Contractor (KBR) protests ‘biased’ treatment at hearing

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Well….well….well…. Bodie’s writing letters again. Boo hoo….The Wartime Contracting Commission is not being fair. I seem to remember that KBR has been invited to many many hearings and did not care to attend. And now that the heat is on, they are all about being participative. KBR…how does that feel to be treated in a way you feel is unfair? Sucks doesn’t it? Welcome to the world of a KBR LOGCAP employee! Click HERE to read his letter

Contractor protests ‘biased’ treatment at hearing

By RICHARD LARDNER – May 13, 2009

WASHINGTON (AP) — KBR Inc., a major military contractor whose fees have generated criticism, says it was subjected to “judgmental and biased” treatment by a special panel investigating waste and fraud in war spending.

The May 4 hearing held by the bipartisan Wartime Contracting Commission was a one-sided affair that unfairly trashed the company’s reputation, according to William Bodie, KBR’s interim president for government and infrastructure.

“The hallmark of any serious evaluative body should be a rigorous and unbiased commitment to collecting data and perspectives prior to the assemblage of conclusions,” Bodie wrote in a May 12 letter to commission leaders.

Formed by Congress last year, the eight-member commission has broad authority to examine military support contracts, reconstruction projects and private security companies. The May 4 hearing was its second public session as it works to complete an interim report next month. A final report is due in 2010.

KBR was not invited to testify at the hearing. Nor did company representatives ask to testify, Michael Thibault, co-chair of the commission, said Wednesday. KBR was asked to provide a written statement and did. (Click HERE to read written statement)

The Army, which manages the so-called LOGCAP contract that has paid KBR nearly $32 billion since 2001, had two senior contracting officials at the witness table.

Commission members have met with KBR on multiple occasions before the hearing, in the U.S. and in Iraq and Afghanistan, and will continue to do so, Thibault said.

KBR, along with an extensive network of subcontractors, provides U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Kuwait with dining facilities, transportation, sanitation systems, warehouses and other critical services.

Thibault said if KBR representatives had been asked to speak at the hearing, the panel would also have had to invite several other companies. The hearing format was intended to be a single panel of government witnesses, he said.

“Differences of opinion are inevitable,” Thibault said of KBR’s objections and the commission’s mission.

April Stephenson, director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, also testified and commissioners used her remarks to criticize KBR.

Since 2004, Stephenson said her office has submitted 32 reports of suspected fraud or improper conduct on contracts to government investigators. The “vast majority” of those referrals stemmed from the KBR contract.

She called the number of referrals “unprecedented” for a single military contract or program. But she declined to give details on those reports or name the sources of the alleged improprieties.

She also said her agency has conducted dozens of audits on the KBR contract and has challenged about $4.7 billion in costs charged by the company, she said.

Bodie said one commissioner — he doesn’t provide a name — said the fraud referrals included “bribery and kickbacks and so forth.” Bodie says there was no way for the commissioner to know this because Stephenson provided no specifics.

Bodie said “it is impossible for an observer to determine the gravity of any referral, the strength of the evidence behind it, or even whether any such investigation was or is active.”

The commission, formed by Congress last year, is styled after the Truman Committee, which examined World War II spending.

The commission is a long way from matching the record of the Truman Committee, which held 432 hearings and issued 51 reports between 1941 and 1948, according to Bodie. By comparison, he said the commission has held two hearings and issued zero reports.

“And given the bias expressed toward KBR, the conclusions made with a slim evidentiary record, and the narrow focus, it is hard to recognize the Truman Committee in this current effort,” Bodie wrote.

The commission responded to Bodie’s swipe by e-mailing the AP a quote from Harry Truman, who chaired the World War II oversight committee as a Missouri senator.

“I have had considerable experience in letting public contracts,” Truman said more than six decades ago, “and I have never yet found a contractor who, if not watched, would not leave the government holding the bag.”
On the Net:

* Wartime Contracting Commission: http://www.wartimecontracting.gov/

(Click HERE to read the original article)

“daveiniraq” email me

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

“daveiniraq” email me. Click HERE

Halliburton’s Army

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

I’ve heard this is a great book and have been intending to buy it but didn’t know when I’d have the time to read it. I was notified this morning that quotes from the testimony of witnesses from the Senate Democratic Policy Committee hearing for July 11, 2008 are in the book. This was the first hearing held on soldier electrocutions and shoddy electrical work. Cheryl Harris, Larraine McGee, Rachel McNeil, Jeff Bliss and myself testified at this hearing. I guess I have to buy the book now!! Below the book cover is a link to Amazon.com.

halliburtons-army2

Halliburton’s Army: How a Well-Connected Texas Oil Company Revolutionized the Way America Makes War

Some US soldiers forced to steal water in Iraq just to survive

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

(At the end of this article are a some of my personal experiences with KBR and potentially contaminated water.)

