Security guards under investigation leaving Afghanistan
KABUL, Afghanistan (CNN) — Ten private security guards accused of wrongdoing at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan have been fired or resigned and were leaving the country Friday, U.S. officials said.
Allegations surfaced last week that contractor ArmorGroup North America allowed mistreatment, sexual activity and intimidation within the ranks of private guards hired to protect the embassy in Kabul. The company and U.S. officials are investigating.
Eight of the guards under investigation were fired and two resigned, the U.S. Embassy said in a statement issued Friday. In addition, the entire senior management team of ArmorGroup North America in Kabul was to be replaced immediately, the embassy said.
The embassy’s security office is continuing interviews of all ArmorGroup guards, and a team from the State Department’s inspector general’s office has arrived in Kabul and begun an investigation, the release said.
The allegations came to light last week when the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and briefed reporters on its findings, which it said were based on e-mails and interviews with more than a dozen guards who have worked at the U.S. compound in Kabul.
ArmorGroup has a security contract with the State Department to provide services through July 2010.
Wackenhut Services Inc., the corporate parent of ArmorGroup, said in an e-mail that it is “fully cooperating”(click HERE to read the original article)
(Click HERE to see the Kabul hazing pics- Caution photos are graphic.)
I think Armour Group did the right thing. They fired the offenders AND MANAGERS!! It’s my personal opinion that KBR would have fired the people who reported this incident, transfer the offenders and promoted the managers.
On a positive note for KBR…there is some new management material looking for work. They should fit right in!
I am positive KBR managers are lifting their glasses to Armour Group and are doing the Happy Dance saying “Woo Hoo….it’s not us this time!”
Ms Sparky
Other Related Posts From Ms Sparky
- The State Department says no more foreign private security guards for them
- Surprise! Another War-Zone Embassy Poorly Guarded by Contractors
- Security assigned to watch guards at Kabul embassy + link to Kabul Hazing PICS
- ‘Deviant hazing’ alleged at U.S. Embassy in Kabul
- Foreign National Guards Not Protecting US Troops In Iraq


















Friday, September 4th 2009 at 1:08 pm |
POGO Statement on Kabul Embassy Guard Firings
September 4, 2009
Statement by Danielle Brian, Executive Director, Project On Government Oversight:
“POGO is pleased that the State Department has finally taken decisive steps to bring the Kabul security guard scandal under control. We remain very concerned, however, with certain elements of this action. POGO has no solid information of the identities of those reported to have been removed. We have been told people are being fired for simply being in the photographs. We do know a number of those were unwilling participants.
We also want to hear that the supervisors who were responsible for this debacle are being held fully accountable and not simply allowed to resign and go to another contractor.”
http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/alerts/contract-oversight/co-gp-20090904.html
Friday, September 4th 2009 at 9:34 pm |
To: Danielle Brian, Executive Director, Project On Government Oversight
I would say if your in the picture half naked with you head up someone’s keester or lined up signing “a train kept a rolling all night”…you might be a “redneck, I mean a willing participant.
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 4:58 pm |
Here is a link to the response that POGO received to an eleven page letter they sent to the DoS regarding the Afghanistan Embassy guards.
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2009/09/state-department-responds-to-pogo-letter-sort-of.html#comments
Also they have a post titled “The New Contractor Misconduct Reporting Rule: Pass, Fail or Too Early to Tell?” There are several comments on this site relating to threats, intimidation and statements being rewritten to meet management’s “expectations.” Feel free to leave a comment (use spell check) & you may help an investigation.
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2009/09/the-new-contractor-misconduct-reporting-rule-pass-fail-or-too-early-to-tell.html