I have to say Jim Childs testimony just blew KBR out of the water. Straight to the point, no sugar coating! Some of my favorite quotes from Jim’s testimony are below.
KBR did not do this work to any electrical code. KBR now claims to have used the British code BS7671 as its code, not the NEC. If you were to use the BS 7671 standards, there would be even more KBR code violations. Army inspectors interviewed KBR workers at the time of inspections. Almost all stated they were working to meet the NEC. They did not even know the British code and had never received any training related to the British code.
KBR’s claim that they were working to the British Standard at anytime prior to the most recent Level III CAR is complete BS (and that “BS” doesn’t stand for British Standard). For the two years I worked for KBR, one year as an electrician and one year in the maintenance office I NEVER heard the term “British Standard”.
Roughly 60 percent of KBR’s electrical workers were Third Country Nationals (TCNs),many of whom had no electrical training.
Why is it that the Americans and Brits have to have an electrical license and the other 1000′s of Third Country Nationals no not. If KBR is claiming there is a low ratio of KBR electrician to TCN, that is not always the case. I have had as many as 10 or more Filipino workers. There is just no way to watch the installations of that many workers. Then there is the language barrier.
KBR’s method would add huge additional costs to their cost-plus contract and, more importantly, would add significant work time which would, in turn, delay the date by which their facilities are made safe for our soldiers.
Our government had to force KBR to use the fastest and most cost efficient bonding method and KBR continues to fight these requirements to this day. In my opinion, this is because KBR does not want to admit that it is easy to properly install the cables, which they had not done, and correct the non-code compliant installations.
This is just self explanatory. It’s all about the money! Hmmmm
KBR needs to stop taking a “lawyerly” approach toward these inspections and requirements. The company needs to do what is right, cost effective, meets the code, and protects our soldiers’ lives. We still haven’t been able to get them to do the bonding work, even though it is easy. I think they are avoiding this work because bonding was one of the electrical defects that led to the electrocution of Ryan Maseth.
I love that word “lawyerly”!! Just how many lawyers does KBR have in theater? I believe bonding and grounding deficiencies are also the cause of death for SSG Chris Everett and Navy Petty Officer David Cedergren.
To read Jim Child’s entire testimony click HERE.
To see the entire hearing video, read all testimony and other supporting documents, click HERE.
Ms Sparky

