Some US soldiers forced to steal water in Iraq

Rations and problems trigger desperate measures to survive intense heat

10:54 PM CDT on Monday, May 11, 2009
By Jeremy Rogalski / 11 News Defenders

HOUSTON — Take Houston’s heat on a miserable summer day and add 40 degrees, making temperatures 130 or more.

Next, add an extra 100 pounds of life-protecting gear to your body: bulletproof vests, guns and ammunition.

And then imagine not having enough water around to drink.

Click HERE to watch the video coverage of this article.

Stories of short supplies have haunted the U.S. military throughout the war in Iraq—things like inadequate body armor or unshielded Hummers. But while many soldiers say they had good access to water and even Gatorade, the 11 News Defenders discovered that others, stationed all over the country and during all phases of this desert war, say something else was often missing.

“We were rationed two bottles of water a day,” said Army Staff Sgt. Dustin Robey, referring to 1 to 1.5 liter bottles.

And he said that wasn’t nearly enough.

“You’ll see guys throw up, you’ll see them pass out,” he said.

Robey said it started early on in the war, and that he and other soldiers are paying the price to this day. In 2003, he said soldiers were given what was the equivalent of only a half gallon of water to survive on a day—all while dodging bullets in the blistering heat.

“We were on missions, I ran out of water,” Robey said.

That’s no surprise. According to an Army Fort Bragg training document on preventing heat casualties in desert climates, water losses can reach 15 liters, or four gallons, per day per soldier. Additionally, Survival, a 1957 Department of the Army field manual, states “in hot deserts, you need a minimum of one gallon (of water) per day” just to survive.

So Robey said his company were forced to improvise.

“We were inside a house, I’d stick my head under the faucet and drink,” he said.

But Iraqi water is often untreated and can cause intestinal sickness.

“We had a real rash of dysentery go through my company. I’d say 50 to 60 guys got it,” Robey said.

But what about getting water from the mobile water treatment trucks the military refers to as “water buffaloes”?

A number of soldiers told 11 News that it was often difficult to locate those trucks in the field, partly because they say there was a shortage of them.  In addition, many soldiers claim that a lot of the water dispensed by those trucks was so heavily treated with chemicals that “no one could keep it down.”

Robey said eventually they became desperate.

“It really hit me the day I was with my commander and we’re stealing water,” Robey said, describing how they raided supplies at the Baghdad International Airport.

To get there, they had to take one of the riskiest routes in Iraq at that time, riddled with road bombs and roadside insurgents.

But they reached the airport and found plenty of water. It was in the hands of civilian contractors, who Robey claims were supposed to be distributing it to soldiers.

“You just had pallets upon pallets upon pallets of (bottled) water,” Robey said.

Water shortages continued in other parts of Iraq at other locations too, according to other soldiers. Private Bryan Hannah recalled a troubling situation in 2007:

Private Hannah: “My sergeant told my lieutenant we didn’t have enough water and he said go find some.”

11 News: “What does ‘go find some’ mean?”

Private Hannah: “It means ‘if you don’t want to die, then go find some water.’”

Hannah and fellow soldiers did just that, finding it once again at a civilian contractor facility.

“We’d just run out and start grabbing cases of water and start throwing them in the gunner’s hatch,” said Hannah.

“This sounds like something that definitely needs to be looked into,” said Dr. Stephen Fadem, a kidney specialist with Kidney Associates PLLC, who also teaches at the Veterans Administration.

“If soldiers are saying that they are not getting adequate water, that needs to be taken seriously,” Dr. Fadem said.

In the short term, Fadem said you could collapse, and in the long term, “they may end up with kidney injury.”

The same training document from Fort Bragg details those very health concerns. It states chronic dehydration is associated with kidney stones, urinary infection, rectal afflictions and skin problems.

“This can be very challenging,” said Dr. Fadem.

But 11 News identified another problem with water in Iraq—dirty water in sinks and showers soldiers used.

“I mean it’s yellow, and it’s filthy,” said Sgt. Casey J. Porter.

Porter, an aspiring filmmaker, took video footage of rust-colored water from faucets at Camp Taji in 2008. By that time in the war, Taji appeared less like a war zone and more like a mall.

“You can eat Subway, Burger King, you can buy a $1,200 Oakley watch, but you can’t have clean water to brush your teeth with, what’s the real priority here,” Sgt. Porter said.

Turns out, at many similar bases, the water was supposed to be processed by Houston-based company KBR. In an internal KBR report, the company sites “massive programmatic issues” with water for personal hygiene dating back to 2005. It outlines how there was no formalized training for anyone involved with water operations, and one camp, Ar Ramadi, had no disinfection for shower water whatsoever.

“That water was two to three times as contaminated as the water out of the Euphrates River,” said former KBR employee Ben Carter.

Carter, a water purification specialist, was the one to blow the whistle on it all. He said he first noticed a problem when he found a live maggot in a base toilet at Camp Ar Ramadi. He subsequently discovered that instead of using chlorinated water, the soldiers’ sinks and showers were pouring out untreated wastewater.

“You’re standing in what’s essentially a sauna of microorganisms. Your eyes, ears, anyplace there’s a cut, a person would be at risk of containing a pathogen,” Carter said.

But when he wanted to inform U.S. forces, Carter said KBR supervisors gave him a verbal lashing.

“The military is none of your f-ing concern, uh, which was shocking to me,” Carter said.

11 News asked military officials about the water problems in Iraq. In a statement by the Multi-National Force in Iraq press office states: “We have a proven system that works. Commanders at all levels do their utmost to provide the necessary resources required to sustain the force.”

KBR in a statement, told 11 News a Department of Defense Inspector General report concluded “KBR has (since) satisfied applicable water standards,” adding that “the DoD has not found any illness which it attributes to water in Iraq.”

But tell that to Staff Sgt. Dustin Robey.

“I take 26 different types of pills a day,” Robey said. “I’ve had kidney stones, almost on a daily basis.”

He said he’s passed hundreds of them since returning from Iraq.

“It feels like someone’s stabbing you in the side just over and over and over again,” Robey said.

He blames the lack of, and quality of water for his poor health, and the hardest part of it all is the toll it’s taken on his family.

“There’s days when I can’t go out and play with my children outside, I’m in that much pain,” Robey said.

As for his military career? It’s over. The Army forced him to retire because of his condition and slashed his pay to the point where is family is staring at foreclosure and has moved in with relatives.

The former staff sergeant’s only hope? That the next time our country does it the right way. And Afghanistan, is just around the corner.

“If we can’t provide enough water, enough materials for guys to get through the day, to where they don’t have long-term effects for guys like myself, then why even fight the war,” Robey said.

Now again, many other soldiers told us a different story: That they had no problem getting enough drinkable water. However, we found that the differing experiences seemed to have a great deal to do with when the soldier was deployed there, what part of the country he was in, and what his assignment was.

Either way, kidney stones have become such a widespread problem among the troops that the military has set up a medical treatment center in Iraq to treat them. (End of article. Click HERE for the original article)

My personal experiences and observations with regard to water: When I first landed in the Green Zone on July 26, 2004, I was basically dropped off on the corner, some guys that happened to be standing there, pointed me in the direction of HR and Billeting (housing). It was about 130 degrees, I hadn’t slept more than a couple hours in the last three days. All I wanted was a shower and a bed. I was assigned to a room in the  barracks. Three bunk beds in a room with a bathroom and shower room at the end of the hall. I  stood under the shower for what seemed like hours. I remember I couldn’t get the water cool enough. I had all the hot water off and the cold water was still warm. It didn’t take me too long to figure that out. The heat of the day warms the cold water in the pipes. There is no cold water in Iraq during the summer!!

The bathrooms were clean enough and it didn’t occur to me to ask if the water was potable (drinkable). There were no signs that it wasn’t, so I showered, brushed my teeth and drank the water….for about two weeks. NO ONE told me the water in the entire Green Zone was Baghdad City water and NOT POTABLE!!! There was one ROWPU (water purification unit) at Camp Prosperity in the Green Zone. I think that water was used for the DFAC (dining facilities) and making ice.  About two weeks later I was in the bathroom brushing my teeth with tap water and someone else came in with a bottle of water. They started brushing their teeth with it and asked why I was using that “nasty” tap water. When she got done telling me everything that was in the water, Hepatitis, Cholera, Typhoid, and who knows what else, I though I was going to throw up. I was PISSED!!! I went to Safety and HR and demanded to know why I was never told. Why there were no warning signs in the bathrooms. I was told they weren’t going to put up signs because they didn’t want to make a big deal about it and freak people out. They knew I would find out about it sooner or later. “What?” I was stunned at the apparent lack of concern and total disregard for the safety of not only KBR employees but the client as well. I put up signs in our bathroom to inform other new people, they were taken down and I got reprimanded.  This was my FIRST clear example of just how much KBR didn’t care about their employees or their safety. Sometime in 2006 a State Department employee was in the Green Zone on a short visit. When she realized she was brushing her teeth in Tigres River water she raised hell. Then all of a sudden, signs went up everywhere!! Go figure. So for at least two years that I know of, hundreds of thousands of State Department, Defense Department, US soldiers, other DoD contractors, KBR, and virtually every coalition country was brushing their teeth and showering in Tigres River Water also known as Baghdad City water!

Now let’s talk about the bottled water for a minute. Pallets of over priced bottled water was allowed to sit in full sun. With no protection from the elements. It would sit there and boil until the seals broke. You had to inspect each bottle to make sure it wasn’t cloudy or that the seal was in tact. So much bottled water was being wasted because of exposure.  Some time in 2006 I think, a water storage facility was established. Just a tin roof over pallets. I asked time and time again why the US didn’t have their own bottling plant in Iraq. I think that would have been just too cost effective.

Here is a Ben Carter video talking about the water issues in Iraq. Ben Carter is suing Halliburton/KBR for not providing the troops and civilians the drinking water they were being paid to provide. Click HERE to read that suit.

Tell me you water horror stories.

Ms Sparky

Fallen Heroes Project – Just For The Love Of It!

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

fallen_heroes_portrait_poster4War….started by few and fought by many. If there is anything good to come from war, it’s the reaffirmation in the goodness of mankind. That may sound like some kind of crazy contradiction, but from beneath the smoldering rubble of broken hearts drowning in the tears of lost loved ones, there are some who are compelled to rise up and honor those who have paid the ultimate price for our freedom. I want to tell you about one such person, portrait artist Michael G. Reagan founder of FallenHeroesProject.org.
A project Michael has called “the most important thing I’ve ever done in my life. This project reached into my chest and touched a part of my heart that I really didn’t think existed”.

Michael G. Reagan is a world renowned portrait artist from Edmonds, Washington. He has created over 11,0000 portraits, more than 1500 for celebrities, professional athletes, US Presidents and other Heads of State. But more importantly, he has created over 1700 portraits of US Soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Click HERE to view some portraits)

Michael has committed to drawing the portrait of every US Soldier killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is his gift to the families and is given free of charge. Michael draws two portraits per day. Learning and caring about each soldier as he does so. He truly believes the soldier is with him. Helping him to get it just right. At the current number of 4284 Fallen Heroes and if not one more Soldier dies, and at the rate of two portraits per day and subtracting the 1700 already completed, Michael will have to draw every day for next 3 1/2 years.

If you ever wondered if one person can make a difference, just asked the thousands of family members of Fallen Soldiers who have received the selfless gift of love from Michael. Before I get to the video  links, I would like to implore you to donate any amount to the project to pay for shipping and art supplies. Please give for Mother’s Day so that every Gold Star Mom may receive this gift. Click HERE to donate.  A little corporate Karma might be in order here.

This first video clip is from a February 2007 Seattle Rotary Meeting. It is 25 unedited compelling minutes of Michael talking about his experience with the  . Click HERE to watch and change your life forever. (get a tissue)

Click HERE to watch an amazingly powerful 3 minute MSNBC clip from September 2006.

If you have a portrait of your Fallen Hero from Michael that you would like to share, please send a photo and I will share it with my readers. If you can, tell us how it has impacted your life.

If you have a Fallen Hero and want to request a portrait click HERE.

I have been trying to write this post about Michael for quite some time. But sometimes I get “stuck” in the fighting and the anger that is DoD corporate fraud affecting our troops and civilians in the Middle East. You can’t write about Michael G. Reagan while you are stuck in “anger”. Thanks Michael for helping me get “unstuck” if only for a moment.

Please donate generously

Ms Sparky

KBR’s Latest Blue Border Alert-Unauthorized Disclosure of Company Information

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Here is KBR’s most recent Blue Border Alert (Threat). It never ceases to amaze me to what lengths KBR will go when trying to keep their employees under control. Threats and intimidation seem to be KBR’s default MO. I can wee why they are panicking.  Every time we turn around, they are in the news and it’s not good. This last spanking they got from the in Iraq and Afghanistan after the scathing testimony from April G. Stephenson, director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency must have really shook them up a little. All those high paid KBR attorney’s must be scrambling to earn their money!!

I have attached the original Blue Border Alert HERE. But I have pasted the text below and I would be remiss if I didn’t post my personal opinions on this not so veiled attempt to get KBR employees past and present to “shut the hell up”!

Reminder of KBR Policy and United States Law Prohibiting
Unauthorized Disclosure of Company Information

May 8, 2009

All employees, directors and agents are reminded that unauthorized disclosure of KBR confidential, proprietary or material non-public information outside of KBR may violate Company policy and applicable United States law. I’m sure it violates some KBR company policy, if not today then tomorrow knowing how malleable KBR policies are. It appears they apply only when it’s to the advantage of the enforcing manager. But…United States Law?? That’s curious. So…informing Federal Agencies or Congressional members MAY violate US Law? Interesting! Or is just when they don’t inform them via KBR? It is common knowledge that could be a serious job jeopardy situation.

KBR policies, such as Corporate Policy 3-0008, “Information of a Confidential or Proprietary Nature,” explicitly prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of company information of a confidential or proprietary nature outside the Company either during or after employment. First, KBR decides what they think is Confidential and Proprietary. Right now, with all the attorneys, and Government agencies biting at their ass, THAT’S EVERYTHING!! I seriously doubt that just because KBR makes it a corporate policy, that makes it legal. If someone is aware of wrongdoing or contract violations and know that disclosing this to KBR would put their jobs at risk, they have an obligation to the taxpayers to go to a Federal Agency. With or without KBR’s blessing. Just how many people have been fired, transferred or harassed into quitting after reporting wrong doing to KBR? I have a stack of stories!! And as far as “after employment” goes…..let me just speak for myself! KISS OFF!

Furthermore, under Corporate Policy 3-0009, “Use and Public Disclosure of Material Nonpublic Information,” no LOGCAP III employee in possession of material non-public information may provide other people with such information. Violation of Company policy will constitute grounds for disciplinary action, including, when appropriate, termination of employment.  Oh no…not the “up to and including termination” threat again!

Not only would disclosure of KBR confidential, proprietary or material non-public information outside of KBR violate Company policy, such disclosure may also violate United States law. For example, a violation of United States federal insider trading laws can expose a person to criminal fines of up to $5 million and imprisonment for up to 20 years, in addition to substantial civil penalties. Moreover, disclosure of KBR trade secrets under United States federal economic espionage laws could subject a person to criminal fines up to $5 million and up to 10 years imprisonment. Oh that’s just bullshit. There is no insider information. EVERYONE knows KBR is under investigation for just about everything including homicide. We don’t really care about KBR trade secrets. Just alleged crimes and DoD contract fraud. That’s all. We could give a shit less if KBR bribed some Nigerian official. We don’t care. But we do care if they killed or injured soldiers or civilians do to shoddy work!!  We do care if KBR is fostering human trafficking. We do care if KBR knowingly exposed troops and civilians to hexavalent chromium. To get those issues resolved, I will gladly go to prison!! Oh and good luck collecting that 5 mil… Nice intimidation tactic though! But your average American employee is pretty smart and I’ll bet they call “bullshit”!

LOGCAP III employees are well-advised to treat any unofficial invitation or plea – regardless of the source – to disclose KBR confidential, proprietary or material non-public information (including internal company communiqués or messages) outside of KBR as posing a grave threat to KBR and its employees. It is a safe bet the requestor is not motivated to protect the best interests of individual LOGCAP III employees. grave threat to KBR and its employees”….No. KBR is it’s own biggest threat to itself and it’s employees. If they would spend as much effort to just do it right the first time as they do trying to cover their tracks, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation.  As for “the requestor is not motivated to protect the best interests of individual LOGCAP III employees” that is where you are mistaken. This requestor is! I don’t even recall where I get info from, must be old age.

