Home » 2009 » May (Page 2)

Archive for May, 2009

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

I have to say Jim Childs just blew KBR out of the water. Straight to the point, no sugar coating! Some of my favorite quotes from Jim’s are below.

KBR did not do this work to any electrical code. KBR now claims to have used the British code BS7671 as its code, not the NEC. If you were to use the BS 7671 standards, there would be even more KBR code violations. Army inspectors interviewed KBR workers at the time of inspections. Almost all stated they were working to meet the NEC. They did not even know the British code and had never received any training related to the British code.

KBR’s claim that they were working to the British Standard at anytime prior to the most recent Level III CAR is complete BS (and that “BS” doesn’t stand for British Standard). For the two years I worked for KBR, one year as an electrician and one year in the maintenance office I NEVER heard the term “British Standard”.

Roughly 60 percent of KBR’s electrical workers were Third Country Nationals (TCNs),many of whom had no electrical training.

Why is it that the Americans and Brits have to have an electrical license and the other 1000′s of Third Country Nationals no not. If KBR is claiming there is a low ratio of KBR electrician to TCN, that is not always the case. I have had as many as 10 or more Filipino workers. There is just no way to watch the installations of that many workers. Then there is the language barrier.

KBR’s method would add huge additional costs to their cost-plus contract and, more importantly, would add significant work time which would, in turn, delay the date by which their facilities are made safe for our soldiers.

Our government had to force KBR to use the fastest and most cost efficient bonding method and KBR continues to fight these requirements to this day. In my opinion, this is because KBR does not want to admit that it is easy to properly install the cables, which they had not done, and correct the non-code compliant installations.

This is just self explanatory. It’s all about the money! Hmmmm

KBR needs to stop taking a “lawyerly” approach toward these inspections and requirements. The company needs to do what is right, cost effective, meets the code, and protects our soldiers’ lives. We still haven’t been able to get them to do the bonding work, even though it is easy. I think they are avoiding this work because bonding was one of the electrical defects that led to the electrocution of Ryan Maseth.

I love that word “lawyerly”!! Just how many lawyers does KBR have in theater? I believe bonding and grounding deficiencies are also the cause of death for  SSG Chris  Everett and Navy Petty Officer David Cedergren.

To read Jim Child’s entire testimony click HERE.

To see the entire hearing video, read all testimony and other supporting documents, click HERE.

Ms Sparky

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

KUDOS to Jim Childs and Eric Peters for their honest “no holds barred” . After all these years I still am stunned at some of the things I hear.

There were so many “jaw dropping” moments during the hearing testimony it’s hard to zero in on one thing. But right now I want to talk about Eric Peters testimony.  Here is a quote from his testimony that I find particularly disturbing.

Any refusal to sign off on electrical paperwork is frowned upon by the KBR management. At Al Asad Airbase, I was asked to sign off on paperwork that was incomplete. The person who had performed the initial work had not completed all of the steps necessary to ensure safe operation and installation. The electrician did not review the loop impedance by testing the entire circuit to ensure there was no fault in the grounding or reverse polarity. My KBR manager assured me that the work would be completed at a later date. But I did not believe them and I did not sign it.

Signing work off as complete or correct when it is not is called “pencil whipping”. It is fraud and I have blogged about this before. This is a common complaint among electricians in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan who are involved with the Bonding & Grounding work. People are asked, told, threatened, intimidated, harassed (pick one) to sign off on work they do not feel comfortable signing off on. Such as work they didn’t actually perform, work that is clearly incomplete, or work that is not done correctly. People who refuse to “pencil whip” are usually labeled as a problem and are “dealt with” accordingly. They are removed from the Bonding & Grounding work, they are transferred, sent home, or the electrician just quits. How many licensed electricians have been hired since August 2008 and how many of those have quit or been fired?  50%….60% If you are one of these electricians email me.

If an electrician did actually go back to finish the work at a later date, the company would have been able to charge the DoD again for work that should have already been done during the initial testing and inspection. Plus the DoD would be getting reports showing completed inspections, so DoD would believe the buildings are safe. Talking with electricians from other sites, this has become a common practice for KBR.

