I’ve Reported Fluor to the DoDIG

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

I mention this in a comment response, but I am going to post it here as well.

Recently Fluor has, for some reason unbeknown to their employees in the Middle East, removed Internet access from their servers. Fluor employees are now unable to privately or anonymously access the following from the Fluor Network. To access any of the following they must wait at an MWR or access it from a another companies computer.

  1. The Department of Defense Inspector General Hotline (DODIG)
  2. The Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID)
  3. The Naval Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS)
  4. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)
  5. The Department of State Inspector General (DOSIG)

Why is this? Here’s what I think could be going on. There are so many KBR employees in Afghanistan and soon to be Iraq signing on with Fluor more and more will be coming forward to report their witnessing of Fraud, Waste, Abuse & Crimes against our soldiers and the US taxpayers. With so many KBR managers now running things for Fluor these reports from former KBR employees could very well implicate them as well.

Unless someone has shot the satellites out of the sky, there is no excuse in this day and age to be anywhere without internet access.

KBR first started isolating and controlling the communication of it employees by forbidding the use of cells phone calling it a security issue. LMAO on that one. Evidently someone got caught with a voice recorder trying to catch his manager lying. Bummer, no more voice recorders. Personal cameras and computers are severally restricted if not completely forbidden by now.

So, if this whole shutting down of the Internet on the Fluor network doesn’t have “Former KBR Manager” written all over it, I don’t know what does.

So you tell me what you think. If you think Fluor is trying to restrict their employees ability to freely and anonymously report to the DoDIG and other investigative and oversight organization, let me know and then send your own report to the Inspector General via thieir email at hotline@dodig.mil

Ms Sparky

Why KBR lost Afghanistan

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Apparently the Army Contracting Center at Rock Island has determined that the lowest bid is not always the best value. Finally some common sense. The decision to leave KBR out of the LOGCAP IV awards in Afghanistan were based on the “best value” approach which also took into consideration past performance. Evidently KBR’s seven years of past performance in Afghanistan did not give them much of an advantage. Hmmm Go figure.

Army announces new contracts for Afghanistan

Jul 15, 2009
By Jon Connor

ROCK ISLAND, Ill. (July 14, 2009) — Two new task orders supporting LOGCAP IV contract operations in Afghanistan are now in effect, Army officials announced July 7.

DynCorp International, LLC was awarded the work for southern Afghanistan and Fluor Intercontinental was selected for work in northern Afghanistan, the Army Sustainment Command at Rock Island, Ill., announced.

KBR also competed for the contracts, officials said. KBR has held a number of LOGCAP contracts to support Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The task orders encompass base life-support services and logistics support, which include base setup, food service, facilities maintenance, and morale, welfare and recreation to name a few, said Jim Loehrl, executive director, Rock Island Contracting Center, Rock Island, Ill.

The two task-order awards include moving all existing work in LOGCAP III to LOGCAP IV, plus capacity to stand up additional base camps, Loehrl said.

The task orders were awarded with pricing for one base year effective July 7, and four option years. Depending on growth in Afghanistan, the two task orders could potentially total $15 billion over five years, Loehrl explained.

This is based on each task order’s base year costing $1.5 billion plus a potential four option years.

“It all depends on what the growth is in Afghanistan as we continue to put troops in Afghanistan and where they go,” Loerl said. “We built the contract capacity to handle that.”

The selection process was an “integrated source selection encompassing technical management proposals, past performance, and costs,” Loehrl said.

From this, a “best-value” decision is then made, Loehrl said, which will benefit the Soldiers and other personnel, and give taxpayers the most value.

The contracting office issued a solicitation outlining the task order requirements and the terms and conditions under which the task order would be administered. The solicitation contained criteria against which each of the contractors’ proposals was evaluated.

“The concept hinges on the principle that while price is always a factor in the selection process, price alone does not define the best value for the taxpayer,” said Amy Hayden, chief, LOGCAP IV Contracting Branch, Rock Island, Ill.

“The best-value approach takes into account the fact that it may be in the government’s best interest to pay a premium to receive a better product or service,” she said.

The new task orders are the continuation of the Army’s plan to transition work from the single-award LOGCAP III contract to the multiple-award LOGCAP IV contract. So far, there have been 10 task orders awarded under LOGCAP IV, Loehrl said.

Loehrl said bidders not selected have the option to protest the award decision. “They certainly are allowed to protest,” Loehrl said. “That certainly is a possibility.”

Protests would be filed with the General Accountability Office, Hayden said.

“While there are circumstances under which contract performance my proceed despite the filing of the GAO-level protest, under normal circumstances, the government must suspend contract performance until the protest is resolved,” Hayden said.

The support for the services, however, would continue. Additionally, KBR can bid for future LOGCAP IV task orders, Loehrl said.

The Army had previously transitioned all LOGCAP work in Kuwait from LOGCAP III to LOGCAP IV (DynCorp), as well as awarded some new work in Afghanistan under LOGCAP IV (Fluor).

These newly announced task orders will transition all work in Afghanistan to LOGCAP IV. Similar processes to compete and transition the work in Iraq are also underway.

“The transition will be operationally driven, and methodically undertaken to ensure a transition that is seamless to the warfighter,” Hayden added.

“The transition is not a ‘turn-key’ operation and is extremely complex,” said Lee Thompson, LOGCAP executive director, Rock Island, Ill.

“Before we even begin the legacy task-order transitions, we will be starting the urgent work required for force expansion [in Afghanistan].”

The first step in the process is to conduct a post-award conference scheduled in early August, Thompson said. The conferees will discuss such areas as transition touch-points, explain the process, and reach agreements between contractors on the conduct of the transition, known as protocols, Thompson said.

“During the transition the incumbent continues to provide services and will do so until the U.S. government is satisfied that the incoming performance contractor can assume full operation of the function,” Thompson explained. “Once the IPC has demonstrated full operational capability, the incumbent is officially released from responsibility and the IPC is officially assigned full responsibility and accountability for performance execution.”

As with all government contracts, reviews, audits, and continuous oversight of contractor performance will be ongoing to make sure government and American taxpayers’ interests are protected, Sustainment Command officials said.

The contractors’ performance will be measured by the Defense Contract Management Agency and Defense Contract Audit Agency in accordance with pre-established performance standards, ASC officials said.

“DCMA and DCAA provide oversight of contractor business systems, and the LOGCAP IV task orders contain award-fee provision incentives for the the contractors to maintain these systems at an adequate level. DCMA also provides quality assurance representatives in-theater to oversee the contractors’ work,” Hayden explained.

“Finally, DCAA reviews contractor billings to ensure they are appropriate. In combination, these measures provide a high degree of protection against inappropriate practices during the execution of these task orders,” she said.

LOGCAP — Logistics Civil Augmentation Program — is an Army initiative to hire civilian contractors to perform services supporting the U.S. military in wartime and other contingencies. Use of contractors allows military units to focus on combat operations.

(Linda Theis, deputy public affairs officer, Army Sustainment Command, contributed to this article.(click HERE for a link to the original article)

KBR hat on? KBR hat off? Which is it?

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

I just love the writers at Houston Hair Balls. It’s a great Houston area blog but they all over the lawsuits filed against KBR in Houston. Here is another great article about KBR BS!

KBR: Prostitution & , Allegedly Yes; Headscarves, Allegedly No

By Chris Vogel in Courts
Wednesday, Jul. 15 2009 @ 6:58AM
kbr71409.jpg

It’s hard to know what kind of workplace behavior is acceptable at KBR these days.

On the one hand, if you believe the many lawsuits filed against the nation-builder, it’s not unheard of for the men stationed in Iraq to verbally and sexually abuse their women colleagues, even rape one on occasion. There are alleged incidents of prostitution and at a Thai brothel, where KBR managers encourage their workers to visit, and in some cases possibly even own the brothel. There are even instances where KBR workers supposedly exposed military personnel to contaminated food, contaminated water and improperly incinerated human remains. Yes, one man claims he saw a wild dog running around base one day with a man’s arm in its mouth.

So it should have hardly come as a shock to Karen Tounkara when she was fired from her contract gig at one of KBR’s Houston facilities for wearing a headscarf. After all, a company must have its standards.

According to a lawsuit recently filed against KBR in Houston federal court, Tounkara, a Muslim, claims she was discriminated against because of her religion when she was prohibited from wearing her headscarf, or hijab, in observance of her faith while she worked.

Tounkara’s attorney, Darius Porter, tells Hair Balls that his client was contracted through a nursing agency to help prep KBR workers heading to Iraq. When Tounkara showed up to her first day of work in December, she was told she could not wear her headscarf. “Mind you,” says Porter, “this was December and there were other nurses there who had on hats and skull caps because of the cold weather. They weren’t required to do anything.”

Later that night, says Porter, the staffing agency told Tounkara she was not welcome back at KBR because of a KBR policy stating that no employee can wear a head-covering at work. When Tounkara explained that she was a Muslim and asked if an accommodation could be made, says Porter, KBR countered by saying Tounkara could wear her headscarf up until entering the gates of KBR and put it back on once she had left.

“That is not necessarily a reasonable accommodation,” says Porter, “so we filed the petition.”

Hair Balls contacted KBR to ask whether the company has a no-hats-and-scarves policy, but have not yet heard back.

The lawsuit states that Tounkara should be protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employers from discriminating against workers based on religion. (click HERE for the original article)

Click HERE for a copy of the complaint.

Sounds to me that KBR was discriminating against Ms Tounkara and they are violating their own headgear policy by making people wear in the Middle East. I would think that ANYONE fired for not wearing the dreaded red KBR hat would have a great case against KBR. I would think they can’t have it both ways.

Ms Sparky

Will the DoD assist Fluor and Dyncorp?

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Now that KBR has lost LOCAP IV in Kuwait and Afghanistan…..what is the DoD’s agenda?

Do you plan to hold KBR in a contingency position  in the event Fluor or Dyncorp flounder and fail at their new contracts?

I suppose this is not an unreasonable strategic plan. But I have to ask, are you going to afford Fluor and Dyncorp the same courtesies you afforded KBR when they were awarded the LOGCAP III contract? Those courtesies being little to no DoD oversight or accountability on KBR’s part. Yes this did lead to a poor quality product but it did allow KBR to pocket billions of US tax dollars therefore being quite financially successful.

Are you going to do anything to assist Fluor and Dyncorp in succeeding in cleaning up after KBR. Or are they just going to be on their own dealing with the mess KBR created while they deal with the heightened levels of DoD oversight being demanded by Congress, something that KBR rarely faced until recently.

The DoD seemed to just turn a blind eye until The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chaired by Representative Waxman on  July 31,  2008 just shamed the DoDIG, the DCMA, and KBR about electrical work. How humiliating for them all. It seems things have started to change since then.

The DoD has been pressured by lawmakers to put a stop to KBR’s rampant reign of fraud, waste and abuse. So they have had to make a showing in Kuwait and Afghanistan by not awarding any LOGCAP IV task orders to KBR.

If KBR is so incompetent that the DoD has totally cut them out of Kuwait and Afghanistan why hold them in contingency? Is there some little vindictive voice somewhere that hopes Fluor and/or Dyncorp fail so that your beloved KBR can jump in and save the day? Then you can go back to the lawmakers and say “See we told you KBR was the only ones who could do it!”

Not too much has changed in the DoD since President Obama took office. It still looks like Bush’s DoD for the most part and there have been a whole lot of military egos that have been bruised recently. I hope Fluor and Dyncorp are expecting this.

Now, lets just wait and see what happens.