Nothing in this reminder is to be construed as prohibiting or discouraging disclosure of appropriate information to duly authorized, official U.S. Government entities and agents. Such authorized disclosures should be accomplished though KBR’s applicable policies, practices and/or protocols. Again, there is the whole “KBR is involved with the process…thing” KBR is notorious for being a threatening, intimidating, vengeful, company. Most people who have involved them in the reporting process, would never do it again.

Employees aware of any request from an unofficial source for disclosure of KBR confidential, proprietary or material non public information outside of KBR, or who are aware of any such disclosure, should contact Project Management, the LOGCAP III Legal Department or the Company’s Ethics Hotline. That is a stupid statement. Anyone who reads this blog knows that I request information all the time. It’s in my blog. It’s a standing request. So what do you want these people to do? Is this one of KBR’s “set ups”? Are they to line up at the PM’s door? “Ms Sparky is asking for more info.” So then you fire the ones who don’t line up at the door!

I do want to make sure I am clear on this. You’re saying that KBR employees can’t go directly to the CID to report a crime? They can’t go directly to the DCMA to report contract abuses? They can’t go directly to the DoD Inspector General? I wonder if  these agencies know that? I’ll bet they do now.

And are you going to put up a bounty to encourage people to NARC on their buddies!! You should. That would be very very KBRish!

KBR, your preverbially “tit is in the wringer” don’t blame it on your “front line”employees, you know, the ones who actually do the work. It’s your own doing! I totally understand why you would not want ANY info getting out to the media or the DCMA or the DoDIG, or Congress or plaintiff attorney’s or or or………………. it’s JAIL TIME and $$$$$$$$$! What a motivator! To bad the safety of our troops and civilians don’t appear to be as important to you!

Ms Sparky

Free Medical For Contractors Using Military Clinics

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Contractors Using Military Clinics

Civilians Also Are Not Paying, Audit Says

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 7, 2009

Military clinics and field hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan have supplied more than $1 million a month in health-care services to civilian contractors during the past two years without seeking reimbursement from their employers, as provided by law, according to a new audit by the Defense Department inspector general.

The report, issued Monday, noted that all costs associated with both emergency and primary medical care are reimbursable to the government and are the responsibility of the contingency contractor personnel, their employer or their health insurance provider.

Yet the study found that Army, Navy and Air Force clinics and hospitals were not billing contractors because there was no unified system for doing so. Moreover, more than half the contracts were vague about who pays for the medical treatment of employees, although the law is clear on this point, the IG found.

Investigators cited cases in which contractors were hospitalized with heart problems, pneumonia, an accidental self-inflicted gun shot or injuries from a blast, but the medical facilities did not bill the patients’ employers for $141,340 for their stays. At the time, the military did have rates of $2,041 a day for nonmilitary inpatients and $195 per visit for outpatients.

Two contractors, Blackwater Worldwide, now known as Xe, and KBR, operated medical facilities for their own personnel and for other nonmilitary people. The cost of those facilities was included in their overall contracts, but the IG investigators said the contractors did not break out what they were charging the Army overall for the medical treatment they were providing.

The IG found that military medical units had incomplete or inaccurate records. For example, in a sampling of about 200 records, 13 percent incorrectly identified patients as contractors, 22 percent had duplicate entries, and 25 percent showed discrepancies between computer and paper records.

In December 2008, as the IG was investigating, a working group was established and led by the Defense Department comptroller to develop a viable method for billing contractors who were getting medical services from military units. The Pentagon’s Joint Staff told the IG early last month that electronic devices to monitor contractor use of military medical units would be installed in Iraq and Afghanistan within three months. These devices will provide a direct link to contractor companies for billing purposes, according to the report.

Meanwhile, another part of the problem remains unsolved.

The IG was told that at the Baghdad medical unit, almost 1,000 outpatient visitors a month were contractors. They made up at least 33 percent of the unit’s outpatient care and were creating a burden for the staff, which was there to serve wounded and sick service personnel.

The Bagram medical unit told the IG that it was staffed for surgical and trauma patients and that the monthly 377 contractor personnel who came “tended to have more chronic medical conditions, which became a burden when specialty care had to be arranged.”

In May 2007, Gen. David H. Petraeus, then the commander of Multi-National Force-Iraq, wrote the Pentagon that the medical facilities were under increased demands because of the treatment provided to contractors and that they were consuming “precious resources that should be used in providing care to coalition military forces.” The reply was that Defense officials would look into the matter and explore options. As of last month, according to the IG report, no alternative option had been put forward. (Click HERE for the original article)