Israel denies Gaza munitions had depleted uranium

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

(If weapons are not a hazard to the health of soldiers and civilians, then why would Israel have to deny their use?)

By IAN DEITCH – 01/20/2009

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel on Tuesday denied allegations it used depleted uranium munitions in Gaza, accusing the Arab nations that made the report of “particularly poor propaganda.”

On Monday, Arab nations asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to investigate reports that uranium traces were found in victims of Israeli shelling during the three-week campaign against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.

“This is a particularly poor propaganda spin,” Yigal Palmor, spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said Tuesday. “These accusations have been raised in the past many times and have been proven groundless each time by independent investigators.”

Similar allegations were raised after the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Investigations found no proof depleted uranium munitions were used.

In a letter to the IAEA on behalf of Arab ambassadors accredited in Austria, Prince Mansour Al-Saoud, the Saudi Ambassador, had expressed “our deep concern regarding the information … that traces of depleted uranium have been found in Palestinian victims.”

The letter urgently requested IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei to “carry out a radiological and physical assessment in order to verify the presence of depleted uranium in the weaponry used by Israel … in the Gaza Strip.”

The letter — which spoke of “medical and media sources” as the origin of its allegations — appeared to be alluding to health concerns related to depleted uranium but the effects of exposure to the substance are unclear.

An IAEA article on the issue says that while the substance “is assumed to be potentially carcinogenic … the lack of evidence for a definite cancer risk in studies over many decades is significant and should put the results of assessments in perspective.”

Still, says the article, “there is a risk of developing cancer from exposure to radiation emitted by … depleted uranium. This risk is assumed to be proportional to the dose received.”

Depleted uranium makes shells and bombs harder and increases their penetrating power. The U.S. and NATO have used uranium-depleted rounds in Bosnia and .

According to the World Health Organization, the weapons are lightly radioactive.

Researchers have suspected depleted uranium may be behind a range of chronic symptoms suffered by veterans of the 1990-91 Gulf War. Some of the symptoms include memory and thinking problems, debilitating fatigue, severe muscle and joint pain, depression, anxiety, insomnia, headaches and rashes.

Arabs: Israel ammo in Gaza had depleted uranium

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

VIENNA, Austria – Arab nations accused Israel on Monday of blasting Gaza with ammunition containing and urged the International Atomic Energy Agency to investigate reports that traces of it had been found in victims of the shelling.

In a letter on behalf of Arab ambassadors accredited in Austria, Prince Mansour Al-Saoud, the Saudi Ambassador, expressed “our deep concern regarding the information … that traces of depleted uranium have been found in Palestinian victims.”

A final draft of the letter was made available to The Associated Press on Monday. It urgently requested IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei to “carry out a radiological and physical assessment in order to verify the presence of depleted uranium in the weaponry used by Israel … in the Gaza Strip.”

Officials at the Israeli mission to the IAEA said they were in no position to comment without having seen the letter.

IAEA spokeswoman Melissa Fleming confirmed receipt of the letter and said a response might be issued later in the day.

The letter — which spoke of “medical and media sources” as the origin of its allegations — appeared to be alluding to health concerns related to depleted uranium but the effects of exposure to the substance are unclear.

An IAEA article on the issue says that while the substance “is assumed to be potentially carcinogenic … the lack of evidence for a definite cancer risk in studies over many decades is significant and should put the results of assessments in perspective.”

Still, says the article, “there is a risk of developing cancer from exposure to radiation emitted by … depleted uranium. This risk is assumed to be proportional to the dose received.”

It is not the first time Israel has been accused of using ordnance containing depleted uranium, which makes shells and bombs harder and increases their penetrating power. The Israeli army declined comment. But the U.S. and NATO have used uranium-depleted rounds in Bosnia and .

According to the World Health Organization, the weapons are lightly radioactive, though “under most circumstances, use of DU will make a negligible contribution to the overall natural background levels of uranium in the environment.”

But researchers have suspected depleted uranium may be behind a range of chronic symptoms suffered by veterans of the 1990-91 Gulf War. Some of the symptoms include memory and thinking problems, debilitating fatigue, severe muscle and joint pain, depression, anxiety, insomnia, headaches and rashes.

Syria, which is being investigated by the Vienna-based agency for alleged secret nuclear activities, says traces of uranium found by IAEA experts at a site bombed by Israel jets Sept. 6, 2007 likely came from bombs or missiles used by the Israelis.

The Israelis have denied using such weaponry in that raid, and on Monday two diplomats accredited to the IAEA and familiar with its Syria investigations told the AP that the agency has virtually ruled out Israeli munitions as the source of the uranium. They asked for anonymity for discussing confidential information.

The IAEA investigation is based in part on intelligence from the U.S., Israel and a third, unidentified country, alleging that the bombed site was a nearly completed nuclear reactor built with North Korean help and meant to produce plutonium — which can be used as the payload of nuclear weapons.

The uranium traces were revealed by an analysis of environmental samples collected by IAEA experts during a visit to the site, in a remote part of the Syrian desert. Since that initial trip in June 2008, Syria has refused or deflected requests for follow up inspections both to the site and others allegedly linked to it.

So, I Ask Again…Why Is The U.S. Still Using Depleted Uranium Weapons?

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

Here’s an article I pulled from a Middle Eastern newspaper. And I ask AGAIN, Why are we still using weapons? And, why isn’t the media in the US covering this (DU) weapons issue? It seems to be a concern in other countries.

IAEA urged to probe Israeli ammo
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:48:37 GMT

Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip during a 22-day war against the populated area

Arab nations have called on the IAEA to launch an investigation into reports that Israel used depleted uranium ammunitions against Gaza.

In a letter on behalf of Arab ambassadors accredited in Austria, Saudi Arabia’s envoy to Vienna Prince Mansour Al-Saoud called on International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to investigate traces of uranium that had been found in the victims of the Israeli onslaught on the Gaza Strip.

A final draft of the letter urged the IAEA Chief Mohamed ElBaradei to “carry out a radiological and physical assessment in order to verify the presence of depleted uranium in the weaponry used by Israel … in the Gaza Strip,” The Associated Press reported Monday.

We express “our deep concern regarding the information … that traces of depleted uranium have been found in Palestinian victims,” read the letter.

In an earlier report, Norwegian medics told Press TV that some of the victims who have been wounded or killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza have traces of depleted uranium in their bodies.

At least 1,300 people, including more than 400 children, have been killed in Israel’s three-week-long unilateral war against the costal strip.

IAEA spokeswoman Melissa Fleming confirmed that UN’s nuclear watchdog has received the letter, saying a response might be issued later in the day.

Regarding the uranium ammunition, an IAEA article read that “There is a risk of developing cancer from exposure to radiation emitted by … depleted uranium. This risk is assumed to be proportional to the dose received.”

Israel had also been accused of using other banned arms including phosphorus bombs and cluster ammunitions against the civilian population of the Gaza Strip.

SB/MMN

New audit of Iraq’s rebuilding has a familiar ring

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

By RICHARD LARDNER, Associated Press Writer – Tue Jan 13, 2009

WASHINGTON – A $722 million project to restore ’s oil production facilities was undermined by weak management, contractor mistakes and Iraqi neglect, U.S. auditors say in a new report similar to many others examining the country’s reconstruction.

Released Tuesday, the report from the office of the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction points to security concerns, postwar looting and the shoddy shape of the oil network as primary contributors to the cost of the contract awarded to Houston-based Inc. in January 2004.

As if this weren’t a challenging enough climate, the effort, administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was hampered by a lack of direction, the report says. Cost overruns and frequent contract changes led to work being delayed or canceled. (To read more click HERE)

Posted in Media Coverage. Tags: . No Comments »

Our Veterans Have a Message for KBR’s William Utt

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

This is what our and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) think of . They are demanding that come clean with the information they have with regards to the chemical exposure of US troops at water plant.

Currently National Guard troops from Indiana, Oregon and I believe South Carolina (correct me if I’m wrong) have been exposed to the deadly carcinogen .

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) have generated a petition which currently has nearly 6300 signatures. They are asking America to support our Veterans by signing the petition and sending this message to KBR. Click HERE to go to the IAVA Petition page.

To: William Utt, CEO of KBR

It’s time for you to cooperate with the military and with Congress to find out exactly what is happening to those members of the military who may have been exposed to hexavalent chromium, and who are now showing dangerous symptoms.

Our troops deserve the best possible effort to ensure that their health and well being is protected. There is too much at risk to not move as quickly as possible to take action on this issue.

I stand with IAVA in calling on you to come clean.

If these accusations are true….this is murder…..where are the charges? It’s time for the DoD to STOP protecting KBR!!!

Leave a comment and let me know you signed!!

Ms Sparky

Senators Request New KBR Investigation

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

(CBS) Written by CBS News investigative producer Laura Strickler.

CBS News has learned the Senate Armed Services Committee has requested a new investigation into the multi-billion dollar military contractor Kellogg Brown and Root (). The investigation request is based on accusations from a retired Army official who managed the contractor’s work in .

Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) and ranking Republican Senator John McCain (R-AZ) sent a joint letter to the Department of Defense Inspector General on December 12, 2008 requesting the new investigation based on claims by former Army civilian who worked out of the Army’s Rock Island Arsenal in Illinois.

In an interview with CBS News, Smith said after he raised serious concerns about KBR’s accounting of billions in taxpayer dollars, he was removed from the project.

“The basic situation was that the army through [the Defense Contract Audit Agency] thought the contractor had proposed at least a billion dollars in costs which they could not support,” Smith told CBS.

Smith said the company was not performing as he believed it should, “Why we couldn’t get that performance, I do not know, but we didn’t get the performance that I thought we had the right to expect,” he said.

Smith said one of the main points of contention was related to $200 million in costs which he says KBR could not justify for troop dining facilities. He said in August 2004, as he was moving to sanction KBR, a general told him not to withhold any money from the contractor. Smith says within hours he was told that he “was no longer a part of the program.”

Smith said after he was removed, the Army outsourced the management of the KBR contract.

In a previous interview with the New York Times, the executive director of the Army Contracting Command said the military was not willing to withold money from KBR out of fear that the company would in turn reduce its level of support for the troops in Iraq. A spokesperson for Army Contracting Command told CBS they will cooperate with any new Pentagon Inspector General investigation.

KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne sent CBS a statement in response saying that KBR will cooperate with any government investigation, “KBR remains committed to providing high-quality service to our customer and conducting our business with ethics and integrity. The company in no way condones or tolerates anything to the contrary. When questions have been raised about our work, we have fully cooperated with the government in providing information requested of us.”

KBR was awarded the Logisitics Civil Augmentation Program or LOGCAP contract to run logistics support, food and shelter for soldiers in Iraq. KBR has won military contracts from the US military valued at over $28 billion since the beginning of the Iraq war. (End of Article)

Oregon troops exposed to toxic chemical in Iraq

Posted on:
FacebookStumbleUponRedditDiggLinkedInYahoo BuzzShare

by Julie Sullivan, The Oregonian
Thursday January 08, 2009, 9:42 PM

Early in the war, Oregon Army National Guard soldiers say they encountered environmental disaster in oil fields. Now it’s clear a deadly toxin also swirled in the desert air.

At least 48 Oregon soldiers assigned to protect contractors rebuilding a water treatment plant near Iraqi oil fields in 2003 were exposed to . The industrial compound, if inhaled, greatly increases the risk of lung cancer.

Last month, 16 soldiers sued Houston-based , claiming the nation’s largest war contractor “disregarded and downplayed the extreme danger of wholesale site contamination.” The suit claims hid its civilian workers’ elevated chromium levels and dismissed widespread symptoms — including constant nosebleeds that toxicologists call “chrome nose” — as sand allergies.

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Indiana, is asking Congress to create a medical registry to track all soldiers and ensure monitoring, which President-elect Barack Obama and Oregon’s Sen. Ron Wyden already support.

In an e-mailed statement Thursday, KBR denied “any assertion” that the company harmed troops or was responsible for an unsafe condition at the facility. KBR has collected $28 billion in military contracts.

The fallout is just hitting Oregon, where officials worry that as many as 52 soldiers may have been exposed — more than was recently reported by an Army Review Panel.

Concern for Oregon soldiers was first raised by Lt. Col. B.J. Prendergast, who served as executive officer of the 1st Battalion, 162nd Infantry Regiment in Iraq in 2003. His soldiers had already been reassigned when he saw a command e-mail alert about the exposure. He immediately demanded an occupational health assessment for the troops. They were evaluated in Kuwait, and their history was noted in post-deployment reports at Fort Lewis, Wash. No blood or urine tests were conducted.

Last month, an Army Review Panel that convened at Bayh’s request concluded that not testing the Oregonians in 2003 was adequate because none of the Indiana soldiers and civilians tested had “substantially elevated” levels of chromium in their blood. Bayh remains concerned about the type and timeliness of the Indiana tests and has asked the Army for more information.

But even Prendergast didn’t know how many Oregon soldiers the Army had identified as potentially exposed until a call from The Oregonian on Thursday.

“This is the first time I have heard about a number of soldiers being tracked,” he said. “As an exposed individual, that number (48) needs to be explained. We don’t know who is on that list.”

Maj. Mike Braibish, spokesman for the Oregon Guard, said a special officer has been assigned to reach each soldier. That includes 181 others who didn’t visit the water treatment facility but who may have been exposed through their colleagues’ boots or clothing. The Guard also intends to contact all 420 members of the battalion.

Mike Doyle, a Texas attorney representing the Indiana Guard soldiers, said at least one Oregon soldier with significant respiratory problems has contacted his firm. A 42-year-old Indiana soldier who served at the plant died of lung cancer in July, and a second solider is also near death. Others still suffer rashes, tumors and breathing problems.

“Doctors may not even know what they’re looking for unless they have this information,” said Doyle. “This is serious, serious stuff.”

Oregonians encountered the carcinogen, famously fought by Erin Brockovich in California, early in the war. When the 1-162 arrived in April 2003, the Hillsboro, Gresham and McMinnville soldiers shouldered a wide responsibility. They protected Kuwaiti ports and naval facilities. And they provided personal security to private contractors working in Task Force RIO, Restore Iraqi Oil.

Two soldiers would ride in contractors’ vehicles from Kuwait as the contractors assessed southern Iraqi oil sites, including the Water Injection plant near Basra. The facility, which treats water injected into oil wells to maintain pressure, is critical to oil production. KBR, then a subsidiary of Halliburton, had won a no-bid contract to repair it.

Looters had pulverized the plant. The hexavalent chromium is a toxic component of the industrial chemical , which was used to fight rust around the facility. Sacks of it had been punctured, likely by insurgents, and the orange and yellow dust spread, in some places 4 feet deep.

It is unclear when Oregon soldiers rotated to the plant. Prendergast thinks it was midsummer 2003 and they were relieved before the extent of the contamination was discovered.

The Indiana Guard was not so lucky. When they arrived in late April 2003, their commander, Lt. Col. James Gentry, said in a sworn statement that “50 percent” of the plant was covered in yellow and orange sand that regularly coated the troops’ boots and uniforms.

Still, he didn’t understand the hazard until KBR employees showed up in protective suits.

“I didn’t have any idea they were going to be in suits until we got in the vehicle with them,” Gentry said in a recent deposition. “And then it’s like, Why are we still doing this? They’re in protective gear and we’re not.”

He immediately contacted Army command and pulled the soldiers back. After the Indiana Guard returned home, he developed rashes and other symptoms. At Christmas the 51-year-old nonsmoker entered hospice care with a rare form of small cell lung cancer.

The Oregon soldiers worked at the water facility for a much shorter time, but Prendergast and other members of the Oregon Guard know that doesn’t mitigate the risk. In June, Dr. Max Costa, chairman of the New York University Department of Environmental Medicine, told a Senate committee that exposure to just 40 micrograms of hexavalent chromium per cubic meter — about the size of a grain of salt in about a cubic yard — has shown a 50 percent increase in cancers.

KBR has come under withering Congressional fire in recent months for serving expired food and untreated water to soldiers in Iraq, failing to correct electrical work at military installations where several soldiers were electrocuted and for dodging federal taxes by paying workers through companies in the Cayman Islands.

Braibish, the Oregon Guard’s spokesman, said they are determined to contact each soldier.

“We don’t know if anyone has had any illness,” he said. “The bottom line is that our soldiers need to be made aware so they can report the exposure, either to their chain or the Veterans Administration, to get the care they need.

“We want them to know that we care.” (End of Article)