Congresswoman wants answers on KBR contract
By KIMBERLY HEFLING – 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — A New Hampshire congresswoman said the Pentagon has failed to justify giving a new, $35 million contract to a company whose electrical work on U.S. facilities in Iraq has been criticized as shoddy and unsafe.
At least three service members were electrocuted while showering at U.S. facilities in Iraq. Others have been injured or killed in electrical incidents.
Houston-based contractor KBR Inc., which maintains nearly all U.S. facilities in Iraq, has said it was not responsible for any of the deaths, and that safety is its top priority.
In a letter sent last month, Army Secretary Pete Geren told Rep. Carol Shea-Porter that KBR got the new contract because the Army Corps of Engineers felt KBR had performed well on other jobs. Geren also said KBR was the only contractor to submit a proposal, and was not on a government list of debarred companies.
“The office that is overseeing this work has the expertise required to monitor both the design and construction aspects of the project,” Geren said in the letter, a copy of which was shared with The Associated Press.
“What do you have to do to get on that list? Why weren’t they suspended?” Shea-Porter, a Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said in an interview this week. She is seeking more information on the contract decision.
“The issue here is we can’t change what’s happened,” she said, “but we certainly have an obligation to these men and women who have suffered and their families to fix them and to make sure we don’t hand another contract out to anyone or any company who had a hand in this.”
Inspections of some of the thousands of Iraq facilities that KBR maintains have turned up major electrical problems at more than a third of the sites.
The AP reported Feb. 6 that KBR was given an Army Corps of Engineers contract to build a convoy support center in southern Iraq that includes a power plant and electrical distribution center. Shortly before the contract was awarded, a senior Pentagon official had rejected the company’s explanation of electrical mistakes in Iraq and said some defense officials had lost confidence in KBR’s ability to do electrical work.
On Feb. 13, KBR was notified by the military that it had accepted KBR’s plan to fix the electrical problems, according to a copy of the letter obtained by the AP using a Freedom of Information Act request.
The military is in the process of inspecting every facility in Iraq and making repairs to electrical problems. (Click HERE for original article)
Other Related Posts From Ms Sparky
- Blumenauer Seeks Answers from Secretary Gates on KBR War Contract, Impact on Oregon Guard
- Not so fast KBR – Lawmakers demand answers from Pentagon
- Arrogance instead of answers for the Hermanson family
- Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH) Calls Out KBR Contract Renewal
- Pentagon Finds Company (KBR) Violated Its Contract
I can supply you with some answers about KBR in Iraq. I worked at Talil and Cedar II for 6 months. So I have first hand knowledge.
1. Time and Attendance: Everyone knows in advance when they are checking. Supervisor ask for forms to be falsified so as to turn them in early for payroll. Daily I watched HR and others come to work for 10 th 15 minutes leave and then return 5 minutes prior to end of day and fill out their time sheets stating they had been there the entire day. I watched personnel take 1, 2 and 3 hour lunches even though they were only documenting 30 minutes.
2. Q.C. and HSE have little or no experience with electrical. No knowledge. If an If the DOD inspector comes around they always know in advance and have a shiel to decieve the inspector.
3. I could go on for hours with what KBR does.
In conclussion: KBR has vested interest in deceiving the DOD and they train daily including developing cheat sheets on governments dime to deceive. KBR knows how to walk the fence line and when they can’t they know how to deceive. KBR is cheating the government ever single day.
Ms Sparky’s Response:
I just shot you an email. I would love to talk more about this. Thanks