Ms Sparky

KBR wants to take care of British soldiers? Surely not!

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

It would appear that KBR hasn’t even broken stride with the loss of LOGCAP IV in Afghanistan. Apparently they can see the raping of the US Taxpayer coming to an end so they now look to violate one of our closest allies, the Brits. Bill Utt is currently in Britain sucking up to the Ministry of Defense in hopes they will allow KBR to take care of their soldiers. What the hell? Surely the Brits get the news over there and know how KBR has been accused of killing and injuring American soldiers due to shoddy electrical. Exposing them to harmful chemicals and contaminated water. The prolific fraud waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars. Knowing all this and still contracting with KBR…you get what you deserve! We don’t want to hear no whining afterwards. Note: the article below is from a British newspaper hence the differences in spelling.

Contractor KBR eyes Iraq oil opportunities

To call US oil and defence contractor KBR controversial is the understatement of the decade.

By Amy Wilson
Published: 8:00PM BST 10 Jul 2009

The list of people and projects linked to the company in the recent past – Dick Cheney, the Iraq War, Guantanamo Bay – is a litany of the red-hot contentious issues of the first part of this century. So you might expect chief executive Bill Utt to walk around stooped over, hauling this baggage around behind him. But in fact he is quite the opposite – an affable, suntanned American, decidedly unflashy, who apologises for being late.

He is in Britain to encourage the Ministry of Defence to send more business in KBR’s direction. The company is not a household name here, other than perhaps through its links to Halliburton, which KBR, as Kellogg Brown & Root, was spun out of in 2007, and which was chaired by former US vice-president Dick Cheney before he joined George W Bush’s presidential campaign. But KBR is involved in large projects with the MoD, including an £8bn PFI deal to build new accommodation for soldiers at Aldershot and around Salisbury Plain, in a joint venture with Carillion. It will provide 11,500 single rooms with en-suite facilities as well as accommodation for more senior ranks.

“We hope to take part in soldier’s accommodation on a wider basis,” Mr Utt says. “The way it is being run now is more expensive. It’s something we think we can do more efficiently.”

Given the state of some of Britain’s military housing, the building programme comes not a moment too soon, and the private companies’ backing for the PFI gives the cash-strapped MoD the means to do it. There is not much meat for the anti-KBR lobby in this project.

KBR also sets up and runs forward-operating bases for the British armed forces in Afghanistan, providing the water, sanitation, fuel and food needed to make the sites run. The company has a much wider remit with the US Army, doing tasks like delivering mail, and Mr Utt is pushing for the MoD to hand over more of what it calls “life support” work, leaving more troops free to get on with the business of fighting a war.

With the defence budget facing even deeper cuts and fighting in Afghanistan intensifying, Mr Utt’s proposition to MoD bosses must be a seductive one: using contractors should allow the armed forces to do their job with fewer people and lower costs.

“Everything downstream of soldiering should be up for discussion,” Mr Utt says. “We allow for a higher percentage of war fighters in the military. You can maintain your power with fewer people.”

And it’s not bad business for KBR either. The company has made fee income of $30bn (£18.5bn) from its contracts with the US since the start of the Iraq war. Mr Utt declines to put a figure on how much money KBR has saved the US in its recent campaigns, but says his staff have undertaken 400,000 hours of activity which would otherwise have been carried out by troops, and the “mileage” the country gets out of its soldiers has increased from 90 days in the Vietnam era to 180 days now.

KBR is able to cut costs because it does not have to pay its staff the $115,000 the US military spends to train and maintain each soldier for a year. The company has 70,000 staff in theatre in Iraq and Afghanistan, many of whom come from poorer countries such as the Philippines and Bosnia.

But it is Mr Utt’s plans for expanding the business as US soldiers pull out of Iraq that will have conspiracy theorists rubbing their hands in glee. With almost seven years of experience working in Iraq and as one of the largest oil and gas contractors in the world, KBR hopes to be the first port of call for oil companies who need to build the infrastructure to develop Iraq’s largely untapped oilfields. A consortium of BP and Chinese National Petroleum Corporation won a deal to develop Iraq’s largest oil field last month. KBR has worked with BP for years.

“We’re at the crossroads of people with on-the-ground experience in the country and experience in oil and gas.”

Mr Utt acknowledges this is an open goal to those who pointed to oil as the reason for the war in Iraq. But he bats away criticism.

“You can accuse me of being welded at the hip to Dick Cheney,” he says. “But we’re a contractor: people tell us what they want and we do it. We don’t set government policy.”

KBR is currently working on the enormous Gorgon gas field, off the north-west coast of Australia. The project is a joint venture between Chevron, Shell and ExxonMobil, and will produce 15 million tons of liquid natural gas a year.

Another large exploration project KBR is involved with is the Kashagan oil field in Kazakhstan, one of the largest discoveries of oil in the last 30 years with scope to produce more than 30 million barrels of oil. Italian oil company Eni works with KBR on Kashagan.

KBR has also worked on the Escravos gas project in Nigeria, along with Chevron and Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, which has the potential to produce 34,000 barrels a day of clean diesel and liquefied petroleum gas. (click HERE for original article)

Ms Sparky

Posted in KBR Contract. Tags: . 2 Comments »

Former KBR Employee (David Breda) Arrested For Raping A Woman In Iraq

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

KBR Employee From Pearland Accused Of Raping A Woman In Iraq

Houston Press
By Richard Connelly in Courts, Crime
Friday, Jul. 10 2009 @ 3:35PM

A KBR employee living in Pearland has been arrested for “abusive sexual conduct” he allegedly engaged in while in Iraq.

agents (that’s to you) arrested , 34, at “a Houston-area barber college,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

According to a newly unsealed indictment, “Breda, a civilian defense contractor employed by a subsidiary of Kellog, Brown and Root (KBR), sexually assaulted a woman at Camp Al Asad, an airbase in Iraq,” the release from the office said.

Breda no longer works for KBR. (Read the rest of the story here…)

Iraq fraud convict to go on trial after plea agreement rescinded

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Iraq fraud convict to go on trial after plea agreement rescinded

Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:30 pm

Quad City Times – A man who offered bribes to land multimillion-dollar, Iraq war contracts but who breached his plea deal with prosecutors is set for trial Monday in Rock Island.

Mohammad Shabbir Khan went to prison after pleading guilty in June 2006 to fraud, money laundering conspiracy and making a false statement. Witness tampering charges were dismissed as part of the plea deal.

However, as Khan’s prison time came to an end, the court ruled the deal Khan struck with officials was violated because he transferred $7.3 million from a bank in Dubai to a bank account in his brother’s name in Pakistan in August 2006, despite statements to federal authorities that he could not get access to the money.

He will face trial on the two counts of witness tampering that were dismissed.

Khan, a high-ranking manager for Saudi Arabia-based Tamimi Global Co., provided a KBR manager with a prostitute and $133,000 in exchange for multimillion-dollar dining hall contracts in Kuwait and Iraq overseen by an office on Arsenal Island, officials said. (Click HERE for the original article)

Here’s my question. Where did this happen.? Who was the KBR manager who accepted the bribes of money and prostitutes and where is he now? ANSWER: On 3 March 2006, Stephen Lowell Seamans pled guilty in the United States District Court, Central District of Illinois, to committing wire fraud and conspiracy to launder money. He was sentenced to 12 months and ordered to pay restitution of $380,130.

The general public doesn’t seem to understand how prolific forced prostitution is in the LOGCAP area of operations. And the biggest pimps are the labor subcontractors that traffic in workers from third world countries.

Updated 7-10-2009 to add court documents.

Mohammad Shabbir Khan Indictment click HERE
Mohammad Shabbir Khan Plea Agreement click HERE
Mohammad Shabbir Khan Complaint click HERE

Ms Sparky