This is indicative of a management culture completely out of control. And, as far as I’m concerned, this is fraud on so many levels. I’ve been told on several occasions that  Service Orders (SOR)  or Work Requests are generated to repair the work that was signed off as complete initially but actually wasn’t. So KBR gets to maintain the manpower levels because they have all these outstanding Service Orders and Work Requests to do work that should have already been done in the first place. Well that is just stinks.

Where is the DCMA in all this? Where is the DCAA? Where is the CID? THIS IS FRAUD! How about a damn Corrective Action Request (CAR) on this!!! It’s time to ask the electricians at each camp if this is going on. I believe the majority of them will tell you the truth. I truly believe that most people want to do a good job and do the right thing. And given the opportunity, the tools, the material and adequate management I think they will.

I would love to hear from more electricians who were recently employed by KBR in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait who quit because they were not allowed to do their job or were told to “pencil whip” paperwork. This is your chance to tell your story. Leave a comment. For those still in country…..if the DoD asks you if this is going on, tell them the truth.

Click HERE for Eric Peters testimony.

Click HERE to go to the Senate Democratic Policy Committee page to watch to hearing video and read all testimony.

Updated 05/21/2009 @ 10:47 PST: Here are my two blog posts from back in February where I talked about this very issue with “pencil whipping”.

KBR Just Doesn’t Get It-Electrical Inspections Published February 16, 2009

Message to KBR Electricians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait Published February 5, 2009

The DCMA and KBR can not tell me they did not know this was going on.

Ms Sparky

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

It just never ceases to amaze me how KBR exec’s can stand up there and say it’s not our fault. Amazing!

KBR’s chief defends electrical work in Iraq

By KIMBERLY HEFLING, Associated Press Writer Kimberly Hefling, Associated Press May 20, 2009 6:14 pm EST

WASHINGTON – The chief executive of the military contractor under scrutiny in the electrocution of U.S. troops in Iraq said Wednesday the electrical codes it used in the buildings it maintained in the war zone “were known and thought to be acceptable” by the Pentagon.

William P. Utt, the chairman of Houston-based KBR Inc. told The Associated Press in an interview that the company was not expected to meet the U.S. electrical code in a wartime environment. He said the company was striving to meet the British electrical code, which was more in line with the Iraqi electrical system.

Earlier Wednesday, Jim Childs, an electrical inspector hired by the Army to help review U.S.-run facilities in Iraq testified before the Democrats’ policy committee that 90 percent of KBR’s wiring in newly constructed buildings in Iraq was not done properly, meaning an estimated 70,000 buildings where troops lived and worked were not safe.

“When I began inspecting the electrical work performed by KBR, my co-workers and I found improper electrical work in every building we inspected,” Childs said.

Utt said KBR is working with the U.S. military to improve the wiring, now that Iraq is more stable.

“We believe the standards that we did employ were standards that were known and thought to be acceptable in an expeditionary environment,” Utt said during the interview, conducted with a group of AP reporters and editors.

“We don’t think the wiring that we installed was potentially dangerous,” he added.

Utt said KBR should be afforded a measure of protection from lawsuits over work it performs for the military.

“We are working for the government, taking a lot of instruction from the government,” Utt said. “We think there ought to be some consideration given in many of these claims to the same protections the government has from these suits that exist.”

At least three U.S. troops have been electrocuted while showering in Iraq, and others have been injured and killed in other electrical incidents. KBR, which maintains electrical work in tens of thousands of U.S. facilities in Iraq, has denied responsibility in the deaths.

In strongly worded correspondence last fall, a senior Pentagon official, David J. Graff, told KBR there were “continuing quality deficiencies” in the electrical work it performed. He said KBR executives were “not sufficiently in touch with the urgency or realities of what was actually occurring on the ground” and that some military officials had lost confidence in KBR.

Despite those concerns, KBR was awarded a new $35 million contract earlier this year for a project in Iraq that included electrical work.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., who chairs the policy committee, said at the hearing that evidence suggests KBR’s work was involved in some of the deaths. He said that documents show that KBR was paid $83.4 million in bonuses for electrical work in Iraq — much of it after the military’s contract management agency recognized KBR was doing shoddy electrical work.

He said $34 million in bonuses was paid to KBR three months after Green Beret Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth, 24, of Pittsburgh, was electrocuted while showering in his barracks in Iraq on Jan. 2, 2008.

Maseth’s family has sued KBR, alleging wrongful death. Military criminal investigators are looking into his death and four others.

“How could it be that, given these obviously widespread problems with KBR’s electrical work, the Pentagon decided to give KBR bonuses totaling $83.4 million for such work?” Dorgan said.

In a letter Tuesday to Dorgan distributed at the hearing, Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn denied that KBR received any such bonuses for work performed after Jan. 1, 2008, and said no additional such awards will be given until a comprehensive review is conducted.

Utt said the company worked with the military on the electrical issue, and he anticipates it will again soon receive “award fees.” He said the fees are paid according to KBR’s performance on a variety of jobs, not just for the electrical work.

Childs, the inspector, worked in Iraq for the military’s , which was created last year to inspect and oversee repairs in about 90,000 U.S.-maintained facilities in Iraq. The AP previously reported that about a third of the inspections conducted have so far turned up major electrical problems. (click HERE for the original article)

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

I just love how efficient the Senate DPC staff is. The video and are already on their site.

Click HERE to go to the Senate DPC page for the Hearing. You will find a video of the full hearing and the testimony from each witness Jim Childs, Eric Peters and Charles Smith.

My personal thanks to:

  • Each witness for their willingness to testify and their commitment to the safety of our troops and civilians.
  • The Senate Democratic Policy Committee staff for their hard work and dedication it takes to put these hearings together.
  • Senator Dorgan for his “unwavering committment” to exposing contractor fraud.

I will be bogging more about the witness testimony.

Tell me what you think!

Ms Sparky

FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInShare

UPDATE: Click HERE to go to the Senate DPC site for video and written .

Senate Democratic Policy Committee Hearing

“Rewarding Failure: Contractor Bonuses for Faulty Work in Iraq”

Wednesday, May 20, 2009
9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
628 Dirksen Senate Office Building

This hearing will examine bonuses paid by the Department of Defense (DoD) to contractor KBR in 2007 and 2008, despite the company’s grossly incompetent electrical work in Iraq, which resulted in the deaths of U.S. soldiers and significant property damage caused by electrical fires.  Witnesses at the hearing will describe how the company failed to hire qualified personnel, performed electrical work in a manner that continues to place our troops in grave danger, and failed to make repairs once hazards were identified.  The hearing, which will be the nineteenth hearing held by the DPC on contracting abuses and corruption in Iraq, will also focus on the need to reform DoD’s fee award system.

Witnesses

James Childs: Mr. Childs, a Master Electrician hired by the Army to review KBR’s electrical work in Iraq in 2008, will testify that the electrical work performed by KBR in Iraq was the worst he has seen in his 30-year career.  Mr. Childs will testify that the great majority of the buildings KBR worked on were improperly wired.  He will also testify about the difficulty he had working with KBR to correct the problems.

Eric Peters: Mr. Peters, a Master Electrician, worked for KBR at Al Asad Airbase, Camp Striker, and Camp Warrior in Iraq.  He worked in Iraq from February 2009 through April 2009, when he resigned in response to KBR’s disregard for safety and its inability to perform quality electrical work.  Mr. Peters will testify about KBR’s poor performance, which resulted in part from the substandard, inferior materials used by the company, and the lack of qualified individuals serving in management.

Charles Smith: Mr. Smith, who managed the LOGCAP III contract for the Pentagon, was forced out of his job in 2004 when he refused to approve paying KBR more than $1 billion in questionable charges.  Had Mr. Smith not been ousted from his job, he would have continued to oversee KBR’s performance under LOGCAP III.  He will testify about the need to reform DoD’s award fee process.  In November 2004, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld awarded Mr. Smith the Department of Defense’s Medal for Distinguished Civilian Service.

************************************************************

If you can’t make it to DC to watch this hearing hopefully it will be on C-SPAN. I will get the videos on Ms Sparky as soon as possible.

My personal thanks to Senator Dorgan, chairman of the Senate DPC, for his true “unwavering commitment” to the safety of our soldiers and civilians and financial responsibility to US taxpayers. Also…a big thanks to Holly and Leslie who made it all happen!!

Ms Sparky

© 2008-2012 Ms Sparky - MsSparky.com All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright