KBR asks judge to throw out Oregon soldiers suit

Photo from Oregon National Guard Website

February 08, 2010

Lawyers for the war contractor Kellogg, Brown & Root on Monday asked a federal judge to dismiss an Oregon Army National Guard soldiers’ lawsuit against it, saying the court in Oregon lacks jurisdiction.

The challenge before U.S. District Judge Paul Papak in Portland is being watched closely in Indiana and West Virginia where National Guard soldiers have also sued KBR, Inc. The Houston-based holding company and its four subsidiaries won contracts to restore oil production after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. National Guard troops were ordered to guard KBR employees as they raced to get the oil flowing.

Soldiers from three states say at one of the assignments, the Qarmat Ali water plant, the contractor ignored and downplayed the health risks. A corrosion fighter scattered across the facility contained the cancer-causing chemical, hexavalent chromium. Twenty-one Oregon soldiers have sued KBR alleging breathing and other health problems as a result. An estimated 600 National Guard Troops from four states may have been exposed to hexavalent chromium at Qarmat Ali, according to Veterans Affairs Sec. Eric Shinseki, including 292 members of the Oregon Guard.

Stephen Deatherage, an attorney for KBR, argued that generally calling for help was not an action directed at the state of Oregon and the alleged victims were not in Oregon when those calls occurred.

The soldiers’ attorney maintains that after the first call, KBR employees knew they were dealing with Oregon soldiers who would be going back to Oregon after their tours. David Sugerman also argued that KBR was disputing jurisdiction in the other states, the case was a matter of fairness.

“These guys need their day in court,” he said.

Judge Papak took the matter under advisement. (Click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Judge allows trial of suits over KBR convoy deaths

By Tom Fowler – Houston Chronicle
Feb. 8, 2010

Lawsuits claiming Houston-based KBR should have stopped a 2004 truck convoy in Iraq before six civilian drivers were killed and others injured in an ambush can go to trial, a federal judge ruled today.

U.S. District Judge Gray Miller had previously dismissed the case, agreeing with KBR’s argument that it didn’t have the authority to keep the fuel convoys off the road and that a trial would be an improper challenge to military decision-making. KBR contracts with the military to provide logistical support.

But after an appeals court overturned his decision, Miller allowed the parties to gather more evidence, which turned up e-mails of KBR managers saying they thought they could stop the conveys and had done so in the past.

Miller said the added information was central to his decision that allowing the trial would not second-guess the military in violation of the political question doctrine — the legal principle that some issues are the province of the elected branches of government and not the federal courts.

“If anything, the record makes it clear that although the political question doctrine lurks just around the corner, it can be extricated from the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants,” Davis wrote.

KBR said it will appeal the ruling.

The case centers on an April 2004 attack on a KBR convoy of supply trucks in Iraq, which killed six civilian truck drivers and wounded 14.

The drivers caught in the ambush were delivering fuel under KBR’s multibillion-dollar contract to transport supplies, build bases, serve meals and provide other support services for American troops in the Middle East.

Plaintiffs in the Houston suits — two injured workers and the family of one who was killed in the attack — allege that the company knew of the likelihood of the attacks in advance and had the authority to cancel the convoys.

Plaintiffs contend that e-mails and testimony allowed after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals sent the case back to Miller suggest KBR supervisors did not believe they were constrained by military orders.

“You, your team or any individual (as you have previously indicated to everyone in theater), have the right to say no to anything that is unsafe or where security is not available,” one KBR senior vice president said in an e-mail shortly before the deadly attacks.

In a statement KBR said it was disappointed with the ruling.

“KBR remains mindful of the tragic circumstances of this case,” the company said. “However, our position remains that the federal courts are not the appropriate forum for these issues to be resolved. KBR’s actions regarding the convoys were based on instruction by the Army and with reliance that the convoys would be protected by the Army. Further, it is not appropriate for federal courts to essentially second guess the military which is in the position daily of making decisions in the dangerous, unpredictable environment of a war zone.”

William Bodie, President of KBR’s North American Government and Defense business, said in a letter to the editor published by the Chronicle in November that the e-mails used in court “do not tell the whole story.”

“In context, the internal communication between KBR and the military evidence the concern KBR had for its employees,” Bodie said. “Further, the U.S. military alone decided to deploy the military supply convoys at issue here; they decided when, where and how the convoys were to be conducted.”

Tommy Fibich, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the judge’s ruling directly refutes those claims.

“It’s clear the judge is saying these plaintiffs need to get their day in court and we look forward to it,” Fibich said. “The company can no longer hide behind these immunities they claim they have for this work.”

The case is set to go to trial on May 24. (Click HERE for article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Resume advice for LOGCAP job seekers

A resume is similar to gourmet cooking which is defined as “Good food prepared simply”. Ask any chef in the world, and they’ll tell you the same thing – it’s all about presentation.

Similarly, when applying for a LOGCAP position, you may be the most qualified applicant within a field of candidates, but if you don’t showcase your experience in a manner that fully communicates your qualifications, you will quite often be passed over in favor of an applicant who may be less qualified, but has a prettier resume.

Can you answer these questions correctly:

What are the 3 most important things is real estate?

Answer:

  • Location
  • Location
  • Location

What are the 3 most things things in a resume?

Answer:

  • Presentation
  • Presentation
  • Presentation

This universal truth applies whether you’re applying for an entry level labor position, a management position, or a technical position – no matter how experienced, or how well qualified you may be, if you don’t present your knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA’s) in a manner which sets you apart from the rest of the crowd, you will just get lost in the resume shuffle.

You must ask yourself: “Why would a recruiter be interested in making a job offer to me as opposed to the next guy? What makes me so different? What distinguishes me from the rest of the crowd?”

Thinking about working in Afghanistan? Take a Look at These 5 Crucial Points.

If you’re looking for high-paying work as a military or civilian contractor and have no issues about working in a region that is higher than normal risk, Afghanistan should never be far from your considerations. But what are some of the reasons that well-paying, high-value contracts still exist there? I’ve rounded up 5 ways that working in Afghanistan will continue to remain viable.

#5: Pakistan is The Key.

At the moment, there is a big north American push on Pakistan, whose secret service and government has been responsible (indirectly) for funding a lot of the mess that has gone on in Afghanistan (depending on who you talk to). As Pakistan comes around to the US-centered point of view, it will create further opportunity in Afghanistan due to the massive changes Pakistan can enact.

#4: The Afghanistan Election Results.

Sadly, democratic elections in Afghanistan are still something that we’ll have to hope for in the future — a lot of money was spent just getting to where we’re at now, and a lot more will be spent — and further jobs created — as we try and make future elections (or re-dos) much fairer.

#3: The US Government Continues to Deploy Contractors.

While political fortunes might actually rise and fall on the fate of Afghanistan — and not just in the USA, but also with some key allies — there are decisions being made about the country that are not going to be ultra-popular among the media. These include the fact that more contracts are going to be created there, because the infrastructure and future planning demands it. That’s important for you.

#2: There is No Way Anyone Can Suggest The Job is Done.

It’s a sad fact that Afghanistan has been the ‘forgotten’ war for so long, but now that the situation in Iraq has slightly calmed down, eyes have returned to the original focus. This war has now gone on longer than both World Wars (in terms of American involvement), and sadly nothing has been fully resolved. This means further engagement for some time.

#1: Pay Should Continue to Remain Quite High.

There’s no point dancing around the subject — working in Afghanistan is subject to much higher risks than other places in the world. But as a result, pay will continue to remain at a strong level as long as the risks are there. Situations might change when the country seriously stabilizes, but right now the US government has basically accepted that Afghanistan represents a seriously high — and unavoidable — cost for the foreseeable future.

Would you like to work as a defense contractor for some of the most well known companies in the business? LogCap4Jobs can provide you with all the information you need – starting with working conditions to some advice on how to land that defense contractor job.

Bruce Diggs

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Full list of “Burn Pit” lawsuits against KBR (updated 02/08/2010)

It’s been difficult keeping up with all the Burn Pit Lawsuits filed against KBR by the Law Firms of Burke LLC and Motley Rice LLC. There have been 43 lawsuits filed in 42 states (2 in Texas). I decided to publish them all in one post for easy reference and plan to keep this list updated as I find out about new cases. I will still post article about individual cases and you can find that in the Burn Pits Category. Be sure to check the Burn Pit Lawsuit site for even more information.

If you have Burn Pit photos, stories or need more information click HERE or contact the Law Office of Burke LLC.

Below is the current list of suits which includes plaintiff name, case #, State and District.

  1. Guilmette v. KBR 1:09-CV-507 Alabama Middle District of Alabama, Southern Division
  2. Brister v. KBR 3:09-CV-97 Alaska District of Alaska
  3. Berchini v. KBR 2:09-CV-1402 Arizona District of Arizona
  4. Carlisle v. KBR 4·09-CV-846 Arkansas Eastern District of Arkansas
  5. Auw v. KBR 3:09-CV-1167 California Southern District of CA
  6. Barranco v. KBR 09-CV-2615 Colorado District of Colorado
  7. Ramirez v. KBR 3:09-CV-1807 Connecticut District of Connecticut
  8. Callue v. KBR 1:09-CV-21590 Florida Southern District of Florida
  9. Moore v. KBR 4:09-CV-97 Georgia Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division
  10. Adams v. KBR 1:09-CV-323 Hawaii District of Hawaii
  11. Lundy v. KBR 1:09-CV-570 Idaho District of Idaho
  12. Lackey v. KBR 1:09-CV-3262 Illinois Northern District of Illinois
  13. Kelleck v. KBR 2:09-CV-370 Indiana Northern District of Indiana
  14. Jellison v. KBR 4:09-cv-458  Iowa Southern District of Iowa, Central Divison
  15. McNabb v. KBR 2:09-2303 Kansas District of Kansas
  16. Hicks v. KBR 3:09-CV-897 Kentucky Western District of Kentucky
  17. LaPierre v. KBR 1:09-CV-563 Maine District of Maine
  18. Metzgar v. KBR 8:09-CV-744 Maryland District of Maryland
  19. KBR Burn Pit Litigation 8:09-MD-2083 Maryland  Maryland – Judge Titus
  20. Cox v. KBR 1:09-CV-11913 Massachusetts District of Massachusetts
  21. Robbins v. KBR 1:09-CV-643 Michigan Western District of Michigan, Southern Division
  22. Olson v. KBR 09-CV-1261 Minnesota District of Minnesota
  23. Harris v. KBR 2:09-CV-230 Mississippi District of Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division
  24. Bittel v. KBR 3:09-CV-5041 Missouri Western District of Missouri, SW Division
  25. Disch v. KBR 2 09-CV-02131 Nevada District of Nevada
  26. McAndrew v. KBR 1:09-CV-5710 New Jersey District of New Jersey, Camden Division
  27. Baca v. KBR 1:09-CV-1077 New Mexico District of New Mexico
  28. Atkinson v. KBR 1:09-CV-513 New York Western District of New York
  29. Ochs v. KBR 5:09-CV-237 North Carolina Eastern Division of North Carolina, Western Division
  30. Cassidy v. KBR 3:09-CV-0100 North Dakota District of North Dakota, Southeastern Division
  31. Boeke v. KBR 2:09-CV-479 Ohio Southern District of Ohio
  32. Green v. KBR 4:09-CV-459 Oklahoma Northern District of Oklahoma
  33. Rounds v. KBR 09-476 Oregon District of Oregon, Portland Division
  34. Blumer v. KBR 09-cv-02459 Pennsylvania Middle District of Pennsylvania
  35. Turner v. KBR 2:09-1530 South Carolina District of South Carolina, Charleston Division
  36. Johnson S v. KBR CIV 09-4186 South Dakota District of South Dakota
  37. Johnson v. KBR 3:09-CV-1065 Tennessee Middle District of Tennessee
  38. Cain v. KBR 5:09-CV-435 Texas Southern Division of Texas, Houston Division
  39. Eller v. KBR 4:08-CV-3495 Texas Southern District of Texas, Houston Division
  40. Wester v. KBR 2:09-CV-531 Utah District of Utah
  41. Beavers v. KBR 1:09-CV-1258 Virginia Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division
  42. OlsonT v. KBR 2:09-CV-1579 Washington Western District of Washington at Seattle
  43. Foth v. KBR 3:09-CV-690 Wisconsin Western District of Wisconsin
  44. Massman v. KBR 09-CV-117J Wyoming District of Wyoming
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Murder plots, corruption & Bodie seeks salvation

He that lieth down with Dogs, shall rise up with Fleas.

~Benjamin Franklin 

"The Godfather" - Don Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando)

This Week in Government Contracting: 

Here is a rundown on some noteworthy happenings in the world of defense contracting, that occurred this week.  I am beginning to believe that there is no such thing as honesty and integrity when it comes to corporations vying for our taxdollars, or the lawmakers we elect to carry out their intended duties to prevent waste and fraud, for that matter.  Feel free to submit a comment and let me know if I missed anything that was newsworthy this week:

Take the money and run
February 2, 2010
(WHAS11) – Keith Shaw is charged with making unauthorized modifications to military aircraft parts and trying to kill his former business associates who were cooperating with military investigators. 

While the plot described in Shaw’s indictment reads like spy novel, the testimony Tuesday was more like hearing a technical manual read aloud. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senator Webb questions the value of  ‘Retired Generals Club’
February 2, 2010
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.). Saying that there’s no reason military spending should be “sacrosanct,” Webb urged Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen to “take a hard look at programs that don’t produce a clear bottom line.” 

Webb shot out three programs. First, he questioned the wisdom of giving $60 million to Blackwater to train sailors in self-defense on board ships — or, as Webb put it, “how to do their job.” He attacked sending military officers to defense think tanks to serve as fellows, specifically calling out the well-connected Center for a New American Security, which has sent a lot of its own analysts to the Obama State and Defense Departments. (Click HERE for full article) 

Senate Leader from Kentucky has ties to corrupt defense contractor
February 3, 2010
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has been quick to denounce a bid by Democrats to stop foreign corporations from pouring money into U.S. elections, claiming current law already bars such spending. As we’ve reported before, it’s not nearly as simple as that — but McConnell should know: The GOP Senate leader has raked in campaign cash from a subsidiary of a major foreign defense contractor that’s currently being investigated by the Justice Department for bribery (See BAE Settles Corruption Charges). (Click HERE for full article) 

Alabama Senator demands a side of pork – to the tune of $35 billion
February 5, 2010
To be sure, Shelby was just one of many lobbying targets for EADS and Northrop Grumman — both of whom are major players in the world of money in politics and influence peddling. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), for one, received a series of suspicious donations from the companies after he threw his support behind granting them the $35 billion Pentagon contract. Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), meanwhile, serves on EADS’s board. (Click HERE for full article) 

KBR ordered to pay $19 million in damages related to LOGCAP III sub-contract
February 4, 2010
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal court has ordered subsidiaries of global engineering firm KBR Inc. (NYSE: KBR) to pay nearly $19 million in damages to The Event Source over a 5-year-old contractual row, according to an 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  The dispute arose from a 2005 subcontract that KBR’s subsidiaries handed the Orlando, Fla.-based global event management firm, under the LOGCAP III contract. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Politics of LOGCAP
February 4, 2010
From 1995 to 2000 Cheney was chief executive and chairman of Halliburton, the major provider of products and services to the military. Most of Halliburton’s government contracts were won by its construction subsidiary, KBR. Under Cheney the company benefited from $3.8 billion in government contracts or insured loans. Cheney’s wealth also escalated from $700,000 to $65 million in five years. (Click HERE for full article) 

Hamilton College – Conference on Military Contracting
February 04, 2010
Additionally, Joelson argued that there are significant non-monetary costs to America when giving these contracts. He pointed to two cases in particular: one, the electrocution death of an American soldier in a shower wired by KBR employees, and the other, an incident in which Blackwater employees killed 17 Iraqi civilians. Both incidents demonstrated problems in the contracting system that the federal government is currently unable to remedy. (Click HERE for full article) 

BAE Settles Corruption Charges
February 5, 2010    
BAE Systems, Europe’s largest military contractor, has agreed to plead guilty to two criminal charges and pay nearly $450 million in penalties in the United States and Britain to end long-running investigations into questionable payments made to win contracts overseas. Under its settlement with the Justice Department, BAE will pay a $400 million fine and plead guilty to one count of conspiring to make false statements about having an internal program to comply with anti-bribery laws. The Justice Department’s complaint said the charge related to more than $200 million of business that BAE had won through 2003 in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Saudi Arabia and other countries. (Click HERE for full article) 

Also announced on February 5th – BAE Systems is shutting down their Grainger body armor plant in Tennessee.  Grainger County’s unemployment rate was reported to be over 13%, prior to this announcement. (Click HERE for article) 

And Finally I don’t know what to think about this one but  Led Zep’s Stairway To Heaven has been stuck in my head since I read this: 

Bill Bodie joins the Army – The Salvation Army
February 3, 2010
Bill Bodie was named the chairman-elect, Salvation Army’s D.C. Advisory Board. Bodie is president of KBR North American Government and Defense in Arlington. He has held leadership roles in the public and private sectors, and has also been published in the Wall Street Journal, the Detroit News and other publications. (Click HERE for full article) 

The Salvation Army has several 12 step programs maybe they will come up with a KBR recovery program for employees and a special one for Bodie’s incessant babbling and BS!

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Militant video shows abducted American in Iraq (link to video)

In this undated image made from a video posted on a militant website, a man believed to be missing civilian contractor Issa T. Salomi is seen in front of a banner reading Asaib Ahl al-Haq, or League of the Righteous, Imam Ali regiment. A Shiite militant group in Iraq has posted the Internet video showing an American it says it abducted and who appears to be a contractor reported missing by the U.S. military. The U.S. Department of Defense identified the missing civilian contractor as 60-year-old Issa T. Salomi and said he was last seen Jan. 23. In the video, the man says his abductors from the League of the Righteous are demanding the release of militants and the prosecution of Blackwater security contractors accused of killing 17 Iraqis in 2007. (AP Photo via APTN) THE ASSOCIATED PRESS IS UNABLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY, CONTENT, LOCATION OR DATE OF THIS VIDEO (AP)

By CHELSEA J. CARTER and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, (AP)
February 6, 2010

BAGHDAD (AP) – Shiite militants kidnapped an Iraqi-American contractor after luring him into central Baghdad with promises of visiting distant relatives, an Iraqi defense official said Saturday, after a video apparently showing the man surfaced online.

The U.S. Department of Defense said Friday that American contractor Issa T. Salomi, 60, went missing Jan. 23 in Baghdad and that search and recovery efforts were under way, but it released no other details. The U.S. military in Baghdad on Saturday confirmed Salomi is missing but would not provide additional information.

In the video, the man — who did not identify himself — says his abductors from the League of the Righteous are demanding the release of militants and the prosecution of Blackwater security contractors accused of killing 17 Iraqis in 2007 in Baghdad.

“The second demand is to bring the proper justice and the proper punishment to those members of Blackwater company that have committed unjustifiable crimes against innocent Iraqi civilians,” the man said. “And to bring justice by proper compensation to the families that have been involved in great suffering because of this incident.”

Blackwater security contractors were protecting U.S. diplomats when the guards opened fire in Nisoor Square, a crowded Baghdad intersection, on Sept. 16, 2007. Seventeen people were killed, including women and children, in a shooting that inflamed anti-American sentiment in Iraq.

There was no way to verify the authenticity of the video, but a high-ranking Iraqi defense official told The Associated Press that Salomi was the man in the video and that he was abducted by the militant group in the central Baghdad district of Karradah. The official said Salomi is of Iraqi origin and that his abductors lured him to Karradah under the pretense of visiting distant relatives.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information.

“We obviously hope for his safe return,” Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said. “We aren’t certain of the circumstances under which he disappeared.”

The Department of Defense said the missing contractor is from El Cajon, California.

Salomi’s family issued a statement, released through the FBI in San Diego, saying they were hoping for his safe return. The statement did not say whether Salomi was believed abducted.

“We are confident that everything is being done by the most capable people here and abroad to bring Issa home safely, and we all are anxiously awaiting his safe return,” the statement said.

The man in the video is seated in a chair and wearing what looks like a U.S. military uniform. Behind him is the black banner of the militant group, also known by its Arabic name, Asaib Ahl al-Haq.

He says his captors were also demanding the immediate withdrawal of the U.S. military from Iraq.

The militant group’s Web site claimed the man in the video is an American officer.

The same group was believed to be behind the kidnapping of British computer consultant Peter Moore in May 2007 along with his four British bodyguards. Moore was handed over to Iraqi authorities in late December. Three of the bodyguards were killed and the fourth is believed dead.

The British government has said no deals were struck for Moore’s release, though it coincided with the transfer of the head of the militant group from U.S. to Iraqi custody.

Qais al-Khazali, along with his brother, were accused of organizing an attack on a local government headquarters in the city of Karbala that killed five U.S. soldiers on Jan. 20, 2007. (click HERE for original article) (click HERE to view the video)

For information on others missing in Iraq I recommend The Missing Man Blog.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Iraq chemical exposure lawsuit against KBR goes global

British veteran joins W.Va. National Guard lawsuit

By Andrew Clevenger – February 4, 2010
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A retired sergeant of the Royal Air Force has joined members of the West Virginia National Guard in a lawsuit alleging that they were exposed to a toxic chemical by a government contractor in Iraq in 2003, becoming the first British veteran to sue over the exposure.

In an amended complaint filed Thursday in federal court in West Virginia’s Northern District, Andrew M. Tosh, 44, of Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, maintains that officials with KBR Inc. knew about dangerous levels of sodium dichromate, a potent carcinogen, at the Qarmat Ali water-treatment plant months before they informed American and British troops guarding the facility.

As part of Operation RIO in 2003, members of the West Virginia National Guard’s 1092nd Engineer Battalion, Guard units from Indiana and Oregon and British troops helped guard the plant while civilian contractors repaired the facility, which provided water pumped to the oil fields to create the pressure needed to extract oil from the ground.
Sodium chromate, a known carcinogen, was used to keep the pipes from rusting.

KBR, a Texas-based offshoot of Halliburton, was awarded billions of dollars of no-bid contracts in Iraq. The company has denied wrongdoing in the incident.

“We now know that the dusty rust-colored substance at Qarmat Ali was extraordinarily dangerous. Whilst afraid for my own long-term health and that of the numerous other RAF Regiment troops I served with in Iraq, I believe KBR management misled the militaries of the U.S. and the U.K. Too many of the men who served at Qarmat Ali were sick whilst there or became ill later. This cannot be coincidental,” Tosh said in a prepared statement.

The lawsuit accuses KBR of allowing military and civilian personnel to continue to work at the plant, where the toxic dust was 4 feet deep in places.

In August 2003, KBR personnel noted that almost 60 percent of people were exhibiting symptoms of exposure, according to minutes from an Aug. 8., 2003, KBR meeting attached as an exhibit to the lawsuit.   ”Wind is blowing the product that is lying dry on the ground,” the minutes state. “People are potentially exposed to something that may be very dangerous.”

KBR officials waited another month to shut down the site, though, according to the lawsuit.

The exposure first became public following a U.S. Senate hearing in June 2008. During that hearing, a military medic testified that his Iraqi interpreter told him that members of the Baath Party probably spread bags of the poisonous chemical all over the plant in order to sabotage the facility.

Half of the roughly 80 veterans involved in sodium dichromate lawsuits still show signs of exposure, from persistent rashes and nose bleeds to severe respiratory impacts such as tumors, said Houston lawyer Michael P. Doyle, one of the lead plaintiffs’ attorneys in the cases. Two cancer deaths — including that of the commanding officer of an Indiana National Guard unit serving at Qarmat Ali, Lt. Col. James Gentry — are attributable in whole or part to the exposure, he said.

“Through this litigation and the congressional investigation, the evidence has begun to show that KBR risked the lives of the U.S. and U.K. military personnel guarding the facility. We allege, contrary to KBR’s dubious claims, that the company continues to conceal the truth about Qarmat Ali,” he said in a prepared statement.

In October, in response to urging from seven U.S. senators, including Robert C. Byrd and Jay Rockefeller, both D-W.Va., the U.S. Department of Defense’s Inspector General launched an investigation into the military’s response to the soldiers’ exposure. (click HERE for original article)

MsSparky.com we have been trying to keep up with this heinous example of KBR’s total disregard for the safety and well being of not only our US National Guard troops, but their own American employees, Iraqi employees,  and now our allied troops as well.

I had heard British troops has been exposed and am happy to see they have joined the fight against corporate disregard for humanity in pursuit of higher quarterly profits!

If you want to witness an example of KBR management at it’s worst, watch these short video clips of three KBR managers who were apparently involved in this deadly exposure. Watch how they explain it all at a deposition.

There is a new Federal prison being built in Morgantown, WV. I’m of the opinion this should be KBR’s new corporate headquarters.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Announcing Ms Sparky’s new link exchange program

As every blogger and website owner knows, the secret to getting visibility for your articles is links to other sites. MsSparky.com is now averaging between 500,000-600,000 page views per month and we are working hard to make sure that continues to rise. MsSparky.com has a 130 (today) authority on Technorati.

Here at MsSparky.com we don’t pay for links to other blogs and sites and we don’t charge other blogs and sites to link here. Hence the name Link “Exchange”.

We are implementing a new Link Exchange Program and are looking for quality blogs and sites who share common interests to exchange links with. If you would like to link to a particular post(s), category or tag or add MsSparky.com to your blogroll, send me an email so we can reciprocate. We will add a direct link to your post/site to the top of this list (click HERE and scroll to middle of page).  If your site or blog fits into what MsSparky.com is all about we will add it to the BLOGROLL or one of the LINK sections  in the sidebar as well.

We reserve the right to not reciprocate. We won’t reciprocate with: hate sites, porn sites, pharmaceutical sites, bogus news sites set up just for advertising, spam sites etc.

Here at MsSparky.com we are very proud of the quality of the information we publish. There is no greater compliment to a blogger/writer than when someone links to something they”ve written and uses it as a reference in one of their own articles. Personally, we think MsSparky.com has some of the best collections of information on KBR and specifically the Iraq Soldier Electrocutions, Qarmat Ali chemical exposure, KBR rapes, Burn Pit exposures, Lawsuits against KBR, LOGCAP IV Contract information, KBR employee issues, VOE and 2009 W-2 info and the latest on Dyncorp, Fluor, CSA, Agility/PWC and so much more. Chances are if you are writing about KBR, LOGCAP, Iraq or Afghanistan, we have an article that can help. If we don’t, we will refer you to someone who does.

I’m NOT a pro at this. If you know of a way to enhance our Link Exchange Program let me know.

For more information on “Ms Sparky’s” Link Exchange Program click HERE so we can “Link-Up”!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR LOGCAP Verification of Employment (VOE) and 2009 W-2 Info

I receive a lot of requests for Verification of Employment (VOE)  and 2009 W-2 information for KBR/SEII/OAS.  Especially during this LOGCAP III to LOGCAP IV transition.

KBR/SEII/OAS/GPS 2009 W-2 Information

According to KBR/SEII in Dubai all W-2’s were mailed on January 31, 2010. I assume your W-2 is coming from Dubai so give it a couple of weeks to arrive. It will be sent to your permanent address of residence listed in your KBR/SEII/OAS/GPS personnel file.

If, for some reason you feel they do not have your correct address, you can verify the correct address by sending them an email with your SAP # or SSN and the address that should be on record.

To request a replacement W-2 download, print, fill out completely and sign this form  enitled KBR SEII OAS W-2 Request TY 2009 return it via fax or scan it and save it as a PDF then email it.

Service Employees International, Inc (SEII) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Employer Identification Number (EIN) is: 98-0382097

If you have the EIN numbers for OAS or GPS let me know so I can list those.

Contact information for KBR/SEII/OAS/GPS Payroll Tax Department – Dubai:
Do not submit resumes here or use these contacts for employment purposes

Email address:  res.DTCTax@kbr.com
Toll free fax number: 1-866-591-2444
International fax number: ++ 971-4-331-1743  (international rates apply)
From U.S you will have to dial 011 971-4-331-1743 (international rates apply)

KBR/SEII/OAS/GPS Verification of Employment (VOE)
Do not submit resumes here or use these contacts for employment purposes

If you worked for KBR’s SEII/OAS/GPS in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Djibouti, Dubai or any other country where you were paid out of Dubai a Verification of Employment (VOE) can be obtained at the contact information below.

If you ever apply for a job requiring a background check or any kind of security clearance you will need this information.

Don’t contact KBR Houston for employment verification. Unless your check stub actually said KBR you didn’t legally work for them and they won’t give a prospective employer or anyone for that matter an employment verification.

Email address for VOE requests:

res.kbr.dubai.voehotline@kbr.com

Postal address for VOE requests:

SEII/OAS/GPS
Dubai Transaction Center.
9th Floor, Al Moosa Tower 1
P.O. Box 120727
Dubai, U.A.E

Fax  numbers to fax VOE requests:

Toll free fax number  1-866-591-2444
International fax number  ++ 971-4- 331-1743 (international rates apply)
From U.S you will have to dial 011 971-4-331-1743 (international rates apply)

Please always provide employee Social Security Number and/ Employee Number (6 digits) along with employee’s last name to verify employment records.

Telephone numbers for KBR/SEII Dubai Payroll office:

Toll free office number 1-866-704-9794
International phone number +971-4-313-7444 (international rates apply)
From U.S you will have to dial 011 971-4-313-7444 (international rates apply)

Keep in mind Friday and Saturday are the weekend in Dubai. And here is a link to the local time.

I am also looking for employment verification information for Fluor for LOGCAP IV.

This information was verified on January 31, 2010. If you find it has changed let me know so I can update.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR v. Jamie Leigh Jones – US Supreme Court Petition

The blogosphere is all a-buzz about how KBR has trashed rape victim Jamie Jones in their latest and lowest legal maneuver to suppress Jamie’s right to address this issue in court. KBR would insist Jamie address the crime of rape behind the closed doors of some dark dank back room where KBR’s secret arbitration hearings are allegedly held

Latoya Peterson at Jezebel.com wrote an awesome article entitled KBR Claims Crime Was “Distinct Risk” In Jamie Leigh Jones Case

The only thing I have to add to Latoya’s article is the actual 188 page Petition KBR filed with the US Supreme Court. KBR et al v Jamie Leigh Jones this is a good size document so give it a few extra seconds to load.

I find reading legal documents about as exciting as watching paint dry, so I haven’t read it all the way through. Those who have read it in it’s entirety are advising readers pay close attention to the footnotes.

I have to say KBR must be very desperate or insanely arrogant or both to humiliate the victim of a sexual assault in a public forum.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Agility Attempts to Vault Fraud Charges

Photo by Pratap Chatterjee

by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
February 1st, 2010

Agility, a Kuwait-based multi-billion dollar logistics company spawned by the U.S. invasion of Iraq, is facing criminal charges for over-billing the U.S. taxpayer on more than $8.5 billion worth of food supply contracts in the Iraq war zone. If the lawsuit,  scheduled for February 8, is successful, the company could owe the U.S. government as much as $1 billion.

Originally known as Public Warehousing Corporation (PWC), Agility boasts that it once supplied one million meals a day to U.S. soldiers and contractors in the Middle East. The company’s Mercedes trucks hauled delicacies from ice cream to lobster tails to feed soldiers living on military bases scattered throughout Iraq. Today it has new contracts to provide food to the U.S. Agency for International Development in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa and – until about a month ago – was supposed to ramp up food delivery to the troops newly posted in southern Afghanistan.

In a lawsuit filed on November 18, 2005, Kamal Mustafa Al-Sultan accuses Agility of cheating him of a share of profits from the lucrative contract because he refused to go along with alleged corruption. A former business partner of PWC/Agility, Sultan is a cousin of the company founder and CEO, Tarek Abdul Aziz Sultan Al-Essa.

After conducting a grand jury investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) joined Kamal Sultan and filed criminal charges against PWC/Agility on November 9, 2009, immediately boosting the original lawsuit’s chances of success.

“We will not tolerate fraudulent practices from those tasked with providing the highest quality support to the men and women who serve in our armed forces,” said Tony West, assistant attorney general for the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, in a press release. “As this case illustrates, the Department of Justice will investigate and pursue allegations of fraud against contractors and subcontractors, whether they are foreign or domestic.”

Joint Venture Leads to Fall Out

PWC was part of the Sultan family’s business empire that is grounded in high-end supermarkets and mega-stores across the Middle East. (See Sidebar.) Starting in the late 1990s, Tarek Sultan teamed up with ex-U.S. soldiers to bid on lucrative U.S. government projects. PWC’s first major contract, initially advertised in May 2002, was for a U.S. Defense Supply Center called Prime Vendor Subsistence to supply food eaten on U.S. military bases in the Middle East in anticipation of the invasion of Iraq. (Halliburton/KBR cooks and serves the food, but it does not supply it.)

At the time, Tarek Sultan had no experience in food supply, nor did he have a personal track record with the U.S. military – a requirement for bidding on the contract. However, KMSCO – run by his cousin, Kamal Sultan – had multi-million dollar U.S. military contracts dating back to1996 for “life support, food supplements, and ice.” In a January 2007 interview with CorpWatch, Kamal Sultan says he agreed to create a joint venture with Tarek in June 2002 to provide PWC with the qualifications to bid.

The Sultan Family

In 1981 the family of Jamil Sultan al-Essa, a Kuwaiti family whose heritage has been alternately described as southern Iraqi and Saudi, opened Kuwait’s first self-service store near the Shuwaikh Port. It focused on hardware and do-it-yourself products. Almost three decades later, that store had evolved into a chain of 11 Sultan Centers scattered around Kuwait. In 1999 the Sultans expanded the retail chain to Oman, and in 2003 they acquired the Safeway chain in Jordan.

The Sultan Center supermarkets sit in or near some of Kuwait’s fanciest shopping malls, and sell a wide range of consumer goods including Horizon Organic milk flown in from the U.S. (at $22 a half gallon), mangosteens from Thailand, tents for desert camping, and shoes. The brightly lit, modern stores offer one-stop, 24-hour-a-day shopping to wealthy Kuwaitis and expatriates, often trailed by maids pushing over-laden shopping carts.

Like many wealthy Middle Eastern families, the Sultans have multiple businesses, each operated by a sibling or cousin with overlapping ownership and often senior government positions. One, Abdul Aziz Sultan al-Essa, was chairman of Kuwait’s Gulf Bank. Another, Kamal Sultan, ran the local franchise for Apple. Yet another Sultan venture, National Real Estate corporation, bought up 25 percent of the shares of a state-owned company, Public Warehousing Corporation (PWC), when it was privatized in 1997.

PWC was given to Abdul Aziz’s son, Tarek Sultan al-Essa, who is a dual Kuwaiti-U.S. citizen and a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business. When Tarek Sultan took over PWC, the company was already charging the U.S. military $60,000 a month to operate Camp Doha on a 1.6 million-square-meter property near Shuwaik port in Kuwait.

In the late 1990s Tarek Sultan hired Toby Switzer, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps, who had extensive experience in U.S. military logistics. When the invasion of Iraq began, Switzer started to visit the U.S. military bases on a regular basis to offer services to the military. As a former soldier, Switzer was able to gain access easily. Indeed, he was invited to events such as the May 2003 Naval Supply Corps birthday party at Camp Patriot with his former comrades in the military supply business.

After the Iraq invasion, Tarek Sultan and Toby Switzer turned to Eric Stagliano of the Lucas Group in Atlanta, an executive search firm that specializes in helping ex-soldiers land jobs. With Stagliano’s help, PWC soon built up a team of former military officers to trawl for business and write up bids to send to the military contract managers in Kuwait and the States. A former PWC employee told CorpWatch: “It’s much easier for a former soldier with a crew cut and shiny shoes to get a contract than any foreigner, even a wealthy Arab.

A year later in May 2003, PWC won the initial Prime Vendor contract. Soon after that, Kamal Sultan alleges, PWC officials asked him to take part in a scheme to defraud the military. When Kamal refused, Tarek Sultan dropped KMSCO from the contract, thus depriving Kamal Sultan of his expected 30 percent profit share. Over the next four years the two men waged a series of legal battles in Kuwaiti courts, with each side alternately gaining the legal upper hand.

Overcharging Allegations

The court cases exposed a scheme of “prompt payment discounts.” It works like this: Company A (a shell company) buys a pound of chicken for $1 and gives it to Company B (e.g., PWC) along with a bill for $1.10. Then Company B sells it to the military for $1.10 plus the agreed-on overhead and profits. Next, Company B pays Company A $1.10 and pockets the ten cent mark-up from Company A as a prompt payment discount.

In this case, Company B has effectively earned the agreed-upon (and legal) profits from the military plus an extra ten cents that the military would never have paid if it bought it directly from company A. At the very least, this system is a waste of taxpayer money. And if Companies A and B are owned by the same people, it may constitute fraud.

Kamal Sultan says that in June 2003, PWC officials asked him to use KMSCO to buy local produce, and re-sell it to PWC at an inflated price invoiced to the U.S. military. In his lawsuit, Kamal Sultan alleges that when he “refused to participate in this announced scheme,” the Sultan Center supermarket chain agreed to take over responsibility to supply local produce.

PWC/Agility spokesperson Jim Cox told CorpWatch in September 2008 that “prompt payment discounts” were written into the contract and therefore not illegal. In any case, they far exceeded the more typical two percent military discounts.

Asked about the relationship between PWC and the Sultan Center, Cox said that the two companies are distinct businesses, listed separately on the Kuwait stock exchange.

In fact, Tarek Sultan and family head Jamil Sultan al-Essa serve on each other’s boards, while Jamil and four other Sultan family members are the largest stockholders the in Sultan Center, and also control a large stake in PWC. The DoJ criminal indictment states: “the two companies had interlocking directorates with at least three directors in common.” PWC/Agility’s Cox explains that this cross-ownership is common and legal in Kuwait.

In the grand jury documents submitted to the courts in November 2009, however, the investigators cite multiple examples of collusion. An October 15, 2004 email from PWC officials asked the Sultan Center to alter figures so that “the temporary price decline in the catalogue will not be obvious to the DSCP (Defence Supply Center, Philadelphia).” It also quotes emails from Albuquerque-based Professional Contract Administrators (a consulting firm working for PWC) to tell Toby Switzer, the CEO of PWC Global Logistics, to “fire somebody, blame it on them, and cover up” the revisions in the Sultan Center’s local market prices “ASAP–THIS IS VERY SERIOUS.”

PWC is also alleged to have profited from “prompt payment discounts” from companies in the U.S. In early 2007 the DoJ began a series of investigations into the company’s pricing practices, alleging that PWC had overcharged the Pentagon by as much as $374 million “by inserting a related company to inflate the amount billed.”

One PWC supplier that the DoJ investigated was American Grocers Inc., which provides foods such as Smucker’s peanut butter to the Sultan Center for resale to PWC in Iraq. In July 2009 American Grocers owner Samir Itani, a Houston-based Lebanese-American businessman, was convicted for tacking on “bogus trucking charges.”

Another company under DoJ scrutiny is Ocean Direct LLC, owned by Richmond Wholesale Meats Inc. of California. At one point, it was supplying $2.3 million a month worth of raw cold-water lobster tails to the military at $21 a pound while the average wholesale price at that time was between $17.60 and $18.75 a pound.

An October 2007 Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that PWC appeared to have also taken advantage of revolving doors between the military officials who hand out logistics contracts and the vendors that bid on them.

For example, when PWC bought poultry, ham, sausage and bakery products from Sara Lee, the Illinois-based company paid PWC five percent of the purchase price. The agreement, which began in 2003, was negotiated by a Sara Lee executive in charge of military sales, Paul Simmons, who was previously a chief warrant officer for the Army.

One of his counterparts on the military side is David Staples, a senior procurement official for the Army who formerly worked at Sara Lee’s Jimmy Dean Sausage unit. Staples went to work for the Army after his predecessor, Emily Prior, quit. Prior now works for Quantum Foods, in Illinois, which supplies beef to troops in Iraq. She also represents Perdue Chicken, another company that sells food to the military.

Agility Expands

As the Iraq war dragged on, PWC made billions from its contracts with the military. By late 2005, it had billed the U.S. $4.6 billion under the Prime Vendor contract, according to Kamal Sultan’s 2005 lawsuit. Four years later, according to the criminal charges brought by the DoJ, the amount billed had almost doubled to $8.5 billion.

Awash in cash, courtesy of U.S. taxpayers, Tarek Sultan embarked on a buying spree, snapping up companies around the world. In December 2006 PWC changed its name to Agility.

From managing a few warehouses in 2003, PWC/Agility was suddenly in the same league as global logistics giants FedEx and DHL. Like many multinational corporations, it signed on to the World Economic Forum’s “Partnering Against Corruption Initiative” where it has committed to zero-tolerance policies toward bribery and pledged to implement anti-corruption programs.

Today, Agility operates ports in Dubai, and runs shipping companies out of New Orleans. The company boasted to the Los Angeles Times that it was capable of “hauling giant mining equipment through the jungles of Papua New Guinea, or erecting stage sets in Asia for touring rock groups such as the Doobie Brothers.”

Wining and Dining the U.S. Military

Senior PWC staff regularly wined and dined army officials at five-star hotels including the Hilton Resort in Kuwait, as well as in the States to obtain military contracts, according to accounts provided by several former PWC officials to CorpWatch.

At least one such instance has been confirmed in a court hearing in Illinois in January 2008 when Peleti “Pete” Peleti, a former U.S. Army warrant officer at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, pleaded guilty to accepting bribes from an unrelated company. At the hearing, government investigators confirmed that Peleti told them that Dan Crighton of PWC had taken him to the Super Bowl game in Detroit, Michigan, in January 2006.

In June 2005 PWC won part of the $1.5 billion Heavy Lift 6 contract to move all the military equipment from the Kuwait ports to Baghdad, sharing the award with IAP, a Florida-based contractor. PWC’s October 2006 purchase of an Alabama-based company, Taos, made it the main supplier of guns to the Iraqi army and police force. (see “One Million Weapons to Iraq; Many Go Missing.”)

The Heavy Lift contract is an example of how the company won bids despite its lack of qualifications. After wining and dining the military contracting officers at resorts in Kuwait, PWC executives obtained the Heavy Lift 6 draft bid documents four months before the published bid, multiple sources told CorpWatch,. The two men involved – Maj. Anthony Kramm who was in charge of the bidding and John Arnold of PWC – are both ex-101st Apache helicopter pilots from the same class at West Point.

Since it did not have the minimum number of trucks to qualify for the bid, the company would never have qualified for Heavy Lift in 2004 without advance knowledge. When the “request for proposals” was published, the company showed the military a fleet of borrowed “low-boy,” “reefer” and “flat-bed” trucks to prove that could fullfill the contract (reefers are refrigeration trucks and low-boys have low beds). As soon as it won the contract, PWC paid Mercedes to set aside an entire assembly line in Stuttgart for four months to build 1,800 trucks.

The U.S. “war on terror” continues to be a profitable source of business for the company. In 2008, Matrix, an Agility subsidiary in the United Arab Emirates, was contracted to fly turbines and transformers from Germany and Mexico to a power plant in Afghanistan. That contract is now the subject of a $20 million dispute with the company building the plant: Black & Veatch of Kansas. (For more on the power plant, (see “Black & Veatch’s Tarakhil Power Plant: White Elephant in Kabul.”)

In 2009, Agility announced revenues of $6.8 billion, a staff of 37,000 employees with 550 offices in 120 countries around the world, making it one of the world’s eight biggest logistics companies.

Supporters and Critics

The company has powerful supporters in the military. Its brochures quote Gen. David Petraeus, now the head of U.S. Central Command: “Agility has performed a miracle across Iraq.”

Some see less miracle and more profiteering. Rory Mayberry, a Halliburton/KBR food production manager for a dining facility at Camp Anaconda testified before Congress in June 2005: “For example, tomatoes cost about $5 a box locally, but the PWC price was $13 to $15 per box. The local price for a 15-pound box of bacon was $12, compared to PWC’s price of $80 per box. PWC charged a lot for transportation because they brought the food from Philadelphia,” he said.

“They get options, privileges, that no one else can get, because they used to be part of the (Kuwaiti) government,” says Saad Salem Al-Qattan, a Kuwaiti business man who owns Al-Rakeb Company Petroleum Electricity & Construction Services (RAPICO) which is involved in a land dispute with PWC/Agility. Asked about the U.S. military contracts, he shrugs: “They (PWC/Agility) are greedy, and the (U.S.) military doesn’t know where to go.”

Several lawsuits have been filed against the company. Beth Hanken, an Iowa businesswoman, sued PWC/Agility when she lost contracts to supply pork to the military. The case was dismissed. The only lawsuit that has so far stuck is Kamal Sultan’s 2005 charge against PWC and its top officials – Tarek Sultan, Toby Switzer, and Emad Al-Saleh, PWC’s deputy director (who now heads an investment management company called North Africa Holding).

After the court unsealed the records in November 2009 when the DoJ joined Kamal Sultan’s lawsuit, PWC/Agility posted a statement on its website: “Kamal Mustafa Sultan, owner of Kamal Mustafa Sultan Company … has a long history of strong animosity towards PWC, its officers and its employees.” PWC/Agility added that Kamal has filed more than 40 court actions against PWC, its executives and its employees in Kuwaiti courts, but that “all of the court actions have been unsuccessful.”

But whether or not Agility wins in court, it is already losing at the cash register. Immediately after the DoJ joined the case, the Pentagon barred PWC/Agility and its subsidiaries – including Taos of Alabama and Matrix from the UAE – from federal contracts by placing it on the “Excluded Parties List System.” DynCorp, a business partner, followed suit in late December by dropping PWC/Agility from a major U.S. military logistics contract in southern Afghanistan.

In November, PWC/Agility said it “is confident that once these allegations are examined in court, they will be found to be without merit.” Since then PWC/Agility has attempted to reach a settlement with the DoJ by offering to pay a $600 million fine, according to reports in the Kuwaiti press. “No agreement has been reached so far and there is no guarantee these negotiations will lead to a solution,” the company stated at the end of December.

A criminal arraignment of PWC/Agility scheduled for early January has been postponed five times so far, the latest delay coming at the eleventh hour on January 29. U.S. Magistrate Christopher Hagy agreed to a new date of February 8, although he expressed exasperation. “There’s a point at which this stops,” Hagy said.

Unless these settlement discussions bear fruit, the arraignment could lead to a trial in which spectators can expect a fascinating view into the extent of corruption engendered by the U.S. occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. (Click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Fluor awarded LOGCAP IV Task Order for Haiti

I’ve been getting a lot of questions about the LOGCAP IV Task Order 6 that was awarded to Fluor for the Haiti work. LOGCAP IV is not just in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) can be implemented anywhere the Army needs civilian assistance.

I have updated my LOGCAP IV for Dummies post to include this most recent task order.

To date, there have been no LOGCAP IV task order award announcements made for Iraq. The next award should be the Corp Logistics – Transportation-Postal (CTP) task order.

LOGCAP IV TASK ORDER AWARDED

Jan 28, 2010
By ASC Public Affairs

The U.S. Army Sustainment Command (ASC) has awarded a task order under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) contract in support of the U.S. military’s humanitarian relief operations in Haiti.

The task order was awarded under the LOGCAP IV contract to Fluor Intercontinental. Under the task order, Fluor is authorized to place a liaison in Haiti to coordinate base operations and logistics support services needed for U.S. military and government personnel deployed in support of Operation Unified Response, the name given by the Department of Defense to the U.S. military’s effort to provide humanitarian relief to victims of the earthquake that struck Haiti earlier this month.

The initial value of the task order is $50,000, with a performance period of 30 days. However, both the value and the performance period of the task order can be expanded as the need for services provided under LOGCAP expands.

Bases supporting U.S. personnel in Haiti will be established after an assessment is conducted and requirements are identified, validated and funded. LOGCAP IV contractors will provide life support services at these bases, including the operation of dining facilities, water and sewage systems, and waste disposal and sanitation services.

The task order awarded to Fluor can be expanded to include these services after the assessment and validation processes are complete. LOGCAP IV contractors will not be involved in the direct distribution of humanitarian supplies; under terms of the task order, Fluor will be restricted to providing logistical support to units and individuals performing the humanitarian mission.

While LOGCAP is usually associated with combat operations, such as those ongoing in Iraq and Afghanistan, the contract can be used to support any deployment of U.S. military forces, including deployments associated with humanitarian relief.

Under LOGCAP IV, proposals for individual task orders are solicited from three contractors – DynCorp International, Fluor and KBR Inc. ASC invited proposals for the Haiti task order from all three companies, and selected Fluor after determining that its proposal delivered the best value to the Army. (click HERE for original article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Houston National Guard troops file suit over Camp Taji burn pits

Ill wind blows, some in Houston Guard unit believe
Baghdad burn pit operated by KBR said to cause migraines, breathing problems and rashes
By LINDSAY WISE and LISE OLSEN
HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Feb. 1, 2010, 12:01AM

A front-end loader moves trash to a waste-burning pit at Camp Taji, about 100 yards from where ?soldiers of Houston's 72nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team are assigned. Photo by Mayra Beltran Chronicle

CAMP TAJI, Iraq — One night in mid-January, a shift in the wind sent a sudden flurry of white flakes into a detainee internment facility guarded by soldiers from Houston’s 72nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team.

