7816</link>
		<dc:creator>sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7816</guid>
		<description>does dyncorp hires green card holder for logcap IV positions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does dyncorp hires green card holder for logcap IV positions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles M. Smith</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7205</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles M. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7205</guid>
		<description>Just a note on this issue of when a contractor can bill for costs.  FAR 52.216-7 — Allowable Cost and Payment (cited above) is the standard clause for this contract.  I am not aware of any non-standard arrangement with DynCorp or the other LOGCAP IV contractors.

At issue, however, is whether DynCorp is billing the Government at any time for costs which they are not incurring by paying their employees.  DCAA has done fine work on LOGCAP from day one of LOGCAP III.  Unfortunately they have not had the resources to do complete audit work.  One of the main audit issues consists of comparing work orders to time sheets to confirm that work shown on time sheets matches work performed.  The validated time sheets should then match vouchers to the Government and payroll records of the employees.  As you might imagine this is time consuming audit work, heavily dependent on the Contractor having validated and approved business systems.

The other issue, as I noted earlier, concerns whether DynCorp is having performance issues due to this payroll problem.  The Government should be taking action to correct any performance deficiencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note on this issue of when a contractor can bill for costs.  FAR 52.216-7 — Allowable Cost and Payment (cited above) is the standard clause for this contract.  I am not aware of any non-standard arrangement with DynCorp or the other LOGCAP IV contractors.</p>
<p>At issue, however, is whether DynCorp is billing the Government at any time for costs which they are not incurring by paying their employees.  DCAA has done fine work on LOGCAP from day one of LOGCAP III.  Unfortunately they have not had the resources to do complete audit work.  One of the main audit issues consists of comparing work orders to time sheets to confirm that work shown on time sheets matches work performed.  The validated time sheets should then match vouchers to the Government and payroll records of the employees.  As you might imagine this is time consuming audit work, heavily dependent on the Contractor having validated and approved business systems.</p>
<p>The other issue, as I noted earlier, concerns whether DynCorp is having performance issues due to this payroll problem.  The Government should be taking action to correct any performance deficiencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-KBR Wife</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-KBR Wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7194</guid>
		<description>It is sad to see that there are still Dyncorp employees experiencing issues with their paychecks.  This should not be happening.  How can Dyncorp expect to keep anyone working if they continue to treat their employees this way??  How can Dyncorp keep their current contracts if this is how they do business???  It should be setting off alarms and whistles everywhere that they can not handle this contract!!!!  Is anyone in our government listening to what is going on with them?????  I don&#039;t know all the in&#039;s and out&#039;s of the contract and really don&#039;t care to learn all of it.  The one thing that I do know and so does everyone else is that this is wrong!!!!!!!  Dyncorp workers should not have to be begging someone to pay them much less be expected to stay while it continues to happen.  I don&#039;t understand how the government can keep paying them knowing all of this is going on.  
H-E-L-L-O!!!!!  Is there anybody home in Washington?? Do any of you care that Dyncorp has hired employees under a government contract to support our military and now is not paying them????  It does not look good on the part of our government for this to continue to go on!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad to see that there are still Dyncorp employees experiencing issues with their paychecks.  This should not be happening.  How can Dyncorp expect to keep anyone working if they continue to treat their employees this way??  How can Dyncorp keep their current contracts if this is how they do business???  It should be setting off alarms and whistles everywhere that they can not handle this contract!!!!  Is anyone in our government listening to what is going on with them?????  I don&#8217;t know all the in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s of the contract and really don&#8217;t care to learn all of it.  The one thing that I do know and so does everyone else is that this is wrong!!!!!!!  Dyncorp workers should not have to be begging someone to pay them much less be expected to stay while it continues to happen.  I don&#8217;t understand how the government can keep paying them knowing all of this is going on.<br />
H-E-L-L-O!!!!!  Is there anybody home in Washington?? Do any of you care that Dyncorp has hired employees under a government contract to support our military and now is not paying them????  It does not look good on the part of our government for this to continue to go on!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Sparky</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>Well said. Thank you for this great comment and thanks for backing it up with FACTS. 

Well DCAA Auditor I think the votes are in. And we are calling you on your crap. 

I&#039;m sticking with Charles Smith and 2 Cents comments. It sounds to me like they have read the contract and their comments are most factual.

So....who are you really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Thank you for this great comment and thanks for backing it up with FACTS. </p>
<p>Well DCAA Auditor I think the votes are in. And we are calling you on your crap. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sticking with Charles Smith and 2 Cents comments. It sounds to me like they have read the contract and their comments are most factual.</p>
<p>So&#8230;.who are you really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7178</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7178</guid>
		<description>DCAA Auditor,

Maybe you should go read the contract.  Page 38 Section I, Specifically I-29.

52.216-7 -- Allowable Cost and Payment:  

(b) Reimbursing costs.

(1) For the purpose of reimbursing allowable costs (except as provided in subparagraph (b)(2) of this clause, with respect to pension, deferred profit sharing, and employee stock ownership plan contributions), the term “costs” includes only --

(i) Those recorded costs that, at the time of the request for reimbursement, the Contractor has paid by cash, check, or other form of actual payment for items or services purchased directly for the contract;

(ii) When the Contractor is not delinquent in paying costs of contract performance in the ordinary course of business, costs incurred, but not necessarily paid, for --

(A) Supplies and services purchased directly for the contract and associated financing payments to subcontractors, provided payments determined due will be made—

(1) In accordance with the terms and conditions of a subcontract or invoice; and

(2) Ordinarily within 30 days of the submission of the Contractor’s payment request to the Government;

(B) Materials issued from the Contractor’s inventory and placed in the production process for use on the contract;

(C) Direct labor;

(D) Direct travel;

(E) Other direct in-house costs; and

(F) Properly allocable and allowable indirect costs, as shown in the records maintained by the Contractor for purposes of obtaining reimbursement under Government contracts; and

(iii) The amount of financing payments that have been paid by cash, check or other form of payment to subcontractors.

____________________________

So before you make a statement, that someone &quot;needs to actually read the contract before making statements.&quot;  Maybe it is time for you to take your own advice.  

After you do that, go ahead and remove your foot and then try again.  

Have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCAA Auditor,</p>
<p>Maybe you should go read the contract.  Page 38 Section I, Specifically I-29.</p>
<p>52.216-7 &#8212; Allowable Cost and Payment:  </p>
<p>(b) Reimbursing costs.</p>
<p>(1) For the purpose of reimbursing allowable costs (except as provided in subparagraph (b)(2) of this clause, with respect to pension, deferred profit sharing, and employee stock ownership plan contributions), the term “costs” includes only &#8211;</p>
<p>(i) Those recorded costs that, at the time of the request for reimbursement, the Contractor has paid by cash, check, or other form of actual payment for items or services purchased directly for the contract;</p>
<p>(ii) When the Contractor is not delinquent in paying costs of contract performance in the ordinary course of business, costs incurred, but not necessarily paid, for &#8211;</p>
<p>(A) Supplies and services purchased directly for the contract and associated financing payments to subcontractors, provided payments determined due will be made—</p>
<p>(1) In accordance with the terms and conditions of a subcontract or invoice; and</p>
<p>(2) Ordinarily within 30 days of the submission of the Contractor’s payment request to the Government;</p>
<p>(B) Materials issued from the Contractor’s inventory and placed in the production process for use on the contract;</p>
<p>(C) Direct labor;</p>
<p>(D) Direct travel;</p>
<p>(E) Other direct in-house costs; and</p>
<p>(F) Properly allocable and allowable indirect costs, as shown in the records maintained by the Contractor for purposes of obtaining reimbursement under Government contracts; and</p>
<p>(iii) The amount of financing payments that have been paid by cash, check or other form of payment to subcontractors.</p>
<p>____________________________</p>
<p>So before you make a statement, that someone &#8220;needs to actually read the contract before making statements.&#8221;  Maybe it is time for you to take your own advice.  </p>
<p>After you do that, go ahead and remove your foot and then try again.  </p>
<p>Have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ksniper</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ksniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7176</guid>
		<description>Sparky who ever this DCCA Auditor is probably a phony knows about the non payment and is sticking his or hers head in the dirt.  If you submit your timesheet correctly and on time you should be paid on time.  According to the contract you should be either paid biweekly or Monthly when you are not paid the employer is in violation of the contract.  DCCA Auditor make sure you are correct when it comes to pay.  Not only or the SCW&#039;s are getting run under the bus but so are the expats as well.  Hopefully there can be a resolution concerning this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sparky who ever this DCCA Auditor is probably a phony knows about the non payment and is sticking his or hers head in the dirt.  If you submit your timesheet correctly and on time you should be paid on time.  According to the contract you should be either paid biweekly or Monthly when you are not paid the employer is in violation of the contract.  DCCA Auditor make sure you are correct when it comes to pay.  Not only or the SCW&#8217;s are getting run under the bus but so are the expats as well.  Hopefully there can be a resolution concerning this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Sparky</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>I just want to make sure I&#039;m clear. Are you telling me a LOGCAP IV contractor can be legally reimbursed for payroll expenses that they have not paid out. In other words, if an employee submits a timesheet and is not paid for whatever reason, and the contractor is reimbursed for these wages, that is not fraudulent. 

I also am concerned the DoD does is not taking issue with the large number of Dyncorp employees dmobing due to non payment in Afghanistan. I am talking about American expats not SCW/TCN&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to make sure I&#8217;m clear. Are you telling me a LOGCAP IV contractor can be legally reimbursed for payroll expenses that they have not paid out. In other words, if an employee submits a timesheet and is not paid for whatever reason, and the contractor is reimbursed for these wages, that is not fraudulent. </p>
<p>I also am concerned the DoD does is not taking issue with the large number of Dyncorp employees dmobing due to non payment in Afghanistan. I am talking about American expats not SCW/TCN&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCAA Auditor</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>DCAA Auditor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Just a note - Mr. Smith needs to actually read the contract before making statements. The LCIV contract due to the large amount of funds being paid out allows the contractors to bill the Government when the costs are committed - that means that when somesone submits a timesheet - and is owed a salary then all of the LCVI contractors are able to bill the Government for the cost. 

Also as a side note - there are withholds - and the invoices are audited prior to being paid unlike most contracts. 

Regardless one of the requirements for award of the LCIV Contract was that the companies have sufficient financial stability and resources to allow them to be able to meet obligations prior to payment. 

By the way DCAA will allow a supervisor to complete the timesheet for those who are unable on a daily basis in front of the individual and then the individual and the supervisor - provided they can either speak the persons language or there is a qualified interpreter present must each initial that day&#039;s entries. It has been and is being done that way overseas for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note &#8211; Mr. Smith needs to actually read the contract before making statements. The LCIV contract due to the large amount of funds being paid out allows the contractors to bill the Government when the costs are committed &#8211; that means that when somesone submits a timesheet &#8211; and is owed a salary then all of the LCVI contractors are able to bill the Government for the cost. </p>
<p>Also as a side note &#8211; there are withholds &#8211; and the invoices are audited prior to being paid unlike most contracts. </p>
<p>Regardless one of the requirements for award of the LCIV Contract was that the companies have sufficient financial stability and resources to allow them to be able to meet obligations prior to payment. </p>
<p>By the way DCAA will allow a supervisor to complete the timesheet for those who are unable on a daily basis in front of the individual and then the individual and the supervisor &#8211; provided they can either speak the persons language or there is a qualified interpreter present must each initial that day&#8217;s entries. It has been and is being done that way overseas for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-7157</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-7157</guid>
		<description>Yes their trying. Many cannot fill out a time sheet and do no speak english. Their bank has no bank numbers and /or routing numbers.Their are small problems, but they are getting paid in cash. gg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes their trying. Many cannot fill out a time sheet and do no speak english. Their bank has no bank numbers and /or routing numbers.Their are small problems, but they are getting paid in cash. gg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baboo Remembers</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>Baboo Remembers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>Western Union....I&#039;m going green this year so everyone can give me cash to recycle.
Merry X-MAS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Western Union&#8230;.I&#8217;m going green this year so everyone can give me cash to recycle.<br />
Merry X-MAS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agitato</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>Agitato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-6881</guid>
		<description>No. Some, but not all, were paid in cash and a rep was elected to come to KAF and Western Union the money.

DIFZ Expats had a payday yesterday, and many were disappointed to find numerous short-pay issues, erroneous witholding, tax errors, etc.

We&#039;ve heard about the debit cards for TCN&#039;s, but no one has seen them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Some, but not all, were paid in cash and a rep was elected to come to KAF and Western Union the money.</p>
<p>DIFZ Expats had a payday yesterday, and many were disappointed to find numerous short-pay issues, erroneous witholding, tax errors, etc.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve heard about the debit cards for TCN&#8217;s, but no one has seen them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Sparky</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-6858</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness. Keep us posted. Do you know if the SCW&#039;s are being paid on time. They were supposed to get two debit cards, 1 for them and 1 for their family so they could withdraw pay in their country. Is that happening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness. Keep us posted. Do you know if the SCW&#8217;s are being paid on time. They were supposed to get two debit cards, 1 for them and 1 for their family so they could withdraw pay in their country. Is that happening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baboo Remembers</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6856</link>
		<dc:creator>Baboo Remembers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-6856</guid>
		<description>Just as long as your not bootlegging alcohol, as with most of the Brit’s in Dubai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as long as your not bootlegging alcohol, as with most of the Brit’s in Dubai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://mssparky.com/2009/12/dyncorp-should-pay-the-employees-they-have-before-hiring-more/comment-page-1/#comment-6855</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mssparky.com/?p=6529#comment-6855</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mrs. Sparky, I work with Macedonians and really like them, but they deduct FICA and Medicade taxes from me and none from them, in essence they get more money to take back to their country and spur their economy. Where is the equal treatment under the law we are fighting for.?????

gg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mrs. Sparky, I work with Macedonians and really like them, but they deduct FICA and Medicade taxes from me and none from them, in essence they get more money to take back to their country and spur their economy. Where is the equal treatment under the law we are fighting for.?????</p>
<p>gg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

