KBR Employees Stranded In Middle East

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

I have been inundated with emails asking what is going on. Everyone is being told the ICAA is not allowing KBR Charters to fly  in Iraqi airspace. To the best of my knowledge this only affects charter travel for those KBR employees who fly in and out of Iraq from Dubai. If you are in Kuwait or Afghanistan let us know if this is affecting you in anyway.

Please let people know what is happening where you are in Iraq and Dubai. I find it interesting KBR didn’t see this coming. So much for the effectiveness of a countrywide employee evacuation plan.

TO: LOGCAP III Project Employees

FROM: Jeff Rock, Chief of Staff, LOGCAP III ME/CA

SUBJECT: TRAVEL ADVISORY – Air Charter Flight Suspension

Air charter operations for the LOGCAP III project in Iraq has been suspended by the Iraq Civil Aviation Authority (ICAA). The security agreement signed on January 1, 2009, between the U.S. Government and the Government of Iraq returned airspace sovereignty to Iraq, and the host country now has complete authority over its airspace.  As a result of this action, passengers scheduled to fly on the air charter today have experienced travel cancellations.

Our air charter carriers are currently in negotiations with the Iraq Civilian Aviation Authority (ICAA) to resolve further cancellations. Additionally, we have engaged key leaders within the military and State Department in order to find a solution. In the meantime, LOGCAP III Senior Leadership is working closely with our air charter vendor to schedule and allocate additional aircraft to move passengers scheduled for R&R as soon as the suspension is lifted.

In an effort to keep LOGCAP III employees informed of the current status of our charter flights, an update will be sent out each day by 1200 hours. Currently, we are not projecting any resolution to this issue for the next 24-48 hours. However, we are working on alternative solutions for movement within the Iraq Theater as well as movement of priority employees (Emergency leaves and other priority movements approved by LC3 HQs) out of Iraq. Once these movement plans are confirmed, we will announce them in the next update. It is requested that our employees do not take any individual actions to rearrange their air movement if they purchased their own tickets until LC3 HQ has issued tomorrow’s update.

I thank you for your patience and understanding as we continue to work with our air charter carriers and the ICAA to find a resolve and return to a normal air charter flight schedule.

Jeff Rock
Chief of Staff
LOGCAP III ME/CA
F1 #43382
APO AE 09344
281-669-5599
DSN 485-2721

A Message from FGG President Bruce Stanski

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

August 5, 2009

Subject:  A Message from FGG President
To:            All Fluor Government Group Employees
From:       Bruce Stanksi, President, Fluor Government Group

Dear Colleagues,

First, let me start by saying that I am very pleased to join Fluor Corporation and to now call the Government Group home.  In the past, I have always admired Fluor as a competitor and I believe this company is the premier EPCM firm in the world.  It is an honor to now be a member of Fluor’s senior management team and to be associated with such a rich legacy and bright future.  I only hope that I can help add to the strong reputation that the company has earned during its nearly 100 years and be an active part of its future.

I joined the company in late March and have been immersing myself into the company’s systems and processes and working on some special assignments for Alan Boeckmann in Dallas.  I am excited to now take on a leadership role within FGG.  My first priority is to create many opportunities for us to get to know each other.  I am planning extensive meetings in the next couple of weeks with the FGG leadership team and scheduling town hall meetings in Greenville as soon as everyone is settled from the relocation to the Patewood Buildings.  I also intend to visit our project sites and other office locations so I can talk to as many of you as possible and learn what is on your minds and of greatest importance.

Since I am still relatively new to Fluor, I know that there are likely a number of questions you may have about me and my management style.  I look forward to answering those questions in person.  Consistent and ongoing communication has always been a hallmark of my management style, and I plan to continue that tradition here at Fluor.

Additionally, I would say that my management style is best defined by two words:   Integrity and Performance.  These are of paramount importance and guide everything I do, and they are always weighed in that order.

Having worked a long time in this industry, I am well aware of Fluor’s unwavering commitment to ethics and integrity..  The deciding factor for me to join Fluor was that I feel that my personal values and business ethics more closely align with those of Fluor than any other company in our industry.  To me, integrity includes following established internal company procedures and complying with corporate policy.  But, it goes well beyond that.  It means conducting ourselves in the highest and most ethical manner in everything we do.  I believe that integrity lives within each and every one of us, an internal compass, if you will that helps us make the right decisions.  It cannot be compromised for any reasons; not for individual aspirations, not for perceived business gains, and certainly not for profitability.  Fluor has great mechanisms to bring concerns or issues to light and I encourage everyone to use those.  I also want you to know that you have my personal commitment that I will support you in any matter of ethics

As for performance, each of us is responsible to serve Fluor by delivering consistent and measurable results.  The type of results we deliver varies greatly depending on our individual roles in the company.  However, what is common to all is the ability for each of us to set meaningful and measurable targets and then measure ourselves to these targets.  As with integrity, I believe full transparency of established targets are necessary and I will readily share those within the business group.  This is the best way that I know to establish clear line-of-site measures which drive the success of our business.

Fluor Government Group’s great success in recent years is evidence of a strong culture.  My intent is to celebrate that success and drive our performance to the next level.  I would like each and every person within FGG to understand our monthly, quarterly and annual objectives and how their individual roles fit into the big picture of success.  I would like our leadership to be thinking about strategy on a weekly basis and all of us bending our daily efforts to achieve this success.

If we understand all aspects of a job we must do, properly staff and support that job with capable personnel, and execute using our established operating procedures and know-how we will be successful.  This success will drive ever increasing customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Concurrent with operational excellence is winning new work.  Every one of us in FGG has responsibility to grow the business so that our loyal and hard working employees can grow in their careers and move from one successful job to the next so as to increase opportunities for all of us.  This means pursuing projects for which we have a high probability of success and that have an acceptable risk adjusted rate of return.  It is also vitally important that we keep the mission of our clients clearly in mind as we go about our important work.

That’s the “short version” of my principles and objectives here at Fluor.  As you may be able to tell, I’m very passionate about these topics, and equally enthusiastic about the being part of Fluor and the Government Group.  I look forward to meeting with you and discussing our future together. (end)

So I wonder how Fluor employees are feeling about this as well as KBR employees who now might be going to work for Fluor. I believe I’ve heard Fluor Logcap referred to as “KBR East”. It should would appear that way.

DOD wake up!

Ms Sparky

Bruce Stanski to head Fluor Governent Group

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

It looks like it’s official, now to run Fluor. Or should I say run Fluor into the ground. We all knew that Bruce just up and quit KBR in Mid March. Click HERE. The article states he went to work for Fluor last March. Hmm So why the wait to announce that he will be the head of the Government Group? Some sort to of legal wrangling with KBR or DoD.

Keep in mind Stanski was at the helm when SSG Chris Everett was electrocuted, when SSG Ryan Maseth was electrocuted, all alleged crimes were being committed in the LOGCAP III theater of operations. What all the alleged Fraud, Waste and Abuse was being committed. If I were DoD I would be very concerned with Fluor. It’s very likely to be the same company different name! I’m sure Fluor will be the new subject of Congressional Hearings, GAO and DoD IG Reports. I find it hard to believe that Stanski was the best they could find.

Stanski to Head Fluor Government Group; Hopkins to Lead Corporate Development

August 5, 2009 6:00 AM ET

Fluor Corporation FLR announced today that Bruce A. Stanski has been named group president for Fluor’s Government business, which includes work for the United States’ Departments of Defense, Energy, Homeland Security and State, as well as the United Kingdom’s Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.

In making the announcement, Fluor’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alan Boeckmann, said, “Bruce has a proven track record of global operations and industry experience supporting U.S. and foreign government clients. We have every expectation that he will substantially build upon Fluor’s strong record of accomplishment in serving government markets.”

Stanski, who joined Fluor in March 2009, brings more than 25 years of operational, financial and government expertise. Previously, he served as president of Kellogg Brown & Root’s (KBR) Government and Infrastructure business. Additionally, he held roles in KBR that included the corporation’s chief financial officer as well as head of strategic planning. Prior to joining KBR, Stanski held executive and director level positions at Westinghouse’s defense/nuclear instrumentation divisions and with other government contractors. In addition, he created and taught government contracting and finance curriculum for The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md. Stanski will be based in Fluor’s Arlington, Va., office and report to David Seaton, senior group president for Energy & Chemicals, Power and Government.

“With the key addition to our senior leadership team of an executive with Bruce’s industry reputation, Fluor will be able to provide unparalleled capabilities to combine strategic, operational and financial competencies to a number of critical end markets,” said Seaton.

John L. Hopkins, who had led Fluor’s Government Group, will now serve as Group Executive, Corporate Development, focusing exclusively on providing strategic leadership and oversight to several corporate staff and business functions, including strategic planning, corporate affairs, government relations, mergers and acquisitions and new ventures. Hopkins will also continue to provide executive sponsorship to the company’s vitally important relationship with the U.S. Department of Energy and relationships in the United Kingdom.

About Fluor Corporation

Fluor Corporation FLR designs, builds and maintains many of the world’s most challenging and complex projects. Through its global network of offices on six continents, the company provides comprehensive capabilities and world-class expertise in the fields of engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, operations, maintenance and project management. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, Fluor is a FORTUNE 200 company and had revenues of $22.3 billion in 2008. For more information visit www.fluor.com.

Fluor Corporation
Media Relations
Keith Stephens, 469-398-7624
or
Brian Mershon, 469-398-7621
or
Investor Relations
Ken Lockwood, 469-398-7220
or
Jason Landkamer, 469-398-7222

(Click HERE for the original article)

The KBR Report/KBR Not At Fault

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

I don’t normally republish editorials, but when KBR actually responds to them in a US District Court jurisdiction where they have a pending lawsuit like the electrocution death of SSG Ryan Maseth, I feel I must publish them for the pure  entertainment of my readers. Please note that KBR’s Bill Bodie didn’t respond this time!! It was just Heather Browne, the sacrificial communications director!

First we have the original editorial from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review in response to the DoD IG Reports on the electrocutions in Iraq.

The KBR report

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Criminal prosecution should follow the Department of Defense inspector general’s new report on a Shaler Green Beret’s electrocution in a Baghdad shower.

The report on the Jan. 2, 2008, death of Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth says Texas-based contractor KBR didn’t properly ground or inspect a water pump and tanks that KBR installed.

Shamefully, KBR has long denied it did that installation. And its claim that the military never directed it to improve the grounding system suggests KBR reprehensibly puts its own welfare before that of U.S. troops.

The new report has to encourage Sgt. Maseth’s parents, whose federal lawsuit against KBR is on hold while KBR appeals denial of its dismissal request. They’re also awaiting an official ruling from the Army’s Criminal Investigative Division, which last year reclassified Maseth’s death from accidental to negligent homicide and blamed KBR.

This nation’s sacred duty to all who wear its uniform includes deterring contractors from potentially fatal shoddiness. That duty demands action beyond the existing civil and military cases to ensure justice and accountability commensurate with the breach of trust inherent in Maseth’s death.

A criminal prosecution must follow the evidence wherever it leads. And if criminal culpability is found, prosecutors must seek outcomes more severe than the wrist-slap fines and promises to do better that contractors routinely shrug off. (click HERE for the original editorial)

Now for KBR’s bull shit response!!

KBR not at fault

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

The editorial “The KBR report” (July 30 and TribLIVE.com) is inaccurate and misleading. Contrary to the editorial’s assertions, the report is not focused solely on KBR.

It is apparent that the author of the editorial did not fully read the Department of Defense inspector general’s report, which alleges possible missteps across several government entities.

The editorial alleges that the pump involved in the electrocution of Shaler Green Beret Ryan Maseth was installed by KBR in June 2006. KBR disagrees.

But the real issue here is that it was not the pump that caused the incident. The incident was caused by the building’s lack of grounding and bonding, which the IG confirmed.

According to the IG, correcting these grounding problems “would have required rewiring the entire building; work which was outside the scope of (KBR’s contract).”

The IG acknowledged that KBR did notify the military of the lack of grounding in Staff Sgt. Maseth’s building prior to Maseth’s death. Under its contract in Iraq, which specifically outlines that KBR shall perform its work consistent with instructions from its customer, KBR was not directed to repair this deficiency until after Maseth’s death.

While the death of Sgt. Maseth is tragic, KBR continues to assert that it is not responsible for the incident.

KBR is proud of the work it performs in Iraq and we remain committed to a transparent, fact-based dialogue on this issue.

Heather L. Browne
Houston, Texas
The writer is director of corporate communications for KBR Inc. (click HERE for original editorial)

Heather my question is for you. Strategically I can see where you might have been forced to make this bogus statement. But I must ask…..”Do you have a soul? Or have you sold it to KBR for a Director position? I’m sure it will serve you well in HELL!”

Just so you all know. I have read ALL the reports.

Ms Sparky

KBR failed to protect troops in Iraq

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Senate Democrats charge that KBR failed to protect troops in Iraq from “deadly poison”

by Julie Sullivan, The Oregonian
Monday August 03, 2009, 6:54 PM

Senate Democrats say the Army and the nation’s largest war contractor failed to protect troops from a “deadly poison” in Iraq and are demanding further investigation.

The statement came after a former Oregon Army National Guardsman and three other combat veterans testified Monday that since being exposed to hexavalent chromium in 2003, they have been chronically ill and that some of their fellow soldiers have died.

“Before my service to Iraq, I was physically fit. I used to run several miles without much effort,” said 42-year-old Rocky Bixby of Hillsboro, who struggled to speak between raspy coughs. “Now I have trouble walking from my house to my car. I simply run out of breath.”

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota, called the Army’s investigation so far into the exposure “tragically inadequate,” and likened it to the government’s mishandling of Agent Orange after Vietnam. “The Defense Department failed to protect our troops,” Dorgan said. “And I believe they are downplaying this in part because it is an embarrassment to them.”

The Army has defended its actions and last year the Defense Health Board, an independent review body, agreed with the Army. Defense contractor Kellogg Brown & Root has maintained in statements that its actions have not harmed troops.

The Houston firm provides almost all basic services for the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. But they have been the frequent target in 20 oversight hearings conducted by Dorgan.

Last week the Defense Department’s inspector general found the company that KBR’s shoddy electrical work failed to protect a Green Beret electrocuted in the shower. Last spring the inspector general found KBR provided wastewater for bathing at one U.S. base in Iraq, causing skin infections and diarrhea. U.S. taxpayers have paid KBR millions in bonuses to restore Iraqi oil production.

Workers — civilians as well as U.S. troops — were exposed to hexavalent chromium as KBR raced to repair a water treatment plant near Basra to get the oil flowing again in 2003.

But the troops’ exposure to the cancer-causing chemical didn’t come to light until a June 2008 oversight hearing. Ed Blacke, a fomer KBR safety official testified that he was sent home from Iraq in 2003 after raising concerns about the reddish-orange powder piled at the plant.

Blacke told Dorgan’s committee that in addition to KBR employees, hundreds of U.S. troops were surrounded by the toxic powder as they slept, ate and patrolled at the plant between April and August 2003.

Among them: members of the 1st Battalion-162nd Infantry, the first Oregon Guard members into Iraq, as well as their Indiana and West Virginia counterparts.

The troops learned of the toxin when the state military departments and the Pentagon sent notification letters out earlier this year. At the Monday hearing, the four veterans say they recalled the reddish dust that spilled from100 pound bags that they used for protection from snipers — and for furniture.

They recalled wind storms that made the soldiers look like “orange powdered donuts.” They recalled the constant metallic taste that one veteran described like “a mouthful of pennies.”

But they were never told to use masks and other protective gear they had carried into combat. Their constant nose bleeds, skin sores and headaches were written off by KBR officials and Army medics as allergies to desert dust.

“Within two months, you could shine a light into my nasal cavity through a hole that had eaten through to the outside of my nose,” testified Russell Kimberling, a former commander who was medically evacuated to Germany after two months. Kimberling returned to guarding the plant in June 2003 until in August, when KBR employees showed up in full personal protection suits.

“They did not see fit to inform us that for safety purposes, we should’ve been doing the same,” he said. The Indiana Guard commander escort KBR is currently in hospice care with terminal lung cancer.Still, Kimberling testified that KBR officials downplayed what they found, describing the chemical, used as a corrosion fighter, as a “mild irritant” and that one would “literally have to bathe” in it for harm to occur. Experts told Dorgan’s committee last year that exposure to a grain of sand’s worth of hexavalent chromium over a cubic meter would greatly increase the risk of cancer.

In September 2003 the plant was shuttered, and eventually cleaned up. In October the Army administered 137 blood tests. The men never received any written results.

At Monday’s Senate’s Democratic Policy Committee hearing, an epidemiologist and the Environmental Protection Agency’s foremost expert on hexavalent chromium testified that the toxin would have largely been out of the troops’ bodies by the timing of tests. Herman Gibb, who spent his career at the EPA, likened it to “giving a breathalyzer to a person three days after they were pulled over for erratic driving.”

Gibb said further study, based on the military’s medical records, was needed, as well as ongoing medical evaluation and care. Congress is looking at a national registry for exposure.

Meanwhile, the Oregon Legislature has tried to provide some care. This summer the Legislature, led by Rep. Chip Shields of Portland, approved funds for soldiers who develop cancer as a result.

Some soldiers are also going to court. Bixby is one of five current or former Oregon Army National Guard suing KBR, as are dozens of soldiers in other states.

Bixby, who still works as a public safety officer at Oregon Heath & Science University, told the senators that after receiving his notification from the Guard earlier this year, the non-smoker finally had a chest X-ray.

“The doctors discovered I have a node on my lung.”  (click HERE for the original article)

Senate DPC Hearings on Sodium Dichromate Exosure at Qarmat Ali

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

The Senate Democratic Policy Committee Chaired by Senator Dorgan held their second hearing on the chemical exposure of our troops and civilians at water plant is Southern Iraq today. The hearing was entitled:

The Exposure at Qarmat Ali: Did the Army Fail to Protect U.S. Soldiers Serving in Iraq?

Witnesses were:

Russell Kimberling
Former Indiana Army National Guard Company Commander

Rocky Bixby
Former Oregon Army National Guard Staff Sergeant

Russell Powell
Former West Virginia Army National Guard Staff Sergeant

Glen Bootay
Former Army (3rd Infantry Division) Combat Engineer

Herman Gibb, Ph.D
Former Environmental Protection Agency Associate Director for Health

To view the entire hearing video, read witness statements, read witness biographies and see other supporting documents click HERE

The first Senate DPC hearing on the Qarmat Ali chemical exposures was held on June 20, 2008 and entitled:

The Exposure at Qarmat Ali: Contractor Misconduct and the Safety of U.S. Troops in Iraq

To view the entire hearing video, read witness statements and witness biographies click HERE

To read specifically Edward Blacke’s testimony, the former KBR safety coordinator at Qarmat Ali, as reference in the hearing today click HERE

There is no doubt in my mind that KBR knowingly exposed their own employees and our troops to this well known toxic chemical. But that is just my personal opinion!! What is yours?

Ms Sparky

IADCO sues KBR

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

You can’t even imagine how it pains me to say this, but I hope KBR wins this suit filed by Iraqi American Development Corp, known as IADCO to those of us who have worked with them.  If it were just about money, I would say I hope IADCO wins and puts the screws to KBR for another $14 mil. But it isn’t. IADCO smuggled Filipino workers into Iraq, brought them into the Green Zone to work on the Palace Rewire Project. When things started going bad with the contract IADCO just didn’t show up to work to finish the job. I don’t have any particulars on that so don’t ask. What I do know about is that IADCO abandoned it’s Filipino workers in the Green Zone with no passports, food, water or the ability yo get out of the country. KBR employees took care of them until the Filipino Embassy intervened and was able to get the workers home.  IADCO was known for not taking care of their Filipino workers from the beginning. Many of us bought food for them and delivered cases of water.  The KBR Contract Administrators knew about this mistreatment of the Filipinos because they were told over and over again.  And, I did report IADCO to the Department of State Inspector General in person in July 2008.

I read IADCO’s complaint. Most of it is pretty laughable to me. All you “Palace Rewire Electrician’s” can click HERE to read it and decide for yourself.  And don’t think I am just jumping on this anti-IADCO bandwagon. I first blogged about them a year ago HERE.

So, if you ever wondered if there was a contractor out there worse than KBR….in my opinion it’s IADCO!

KBR Sued by Subcontractor

The Blog of LegalTimes
July 31, 2009

Global engineering and construction firm KBR is being sued by a former subcontractor, which claims it is still owed payment for work it did four years ago in Iraq.

Iraqi American Development Corp., a subsidiary of Nevada-based Iraqi American Media, filed its $14 million suit Tuesday at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. According to the complaint, KBR, then a Halliburton subsidiary, hired the company in 2004 to rewire Iraq’s Presidential Palace.

The subcontractor brought in more than 125 workers for the project, which was scheduled to finish in 2004. But according to the complaint, problems began almost immediately. Because of KBR’s “pending financial situation” (it was placed under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2003, and didn’t emerge until 2005), it was unable to obtain a necessary letter of credit to pay for equipment and materials, leaving the subcontractor to cover the costs. The complaint also alleges that KBR failed to make work areas available or to provide adequate security, and missed monthly payments. The resulting delays set the project’s end date back to November 2005.

At that point, the complaint states that KBR let the contract expire, confiscated the subcontractor’s equipment, computers and records used in the project and finished a minimal amount of work itself.

The complaint states that in 2007 KBR agreed to pay the full $14 million owed on the original contract. It has yet to make the full payment, the complaint says, and has not compensated the subcontractor for its extra costs.

Neither KBR nor the subcontractor’s attorney, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton partner John Fornaciari, returned calls for comment. No lawyers have entered an appearance for KBR.

KBR has had its fair share of legal travails over recent years. In February, the company pleaded guilty to bribing Nigeran officials. It has been sued by female employees claming sexual abuse, families former workers who say they were illegally trafficked to Iraq, and soldiers who say it served them spoiled food.

Posted by Jordan Weissmann on July 31, 2009 at 03:07 PM in D.C. Courts and Government (click HERE for the original post)