The Texas Army National Guard troops weren’t witnessing a rare Baghdad snowfall. The flakes drifting from the pitch-dark sky were ash and bits of charred trash belched from an open-air burn pit about 100 yards from the outer walls of the internment facility.

Operated by Houston-based contractor KBR, the pit consumes 120 tons of garbage a day here at Camp Taji, a U.S. military base north of Baghdad. On calm days, noxious smoke billows upward and dissipates into a smog-like haze. When the wind blows, the acrid-smelling fumes pour into towers and yards where about 800 Texas troops from the 72nd keep watch.

“It hovers over like a blanket,” said Sgt. 1st Class Kevin Ethier, 36, of Montgomery. “After it rains, you’ll get puddles of stuff. It’s like a yellowish, brackish color. It looks metallic. It’s just disgusting.”

Soldiers say a fine layer of soot settles on their uniforms and black goop comes out when they blow their noses. They complain of migraines, breathing problems, coughs, sore throats, irritated eyes and skin rashes.

The Texas Guard troops aren’t the first to report problems from exposure to burn pits at U.S. military bases across Iraq and Afghanistan.

Forty-three pending federal lawsuits allege that KBR and other contractors working for the U.S. military poisoned workers and soldiers alike by incinerating toxic waste in improperly supervised burn pits. The suits have been consolidated in a Maryland federal district court.

Houston-based Halliburton and a Turkish contractor frequently are named as co-defendants, documents show. However, a Halliburton spokeswoman said the company has “no responsibility” for burn pit operations and should be dismissed from the litigation.

KBR denies blame

The cases feature more than 300 plaintiffs — and the family members of a dozen dead workers and soldiers — all of whom say they were harmed by improper burning of waste by wartime contractors or the military at 20 sites in Iraq and one in Afghanistan. At least nine people say they were sickened by the burn pit at Camp Taji.

KBR officials told the Houston Chronicle that their company was involved in operating only 10 of the sites named in the lawsuits. Mark Lowes, vice president of litigation for KBR, said the company disputes that any burn pit directly harmed the health of soldiers or others, saying litigants have failed to prove exposure to burn pits caused the many symptoms they later reported suffering.

While KBR continues to operate 12 burn pits in Iraq — including Camp Taji’s — and one in Afghanistan,the company said it does not decide where to locate them or what items to burn.

“KBR operates burn pits in accordance with guidelines approved by the Army,” the company said. “Further, it is the Army that also decides where on base to locate the living and working facilities for base personnel.”

More than 100 people have complained about a massive burn pit a few kilometers north of Taji at Iraq’s Joint Base Balad — including allegations that lithium batteries and human body parts were incinerated there, according to lawsuits filed against KBR and others in Houston, San Antonio and elsewhere. KBR repeatedly has denied operating the pit, though it recently got a multimillion dollar contract to replace pits at Balad with four huge incinerators.

Sgt. 1st Class El “Kevin” Sar, who considers Houston his hometown, said he did two tours of duty at Balad in 2006 and 2007 and developed migraine headaches, shortness of breath and chronic insomnia. Sar said he ended up being evacuated because of a recurring lung infection.

Sar, 41, remains abroad on active duty as a U.S. Army solider, but said he continues to take medication for chronic lung problems doctors have blamed on toxic exposure.

“I can’t run anymore. I still cough and once in a while I feel chest pain and regurgitate mucus,” said Sar, one of 18 Texas-based victims named in a burn pit lawsuit originally filed in San Antonio.

In that case, othersoldiers from San Antonio, San Marcos and smaller cities also complained exposure to burn pits caused them health problems, including acute abdominal pains, chronic respiratory infections, burning sensations in the lungs, a tumor and persistent cold-like symptoms.

David McMenomy of Lampasas and Steve Wayne Palmer of Forney complained of health problems suffered after being stationed at Camp Taji. McMenomy developed a football-size tumor that was removed from his hip.

Soldiers doubtful

Military officials acknowledge that burn pit smoke causes acute short-term health effects in some people — such as irritated eyes and coughing — but the long-term effects are less clear.

A Navy Health Research Center study that evaluated 40,000 service members found a 30 percent increase in complaints immediately after deployments, but no increase in respiratory conditions such as asthma or bronchitis two years later, said Col. Timothy Mallon, a physician assigned to U.S. Forces-Iraq.

Texas soldiers at Taji are reluctant to believe that exposure to the burn pit won’t cause them long-term harm.

“You can’t start your day without a splitting headache,” said Staff Sgt. Charles Bloom, 31, of Sugar Land.

Staff Sgt. Scott Jarvis, 45, of Houston, said he tries not to think about what’s being burned and released into the air.

“I have a very hard time breathing sometimes, and I have a big rash on my face,” Jarvis said.

1st Lt. Sean Lindley, 27, said the air aggravates his throat and eyes. The health worries increase the stress of deployment, he said.

“It sucks being here,” said Lindley, who’s from Portland, Texas. “You’re away from your family and friends and everything and then you add this on top of it.”

Lawsuits specifically allege contractors and others dumped a human arm, other body parts, batteries, tires, asbestos and a variety of toxics into burn pits. Aside from Balad, all of those pits apparently remain in operation, said Susan Burke, one of two chief counsels for plaintiffs in the consolidated cases.

Fewer pits in operation

Military regulations dictate that burn pits should be used as short-term solutions when incinerators or recycling options are not available. Items prohibited from the pits include batteries, tires, fuel cans, propane cylinders, appliances and electronics.

The number of burn pits and incinerators is decreasing as U.S. forces draw down, said Col. John R. Robinson, spokesman for the Deputy Commanding General for Operations, U.S. Forces-Iraq.

As of November, 74 installations in Iraq used burn pits, Robinson said. He added that there are 49 incinerators in Iraq, and that the military is installing more to reduce the number of pits.

KBR operates 45 incinerators at 14 locations, said KBR communications director Heather Browne. She said U.S. Army officials began ordering incinerators to replace burn pits at several bases, including Taji, in 2004, but many orders got put on hold until 2007 or 2008 because of budgetary concerns.

A solid waste incinerator opened at Taji in July 2008. Construction of a second one was completed in December. But the pit near the detainee facility still consumes 2,000 cubic meters of trash weekly.

Taji is set to be turned over to the Iraqi government in March, and the Texas troops hope they’ll soon get orders to transfer elsewhere in Iraq.

“I go home at night smelling like burned garbage,” said Spc. Gerald Jacob, 30, of Humble.

“It’s not pleasant. But it’s OK. As long as time’s not standing still I can make it work. I’m just counting the days.” (click HERE for the original article)

I’ve been doing my best to keep up with these Iraq Burn Pit lawsuits and related articles. To read read everything I have on the burn pits, check out my BURN PITS and BURN PIT LAWSUITS categories.

If you have photos or information you would like to share about the burn pits at your camp click HERE. I will make sure it gets to the plaintiff’s attorney at Burke O’Neil, LLC.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Indictments, convictions, rewards & let’s make a deal

Federal fraud case against Kuwaiti company (Agility/PWC) postponed
Atlanta Business Chronicle – by Dave Williams -  January 29, 2010
The challenges of serving a federal court summons on a foreign business have led to several delays in the arraignment of a Kuwait-based logistics company charged with defrauding the U.S. military.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher Hagy of Atlanta agreed Friday to the latest request for a postponement by lawyers representing The Public Warehousing Co. K.S.C. (PWC) and rescheduled the arraignment for Feb. 8.

PWC is accused of submitting false information to win three contracts to supply food to American troops in Iraq, Kuwait and Jordan, and then overbilling the government for the items it delivered.

U.S. attorneys unveiled the indictment last November in Atlanta.

Federal prosecutors have opposed delaying the case. According to court papers, federal agents attempting to serve copies of the indictment and summons at the offices of PWC’s Atlanta lawyers were rebuffed.

However, officials with CT Corp. of Wilmington, Del., the registered agent of record for PWC’s U.S. subsidiary, did accept the papers.

“It is our hope that it goes forward,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Barbara Nelan told Hagy on Friday.

According to a civil complaint related to the federal case, the Defense Department lost more than $1 billion through PWC’s alleged fraud. The government is seeking to recover more than $3 billion.  (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

According to this article in the Atlanta Journal Constitution this delay is due to a possible settlement between PWC/Agility and the US Government:

Settlement possible in military contractor fraud case

By Bill Rankin -The Atlanta Journal-Constitution – January 29, 2010

A Kuwaiti firm indicted here for overcharging the Army on an $8.5 billion contract is negotiating a possible settlement of the case with the Justice Department.

For the fifth time on Friday, Public Warehousing Co. was granted a continuance of its criminal arraignment. At a brief hearing, U.S. Magistrate Christopher Hagy said he was told by one of the company’s lawyers that a reason the company requested the delay is because of ongoing negotiations.

But Hagy, who rescheduled the arraignment until Feb. 8, expressed impatience with the company’s continued requests to postpone the hearing.

“There’s a point at which this stops,” Hagy said.

“It is our hope that it goes forward,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Barbara Nelan replied.

By agreement, Public Warehousing’s attorneys did not have to attend the hearing. Contacted later, Atlanta lawyer Richard Deane, one of the company’s attorneys, declined to comment.  (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

Other Noteworthy Happenings:

Former Army Staff Sergeant Pleads Guilty to Money Laundering
Thursday, January 28, 2010

WASHINGTON — A former staff sergeant in the U.S. Army pleaded guilty today to a one-count criminal information charging her with money laundering arising from a scheme involving the fraudulent awarding and administration of U.S. government contracts in Iraq, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division.

Theresa Russell, 40, of Pleasanton, Texas, pleaded guilty in federal court in San Antonio. According to court documents, from January 2004 through October 2004, Russell was deployed to Logistical Support Area (LSA) Anaconda, a U.S. military installation near Balad, Iraq. As part of the plea, Russell admitted that from April 2004 to February 2005, she received more than $30,000 in cash from John Rivard, a former major in the U.S. Army Reserves. Russell admitted that she knew the money she received from Rivard was the proceeds of bribery. (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

The Sting Part II: Foreign Bribery Investigation Claims Another Contractor Scalp

Neil Gordon – Project On Government Oversight – Jan 27, 2010

This is an update to last week’s post about the massive FBI sting operation that led to the arrest of 22 defense contractor employees on charges of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). We noted that the investigation was ongoing, which might explain why the Department of Justice didn’t name the companies for which those individuals worked. Fortunately, with Google and the help of our readers, we were able to identify most of the companies, none of which are among the top federal contractors featured in our Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.

This week, however, we discovered at least one connection to a contractor our database. It turns out that one of the main “actors” who took part in the sting operation and helped the FBI nab the 22 individuals is a former executive at Armor Holdings who is facing FCPA charges in a different matter. Richard Bistrong, a former vice president for international sales at Armor Holdings (acquired by BAE Systems in 2007), is accused of paying bribes from 2001 to 2006 to get contracts to supply law enforcement equipment to United Nations peacekeeping forces and government agencies in the Netherlands and Nigeria. Bistrong’s assistance in the sting operation probably guarantees him a lenient sentence. (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

DHB Industries Ex-Chief David Brooks Looted Company, Jury Told

Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) — David Brooks, a founder and former chief executive officer of military contractor DHB Industries Inc., committed a $185 million fraud and looted the company to pay for personal expenses, a prosecutor told jurors at a trial.

Brooks and former Chief Operating Officer Sandra Hatfield are accused of insider trading as well as securities fraud and tax, wire and mail fraud for manipulating financial records to increase DHB’s reported earnings and profits. DHB, based in Pompano Beach, Florida, and now called Point Blank Solutions Inc., makes body armor for the military and police.

Brooks and Hatfield allegedly lied about inventory of “Interceptor” combat vests that were shipped to the U.S. armed forces and falsely inflated the company’s value and their own stock, prosecutors said. The trial in federal court in Central Islip, New York, will last several months, the U.S. said.  (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

Oklahoma Man Pleads Guilty to Aiding and Abetting the Solicitation of a Kickback in Connection with a Government Contract in Afghanistan
Tuesday, January 26, 2010

WASHINGTON — An Oklahoma man pleaded guilty today for his role in a scheme to solicit a kickback in connection with the award of a private security services subcontract to protect U.S. government personnel and contractors in Afghanistan, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division, Assistant Attorney General Christine Varney of the Antitrust Division and U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Ryan Scott McMonigle, 38, of Ponca City, Okla., pleaded guilty today before U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III, in the Eastern District of Virginia to one count of aiding and abetting the solicitation of a kickback. (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

U.S. Army Major Charged with Smuggling Cash from Iraq and Making False Statements
Monday, January 11, 2010

U.S. Army Major Charles E. Sublett, 46, of Huntsville, Ala., was arrested today on charges of bulk cash smuggling and making false statements to a federal agency.

Major Sublett was charged in an indictment, returned by a federal grand jury in Memphis, Tenn., on Jan. 5, 2010, and unsealed today following his arrest in Huntsville. According to the indictment, Major Sublett smuggled more than $100,000 in currency, concealed in a shipping package, into the United States from Iraq in January 2005. Major Sublett also allegedly failed to declare that he imported the money.  (Click HERE to read full article)
———————————————————————————————-

DoS Reward’s Incompetence

On Monday the Special Inspector General Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) released a 2nd report that outlines “The Long Standing Weaknesses in Department of State’s (DoS) Oversight of DynCorp Contract for Support of the Iraqi Police Training Program.”

On Friday the DoS rewarded DynCorp for their incompentence, by awarding them with a contract worth up to $20 million,  to support the African Peacekeeping Program.

So let me get this straight, billions of taxpayer’s dollars have been identified as ripe for fraud because of DynCorp and the DoS’s lax oversight of them.  What the hell, you screw up and you get caught and the DoD or the DoS writes you a check, worth millions?!
———————————————————————————————-

After reading about all of these dirty deeds,  and you still aren’t running to a shower with a bottle of bleach, you may just need a little more graft and corruption in your life.  The movie “Edge of Darkness” starring Mel Gibson is now in theaters.   This fictional thriller includes conspiracy, a defense contractor with a “sleazeball” CEO.  Gosh this all sounds very familiar, maybe art does imitate life.

Forseti

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR rapist David Breda sentenced to two years

Former Contractor Sentenced to Prison for Iraq Sex Assault

A former civilian defense contractor convicted of sexually assaulting a female co-worker at an Iraqi air base has been sentenced to two years in federal prison.

David Charles Breda Jr. of Pearland received the maximum penalty from U.S. District Judge Gray Miller in Houston on Friday. Miller also ordered the 35-year-old ex-contractor to register as a sex offender and serve a lifetime term of supervised release.

Miller also set an April 16 hearing to determine the amount of restitution Breda is to pay.

Breda pleaded guilty Oct. 16 to abusive sexual contact with a co-worker at Camp Al Asad, Iraq on Oct. 8, 2008, admitting to jumping and fondling the woman while both were working for a subsidiary of Houston-based KBR Inc. Click HERE for original article)

That’s one down and who’s knows how many to go!!

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR’s don’t ask, don’t tell policy against rape victims

"Hear No Evil - See No Evil - Speak No Evil" KBR employees from Left to Right (L) Richard Harsey-Plumber-Camp Harper (C) Rick Solomon-Security Coordinator-Camp Harper (R) Eric Barnhart- Security Manager for T-Sites including Camp Harper (photo allegedly taken by William Risner Feb 2008)

Raped and Drugged at KBR, Woman Says

By CAMERON LANGFORD – Courthouse News Service – January 29, 2010

HOUSTON (CN) – At least two fellow workers drugged, raped and sodomized a paramedic working for Kellogg Brown and Root in Iraq, after KBR failed to warn her about the numerous sexual assaults that KBR employees had inflicted upon other women there, the woman says in a federal complaint.

The plaintiff was hired as a paramedic/medic in July 2007 and after her first assignment in Iraq was assigned to Camp Harper outside of Basra, where she says she was brutalized on Feb. 3, 2008.

She says she began to feel strange after drinking a screwdriver with some of her civilian colleagues after work that night on base. While she was incapacitated, she says William Risner, a KBR employee, led her to his room where Risner and a “special forces agent” identified only as “Jason” raped and sodomized her together, she says.

She recalls being anally penetrated by Jason, and screaming when this occurred. When she screamed, Mr. Risner quieted [the plaintiff] by putting his penis in her mouth. [The plaintiff] was sexually assaulted. At no time did she consent to the conduct of Defendant Risner or Jason. Defendant Risner and Jason then switched places, and [the plaintiff] recalls someone holding her legs up,” the complaint states.

The woman says that when she reported the rape to KBR officials, they subjected her to prolonged interrogation, forced her to sign false statements, and took away her company computer.

She seeks punitive damages from KBR, Risner and “John Doe Rapists,” for negligence, false imprisonment, assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

She is represented by Kell Simon with the Ross Law Group of Austin.  (Click HERE for original article)

The above photo was taken after the alleged rape at Camp Harper, a small T-Site near Camp Adder in Tallil, Iraq in February 2008 and appeared as evidence at a hearing of the U.S Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on April 9, 2008 where Lawn Leamon testified about her ordeal.

The photo was allegedly taken by accused rapist William Risner after he and an accomplice allegedly raped and assaulted Dawn Leamon on February 3, 2008 Super Bowl Sunday. Included in the photo are KBR employees from Left to Right (L) Richard Harsey-Plumber-Camp Harper (C) Rick Solomon-Security Coordinator-Camp Harper  (R) Eric Barnhart- Security Manager for T-Sites including Camp Harper. I do not know if these people still work for KBR and if so where.

The photo supposedly was intended to send a message to Ms. Leamon that “no one heard anything, no one saw anything and no one was going to say anything.”

It’s very disturbing to me that two KBR Security professionals, one a manager over the entire area, are involved in this shameful display. Security are the people tasked with protecting the employees and investigating the crimes. This is just another example of the septic management that was systemic theater wide at KBR.

You can read the transcript of Dawn Leamon’s testimony given before the Committee on Foreign Relations HERE.

For a copy of the complaint “Dawn Leamon vs KBR” filed January 27, 2010 click HERE.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

Defense contractors to DoD – “The taxman is calling; it’s for you”

Contractors ask DoD to reimburse offshore payroll taxes

By ELISE CASTELLI |  Jan 27, 2010
In 2008, Congress passed a law to force contractors to pay payroll taxes for employees who are U.S. citizens working for their offshore subsidiaries. The IRS is collecting more taxes as a result, but much of that new tax revenue is leaving government in the form of higher contract costs for the Defense Department.

Defense contractors have billed the department for more than $140 million in reimbursements for payroll tax expenses they’ve paid since the law was passed, a new Government Accountability Office report says.

And that’s just on five contracts — worth a combined $6 billion — that were reviewed by GAO.

Executives from some of the biggest Defense contractors — including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and KBR — told GAO that, before the law was passed, they hired U.S. citizens at their offshore subsidiaries as a way to lower their costs and remain competitive. The companies say they only use the offshore subsidiaries to hire employees to perform work overseas.

Overall, GAO said the law is accomplishing its intended effect: forcing offshore companies to share the tax burden for social security, Medicare and federal income tax payments. GAO recommended Congress expand the legislation to force contractors offshore to contribute to state unemployment insurance programs so workers can collect when they lose their jobs.

In 2009, one state, Texas, denied unemployment claims of 140 individuals employed by several of the contractors because they were employed by offshore subsidiaries that did not contribute to the state’s unemployment insurance programs. GAO chose Texas because several major contractors have corporate offices there. (Click HERE for original article)

David Isenberg wrote an excellent article on this in the Huffington Post, click HERE to read that article.
———————————————————————————————-

Okay I have to admit, I wish I could find a way get someone else to foot the bill and pay my taxes. I guess I have to give these folks credit for their creative thinking.

These companies mission statements must read something like:

Maximize the Project, More Cost, More Plus  (I think screw the taxpayer, is in there somewhere too)

I have to wonder if the reason the DoD appears to turn their head the other way and not support legislation like the Franken Amendment is because these contractors have them by the short hairs and the proposed law will just up the price of the contract.

Eventually the DoD or Congress will demand that contract costs be cut arbitrarily and these contractors will comply by outsourcing the jobs to foreign nationals and the US taxpayers will be left holding the bag and the bill AGAIN.

Forseti

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

KBR employees not sure if they can sleep on company time or not

Sometimes KBR just makes it so damn easy to highlight the blatant ineptitude that would be KBR LOGCAP management. Below is an email sent out today to 1000’s of KBR employees from Patricia Murphy KBR HR manager.

Just a quick explanation first. Many KBR employees must go to Entry Check Points (ECP’s) daily to pick up their Subcontract Workers(SCW’s)/Third Country Nationals(TCN’s) and Local Iraqi employees to escort them onto the Camps/Bases where they work. Evidently at this Entry Check Point (ECP), there is a whole lot of time spent waiting.

From: Edmond Halili
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:51 AM
To: DL_KBR LOGCAP III DF&I All Hands
Cc: Patricia Murphy
Subject: IMPORTANT BADGING Information

Good morning,

If you are taking personnel out to ECP 13, whether PPI, GCC or KBR Direct Hires, you will no longer be allowed to sit and sleep in your vehicles.  US Military now have personnel patrolling the parking lot.  If you are found in a vehicle you will most likely be questioned.  If you are resting in a vehicle you will be questioned.  This includes “resting your eyes”..

The Military has expressed concerns with our employees loitering and sleeping in the area.  If you are driving or escorting employees, you are to be monitoring those personnel.

You should also have with you a copy of the email notification that you receive announcing your appointment.

US Military is asking that everyone watch for suspicious activity and report to any US military personnel if you see anything out of the ordinary.

Please share this information with all in your AOR.

Thank you.

Regards,

Patricia Murphy, PHR
HR Manager
KBR, Inc.
F2 Regional
APO, AE 09344
Office: 281-669-5065
Patricia.murphy@kbr.com

One must assume, for something to be disallowed it must first be allowable. Did Ms Murphy intend to imply in an All-Hands email that KBR has in the past allowed their employees to commit time sheet fraud by giving them permission to sleep on company time in a company vehicle at Entry Check Points?

Shortly after the initial email went out, this one followed:

From: Essence Peel
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:32 PM
To: DL_KBR LOGCAP III DF&I All Hands
Cc: Patricia Murphy
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT BADGING Information – PLease Disregard
Importance: High

ALCON:

Disregard the message below. (In this post it is the one above)

Thanks,

Essence Peel
Operations Manager
KBR, Inc.
F2 ID #43375
APO AE 09344
Office: 281.669.5019
DSN: 318.847.2322

Is Ms Peel disregarding the disallowing of the sleeping at ECP’s making it again allowable? This is all so very confusing. I think what most people just want to know is….can they catch some ZZZ’s at the ECP’s or not?

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

ITT employee (formerly KBR) Luis Draco killed in Iraq

Luis Draco

Luis Draco formerly KBR IT and currently ITT recently died at the hands of cowardly terrorists. Cowards who lob mortars and rockets (aka Indirect Fire-IDF) into camps congested with unarmed civilians. I lost a friend this way in the Green Zone. I can’t think of anything else so cowardly! C3 Warhorse is located approximately 35-45 miles northeast of Baghdad on Baquba Airfield.

Here’s the email sent out announcing the Memorial

From: (name edited)
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:57 AM
Subject: Memorial service for Luis Draco
Importance: High

There will be a memorial service for Luis Draco Thursday January 28th at (edited).  The memorial service will be located at the (edited). (I have edited out the exact time and location of this memorial in an effort to not give those cowards the time and location of another target. Anyone who needs this exact information has access to it.)

Luis Draco began working for KBR in February 2004 in Document Controls on Camp Liberty and Taji.  In May 2005, Luis departed the LOGCAP III project to complete his Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science.  Luis returned to the LOGCAP III project July 2007 as a member of the KBR IT family where he worked in the Desktop Support office and the Network office.  Luis was one of the most high spirited members of IT, always laughing, full of jokes and he would be there for you when you needed him.  In September 2009 Luis went to work for ITT and was assigned to C1 Speicher.  Luis Draco passed away on January 23rd of injuries suffered from an IDF attack at C3 Warhorse.  Luis Draco will always be apart of the KBR IT family, one of the best friends a person could have and he will never be forgotten.  We miss you Luis!

(name edited)
(name edited)
Kellogg, Brown & Root, Inc.
Camp Liberty – Baghdad, Iraq

My heartfelt condolences go out the Luis Draco’s friends, family and co-workers. He sounds like someone I would have enjoyed working with.

Ms Sparky

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts:

DoJ finds bowling for contractors more lucrative than bowling for dollars



Looks like the long arm of the law is finally reaching out and bitch slapping some of the contracting cronies and culprits who believe the law does not apply to them.  All I have to say is, “IT’S ABOUT TIME!”

The Department of Justice (DoJ) seems to be getting serious about enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Last year’s record breaking settlement with Halliburton and KBR to the tune of $579 million appears to have been only the beginning.  Last week the DoJ unsealed indictments against 22 high ranking individuals working for undisclosed (in the indictments) Defense contractors and then followed up with an indictment for one of their very own undercover operatives, Richard Bistrong, who helped them sting the first 22 alleged wrong doers.

So far it seems to be only the minor players in the goverment contracting lottery (KBR and former KBR CEO Albert “Jack” Stanley were convicted for bribing government officials in Nigeria unrelated to LOGCAP) are being indicted and charged.  If I were one of the “Big Names” in the contracting game in Iraq and Afghanistan, I would probably be looking over my shoulder about now. But then again I have a conscience, a soul and can see my reflection in a mirror.  The DoJ has only unsealed the indictments on individuals. As of yet, no companies have been named. According to the press release the investigation is ongoing and I can’t wait for the other shoe to drop on this one.

Following are some of the indictments, convictions  and note worthy news that has happened during the last week:

Supplier Accused of Bribes for U.N. Contracts
By DIANA B. HENRIQUES
January 23, 2010
Last year, according to people briefed on the case, a Florida businessman went undercover to play the part of a corrupt sales executive in a foreign bribery sting that led to nearly two dozen arrests and 16 indictments announced earlier this week.

On Friday, the executive was accused by prosecutors of playing the same role in real life — paying bribes from 2001 to 2006 to get contracts to supply helmets, armored vests, pepper spray and other protective gear to United Nations peacekeeping forces and a Dutch law enforcement agency. The accusations in the new case were made in documents filed by the Justice Department in Federal District Court in Washington. The defendant is Richard T. Bistrong, identified in the court record as a former vice president for international sales at a military and law enforcement equipment manufacturer in Jacksonville, Fla. (Click HERE to read full article)
——————————————————————–

Man convicted of selling fake computer parts to Marines
By MARY FLOOD HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Jan. 22, 2010, 6:57PM
A Sugar Land man was found guilty Friday of selling counterfeit computer parts to the U.S. Marine Corps for use in Iraq.

A jury in Senior U.S. District Judge David Hittner’s court found that Ehab Ashoor trafficked in counterfeit Cisco computer products. He provided the Marines with 200 fake Cisco gigabit interface converters — hardware that allows computers to communicate with one another – and that were to be used in connection with Iraq operations.  (Click HERE to read full article)
——————————————————————–

Assets of Suspended Pa. Navy Contractor Sold

PITTSBURGH January 22, 2010 (AP)

Assets of western Pa. company suspended from bidding on Navy contracts sold to Canadian firm.

The assets of a western Pennsylvania Navy defense contractor that was suspended from accepting government contracts have been sold to a Canadian firm for $24 million.

API Technologies Corp. of Toronto says it is buying the assets of Kuchera Defense Systems Inc., of Windber, and will maintain and expand the 300-employee operation near Johnstown.  (Click HERE to read the full article)
——————————————————————–

POGO (Mostly) Identifies Companies Stung in Foreign Corruption Investigation
Neil Gordon – Jan 21, 2010

This week brought big news in the world of contractor misconduct: a federal sting operation nabbed a total of 22 defense contractor executives and employees for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The 22 individuals were arrested this week and charged with paying bribes to an undercover FBI agent posing as an African defense ministry official looking to award a $15 million military and law enforcement equipment supply contract. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is calling it the single largest prosecution in the history of its enforcement of the FCPA, which prohibits individual and companies from bribing foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.  (Click HERE to read full article)
——————————————————————–

Contractor jailed for weapons fraud
By The Mainebiz News Staff  01/18/10

A defense contractor in Biddeford has been sentenced to eight years in prison for defrauding the U.S. Department of Defense out of millions of dollars.

Maurice Subilia Jr., once the president of missile parts manufacturer Fiber Materials Inc., was also ordered to pay $9.2 million in restitution, the total amount the government lost as a result of Subilia’s actions, according to the Portland Press Herald. Subilia last year pleaded guilty to conspiracy, money laundering and bribery of public officials for his involvement in a scam of the Army’s Space and Missile Defense Command. From 2000 to 2007, Subilia paid $1.2 million in bribes to two Army officials in return for more than $10 million in subcontracts awarded to companies Subilia controlled, which then supplied the military with subpar materials.  (Click HERE to read full article)
——————————————————————–

Former U.S. Army Officer Sentenced to 42 Months in Prison for Bribery and Weapons Conspiracy

Friday, January 22, 2010

Michael Wheeler, a former lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves, was sentenced late yesterday to 42 months in prison for his participation in a wide-ranging bribery conspiracy involving the U.S. government, the Republic of Iraq and the Coalition Provisional Authority – South Central Region (CPA-SC) in Al-Hillah, Iraq, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division. Wheeler was also sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Mary L. Cooper for the District of New Jersey – Trenton Division to serve three years of supervised release following his prison term and to pay $1,200 in restitution. (Click HERE to read full article)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Related Posts: